We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Most of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News
- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
by Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
Saturday, Dec. 01, 2001 at 6:05 PM
So how did the media report the results of the ballot reexamination?
Overwhelmingly, they chose to lead with the news that was comfortable,
uncontroversial-- and seven months old. "In Election Review, Bush Wins
Without Supreme Court Help," was The Wall Street Journal's headline on its
story, paralleling The New York Times' "Study of Disputed Florida Ballots
Finds Justices Did Not Cast the Deciding Vote." That angle would be fine if
you believed that the Supreme Court was the most important aspect of the
story; but what about the presidency?
Report this post as:
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by
the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and
rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the
contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center.
Running sf-active v0.9.4