Lomas v Bank of America – Fraud Turns into Extortion in the Los Angeles Superior Court

additional false notations, america, angeles county, attorney, attorney asdourian, attorney general, attorney mark asdourian, attorney office, bank, bet tzedek, blue panel report, blue ribbon review panel report, brian moynihan, brian moynihan are asked, california, california judge, california judge peter, california judge peter meeka, case summary, chief judge, clarence thomas, clerk john clarke, congressional inquiries, congresswoman diane watson, continues racketeering, court john, declare any benefits, dr zernik, due process, edith jones, ex parte applications, financial benefits, flag counter, foreclosure procedure, fraud, fraud turns, georgetown university, harvard law professor yochai benkler, harvard law school, human rights, human rights alert, human rights council, in fraud, in lomas, irvine law school, joseph zernik, judge, judge meeka, judge peter meeka, judicial notice, july, justice, justice initiative, kc059379, laurence tribe, law school, legal times, lomas, lomas v, lomas v bank, los angeles county, los angeles judiciary racket, los angeles superior court, los angeles superior court  the, loyola law school, meeka, meeka regarding financial benefits, mega, national defender leadership institute, once plaintiff lomas, peremptory challenge, plaintiff lomas, plaintiff susan lomas, president brian moynihan, president sandor samuels, press release, proposed organizational chart, public corruption, quiet title action, re lomas, reconciliation commission, restore due process, sandor samuels, senate judiciary committee, senator dianne feinstein, senator leahy, senior counsel, serious concern, staff report, superior court, supreme court, take action, total item views, total reads, united nations, united nations human rights council, united nations human rights council staff report, united states, v bank, v bank of, widespread public corruption