Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

View article without comments

Crime and Corruption at the Walt Disney Co

by charles amsellem Thursday, Jul. 04, 2002 at 11:32 PM
blackreb@earthlink.net

cartoon c 2002 by charles amsellem

Crime and Corruption...
mickey_mouse.jpg, image/jpeg, 825x640

by charles amsellem

The Walt Disney Co's mainstream wholesome image may finally be crumbling as some of their criminal and unethical behavior is coming to light. Industry insiders and those that get their information from something other than the evening news have long known of the odious politics of the entertainment giant. Now even the bewildered herd may be offended by their obstruction of justice, their slimey and arrogant maneuvers, and their contribution to the degradation of the environment.

Just like the stories of Aladin, Snow White, Pinnochio, Sleeping Beauty, Peter Pan, The Little Mermaid, Beauty and the Beast, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Cinderella, Tarzan and others, Winnie-the-Pooh didn't originate in the Walt Disney studios. Disney archives confirm that even their icon, Mickey Mouse, was created by animator, Ub Iwerks. Walt Disney, after being assailed with rumors that his artistic skills left much to be desired, admitted that Iwerks created the character. When speaking to the media, Disney assumed full credit for the creation of ever loyal and silent employee, Iwerks, even over the repeated objections from his brother, Roy Disney. Disney never actually drew Mickey Mouse and only admitted to the fact decades later. (1)

Pooh and his friends were the creation of A. A. Milne, who sold his United States merchandising rights to literary agent Stephen Slesinger in 1930. The stories about the stuffed animal characters were an immediate and enduring success and Walt Disney negotiated an agreement with the Slesinger and Milne heirs in 1961 for the North American merchandising rights. The continued success of the Pooh franchise, which is one of the largest revenue streams for the Walt Disney Co, left widow, Shirley Slesinger believing that she was seriously short changed out of owed royalties for years.(2)

After many years of this abuse, the widow made enough noise that in 1983 the company gave her a large settlement for the breach of agreement and upgraded her royalties to global status.(3) Was it ever after a world of laughter, for Slesinger's new deal with the people that brought you several replicas of The Happiest Place on Earth? Nope...it was a world of tears, and after continually being cheated on royalties for many more years she finally got fed up and sued the cheap bastards in 1991.(4)

Such is Disney's callous greed and slimey legal maneuvering that the case is still in court to this day: the longest on the docket in Los Angeles Superior Court history! Furthermore, until January 2002, the court filings were sealed on the grounds that they would reveal proprietary information. A successful challenge to the decision by the Los Angeles Times revealed that they had much to hide indeed. Judge Ernest Hiroshige fined Disney ,000 for destroying documents that would have likely proved Slesinger's case.(5)

The judge stated, "...at the very least [destroying the files] amounts to gross negligence and raises a triable issue of fact as to whether Disney willfully destroyed and suppressed evidence in the case." Adding, "Disney misused the pretrial discovery process in this case by destroying evidence that it knew or should have known was sought by [Slesinger] in discovery."(6)

Disney's lawyers made the laughable claim that none of the files were relevant to the case including one box labeled "Winnie-the-Pooh legal problems". (7) Yet a 1967 memo proves top executives at the company forsaw legal challenges over the licence.(8) Disney corporate crumbs claimed that 40 boxes of documents were destroyed due to a clerical error! In fact, upwards of 400 boxes were destroyed.(9) This development so outraged judge Hiroshige that he barred Disney from disputing some of Slesinger's claims and gave directions to the jury that they can decide for themselves if Disney suppressed evidence. Disney is appealing the decision.(10)

Although it's true that the royalties that the Slesingers recieved have made them wealthy, they have spent millions fighting Disney to get the estimated 0 million and more that they claim they are owed.(11) Disney's own estimates of money earned from the Pooh franchise total .3 billion from the year 1998 alone. Stock analysts estimate they made .5 billion Pooh bucks in the year 2000 alone.(12)

When reporter, Nikki Finke, wrote about this story, Disney threatened her employer, the New York Post. She was subsequently fired, being accused of 'unnamed inacuracies', by editor in chief, Col Allen. The Post's sleazy tactics could well rival the studio that brought us such colloquial charm as Donald Duck and Goofy. Finke's lawyer sent a letter to summerize her complaint at the Post's attorneys' own request for settlement negotiations, and they used that document to sue her. Days later, as initially planned before this pusillanimous doublecross, Finke filed a million suit against Disney and the NY Post for destroying her reputaion. (13)

Yet in spite of all of this Cruella Deville like nastiness, with such sentimental yarns as Pocahontas and The Lion King, and their earth-friendly messages, Disney still significantly contributes to the beauty in the world, right? Well, lets look under the sea of Hong Kong's waters for the answer. Dredging and dumping in association with construction activities in the area have been accelerated significantly by the Walt Disney Co. The building efforts such as that of of Hong Kong Disneyland and the Chek Lap Kok airport that will bring tourists to the region has virtually caused an environmental disaster.(14)

Several types of fish have already vanished from the region since construction began and put the majority of local fishing families out of work.(15) By some estimates, the imperiled population of the white dolphin, unique to the Pearl River Delta of mainland china, numbers fewer than that of the 101 dalmations in Hong Kong waters.(16) Although the dophin populations are being endangered more by the airport construction and other enviromental hazards, the Disneyland dredging is significantly threatening their food supply according to environmentalists and fishermen.(17)

Furthermore, the environmental impact assessment, which reported favorably to Disney interests, was conducted after the deal was agreed upon.(18) And to top it all off, Hong Kong taxpayers will pay .89 billion dollars, in comparison to the Walt Disney Co's 0 million for the project(19). Dumbo couldn't fly over that many dollar bills and Tinkerbelle's magic dust will not bring life back to a sea that local fishermen bemoan as quite dead.(20) Anyone that thinks that the Walt Disney corporation is or ever was an upright organization is living in Fantasyland.



(1)Eliot, Marc, Walt Disney: Hollywood's Dark Prince, Carol Publishing Group, New York, 1993

(2)Goldsmith, Susan, The Pooh Hits The Fan, New Times Los Angeles, March 21-27, 2002; p. 15

(3)ibid

(4)Goldsmith, p. 16

(5)Goldsmith, p. 12

(6)Goldsmith, p. 19

(7)ibid

(8)Meg, James, Roy Disney Forsaw Pooh Rights Dispute, Los Angeles Times, January 22, 2002

(9)Mokhiber, Russell, The Winnie The Pooh Files, Multinational Monitor, Washington, March 2002

(10)Goldsmith, p. 19

(11)Goldsmith, p. 12

(12)Mikhiber,

(13)Cotts, Cynthia, The Pusillanimous 'Post', The Village Voice, New York, April 30 2002, p. 36

(14)Lyn, Tan Ee, Disney Magic Turns Sour For Some In Hong Kong, Ashville Global Report, Nov 23 2001;

(15)ibid

(16)http://www.tesan.vuurwerk.nl/reports/bcelc/dolphin.htm

(17)Lyn

(18)Balfour, Fredrick, Building a Mouse House in Hong Kong, Business Week Online, April 11 2002

(19Emmons, Natashia and OBrian, Tim, Taxpayers to Foot Most of Hong Kong Disney Bill, Amusement Business, New York, Novemeber 8 1999

(20)Kan, Wendy, Smells a Little Fishy, Time Asia, December 25 2000-January 1 2001

Report this post as:

Disney Quip

by necessarily anonymous Friday, Jul. 05, 2002 at 3:44 PM

There's a saying they have about how hard they work you at Disney.

"If you can't come into work on Saturday, don't bother coming in on Sunday."

Report this post as:

Poet

by Edward Bear Saturday, Jul. 06, 2002 at 4:21 PM

THE VIEW OF POOH

T?was seventy some years ago,

My authors made a pact, you know,

With Stephen S., a trusted friend

Who?d found me on a bookshelf?s end;

To give me color, life and sound,

To make my likenesses abound

And then to bring me up to be

The best-loved bear in history.

So to American I came

To entertain and earn my fame,

With Piglet, Kanga, Owl and Roo,

With Eeyore and his lost tail, too,

With Rabbit and with Tigger who,

Packed Heffalumps?The Woozles flew.

With Stephen?s touch we rose to fame.

On radio they?d say our name.

In matinee?s the children laughed,

To see me stuck showing my aft!

The old days, we would call them now,

Grow fonder, day by day, somehow.

When Stephen had to go away,

My author followed him, they say,

A tear stayed in our hearts until,

With Daphne?s hope and Shirley?s will,

All Hundred-Acre Wood once more,

Was happy as it was before.

That?s why we never understood,

Just why we went to Hollywood!

But Shirley dear renewed our fame,

and very soon Walt Disney came,

to tell us of his plan so grand

To take us all to story land.

When Piglet was afraid to go

Dear Shirley said, ?There, there, you know,

It?s time to see the world and grow,

I?ll write you often so I?ll know

If your stuffing is just right

And your tails are buttoned on tight.?

And so she lead us by the hand

To Disney?s happy storyland.

At first we had the grandest time,

Our Uncle Walt was very kind,

But when he also went away,

His magic left that very day.

Then royalties fell through the cracks,

Creativity got the ax.

Money and determination

Took charge of imagination.

Little Roo began to cry

That profit was the reason why

Kanga?s pouch was sewn so tight

He had no place to sleep at night!

To the lawyers all looked swell,

Until dear Shirley rang their bell,

And then we had an awful fight,

For what was just our simple right!

Three years of investigation

Showed beyond all reservation

They had made a lot of money,

From my little pot of Hunny.

We didn?t want to sign anew,

Way back in 1982.

Because we found that it was true,

They commingled all our revenue.

But when they asked for one last chance,

They gave us all this song and dance,

And now it seems they must have lied,

Before the ink had even dried!

I think they thought that if Pooh found

That their reporting was not sound,

They?d find a lawyer who talked fast,

To hide what they?d done in the past..

Now, oh giant corporation.

This Pooh wants an explanation?

Tell me, please, how much you owe,

And where did all my Hunny go?

Through all the tangled, tangled vines

Of your worldwide accounting lines,

In all the documents you shredded,

For 40 years that we were wedded?

And what and why did you subtract,

Trade-off, commingle and redact?

To cut our tiny share until

Gross was net and net was NIL?



?Oh, Bother! Now what can we do?

Think. Think and Think,? thought Pooh.

?Hire a lawyer,? cried Baby Roo;

?A lawyer who knows just how to sue.?

?A barrister they won?t bamboozle,

For he?ll know all their tricks,? said Woozle.

?Must we?? Piglet timidly inquired;

Then Owl explained: ?It is R-Q-U-I-R-D.?

?A lawyer?? Said Eeyore, feeling blue,

?I suppose -that is -what we -must do.?

?A lawyer,? said Tigger,

???who never Y-Y-YIELDS!

Lets all bounce over to see Bert Fields!?

Tra-la-la, Tra-la-la

Rum-tum-tiddle-um-tum.

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy