We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Nuclear Proliferation of the Beast

by Archangel Michael Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2001 at 4:27 PM
ArchangelMichael@Bookofllife.org Los Angeles

White House Nuclear Proliferation! 1992-1999:"It was the Nuclear Proliferation of Clinton,,,That stands as the greatest betrayal of all time in America history!"--Archangel Michael November 30 year 2000...

errorFAQ's Nostradamus Century Ten Quatrain Seventy Two


FAQ-X72-J

In the year 1999, September they meet
A big king Clinton will defray Missile Technology
Bring back the big king Zemin and the Eastern Empires
Before and after March-Clinton makes War to cover up crimes

FAQ-X72-F Sell Out Pages 1-6

http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/t/FAQ-X72-F.htm Sell Out page 1

http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/t/FAQ-X72-F2.htm Sell Out page 2

http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/t/FAQ-X72-F3.htm Sell Out page 3

http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/t/FAQ-X72-F4.htm Sell Out page 5

http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/t/FAQ-X72-F5.htm Sell Out page 6

http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/t/FAQ-X72-F6.htm Sell Out page 6

Copyright (c) Archangel Michael Bookoflife.org and net-- 2001.









http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j.htm Page 1
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j2.htm Page 2
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j3.htm Page 3
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j4.htm Page 4
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j5.htm Page 5
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j6.htm Page 6
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j7.htm Page 7
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j8.htm Page 8
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j9.htm Page 9
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j10.htm Page 10
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j11.htm Page 11
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j12.htm Page 12
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j13.htm Page 13
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j14.htm Page 14
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j15.htm Page 15
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j16.htm Page 16
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j17.htm Page 17
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j18.htm Page 18
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j19.htm Page 19
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j20.htm Page 20
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j21.htm Page 21
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j22.htm Page 22
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j23.htm Page 23
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j24.htm Page 24
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j25.htm Page 25
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j26.htm Page 26
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j27.htm Page 27
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j28.htm Page 28
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j29.htm Page 29
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j30.htm Page 30
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j31.htm Page 31
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j32.htm Page 32
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j33.htm Page 33
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j34.htm Page 34
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j35.htm Page 35
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j36.htm Page 36
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j37.htm Page 37
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j38.htm Page 38
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j39.htm Page 39
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j41.htm Page 41
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j42.htm Page 42
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j43.htm Page 43
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j44.htm Page 44
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j45.htm Page 45
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j46.htm Page 46
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j47.htm Page 47
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j48.htm Page 48
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j49.htm Page 49
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j50.htm Page 50
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j51.htm Page 51
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/j/j/j52.htm Page 52

(c) Copyright Archangel Michael - Bookoflife.org and net 2000-2001

http://www.Bookoflife.org




(FAQ-X72-T)




Nostradamus 1999 Prophecy
Century 10 Quatrain 72






http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/t/FAQ-X72-T.htm

http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/t/FAQ-X72-T2.htm

http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/t/FAQ-X72-T3.htm

http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/t/FAQ-X72-T4.htm

http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/t/FAQ-X72-T5.htm

http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/t/FAQ-X72-T6.htm


Questions to the (X. 72) Nostradamus prophecy

1.Did big companies get the OK by President Clinton to build up Chinese missile and aerospace sectors of their military empire?

2. Did Congress know about this?

3. Why did the media not tell me?


4. Was this a big part of the plan of Clinton to resurrect the US economy to prosperity?

5. Was one of the largest sources of illegal campaign contributions came from Mrs. Kanchanalak of the Thai conglomerate, the Ban Chang Group?

6.Is it important when it comes to technology and national defense, there are several areas of critical, non-weapon specific importance, including: the communication of voice transmissions, the communication of data, and the processing of sensitive information?

7.COSTINDs primary functions is the acquisition of communications technology for Chinas military. CONSTIND surreptitiously controlled a company called Galaxy New Technology.

8. Why are their tens of thousands of government documents sealed to year 2050? About the US technology cooperations business dealings with China, and Clinton's involvement?

9. Did Nostradamus predict that Clinton would be lucky in his impeachment trial?

10. Did Nostradamus name March 1999 in X-72 Prophecy?

11. Was their war before and after in the March time frame?

12. Why do people think Nostradamus didn't predict the world when he and most French people new about America, and he told his son , that, he predicted the whole regions of the world?

13. Was Nostradamus New Year March 14, making September 14, as, the seventh month of the prophecy, the Day Jiang Zemin of China and Bill Clinton of United Sates of America meet for their historical treaty of Most favored Nation in New Zealand?

14. Did all the information about these details come out in 1999?

15. Didm Johnny Chung "disclosed that he received more than $2 million between 1994 and 1996 from various Chinese investors, slated for the DNC for Clinton? Why was this covered up in July 1999, by the Magnificent seven, Judges Loyal to Clinton!

16.Chung said DNC leaders were ``fully aware that I was doing a lot of business and cultivating friendships with people from the People's Republic of China. Where they aware?

17. Do you explain 72 time line points to Clintons term and involvement in defrayment of technologies to the Eastern Empires?

18. Do these 72 points bare what the Media puts out to what the Freedom of Information Act documents contradicts?Why did they cover it up. Was "Its the economy, Dummy!" statement by Clinton that got most Americans saying who cares if we give the Eastern Empires technologies so they can be used against us. Anyway, until March 1999, and Clinton was contemplating his legacy, that he got involved with foreign policy.

19. Were foreign guest from China having special dinners with Clinton to help him in his campaign for re-election?

20. Did big companies get the OK by Clinton to build up Chinese missile and aerospace sectors of their military empire?

21. Did Hughes to complain angrily to the CIA that [Pandolfi] was operating outside of customary channels, exposing this to the media?
Did US Missile companies and satellite companies pay big money to the Democratic National Comity for Clinton's re-election, so they could keep doing business of resurrecting China missile and aerospace programs?

Excepts taken from:
Los Angeles Times 12/11/00 Front page [A-27-28]






In view of Clinton moving the Satellite and Missile technologies transfers from Sate Department to the Commerce department in 1993-4- with Sectary Brown as head of the Commerce department.. March 1999 the Congress moved it back to the State Department and reclassified commercial satellites and related components as munitions.


Tighter export controls triggered by fears of Chinese espionage are crippling the U.S. satellite industry and undermining American technological supremacy at a time of fierce global competition.

This was against of coerce Clinton's who saw $trillions of dollars from the Chinese and eastern empires pour plane loads of money into American economy. This was the biggest part of the 8 years economic boom. [page A-27]


The Rand Corp. expert in arming China's military with US satellites, said this is the keys to California's economy..


Most satellite companies are in California.

The 1999 Decision has damaged manufactures, subcontracters, consultants and even university researcher's, they have run afoul of the new law...

The decision in March 1999, has had a huge effect of the US economy..The stock Market has been falling slowly ever since this happened.. Truly the selling of the thing that are in the sky was a big part of the US economy during Clinton's reign..

In nearly two years since Congress imposed additional export restrictions on commercial satellites, the U.S. share of the global market has plummeted from 75% to 45%, according to the Satellite Industry Assn., a Washington-based trade group. effecting the US stock market and US economy slowing it down..Their is talk about easing the restraints to boost the economy back up..But at what price...


This marks the first time that the U.S. share has fallen below 50%, with the preponderance of the impact falling on California's long dominant spacecraft manufacturers.

Industry and military experts warn that further erosion of America's decades-long dominance of the global satellite industry poses a serious
threat to this country's long-term commercial and military competitiveness.

The drop has been so severe that some of the staunchest supporters of the tougher export controls concede that Congress--led by conservative Republican legislators from California--may have gone too far.

But Moury said. U.S> Satellite makers are not interested in jeopardizing national security for commercial gain.[page A-28] Moreover, US aerospace officials assure that these export contro0ls efforts are often futile because most technologies in U.S. Commercial satellites is available from foreign competitions that do not have similar restrictions.

The lawmakers are even considering reversing some of their hastily imposed restrictions, which forced companies to obtain thousands of separate government licenses. The original impetus for the rules,
involving allegations that U.S. firms gave China information critical to its missile program, has been widely disputed. But enormous lawsuits on Clinton allowing big U.S. Satellite and missile Corps. to build China's aerospace divisions, is vary troubling to the Congress..

"This was a feel-good solution that over the long run probably hurt American security," said Loren Thompson, a defense analyst at the Washington-based Lexington Institute, a conservative think tank. Clinton has made a huge effort to make this time in American history the happiest and prosperous time in most recent memory...What was the price? Was China aggressive approach too much for Clinton to defend?

Was this to China connection the ticket to paradise!

In all, the number of publicly reported orders of U.S.-made geostationary satellites, the most popular type, dropped from 16 in 1998 to 13 so far this year while orders for European spacecraft rose from 6
to 16 in the same period. Each satellite can cost up to $250 million.

After the 1989 Tiananmen Square incident any satellite sold or launched by China had to be approved by U.S. President. This was Clinton.

Industry officials--who are pushing Congress to reverse the 1999 decision--say the damage has spread far beyond the satellite manufacturers. Subcontractors, consultants and even university researchers have run afoul of the new law.

Frustrated University of California officials report that they have had to decline or abort numerous aerospace research contracts because of newly imposed restrictions on involvement by foreign nationals or travel overseas by U.S. scientists.

U.S. Security is not an issue,, Its all about the almighty dollar..So what if China can launch a massive Nuclear strike against the United states starting in 2005... We need to beat out the European competitors, that will sell not as advanced but same components.

Truly any terror from the sky, is boosting the American economy that was fueled by this paradise business.. a quarter of a Billion dollars a pop, is big money and they want thousands of our satellites.. The issue of national security is mute..This is business, not loyalty.. w e need the facade of the paradise of a booming economy in the United Sates of America...

what are the decisions then?

Even some of China's harshest critics now concede that the revised export controls are a threat to a key California industry.

In a significant reversal, Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Huntington Beach), a major backer of the 1999 move, said he would consider shifting the satellite export controls for NATO allies or other friendly countries
back to Commerce, given the "very legitimate concern" about the long-term health of this critical U.S. industry.

But Clayton Mowry said U.S. satellite makers are not interested in jeopardizing
national security for commercial gain. They agree that some items contained in commercial satellites--such as kick motors, radiation-hardened chips and encryption devices--should be regulated as weapons.

Would this cause a terror if the Chinese one day use this technologies that was provided by the United states for their cash, if they decided to launch their own wave of Nuclear missiles controlled by the satellites California provided them with?

U.S. aerospace officials argue that these export control efforts are often futile because most of the technology in U.S. commercial satellites is available from foreign competitors that don't have similar restrictions.

Still, the satellite industry found itself in the hot seat when accusations surfaced--first in the New York Times and later in a congressional committee chaired by California Rep. Christopher Cox (R-Newport Beach)--that Hughes and Loral had severely compromised U.S.
security by sharing sensitive information with the Chinese in the aftermath of two failed rocket launches in that country.

Later reports refuted claims that China was able to significantly improve its nuclear weapons capabilities using material it had illegally obtained from U.S. satellite makers or spies. But activist and watchdog groups close to the story over the entire Clinton term say William J. Clinton personally over saw it, and then tried to cover it up..[See campaign contributions and defrayment].

But within days of the initial media reports in 1999, China critics in Congress--including Cox, Rohrabacher and Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-El Cajon)--accused the Commerce Department of selling out U.S. security interests and began pushing for stricter controls on U.S. satellite exports, particularly to China.


A grand jury convened last year to investigate the charges against Hughes and Loral has adjourned. Sources in Washington said the U.S. government is exploring a plea agreement with the two companies that would probably include monetary penalties. Loral and Hughes continue to deny any wrongdoing.

Gareth Chang, who headed international operations for Hughes at the
time of the alleged violations, declined to comment on the charges
because the investigation is ongoing.

But Chang, who is now chairman of Click2Asia, an Internet firm, and Bookoflife.com who when a user clicks on Bookoflife.net or Bookoflife.org gets a wake up, from a website that declares Nostradamus foretold President Clinton would sell Missile and Satellite technologies to resurrect China and the Eastern Empire for Money.. Get quite a surprise...

Chang goes on a said U.S. satellite makers have lost credibility with foreign buyers, particularly in some of the world's fastest growing markets in Asia and
the Middle East.


But, U.S. satellite makers have been careful about criticizing Congress or the State Department out of fear of jeopardizing pending applications for to sell more to the Chinese and Eastern empire's..


Instead company officials say they are trying to work "within the system" including boosting staff to handle export applications.

To think about the e-mense economy that comes from all this business..Boeing Satellite Systems has 20 employees whose job is to apply and respond to State Department queries, up from just three two years ago,
according to a spokesman.

The harshest criticisms have come from industry representatives."Congress took a sledgehammer to something that only required a
jeweler's tool," said Joel Johnson, vice president for international affairs at the Aerospace Industries Assn. "Instead of focusing on controlling Chinese launches, Congress went after the entire industry."

So the whole Issue of Clinton was to boost the economy by selling out the country.. Was it worth it? Was paradise in this garden of eden worth the sacrifice that in about 10 years all most all the rogue countries will own their own nuclear weapons that they will have a heavy hand in the bargaining table of the platform Earth that we call home.




(c) Copyright Archangel Michael Bookoflife.org and net -2000


December 11, 2000
BABYLON ... HISTORY ... MYSTERY !!

Ancient Babylon was the most powerful, most wealthy, most beautiful, most advanced, most pluralistic, most imperialistic, and most prideful nation in the ancient world !!

The Babylonians thought they were invincible. When they first saw Cyrus the Great, the new King in the East, they laughed at him. Cyrus' Persia was not as powerful, or wealthy, or advanced... but Cyrus had something the Babylonians didn't... he had the ANOINTING of GOD !! (Isaiah 45:1)

Cyrus spent a year cutting canals north of the city of Babylon. [Note: China now is in control of the Panama Canal.] Then when the time was right, he diverted the water of the Euphrates River... this allowed his army to enter Babylon secretly. By the time the Babylonians realized they had been invaded, it was too late. Babylon the Great, the invincible city, fell to Cyrus instantly !!

With Clinton defraying all the most advanced missile technologies to the Chinese [x-72] who then make money selling on the technologies and arms on the open black market..The Underestimated depleted US army CAN be vulnerable...in the future... With Hollywood and the media lolling America to sleep..History will repeat it self over and over again. Nostradamus dire prediction was a wake up call.. Who is listening.......?
http://www.washtimes.com/national/default-2000121523714.htm



** Official Government COX Report **

Warning what you are about to read may effect your sleep!
!--The Final Report was, when issued, and remains today, classified Top Secret. __!


Cox Report:
http://hillsource.house.gov/CoxReport/report/welcome2.html




--America to -->
Under Clinton approval of Commerce Department
Clinton abolishes COCOM April 94..
All Military weapons go from the State Department to Commerce Department..And Yes Congress new..But How much the new of what was going on ,,Time will tell....

China
1.http://www.softwar.net/loral2.html <--Big
2.http://www.softwar.net/mid.html
3.http://www.softwar.net/kashing.html
4.http://www.softwar.net/pladef.html
5.http://www.softwar.net/order.html
6. Docs--> http://www.softwar.net/softb.html





Russia
13.http://www.softwar.net/kh31p.html

Cox Report Link found at my page:
http://www.geocities.com/michaeljohnathanmcdonald/x72/History/X72p2.htm

Clinton Legacy Watch # 19: Will Gore-Chernomyrdin At Last Put a Halt to Russia's Dangerous Nuclear Sales to Cuba, Iran? (Washington, D.C.): Next week, the United States will host the tenth in a series of secret meetings in which high-level representatives of the U.S. and Russian governments strive to find ways to advance the bilateral relationship. All too often, these meetings of what has come to be called the Gore-Chernomyrdin Commission (GCC) after its two principals, Vice President Al Gore and Russian Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin, have proven to be forums for the United States to paper over real differences with and otherwise make concessions to Moscow. The American delegation must use this session to break the mold -- by insisting that the Kremlin halt activities that pose real threats to U.S. interests and/or citizens: Russia's dangerous nuclear cooperation with Cuba and Iran. Gore did not do it! He failed in October 2000. The USA found out that Gore did nothing to stop nuclear Proliferation.
http://www.konformist.com/botm/volume03/botm0799.htm

Some cannot translate Nostradamus because he uses various OLD forms of Latin, Greek, German, and his OLD French is vary hard to translate because it doesn't blend well with New French..

Example "Huer" in Modern French is "Hour"
In OLD French its "Luck" or "Fortunate"

As for the Word "Terror" that was in many Books including Nostradamus editions after he left the Earth! I used the original 1568 Version, that, was the first volume to be issued to the public containing the Century 10. You can get it in France!

Original 1568 Version of the 1999 Prophecy!
Facsimile of this verse in Benoist Rigaud's original 1568 edition, from the copy in the Bibliothque Municipale de Lyon.

The word "Deffraieur" was mistaken for "Terror"

You can check the differences?

Well if it is not Terror what is the word in Q's 175 194 230 294 301 388 522 523 565 621 681 880 950? or is it an alternate
meaning?

It's effraieur, frayeur, effrayeur, terreur, fraieur, frayeur, effrayeur, effraieur, effrayeur, effraieur, effraieur, frayeur and frayeur
respectively.

By contrast, the word in X.72 is 'deffraieur', which is no closer to any of the above than 'fright ' is to 'right' or 'terror' is to
'error'.

This verse , is not (as most translations claim - to much justified public alarm a rock from outer space to hit Earth!) 'a great King of terror from the sky'. Not as
it stands, at least. The last word in line 2, which only acquired an apostrophe (thus making it 'd'effraieur') in corrupt subsequent
editions, means 'defraying' or even 'buying off' . suggests, as elsewhere in the Prophecies, that this
appeasing ruler has some kind of divine authority to sell out his nation.

Nostradamus wrote some letters about this ruler! But it is for his futuer and I will not release it as of now!

Deffraieur OF: Defrayer; appeasement betrayal To 'sell out', defray; as in lie cover up truth with criminal intentions
,to be bought off. Description of the first king as a sell out to his country to the second king.

In modern urban street language and probable ancient also means Sell out; *sacrifice principals for money-cash.

[Or in English: 'Parochus (purveyor)... A provider/host who furnishes us with everything that we need for the road'.
Note the spelling 'deffraieur' - exactly the same as in the original version of verse X.72 of only 30 years later]

"Parochus...Un deffrayeur, qui nous fournist de tout ce qu'il nous fault par les chemins." (Estienne, Dictionarium
Latinogallicum, 3rd edition, 1552)

"Defrayeur: m. A Cater, or Steward; one that in a iourney furnishes, and defrayes the prouision, and expence of
the whole companie." (Cotgrave, 1611)

More on X-72 in the News:
(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, and which uncovered and sparked the Chinagate scandal in its 1995 lawsuit against the corrupt Clinton-Gore Commerce Department, then run by the late Ron Brown, announced today that it will challenge the last minute plea agreement of suspected Chinese intelligence operative James Riady and his Chinese intelligence front company, Lippo Group. Judicial Watch stated that Riady/Lippo Group, which had employed suspected Chinese spy John Huang and then had him placed, through President Bill Clinton and First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, in their Commerce Department, are being let off the hook. Riady is to receive only 400 hours of community service, even less than John Huang. Nor is Riady being required to serve any jail time.

