We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Ashcroft and Anti-Semitism

by RevereRides Friday, Jan. 26, 2001 at 5:19 AM

When John Ashcroft addressed an audience at Bob Jones University on May 8, 1999, the man who is now George W. Bush’s nominee to be attorney general cited – and exaggerated – a passage from the Book of John that has contributed to the persecution of Jews for the past two millennia.

From:

To:

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 8:52 PM

http://www.consortiumnews.com/011601a.html

January 16, 2001

Ashcroft & Anti-Semitism

By Robert Parry

When John Ashcroft addressed an audience at Bob Jones University on May 8,

1999, the man who is now George W. Bush’s nominee to be attorney general

cited – and exaggerated – a passage from the Book of John that has

contributed to the persecution of Jews for the past two millennia.

Ashcroft, then a Republican senator from Missouri, ventured into this

controversial doctrinal terrain with an argument that "a slogan of the

American Revolution" was a declaration that the colonists recognized only

Jesus as their king.

To an appreciative audience at the conservative Christian school in

Greenville, S.C., Ashcroft asserted that angry American colonists frequently

rebuffed British authorities trying to enforce the laws of the British king

with the response, “We have no king but Jesus.”

But Ashcroft went further. He reached back to antiquity to what he saw as the

antithesis of this founding American belief. Ashcroft counterpoised the

phrase, “We have no king but Jesus,” against an alleged declaration by the

Jews of Jerusalem seeking the execution of Jesus for sedition.

According to a transcript of his speech released last week, Ashcroft offered

the following rendition of the Biblical passage:

“My mind thinking about that [phrase, “no king but Jesus”] once raced back a

couple of thousand years when [Roman governor Pontius] Pilate stepped before

the people of Jerusalem and said, ‘Whom would ye that I release unto you?

Barabbas? Or Jesus, which is called the Christ?’ And when they said,

‘Barabbas,’ he [Pilate] said, ‘But what about Jesus? King of the Jews?’ And

the outcry was, ‘We have no king but Caesar’.”

In the Bob Jones speech, Ashcroft then contrasted this supposed outcry of the

Jews of Jerusalem with the supposed principle behind the American Revolution.

Ashcroft said:

“There’s a difference between a culture that has no king but Caesar, no

standard but the civil authority, and a culture that has no king but Jesus,

no standard but the eternal authority. When you have no king but Caesar, you

release Barabbas – criminality, destruction, thievery, the lowest and the

least. When you have no king but Jesus, you release the eternal, you release

the highest and the best.”

Ashcroft's Scholarship

To suggest that America's Founding Fathers envisioned a society built on the

premise that “We have no king but Jesus” is challenged by many scholars.

According to historians of the revolutionary era, many of the Founding

Fathers staunchly opposed any sectarian creed as the basis for the new

country, as is reflected in the First Amendment and in the public statements

and writings of Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, Tom Paine

and others.

“Their prevailing faith was deism, a belief that God presided over the

universe and had a providential interest in mankind,” wrote historian Thomas

Fleming. “But He was not a personal God in the vivid way Jesus is presented

in the Gospels.” [See American Dispatches, Feb. 2000, or TomPaine.com's

archives.]

The notion that the rebellious Jews of ancient Jerusalem eagerly announced

their submission to “no king but Caesar” also clashes with the historical

record and reflects some dubious scholarship on Ashcroft’s part.

The alleged quote is not mentioned in the three earliest Biblical accounts of

Jesus’s life and death, in Matthew, Mark and Luke. The quote only appears in

the version believed to be the most distant in time from the actual events,

the Book of John.

Some Biblical scholars believe that the Book of John – apparently written

near the end of the First Century – reflected a political need of the early

Christian church to shift the primary blame for Jesus’s death away from Rome

and on to the Jews. By then, Rome had crushed Jewish resistance in Israel,

destroyed Jerusalem (in 70 A.D.), and scattered many Jews to other parts of

the Roman Empire.

Over nearly the next 2,000 years, Jews faced systematic repression justified

in large part by their supposed collective “guilt” in the crucifixion of

Jesus. That repression included early pogroms during the first centuries

after Christianity merged with the power of Rome, into the Middle Ages, on

through the 20th Century and Adolf Hitler’s “final solution” to the “Jewish

question.”

Given that history, some Americans might find the use of these Biblical

claims about Jews condemning Jesus questionable from any government official

and especially someone responsible for enforcing the laws of the United

States.

Also objectionable to many could be Ashcroft’s suggestion that Jews favored a

culture of “criminality, destruction, thievery, the lowest and the least, ”

while Christians chose a culture that released “the highest and the best.”

Blaming the Jews

But Ashcroft’s speech even broadened the supposed guilt of the Jews beyond

what appears in the Book of John.

In the Bible, the quote – “We have no king but Caesar” – is not attributed

to “the people of Jerusalem” as Ashcroft told the audience at Bob Jones

University. The Book of John attributes the quote to “the chief priests,” a

small group of rival religious leaders opposed to Jesus.

“Shall I crucify your King?” asks Pontius Pilate, according to John, 19:15.

“The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar.”

Indeed, the earlier gospel, the Book of Mark, states that the rival priests

had to convince the Jews to pick Barabbas over Jesus. “The chief priests and

elders persuaded the multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy

Jesus,” according to Mark 27:20.

Much of the criticism of the Ashcroft nomination has focused on his professed

admiration for leaders of the Confederacy and his opposition to President

Clinton’s appointment of an African-American to the federal bench in

Missouri. There have been other questions about whether his extreme

anti-abortion views would stop him from protecting abortion clinics from

violence.

With the release of the Bob Jones text, another troubling facet of the

nomination could be Ashcroft’s apparent comfort with anti-Semitic canards

dating back nearly 2,000 years.

Robert Parry's latest book is Lost History, an account of how the Cold War

influenced American perceptions of recent history.

Back to Front



Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy