We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

View article without comments

Bush admin already privatizing newly-federalized airport security workers

by air traveler Friday, Apr. 26, 2002 at 11:50 PM

Congress passed laws to make airport security screeners federal employees, but the Bush administration is privatizing most of the work in a "race to the bottom" bidding process that looks rather familiar.

After 9/11, there was something of a national call to federalize security screeners at American airports. Folks finally realized that maybe the people we depend on for our flying safety ought to get good quality training and decent pay.

So Congress and the Bush administration passed laws federalizing the airport security workforce. It was amazing to watch a bunch of pro-business, pro-privatization Republicans making the case that MORE government is the answer (although mostly through gritted teeth – they were only doing it to make it look like they were taking action to “fight terrorism,” but that’s another story).

Funny thing is, though, if you read through the details you’ll notice that all the work being done to create this new government workforce is being farmed out to the private sector.

In April 2002 the feds awarded contracts worth .9 million to three companies for each to “develop a master plan and schedule for the federalization of security for the nation’s 429 airports.” The money will go to Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Hensel Phelps Construction Company, and Lockheed Martin Corp.

Back in March, before the first new federalized airport security workers even started work, NCS Pearson, another private company, was awarded 3.4 million to provide “an automated, Web-based system for the recruitment and placement of personnel.” NCS Pearson will also “provide on-going human resources services for these personnel deployed throughout the country.”

Since these contracts were competitively bid, it means they went to the lowest bidder. This is exactly the same complaint that has been made about the way airlines contracted out security work when it was their responsibility.

They call this federalized? I call it privatized. It’s the same old “race to the bottom” approach to airport security.

There’s no question that prior to 9/11, airport screeners were badly underpaid and undertrained. However, not a single security screener has been found at fault in the September tragedy. It's worth noting that the people who did some of the bravest, best work to save lives after 9/11 were medics, firefighters and police. Mostly government employees who get paid living wages with good benefits, and they’re members of unions that look out for their best interests.

I’m left with two questions:

1) If federalizing airport security just means redistributing the work to a different set of private companies, will we really be any safer?

2) Is the Bush administration following the will of the American people if he’s privatizing by stealth what Congress federalized by law?

To learn more about privatization of these workers, or to apply for a job as an airport security screener, visit the new federal Transportation Security Administration at www.tsa.gov.

Report this post as:


by sho Saturday, Apr. 27, 2002 at 1:03 AM


It would make the most sense if the new airport security folks were treated like the coast guard and placed under the commerce dept. Afterall, our airports are another port and the coast guard do have the ability to "intervene" They are also trained to rescue which can come in handy in an emergency (say something as simple as a fire or a minor accident)

leave it to the bush team to do something under the radar. But then, if something happens they can just blame it on the new overseers and say "I told you so--it didn't work."

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy