|
printable version
- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
View article without comments
by colin lieberman
Thursday, Aug. 17, 2000 at 9:37 PM
coyote@bantu.com los angeles
LAPD Chief Bernard Parks's own words about the violence his men incited on Monday night.
(to read Parks' words, use the link at the bottom)
When the Rampart Sacandal broke, Parks stood behind the LAPD, saying that there were *no* systematic problems in his department.
Quotes from his comments on Monday night:
"A pro-anarchy, pro-violence, pro-destruction group of 'entertainers" called Rage Against the Machine has whipped the crowd up into a fury."
"Monday night's shirtless troublemakers wouldn't know what a protest is or what a real, honest-to-God cause is if one hit them in the face."
"...the potential for serious injury--even death--would have been far greater had the violence been allowed to continue and the momentum to build."
"...the LAPD accomplished its mission of maintaining the peace and ensuring public safety while using only the minimum force necessary."
use the link below to access the full text
www.latimes.com/news/comment/20000816/t000076737.html
Report this post as:
by Voodoo
Thursday, Aug. 17, 2000 at 10:01 PM
voodoo@freecali.org N/A N/A
minimum force == point blank rubber bullets & herding peaceful people down the street??? http://la.indymedia.org/display.php3?article_id=2067
www.freecali.org
Report this post as:
by Joe Momma
Thursday, Aug. 17, 2000 at 11:18 PM
mailto:webmaster@lapd.org
What a load of crap! It's hard to choose between the numerous falacies and lies in each paragraph. I guess I'll pick a few and leave the rest for others to comment on.
[quote] A pro-anarchy, pro-violence, pro-destruction group of "entertainers" called Rage Against the Machine has whipped the crowd up into a fury. [/quote]
Whipped 'the crowd' up into a fury? Bullshit!
...
(yes, I'm ignoring the blatant lies by Parks about RATM)
...
Four paragraphs later Parks says:
[quote] What we won't tolerate, though, are the activities of a small band of hooligans ... [/quote]
Which was it Parks, a crowd of thousands whipped 'up into a fury' or a 'small band of hooligans'? Please try to make up your mind, if you can find it.
[quote] It also needs to be said that I'm fully aware of the constitutional right of people wanting to advocate any and all causes to lawfully bring attention to their causes. ... What we won't tolerate, though, are the activities of a small band of hooligans ... [/quote]
Assuming the truth of your assertion about your alleged understanding of our constitutional rights (for amusement purposes), it is nevertheless obvious that you are unable to distinguish between a 'small band' and the much larger group of lawful, peaceful, non-violent protesters.
The LAPD beat and shot at people who were in no way associated with your 'small band of hooligans'. The larger group of hooligans, who should rightly be arrested and charged with criminal behaviour is the LAPD, and you as there 'leader'.
[quote] I am especially proud of the restraint shown by the men and women of the LAPD. [/quote]
Yes we are all impressed by the restraint shown by the LAPD when it comes to arresting and charging agent provocateurs, while beating and shooting innocent protesters who are struggling to find some way to put power back in the hands of the poeple. Nice work. Congratualtions on a job well done. There is a whole new generation which is becoming aware of your sort of smug abuse of power.
Joe Mommma
intent on unlawfully engaging in violent acts, trying to provoke police officers into playing the game on their terms.
www.bettybowers.com/
Report this post as:
|