We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

How Anti-terrorist legislation may affect assylum seekers

by Lawyers Commitee on Human Rights Thursday, Oct. 04, 2001 at 10:24 PM

This article starts out slow and dull, but gets to the heart of the matter with the paragraph begining- "House Bill Contains New Probision That Could Jeopardize Genuine Asylum Seekers..."-

errorStatement on Immigration Issues in Counter-Terrorism


October 2, 2001

In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, the
U.S. government has the authority, indeed the duty,
to take every reasonable step to ensure security for
everyone in the United States. As one of its first
official responses, the Bush Administration has
proposed counter-terrorism legislation for
fast-track approval by Congress.

Congress is now debating and negotiating this legislation, and the Lawyers Committee for Human
Rights welcomes the progress that has been made.
For example, we are relieved that the Attorney
General's decision to label a non-U.S. citizen as a
threat to national security would, under the current
proposal, be subject to, at least, limited judicial

At the same time, we remain deeply concerned that
the proposed legislation would still allow for the
indefinite detention of some non-U.S. citizens. We
are also disturbed that a new provision in the House
bill could put genuine asylum seekers and their
families in serious danger by allowing U.S.
officials to disclose sensitive information to the
governments from which the refugees have fled.

An initial proposal of the legislation would have
allowed indefinite detention of any non-U.S. citizen
on the authority of the Attorney General. The new
bill, introduced by House Judiciary Committee
Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) and Ranking
Minority Member John Conyers (D-MI), would allow
detention without charge for up to seven days. Afterthat, the authorities would have to charge the
non-citizen with a crime or with a violation of
immigration law in order to keep him or her in

The current bill could still lead to indefinite
detention, in the case of a non-U.S. citizen who has
been charged with an immigration violation. The
Attorney General has discretion to order an
individual deported and then to postpone deportation
indefinitely. Detention could also become indefinite
if the United States seeks to deport a detainee to a
country that refuses to accept the person.

Under the current bill, the Attorney General now
must have "reasonable grounds to believe" that a
person is a possible terrorist before labeling him
or her as such, and ordering detention. This is an
improvement over the "reason to believe" standard in
the earlier proposal, but still needs greater

Under the current proposal, only the U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia can review the
grounds for detention, regardless of where the
detainee is being held. In many cases, this will be
a major obstacle for detainees seeking their right
to judicial review.

House Bill Contains New Provision That Could
Jeopardize Genuine Asylum Seekers and Their Families

Under the new House proposal, U.S. authorities can
for the first time disclose the otherwise
confidential contents of an asylum seeker's
application, including to the government from which
they are fleeing. This would occur in cases where
the applicant has been accused of being a terrorist
or a threat to national security. Many repressive
governments around the world use accusations of
terrorism to justify violations of human rights, to
arrest people without sufficient cause and extort
information from them under torture, to discredit
and destroy their political opponents. If enacted,
this provision would put the lives of refugees
fleeing repressive governments and their family
members back home at serious risk. These are the
very people we should now be protecting. The
Immigration and Naturalization Service must have
discretion to investigate asylum applicants, as it
already does.

We wholeheartedly support the U.S. governments
efforts to protect public safety, and agree with the
Attorney General and the authors of the House bill
that new measures are required to support those
efforts. Protecting the public, however, does not
require the indefinite detention of non-citizens and
the endangerment of innocent asylum seekers and
their families.

We urge the Attorney General and the Congress to
continue to amend this legislation so that it will
not put at risk the rights of refugees and other
non-U.S. citizens.

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy