|
|
json version - view hidden posts
View article without comments
by USBEFOREISRAEL
Tuesday, Dec. 27, 2005 at 9:04 AM
Fw: Israel is the reason America is at war
nomorewarforisrael.blogspot.com
by American Insurgent
Tuesday, Dec. 27, 2005 at 11:41 AM
 nowarforisrael.jpg, image/jpeg, 600x150
...but the Zionist media would rather you think it was about oil. Saddam never refused to sell us oil and less than 25% of our oil comes from the entire middle east. www.nowarforisrael.com
www.nowarforisrael.com
by Sheepdog
Tuesday, Dec. 27, 2005 at 4:40 PM
Look at the capital sectors involved in this sudden new and deliberate backlash as the NYT [spit ] begins to inform the public of these belated disclosures after decades of pleasant slumber and willing complacency as the guardians of truth for the CIA. You really ought to read my little muse: http://la.indymedia.org/news/2005/11/140166.php I worry about this sick little lamb as we all should be. May the secret service give him better protection than they did on 9-11. The CIA through its well established old money connections is ratting out the Neocon Zionist involvement in this present catastrophy.and during these times when the factions of devision in the ruling class occurs we should all pull up a lawn chair with a good rifle across our knees and watch the show. Just like the 4th of July. :>)
by Tramp
Tuesday, Dec. 27, 2005 at 6:30 PM
If we had wanted to go to war for Isreal we would have done it during the first Gulf War, when Iraq actually fired missiles into Isreal. We could have taken out Saddam then, but we didn't. We should have.
If 9/11 hadn't happened Saddam would most likely still be in power today. I'm not saying he was directly responsible for 9/11, because he wasn't. But post 9/11 he was properly seen as the infection he was in the Middle East and needed to be removed (and should have been long before).
All of that said, the US is not directly defending Isreal here. If our intent was to directly defend Isreal we'd be all over Iran and Syria right now.
Should Isreal ever come under direct attack again then we should defend them. They were a crucial ally during the cold war and still are in the war on terror. They are the ONLY mature democracy in the middle east and should be defended against the theocratic dictatorships and totalitarian socialist states that surround them. Isreal isn't perfect, but it's a damn site better than the goons that surround them.
But by all means... let your seething hatred of Jews be your guide to geoplitical events.
by Sheepdog
Tuesday, Dec. 27, 2005 at 8:38 PM
Okay, not that old. Infamy is to create two lies and get people to fight over which one is true. (paraphrased, I'm sure )
This is not about '19 savage arabs' this is about that colony of cutthroats in Palestine. And maybe why your lies are ubiquitous. And why ownership is so consolidated. Now the CIA sector of old banking capital that views inflation and debt finance a road to ruin [ at least to their particular assets ] is calling artillery in on the Neocons. This is what this attack on the cabal in the reigns of nominal power now, don't realize and what it's all about. This certainly isn't about people of the Jewish faith. Although they most likely may get caught up in the ruin because of squawking like the previous one by 'Tramp'.
by pointer
Tuesday, Dec. 27, 2005 at 8:57 PM
See:
www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/publish/article_237.shtml
by Tramp
Tuesday, Dec. 27, 2005 at 9:20 PM
You said: "... that colony of cutthroats in Palestine"
I congradulate you for one of the best descriptions EVER of the barbarians we all know as 'Palestinians'.
by Tramp
Tuesday, Dec. 27, 2005 at 9:35 PM
That link proves NOTHING.
The US and Israel share some common foreign policy goals. So what? So does the US and Saudi Arabia. Or Canada, or Mexico or even Iran as it pertains to the removal of Saddam. That proves nothing.
Netenyahu's paper discussing the removal of Saddam also proves nothing. Nor does the presence of Jews in our Gov't. Bush is a Christian... how do you know this wasn't a war for Christians?
I thought Bush went into Iraq for...
1) Oil 2) To avenge the assassination attempt on his father 3) Because 'God told him so' 4) To line the pockets of Halliburton 5) Because he 'hates the brown people' 6) Because he wants to wage a 'war against Islam'
This "War for Israel" thoery is just one more in a list of other crackpot ideas from the functionally illiterate, socialist Left. The bottom line is that the Left wants to see Israel, like it wants to see the US, weak and ineffectual in world affairs. It believes that both the US and Israel are just too darned big for their britches.
The sad part is that they are willing to openly support groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad to achieve this goal. Along with those groups they quietly, and sometimes not so quietly, cheered 9/11.
This is derived from a schoolyard sense of justice and a petty hatred of success and capitalism. There's no moral thought whatsoever in any of it.
But you keep on supporting those who'd like nothing more than to saw your head off and burn your country to the ground.
by Sheepdog
Tuesday, Dec. 27, 2005 at 10:15 PM
you mean This One? http://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/publish/article_237.shtml Thanks Tramp I believe I will. And the night has a thousand eyes.
by Sheepdog
Tuesday, Dec. 27, 2005 at 10:43 PM
The point that I'm making is that it's a losing fight against the old money and its media. These disclosures are merely opening shots, I believe to involve the Zionists that are operating in their own interests against these old banking capital investments in some very deep and bloody shit. This crap is getting too dangerous with collateral damage the only card they can throw, at all of us, too easily turned to high level N.B.C. warfare. Hey I live here and so do you. [?]
by fresca
Wednesday, Dec. 28, 2005 at 1:03 AM
"The bottom line is that the Left wants to see Israel, like it wants to see the US, weak and ineffectual in world affairs. It believes that both the US and Israel are just too darned big for their britches."
A perfect summation of this phenomena.
The left sees Israel and the US as the "rich white guys" of the world community and therefore they must be vanquished. And there is definetly a level of anti-semitism involved as well.
It is truly amazing the lengths at which the left does, in fact, support and defend any and all enemies of these two regardless of how these very same entities are at complete odds with supposed liberal values.
For instance the complete inclusion of Church AS state. Complete and utter absence of womens' rights. Zero rights for gays and lesbians.
Well, you know the story.
All things that the left would become apoplectic over if committed by white Christians or Jews.
All in all, the lefts hatred of the US and Israel is stunningly transparent and pretty fucking silly.
by Sheepdog
Wednesday, Dec. 28, 2005 at 1:53 AM
do you weasels get paid by the word or what?
by Sheepdog
Wednesday, Dec. 28, 2005 at 3:35 AM
My question is just how deep the Mossad is involved in the entire mess. Not that there isn't plenty of involvement to go around to everyone. This is like a Mexican standoff with blackmail vs. blackmail. It can only be instructive as the pressure builds.
by The Mole
Wednesday, Dec. 28, 2005 at 5:45 AM
For Tramp and the rest of the Israeli lobby:
We didn't invade Iraq in Gulf War 1 because we thought Saddam really did have serious biological warheads and we didn’t want to risk the lives of millions of Israelis by going ahead. You see, there are some biological agents that not even the best masks in the world will save you from. We only decided to invade Iraq after we were sure that Iraq “did not” have these particular agents. The general hypothesis was that Saddam was ready to begin the manufacture of advanced biological weapons that could be used on Israel rather discreetly. This was also the notion pushed by AIPAC and other pro-Israeli lobbies. It was this constant drum beat that has us there now, not 9-11. The Forward, America’s leading Jewish propaganda mill next to the mainstream, used to run radio ads saying “Will America act before Saddam creates a weapon of mass destruction?” I don’t want to say that other lobbies are not strong, but the Mossad is the only foreign intelligence “allowed” to operate on the “level” that they do in America.
Israel and democracy. Don’t inhale. If you were a Palestinian “removed” in 1947, not only could you not return but you couldn’t vote if you did. Okay, it’s a democracy but only if you’re Jewish. Moszeltov.
Right now plans are being made to attack Iran. We have already given Israel “bunker busters’ for the job but we still can’t quite figure out if Iran hasn’t already gotten a few nuclear missiles from “friendly countries”. If Iran is not hit in the coming months it will be because the intelligence isn’t finalized on this point. Will Russia and Pakistan get involved? In my humble opinion, we have never been closer to World War Three.
Israel has nuclear weapons. Their reactor is in Dimona. They dump the radio-active waste in Nablus. What a nice thing to do to the Holy land. Why does Israel want to be the only ones in the middle east with nuclear weapons? How about this; The Al Aqsa mosque is in disrepair and when one of the walls happen to fall in or “something else” happens to it, the Jews will start on the reconstruction of Solomon’s Temple on top of one of the most sacred sites in Islam, the Dome of the Rock. Just think of the possibilities.
We should take Neturi Karta’s advice, www.nkusa.org, and peacefully dismantle the Zionist state before its too late. However, it probably is. Shalom.
www.aljazeera.com/me.asp?service_ID=10238
by Sheepdog
Wednesday, Dec. 28, 2005 at 7:21 AM
Thanks for the interesting input, The Mole. fresca is up late.
by johnk
Wednesday, Dec. 28, 2005 at 7:37 AM
I think it's the other way around. America's support for Israel is driven by America's need for oil, and to influence politics in the Middle East.
Why else would the US and Europe fund a Jewish state? For the first half of the 20th century, Europeans were killing Jews, and American's weren't exactly fans of Judaism either. At the time, many Americans barely liked Catholics!
by among other things
Wednesday, Dec. 28, 2005 at 4:19 PM
But mostly it's about who gets to use that oil. And pipelines to their intended sink, protected and administered by U.S. military power. Even if it's over a radioactive landscape.
by fresca
Wednesday, Dec. 28, 2005 at 5:51 PM
The truth of this post seems to lead to it's deletion.
There's no other reason for it.
It makes no value judgements. It simply states observable facts.
**************************
"Why does Israel want to be the only ones in the middle east with nuclear weapons?"
Because Israel is surrounded by a barbaric culture, comprising several states that exist to annhilate all jews.
So, of course, they want to be heavily armed.
In addition, they are the only civilized state in the middle east and therefore the only state capable of handling such weapons.
One would hope that they have many, many, many such weapons as well as numerous conventional armaments.
These are absolute savages that surround them.
You on the left need to wake the fuck up and smell the coffee. Your heroes are simply backwards, racist, murderers.
by smeeble
Thursday, Dec. 29, 2005 at 1:55 AM
Why even waste the effort at dismantling that vicious little Zionist outpost. We could just let it starve. Wall them in and let them starve. Let them make their own way without using US arms and equipment. Give them a taste of Palestinian life.
by smeeble
Thursday, Dec. 29, 2005 at 2:37 AM
We could just cease giving them arms and money. Obviously they have walls.
by Coker 7% solution.
Thursday, Dec. 29, 2005 at 2:56 PM
This could not be anymore true. >These are absolute savages that surround them<
And the rightful owners of these stolen lands have to endure this fact. Without an Army or an Airforce, without tanks or helicopters, they survive constant assault. Capricious killing, constant humiliation and imprisonment. On their own land. No matter how often and numbingly repetitious the zionists want us to believe they were never a people, culture or nation of their own It's the unrelenting chant of lies that allow the Palestinians to be slaughtered at the whim of the zionist nation because these " Israelites" feel it's their privilege to cage and massacre the people of these stolen lands. Their lies are their most monstrous weapon, after their nuclear arsenal. They continue to degrade and crush the real Palestinian victims. All the while bleating about their right to lie and steal and murder.
by fresca
Thursday, Dec. 29, 2005 at 5:03 PM
Please provide ANY substantial evidence that History has recorded any record of a "Palestinian" people, their own language, goverment, culture.
Anything.
There simply is none.
by like -duh
Thursday, Dec. 29, 2005 at 5:27 PM
Walls ,they have. Just cut off their foreign aid, until the zionazis shrivel into dust.
by johnk
Friday, Dec. 30, 2005 at 11:58 PM
The post got hidden because it got flagged. I think it was for the language in the post.
Israel is descibed as "civilized".
Muslims are described as "barbaric" "savages" "backwards".
by New World Order Resistance
Saturday, Dec. 31, 2005 at 2:57 PM
 boycott_israel.gifdyonyu.gif, image/gif, 100x100
"by fresca Wednesday, Dec. 28, 2005 at 9:03 AM Please provide ANY substantial evidence that History has recorded any record of a "Palestinian" people, their own language, goverment, culture."
This website might help you, http://www.palestineremembered.com/index.html
www.palestineremembered.com/index.html
by fresca
Saturday, Dec. 31, 2005 at 6:05 PM
Thanks for the link. But it's just yet another site without any evidence that there has ever been a true "palestinian" culture. No culture to differentiate it from other arabs. No language of it's own. No state. Nothing.
I understand that the term "palestinian" refers to the people in question in Israel, but it's simply a term of convenience.
There is simply no such thing as a "palestinian" as the term refering to an actual people.
by what a pantload
Saturday, Dec. 31, 2005 at 6:23 PM
"Muslims are described as "barbaric" "savages" "backwards"."
Are you trying to say they're not?
Yeah, right.
by Factor
Saturday, Dec. 31, 2005 at 6:23 PM
There is no people known as 'jews' because it is a faith not an ethnic set. Notice how zionazis always shout the most blatant, loudest lies. We can view 'fresca's words as the exact opposite of the truth. I have an 1935 illuminated globe on which Palestine is clearly marked as a nation. Fresca hopes history will forget. The Zionazis are busy destroying any and all records to sustain this lie and Hitler was right. One genocide is like any other genocide as long as the international outrage can be covered over. The Zionazis surely remember all the things they learned while working with Eiechmann and this is just another tactic in the murder game.
by Tramp
Saturday, Dec. 31, 2005 at 6:28 PM
If Palestinians or, more broadly, radical Muslims, are described as "barbaric" "savages" "backwards" its probably because...
They commit suicide bombing EVERY SINGLE DAY.
They created that pillar of civilisation we all know and love... THE TALIBAN.
They routinely saw the heads off of people.
They routinely commit honor killings.
They openly declare their love of death.
... ad nauseum...
So, based on their very well establish track record, I'd say that terms such as "barbarian" aren't far off the mark. If we are willing to call Hitler a "barbarian" and a "savage" then we are certainly justified in using those terms with regard to radical Muslims, and that includes the Palestinians, who are the locus of much of this violence.
by Bruce
Saturday, Dec. 31, 2005 at 7:38 PM
Tramp & Modify "If Palestinians or, more broadly, radical Muslims, are described as "barbaric" "savages" "backwards" its probably because... They commit suicide bombing EVERY SINGLE DAY. [ you mean the Iraqi resistance? I'd do the same thing to foreign invaders] They created that pillar of civilisation we all know and love... the Taleban [ actually the Taleban was created by the ISI or the CIA:] They routinely saw the heads off of people. [ and we routinely kill them with WP. Parody, anyone?] They routinely commit honor killings. [ you got me there. Just like fundamental christians bomb clinics- go figure] They openly declare their love of death. [ you are going to back this up with something?]
by fuckwit detector
Saturday, Dec. 31, 2005 at 9:02 PM
Just when you think you've seen all the stupid ones, yet another crawls out of the sewer.
How many clinics have been bombed, Brainiac? What's the ratio of right wing fanatics, as compared to islamofascists and their fellators?
Better yet, what's the ratio as compared to ALF and ELF and PETA, Brainiac?
The ISI or the CIA? You don't know, but are just throwing shit against the wall and hoping it sticks, ain't that right?
Last but certainly not least, Brainiac asks if someone can back up the claim that Islamofascists openly declared their love of death. There are none so blind as those acne crippled Appeasers who have the groins of terrorists blocking their view.
by Bruce
Saturday, Dec. 31, 2005 at 9:14 PM
Are you totally stupid? Or just a foul mouth behind a keyboard? I put my money on both. One thing is for sure, you can't use a search engine. Enter CIA + Taleban. You can do that. Or you can act like a "fuckwit". Could be it's not any act.
by Brainiac's bestest friend
Saturday, Dec. 31, 2005 at 9:50 PM
You're asking someone else if they're totally stupid?
You, the intellectual Vesuvius that compared abortion clinic bombings with the Islamofascists, yet ignored ALF and ELF and PETA?
Why is that, Brainiac? Why didn't you include hippie sewage terrorists in your little list of grievances? Surely it's not because unbathed terrorist fellatoes are intellectually dishonest fucks, right?
by Brainiac stomper
Saturday, Dec. 31, 2005 at 9:54 PM
"They openly declare their love of death.
[ you are going to back this up with something?] "
The burden is on you, Brainiac. They have publicly and consistently said such, and I defy you to back your assertion that they "love" life.
We're waiting, asswipe. Of course you have to get off your knees and wipe your chin first....
by Brainiac's bestest friend
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 12:50 AM
I'm going to continue asking you this question, Brainiac:
Why didn't you mention ALF and ELF and PETA when you wanted to be oh-so kewl in your adolescent retort? How many bombings have those terrorist groups done as compared to bombings of abortion clinics?
We're still waiting, Brainiac....
by JonK
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 1:36 AM
Israel is to Palestine as San Diego is to Tijuana.
On second thought, that's being unfair to Tijuana. Palestine is much worse than Tijuana. Israel is at least on par with San Diego and perhaps even nicer.
Why do you suppose Israel is such a well developed, clean, technologically sophisticated and successful country?
And why do you suppose all of the Muslim countries surrounding Israel are such armpits??
Think about it doofus. Even you should be able to pick up on a clue like this.
by Bruce
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 1:47 AM
WTF are you babbling about? I can imagine it's hard to go into the connections the CIA has to the Taleban but sheesh, you're not making any sense, not that I am surprised. The reason America went to war in Iraq was that the "Israelis" in the form of the Neocon administration and all the dual citizenship members of this crew of assholes needed the oil for the Zionists in Israel. We aint getting any of it. Wait till the Old Guard decides to rip out their guts. They don't like their capital devalued and are now disclosing more and more of the shit under your Zionist rug. Your time is running out.
by Bruce
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 2:14 AM
Why *are* there so many dual citizen members in this current administration ? After "Israel" has BFed this country so many times.
by Brainiac's bestest friend
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 3:12 AM
Why didn't you mention ALF and ELF and PETA? How many bombings have those terrorist groups done as compared to bombings of abortion clinics?
We're still waiting, Brainiac....
by Brainiac's bestest friend
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 3:15 AM
I see that Mr. Palsied Scissorhands took your comment out, but it was a damn good one.
by fresca
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 7:24 AM
They commit suicide bombing EVERY SINGLE DAY. [ you mean the Iraqi resistance? I'd do the same thing to foreign invaders]
AND THAT WOULD MAKE YOU A SAVAGE...ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING VIRTUALLY EVERYONE OF YOUR VICTIMS ARE OTHER IRAQI CIVILIANS.
They created that pillar of civilisation we all know and love... the Taleban [ actually the Taleban was created by the ISI or the CIA:]
UTTER NONSENSE. DO YOUR HOMEWORK. YOU CAN"T BLAME EVERY STONEAGE ISLAMIC DEVELOPMENT THAT OCCURED IN AFGANISTAN IN THE 80'S AND 90'S ON THE CIA'S SUPPORT OF THE MUHAJADEEN AGAINST THE SOVIETS. THAT'S A SIMPLISTIC AND EMBARASSINGLY STUPID ANALYSIS. IN FACT THE TALEBAN, DEVELOPED QUITE APART FROM THE MAIN FACTIONS FIGHTING THE SOVIETS.
by fresca
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 7:31 AM
" I have an 1935 illuminated globe on which Palestine is clearly marked as a nation. "
Really?
So what's the capital? What's their language? What form of government did they have? And their Monetary system? How about their constitution? What did their passports look like?
I'm fascinated with this brand new state that you've discovered.
by Can do
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 7:51 AM
This was a land. And a people. Ask the Truks and the Brits
by fresca
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 5:41 PM
You've basically linked a map showing what was left of the region after TransJordan was finally founded in 1946.
That the word palestine was used to call this area of arab, Christian and Jewish land is not in dispute. That it was ever a distinquishable state, culture or society is.
It wasn't.
by Hey
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 7:52 PM
Why doesn't fresca show us a map of Israel before say 1920 It simply wasn't there.
by factor
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 8:00 PM
The zionists were allowed to settle into this former Ottoman state as long as they didn't imposed on the inhabitants that lived there after WWl. That didn't last long. WWll gave the Zionist the rational for immigration after Eichmann made a deal with them. The rest were sacrificed into the death camps. For the Zionists.
by fresca
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 8:23 PM
"Why doesn't fresca show us a map of Israel before say 1920 It simply wasn't there."
Read your history. Israel became a state in '48.
The first ever state on that land.
by factor
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 9:39 PM
"The first ever state on that land." Splitting hairs and rewriting the history when not outright destroying it is a serious endeavor. What it comes down to is betrayal and massacre of the people who are now treated like mad dogs rather than humans. The rhetoric that is used by 'fresca' and 'Tramp' and that other psychopath with a fellation fetish, show most of the visitors here to read the comments section, exactly how sick, evil and wretched the enemies of Palestine are. Their ugly ideology. Their murderous intent and the methods they use to twist the truth when they are compelled to use it. And then the final retreat into victimhood and self righteousness as they kill with impunity.
by Filbert
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 10:00 PM
You want links you want quotes names dates and blood types? Why not? Copy and paste this CIA +Taleban +ISI [ It's called a search engine] ------Not Google-------They Suck-------
by fresca
Sunday, Jan. 01, 2006 at 11:30 PM
" What it comes down to is betrayal and massacre of the people who are now "
Fucking nonsense. Jews were moving into that area since the late 1800's. They BOUGHT alot of the land to begin with.
When Israel was established in '48 "palestine" could have had it's own state. They chose not to and were immediately set upon by their own ARAB neighbors.
There has been no shortage of violence and massacres from the hands of these "palestinian" arabs either, by the way.
To paint the "palestinians" as some noble, oppressed and betrayed people is utter fucking nonsense.
They had centuries to evolve and create a civilized society in that area. Had they, Israel probably wouldn't exist now. But of course, as soon as Israel DID exist and flourish, all of a sudden these "palestinians" have this rich history and legacy that's being oppressed.
Bullshit.
"palestinians" (sic) had their chance. They BLEW it.
Time for them to melt back into the rest of the arab world where they came from.
by Slice o Life
Monday, Jan. 02, 2006 at 12:03 AM
In 1948 the Zionists began their systematic campaign of bloody terror against the population. Many thousands were slaughtered without provocation in the massacre of many entire villages. This is not the advancement of culture, this is just the same old conquest. This one is particularly grievous for both sides. The simple solution having been used for the last sixty years have only produced terror. Frecsa wants more of this solution.
by pay attention here
Monday, Jan. 02, 2006 at 12:14 AM
In the future be at least a fraction more truthful by not chopping up a sentence of mine to taylor it modified, and out off context, to suit your lie. You don't want everyone to know, if they haven't already by now, just how immoral and mean and petty your kind are. And how much your words are worth.
by fresca
Monday, Jan. 02, 2006 at 2:36 AM
"In the future be at least a fraction more truthful by not chopping up a sentence of mine to taylor it modified, and out off context, to suit your lie. You don't want everyone to know, if they haven't already by now, just how immoral and mean and petty your kind are. "
Oh please, I copied and pasted your quote as you typed it short of the last few words which change the context and meaning not one bit.
Your point remained intact. That the "palestinians" are some oppressed innocent group of saints set upon by the evil Jews.
Your type is a dime a dozen around here.
Your only concern for any problem in the middle east is if it's the Jews causing it. You grant the arab/muslim world carte blanche to continue to wage a racist, sexist and savage war against all Jews (as they put it) and against civilized society as a whole.
Your abject racism is VERY transparent.
by deplorable reasoning
Monday, Jan. 02, 2006 at 2:53 AM
Look. The bottom line is that the side 'fresca' supports, believes ethnic terror and genocide is fine as long as the level of repression can provoke some retaliation to justify more repression and genocide. What ever it takes. But don't look at the issue of who is doing and has done most of the killing.
by here's a map
Monday, Jan. 02, 2006 at 3:38 AM
by here's another map
Monday, Jan. 02, 2006 at 3:40 AM
by fresca
Monday, Jan. 02, 2006 at 9:19 AM
"as long as the level of repression can provoke some retaliation to justify more repression and genocide. "
Pretty much a verbatim quote from the pages of the Hamas or Islamic Jihad or (name-your-favorite-islamic-militant-group) field manual.
As long as these "palestinian" terrorists continue to attack Israel with the backing of other "innocent palestinians" and neighboring "peace-loving" muslims, there will never be peace.
by look at IT
Monday, Jan. 02, 2006 at 9:23 AM
>Pretty much a verbatim quote from the pages of the Hamas or Islamic Jihad or (name-your-favorite-islamic-militant-group) field manual. <
Where the hell do you pull this shit from? Your ass?
by conductor->
Monday, Jan. 02, 2006 at 4:58 PM
"Your only concern for any problem in the middle east is if it's the Jews causing it. " {Is it warm under the skirt of an entire religious sect? Nasty thing. You are repetitious and with your naked hypocrisy showing. Why does the Zionist raw aggression and criminal extortion go on? It's because of the well oiled, very reactive propaganda box. The usual players are involved in a coordinated assault on truth. Always flashing the manufactured " seething hatred of 'jews" yawner. Your kind farts these little phrases as a matter of course to foul the line of truth. The very level of this interference highlights the concern for perception management.}
"You grant the arab/muslim world carte blanche to continue to wage a racist, sexist and savage war against all Jews (as they put it) and against civilized society as a whole."
Don't again --yawn--- hide under that skit, nasty thing, Conflation is a specialty of your kind. As well as another of those obligatory little squealing pig phrases
-"Against all Jews As they [you mean yourself, because You may want to back at least one or two of your swamp of lies up, with something other than total crap. You very job here is endangering people of the Jewish faith by providing the very fuel of real global genocide. *You're* one of the stokers of the coming furnace ] put it"-
Shallow stupid little tool.
by fresca
Monday, Jan. 02, 2006 at 10:59 PM
I think the most entertaining thing about the far left is the lengths it will go to convince itself that it's silly views and values are important enough, or actually, not too inane too inane to warrant some actual official response from the real world.
That any and all posts supporting Israel or at least calling attention to the fact that the issue is a two-sided one with "palestine" having an equal part in the violence, is somehow an official Zionist act of propaganda shows how severely narrow and intolerant the leftist mind really is.
The left will, of course, continue to deny history and support the bad guys out of spite. It's what it does.
Thabnkfully, it does so very transparently, and as in this thread, rather amusingly.
by And
Monday, Jan. 02, 2006 at 11:53 PM
Israel is the reason we have fresca here. Busy busy busy always with a very big bucket of thick white wash. Can't put it on with a brush -it needs a trowel.
by this is what I mean
Tuesday, Jan. 03, 2006 at 4:10 AM
From 'fresca'
"That any and all posts supporting Israel or at least calling attention to the fact that the issue is a two-sided one with "palestine" having an equal part in the violence, is somehow an official Zionist act of propaganda shows how severely narrow and intolerant the leftist mind really is."
[ Why is Palestine in lower case and quotes while all references to the Zionist state of Israel in proper name capitals? This is because to attempt to reverse the reality of the fact that the Zionists are in occupation of Palestine not as you and the JDL want us to believe; the other way around, which is opposite of the truth. This is the single most defended lie. It needs to be.] The rest of the section contains ad homenims which are to be expected from this team because they want to create an incommunicable atmosphere on this forum. That is way these unfounded personal attacks are their standard recourse. It's good to be reviled by this kind.]
by fresca
Tuesday, Jan. 03, 2006 at 7:14 AM
The above is a perfect example of what I'm talking about.
This fool actually thinks that anyone attacking his inane views of the isareli "palestinine" conflict and his inherent racism and support of militant islam MUST be some sort of operative.
That's just plain schizophrenia.
Uh, you're not that important due and your views are fringe.
by word
Tuesday, Jan. 03, 2006 at 4:14 PM
Israel is the reason for the campaign of deceit. Their crimes are unrelenting and ugly. That is why the constant and well organized involvement of more than one operator working in the same propaganda framework. Employing the same frayed and threadbare old standbys. If we were so in the minority and so irrelevant there would not be this concerted a defense of such "irrelevancies". And the idea of withdrawing the support from this criminal enterprise with its attendant misery and injustice would not resonate. Twisting circumstances and history around to make Palestine the myth and 'Israel' the substance is a full time job and takes effort .. Happy to serve your 'entertainment' pro bono, speaking only in certainty, for myself.
by observer
Tuesday, Jan. 03, 2006 at 5:09 PM
Exactly as predicted, the same racist inferences without substance. The familiar conflations. The same sloganeering. But with feeling. Never addressing a damn point. Please entertain *me*. Call in your entire crew. Me and 'you'.
by fresca
Tuesday, Jan. 03, 2006 at 8:52 PM
" Never addressing a damn point. Please entertain *me*.
Ah! the time honored tradition of the left crying " Never addressing a damn point. Please entertain *me*. " as a coded response meaning that all their points have been refuted.
It is the left which steadfastedly ignores all salient points.
Let's just see how the following points are addressed.
1) GAza, GH and WB are all territories gained by Israel in '67 from Egypt, Syria and Jordan respectively. NOT some mythical state known as "palestine".
2) When Jordan became a state on the VAST MAJORITY of the land coloquially known as Palestine in '47, the left had NO PROBLEM with that. Nor does it have any problem with the thousands of "palestinians" murdered by Jordan since.
3) "palestinian" militant groups have, as their main driving philosophy, a desire to "kill Jews from the river to the sea" or "wherever they are found". The left seems to have no problem with this blanket hate speech.
4) "Palestine" could have become a state in '48 but declined, at which point it's arab neighbors rushed in and grabbed much of it's land. NOT ISRAEL mind you , but Egypt, Syria and Transjordan.
Now, I'm not holding my breath. I suspect I'll get more of the "he's clearly a Mossad Cointelpro plant" or some such other schizophrenic bullshit. Or maybe some plain old "Nuh Uh1 it's the Zionazis!".
Let's see. This oughta be good.
by buy this
Tuesday, Jan. 03, 2006 at 10:31 PM
1) GAza, GH and WB are all territories gained by Israel in '67 from Egypt, Syria and Jordan respectively. NOT some mythical state known as "palestine". [ Ah the major Zionest lie and excuse. -'We conquered and or invaded it because we had most of the weapons and we get to keep it. - Maybe we should have let Nazi Germany keep France or Japan keep China. After all might makes right. Then there is the myth of 'Israel' which in 1948 was created in the propaganda mills of the world, by perception managers like 'fresca' and team, to obliterate any idea of a native population living there for millennia before the 'state' of 'Israel' ever was conceived Before the terrorist invasion by heavily armed conquistadors or crusaders bent on buying where permitted and swindling, murdering or terrorizing where resistance occurred to the appropriations of their land. All to foster the myth of an 'Israeli' nation instead of the land of the original people, known through out the world as Palestine. Now the recipients of determined 'ethnic cleansing' which is a cruel euphemism for murder, humiliation, degradation, torture and murder on a daily basis. Inhuman treatment by a loudly self professed democracy and 'evolved' society. Zionists rely on massive disinformation and short term historical memory as well as a here to fore compliant media to maintain this lie. To the residents who were there before 'Israel' came into being, no matter the intense difraction into particulars, it is a death camp with Israeli razor wire and guard posts.]
2) When Jordan became a state on the VAST MAJORITY of the land coloquially known as Palestine in '47, the left had NO PROBLEM with that. Nor does it have any problem with the thousands of "palestinians" murdered by Jordan since.
["The left had NO PROBLEM with that" How wonderful. Someone who can read the collective mind of 'the left' with such omega like infallibility. A fool is the most correct creature anyone could ever meet. Just ask them. That's if the above quote meant anything but sloganism anyway. 'The "left" ' - don't make me laugh. You're running on MT.
3) "palestinian" militant groups have, as their main driving philosophy, a desire to "kill Jews from the river to the sea" or "wherever they are found". The left seems to have no problem with this blanket hate speech.
[ and the way you have been advocating death to Muslims for years is what... just kidding? Nasty hypocrite. Your objection is to the fact that they wont just lay down while the tanks roll over them. To give up their lives which have been transformed into a living hell.]
4) "Palestine" could have become a state in '48 but declined, at which point it's arab neighbors rushed in and grabbed much of it's land. NOT ISRAEL mind you , but Egypt, Syria and Transjordan.
[ "Israel "could have dealt fairly and ethically with the existing population and immigrated peacefully even if that meant respecting the indigenous culture and people. . And you're confusing immigration and migration after the Turks were pushed out with Zionist armed and bloody seizure. You're still MT ]
by fresca
Tuesday, Jan. 03, 2006 at 10:56 PM
"1) GAza, GH and WB are all territories gained by Israel in '67 from Egypt, Syria and Jordan respectively. NOT some mythical state known as "palestine". [ Ah the major Zionest lie and excuse. -'We conquered and or invaded it because we had most of the weapons and we get to keep it. - Maybe we should have let Nazi Germany keep France or Japan keep China. After all might makes right. Then there is the myth of 'Israel' which in 1948 was created in the propaganda mills of the world, by perception managers like 'fresca' and team, to obliterate any idea of a native population living there for millennia before the 'state' of 'Israel' ever was conceived Before the terrorist invasion by heavily armed conquistadors or crusaders bent on buying where permitted and swindling, murdering or terrorizing where resistance occurred to the appropriations of their land. All to foster the myth of an 'Israeli' nation instead of the land of the original people, known through out the world as Palestine. Now the recipients of determined 'ethnic cleansing' which is a cruel euphemism for murder, humiliation, degradation, torture and murder on a daily basis. Inhuman treatment by a loudly self professed democracy and 'evolved' society. Zionists rely on massive disinformation and short term historical memory as well as a here to fore compliant media to maintain this lie. To the residents who were there before 'Israel' came into being, no matter the intense difraction into particulars, it is a death camp with Israeli razor wire and guard posts.]
EXCEPT THAT NAZI GERMANY WERE THE AGGRESSORS. ISRAEL WAS invaded BY ITS ARAB NEIGHBORS IN 67. tHE LAND IS CLEARLY iSAREL'S. OR DO YOU PROPOSE GING THE LAND BACK TO EGYPT, SYRIA AND JORDAN? DO YOU THINK THEY MIGHT GIFT THIS LAND TO THE "PALESTINIANS"?
2) When Jordan became a state on the VAST MAJORITY of the land coloquially known as Palestine in '47, the left had NO PROBLEM with that. Nor does it have any problem with the thousands of "palestinians" murdered by Jordan since.
["The left had NO PROBLEM with that" How wonderful. Someone who can read the collective mind of 'the left' with such omega like infallibility. A fool is the most correct creature anyone could ever meet. Just ask them. That's if the above quote meant anything but sloganism anyway. 'The "left" ' - don't make me laugh. You're running on MT.
OF COURSE I DO. ANYONE WHO CAN READ CAN GET A CONSENSUS OF A PARTICULAR SUBCULTURES COLLECTIVE OPINION ON A SUBJECT. I'VE BEEN READING INDYMEDIA FOR YEARS AND I'VE NEVER SEEN A WORD REGARDING JORDAN'S TREATMENT OF THESE PARTICULAR ARABS. SO YEAH, I DO KNOW.
3) "palestinian" militant groups have, as their main driving philosophy, a desire to "kill Jews from the river to the sea" or "wherever they are found". The left seems to have no problem with this blanket hate speech.
[ and the way you have been advocating death to Muslims for years is what... just kidding? Nasty hypocrite. Your objection is to the fact that they wont just lay down while the tanks roll over them. To give up their lives which have been transformed into a living hell.]
NO, MY OBJECTION IS TO THESE SUBHUMANS LIKE HAMAS WHOSE ATROCITIES PROMOTE AND ARE DESIGNED TO PROVOKE ISRAELI RETALIATION. DO YOU EXPECT ISAREL TO SIMPLY LAY DOWN THEIR ARMS AND BE ANNIHILATED? AND WHILE I CERTAINLY CAN SEE ISLAM FOR THE BACKWARDS CULT THAT IT IS, THE ONLY FOLLOWERS I WANT DEAD ARE THE ISLAMISTS. AND QUICKLY PLEASE.
4) "Palestine" could have become a state in '48 but declined, at which point it's arab neighbors rushed in and grabbed much of it's land. NOT ISRAEL mind you , but Egypt, Syria and Transjordan.
[ "Israel "could have dealt fairly and ethically with the existing population and immigrated peacefully even if that meant respecting the indigenous culture and people. . And you're confusing immigration and migration after the Turks were pushed out with Zionist armed and bloody seizure. You're still MT ]
I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE HELL YOU'RE RESPONDING TO HERE BUT THE POINT REMAINS THAT "PALESTINE" CHOSE AGAINST STATEHOOD IN '48 AND WAS OVERRUN BY IT'S ARAB NEIGHBORS. NOT ISRAEL. AND BY THE WAY, THE TURKS WERE GONE BEFORE '48.
by soon to be jumping up and down
Tuesday, Jan. 03, 2006 at 11:27 PM
Oh -resorting to cap lock.
I'm glad to have elicited such a reaction.Create your own version of history if you want. Make sure to repeat loudly and often. Still it cannot hide the smell of death from its actions. And still you are a silly short sighted tool. Any backlash resulting from the reality of this genocide will be yours to take credit for. You wont be alone if that's any consolation.
by fresca
Wednesday, Jan. 04, 2006 at 12:44 AM
"Oh -resorting to cap lock.
I'm glad to have elicited such a reaction."
The caps were used to differentiate my refutations of your lame obfuscations from your typing.
Clearly.
By the way, regardless of what side you're on, calling ANYTHING having to do with the situation "genocide" is just silly hyperbole.
My points still stand, unchallenged.
by read this
Wednesday, Jan. 04, 2006 at 1:09 AM
In the Genocide Convention of 1948, the word genocide was defined loosely, as any act "committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group as such." Genocidal acts included causing serious "mental harm" or inflicting "conditions of life" aimed at such destruction.
by fresca
Wednesday, Jan. 04, 2006 at 4:12 AM
"In the Genocide Convention of 1948, the word genocide was defined loosely, as any act "committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group as such.""
Sounds sorta like what hamas et.al have always said they've wanted to do to the Jews.
Thanks for clearing that up.
by on the other hand
Wednesday, Jan. 04, 2006 at 4:33 AM
>Sounds sorta like what hamas et.al have always said they've wanted to do to the Jews.< That would be after the massacres of the Zionist invasion gave them new insights into the spirit of their new neighbors. Jews were living with Muslims as well as Christians, in relative peace for thousands of years. Don't bring them into your corner to hide behind. There are many Jewish people who are working for justice who would be offended to be called Zionists. Particularly when they are aware of the world beyond your seething hatred for Muslims and Islam.
by johnk
Wednesday, Jan. 04, 2006 at 9:51 AM
If "Israel is the reason", then where the hell is the Israeli military in Iraq?
by Where do you think they are?
Wednesday, Jan. 04, 2006 at 5:19 PM
That's easy, they're busy killing civilians in occupied Palestine. Unfortunately, they are also getting ready to start WW4 with Iran, Syria and Egypt.. That's why they need their proxies to do the heavy lifting and dying in Iraq and Afghanistan. Israel needs the oil and the pipelines.
by heard it before
Wednesday, Jan. 04, 2006 at 5:59 PM
If “they do it, too” were a valid excuse, Hitler would be off the hook for killing those six million Jews, because Stalin killed six million Ukrainians.
by fresca
Thursday, Jan. 05, 2006 at 1:07 AM
"If “they do it, too” were a valid excuse,"
You're right. It's not.
It's ONLY hamas et.al who operate under such racist and genocidal guidelines.
by Stubbs
Thursday, Jan. 05, 2006 at 1:14 AM
That's because 'Israel' can never do any wrong. Genocide, when done by 'Israel', is always for the good. Just ask the JDL or 'fresca.'
by fresca
Thursday, Jan. 05, 2006 at 3:03 AM
It's simply because it's not genocide for Israel to defend itself against a horde of savages who loudly and proudly proclaim their wish to kill "every Jew wherever they may be found".
by look @ you
Thursday, Jan. 05, 2006 at 3:55 AM
And the Palestinians can say:
"It's simply because it's not genocide for Palestine to defend itself against a horde of savages who loudly and proudly proclaim their wish to kill "every Palestinian wherever they may be found".
Just like 'fresca'.
by fresca
Thursday, Jan. 05, 2006 at 5:18 AM
But Israel doesn't say this. Israel doesn't have, as part of it's fucking mission statement the desire to kill all arabs. Only certain "palestinian" groups , with seemingly full support of the populace have declared the same against all Jews, not even just Israeli's but ALL JEWS.
by of course not
Thursday, Jan. 05, 2006 at 3:44 PM
They have spokesmen like 'fresca' who are there to try and contain the truth which is Israel's determination to extinguish the Palestinian culture and people. As they loudly and constantly proclaim that there never were any people there and while they earnestly strive to make this a reality. You have yourself stated numerous times the wish to wipe out ALL Muslims.
And this is no difference from the radical 'solution' offered from any racist agenda.
by fresca
Friday, Jan. 06, 2006 at 12:26 AM
Keep repeating the same nonsense over and over again and hope it sticks.
"Israel's determination to extinguish the Palestinian culture and people."
There simply is NO "palestinian" culture or people.
None. There never has been. Period.
by citizen
Friday, Jan. 06, 2006 at 2:07 AM
And with that kind of attitude it is little wonder that bombs do go off in crowded 'israel' busses, killing 'israelis'. They simply don't exist. Just testing.
by fresca
Friday, Jan. 06, 2006 at 2:19 AM
"And with that kind of attitude it is little wonder that bombs do go off in crowded 'israel' busses, killing 'israelis'. They simply don't exist."
Well, I'm not surprised that you've found yet another justification for killing Jews but please allow me to point out something.
Israel , unlike "palestine" or "narnia" or "middle earth" does in fact exist. It has a government, a culture, it's own language. It has borders. It's recognized on maps.
None of which can be said for the other exciting yet mythical places mentioned above.
by and so it goes
Friday, Jan. 06, 2006 at 2:48 AM
I didn't expect you to be. So stop wanking when these mythical people kill. The solution would be to let 'israel' fend for itself without that 5 Billion a year to buy and grease the guns and tanks they require to murder a people you say doesn't exist. No wonder you are choking in blood.
by fresca
Friday, Jan. 06, 2006 at 3:32 AM
" So stop wanking when these mythical people kill. The solution would be to let 'israel' fend for itself without that 5 Billion a year "
Oh they exist all right. But "palestinian" is a mere contrivance. They are simply arabs bent on killing Jews. Adjecent Jew-Haters as they've so succinctly been dubbed.
And 5 billion (it's actually around 3 billion but 5 would be better) dollars is a small price to pay to help support and defend the only bastion of civilization in the entire middle east.
I mean, at least we must agree on that right? Even you must admit that the arab world is a de-evolved, savage miasma of hate, violence and barbarism.
There's simply no refuting that. There are countless examples and evidence of this, literally daily.
|