It is well known that John Huang, when working at the Commerce Department, went across the street on a regular basis and faxed documents to Riady/Lippo overseas. During the period that these fax transmissions were occurring, John Huang was receiving regular national security briefings from the CIA. During five depositions taken thus far of John Huang by Judicial Watch, he has invoked the Fifth Amendment nearly 2,500 times and been held in contempt for failure to answer 140 times. Huang refused to answer questions as to whether he passed classified materials to Riady/Lippo and Chinese intelligence. He also refused to respond as to whether or not Hillary Clinton was involved.

This attempted plea agreement, just days before the change in Administrations, is evidence not only of the criminal complicity of the Clinton-Gore Justice Department and its heads, Janet Reno and Eric Holder, but is an outrageous affront to our justice system furthering the harm done to our national security, stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman

Judicial Watch will move to block this plea agreement in Los Angeles federal court. The question is: Will the judge assigned have the courage to reject this sham plea agreement? added Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton

We Must Keep telling the Americans that Nuclear Proliferation of Clinton Administration was wrong.. Even licensing our top technology weapons CO. to do business with China, in the Trillions of Dollars..

TOP SECRETS REVEALED: MASSIVE DOCUMENT LEAK SHOWS 'CHINA THREAT'; NEW BOOK SAID DANGEROUS TO
SECURITY

**World Exclusive**

The nation's intelligence community is bracing for the release of a new bombshell book that
discloses and documents specific Chinese threats against America, the DRUDGE REPORT has
learned.

WASHINGTON TIMES reporter and BestSelling author Bill Gertz is preparing to unleash top
classified reports that detail Communist China's vast efforts to undermine and destroy the
United States.

Secret FBI, CIA and NSA reports are presented publicly for the first time in CHINA THREAT -- a
development that could land Gertz in legal hotwater, according to sources.

Gertz's publisher REGNERY legally vetted the book, and several super-secret CIA reports were
withheld at the request of the agency, but the leak is so large in scope, sources close to
Gertz fear he could ignite the first investigation after new legislation criminalizing leaks of
all "properly classified" government information is signed into law.

["President Clinton may be inclined to sign the law after he see the documents published in
THREAT.]

"This puts Gertz in a new league," says a government source. "He's about to become Target
Number One of the Spy World."

In CHINA THREAT, Gertz warns fellow Americans:

*How the FBI pursued six Chinese intelligence agents and never found a senior Chinese mole
inside the U.S. government code-named "Ma" who had access to top secret intelligence.

*"The Hug": How spy suspect Wen Ho Lee was embraced by China's top nuclear weapons scientist
during a visit to the United States. The nuclear scientist, Hu Side, was overheard by an FBI
informant at the time as saying Wen Ho Lee provided great assistance to China's nuclear weapons
program.

*How a classified Chinese government document, known as Document 65, reveals that China is
willing to attack the United States with nuclear weapons if U.S. forces intervene to defend
Taiwan in a regional conflict.

Gertz unleashes a Chinese spying manual, translated into English,




Nostradamus BIO and great links!

Short Bio
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/MichelNostradame.htm

Links
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/nl.htm

Discussions on Various Nostradamus topics and Prophecy in general
http://www.Geocities.com/Archangelspica/Nostradamus/APN/APNcont.htm


And the famed! "To all skeptics, or propagandists"
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/AM/D.htm

Nostradamus Astrology
http://www.geocities.com/archangelspica/Nostradamus/APN/NFAQ-B.htm
Nostradamus 1999 Prophecy is at my site
http://www.Bookoflife.org
JAN 23 2001
Archangel Michael
(www.Boookoflife.org)

























Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 3 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
Can this be pulled? Paul Daly Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2001 at 4:44 PM
The Transfer of Technology to China is.... Brent Wednesday, Jan. 24, 2001 at 8:22 PM
Thanks Bret Michael Thursday, Jan. 25, 2001 at 9:05 AM
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy