imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
• latest news
• best of news
• syndication
• commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
json version - view hidden posts

View article without comments

A majority of Californians voted against Arnold Schwarzenegger

by Duane J. Roberts Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 2:01 PM
duaneroberts92804@yahoo.com

A majority of persons who voted in the October 7th special election cast their ballots for candidates other than Arnold Schwarzenegger. They voted against him.

The following calculations are based on information

that was posted on the California Secretary of State

WWW site as of 8:57 a.m. this morning.

I expect this data to change slightly over the course

of the next few weeks as thousands of other ballots

are counted and tabulated.

Despite claims of a "landslide victory" for Arnold

Schwarzenegger, the numbers clearly show that he has

NO mandate to govern California

So far, the numbers indicate that about 51.7% of those

persons who cast ballots in this election voted for

candidates OTHER than Schwarzenegger.

Since Schwarzenegger did not win a majority of the

vote in this election, he cannot claim that his views

and ideas represent the will of the electorate.

Sincerely,

Duane J. Roberts

duaneroberts92804@yahoo.com



STATEWIDE VOTE FOR CANDIDATES OTHER THAN

SCHWARZENEGGER

Cruz M. Bustamante Dem 2,395,237

Tom McClintock Rep 991,468

Peter Miguel Camejo Grn 208,526

Arianna Huffington Ind 42,227

Peter V. Ueberroth Rep 21,561

Larry Flynt Dem 15,112

Gary Coleman Ind 12,514

George B. Schwartzman Ind 10,758

Others (excluding write-ins) 171,427

Total 3,868,830



STATEWIDE VOTE FOR SCHWARZENEGGER

Arnold Schwarzenegger Rep 3,601,797



STATEWIDE VOTE FOR ALL CANDIDATES (Including Arnold)

All candidates 7,470,627



PERCENTAGE OF VOTE FOR ARNOLD VERSUS OTHER CANDIDATES

Arnold Schwarzenegger 48.2%

All other candidates 51.7%

Recall Governor Groper

by NASCAR Voters Suck Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 2:07 PM

Californians deserve better.

^

by whoo-hoo Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 2:19 PM

They're losing their power, which is everything to these liberals. Seems the citizens of California just can't be trusted with something as important as who's in office.

These liberals don't trust the people, they don't trust elections, they want to control thought, they want to control speech, they want to control rather than govern. These liberals idea of freedom is for everyone to do what they say.

And so we get posts like two above.

The panic begins.

mr

by patrick Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 2:29 PM

let me preface this comment by saying that I voted against the

recall but selected bustamante otherwise.

In looking at the votes the combined republican votes

for schwarnegger and mcclintock

dwarfed the democratic alternative bustamante

i hope that someone looks into this since it makes

be wonder what sort of turnout there was and

whether a lot of democrats crossed over

"and whether a lot of democrats crossed over"

by Jen Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 2:48 PM

Or whether those Diebold voting machines were rigged.

data for the abstained?

by adrian more Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 3:55 PM

% of abstainees anybody?

data for the abstained?

by adrian more Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 3:56 PM

% of abstainees anybody?

Hey Duane!!!!

by john Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 4:43 PM

Hey Duane, while it is true that the Governor Elect received only 48% of the popular vote, but, why dont you check your facts before you open your pie hole. The current Governor received 47% of the popular vote, so what does that mean? Davis had 2 or 3 people to run against. Arnold had 134.

By the way, are you still wearing that STUPID looking hat????

Dirty politics killed the Democraps.

by Max Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 4:49 PM

The people have spoken. They are fed up with fifth column leftists and dirty politics. Get your acts together or get the hell out of our country!

Looking at the Ahnold-McClintock Votes

by stats Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 5:03 PM

We can see 3 out of 4 Republicans approve of sexual harassment.

Clintonesque

by calvoter Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 5:07 PM

Clinton cured everyone of caring about sexual harrassment. It has nothing to do with the job of being president. The people don't care. It's time to move on.

moveon.org

Plutocracy Marches On

by NASCAR Voters Suck Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 5:10 PM

Another multimillionaire seizes the reigns.

Stupid Post

by Lee Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 5:12 PM

Regardless of who you wanted to win the election, in any competitive election in the U.S. the winner seldom gets a simple majority of the votes. Fringe candidates from other parties (Green, Libertarian, Socialist, etc.) take enough of the vote to keep this from happening. If this is so important to you Duane, maybe you should advocate the abolition of all candidates that aren't Republican or Democratic.

Solution to this problem would be Instant Runoff Voting

by Duane J. Roberts Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 5:54 PM
duaneroberts92804@yahoo.com

I disagree with Lee's assertion that we should make it more difficult for the candidates of political parties other than Democrats or Republicans from qualifying for the ballot.

If anything, I think instituting a system of Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) here in California would completely eliminate the problem of candidates not getting a majority of the vote.

See the following URL for more information:

http://www.fairvote.org/irv/

And John is right when he argues Gray Davis got 47% of the vote in the November 2002 election. Like Schwarzenegger, he too had no "mandate" to govern California. That's part of the reason why he was recalled.

Sincerely,

Duane J. Roberts

duaneroberts92804@yahoo.com

Re: Solution to this problem would be Instant Runoff Voting

by Duane J. Roberts Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 6:00 PM
duaneroberts92804@yahoo.com

I wrote:

> I disagree with Lee's assertion that we should

> make it more difficult for the candidates of

> political parties other than Democrats

> or Republicans from qualifying for the ballot.

I should have wrote:

"I disagree with Lee's assertion that we should make it more difficult for the candidates of political parties other than Democrats or Republicans to qualify for the ballot."

That reads much better.

Sincerely,

Duane J. Roberts

duaneroberts92804@yahoo.com

"A majority of Californians voted against Arnold Schwarzenegger" CMON!!!!!!

by KOBE SBM Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 6:04 PM

You gotta be shittin me! Any true-blue native Californian like myself could see this one as soon as Arnold became a candidate. Besides the sheer "novelty" of the man, he is strong on politics which concern REAL Californians.

1. The state of California has the single largest economy of any state in the Union. http://commerce.ca.gov/state/ttca/ttca_homepage.jsp

a.) The $9 billion loss incurred by Davis as a result of the Enron scandal is barely a ripple compared to the Gross State Income.

b.) Calls on this site to "boycott California" are drug induced blurtings of morons. The economy of California is the 5th largest in the WORLD, and it doesnt depend on any income from you left wing whiners (most of whom dont have a decent job anyway), or you sign-carrying, low income imbeciles who dont pay much in taxes.

2.) One look at Arnold, and one look at the seriously DAMAGED beotches who claimed that Arnold "groped" them tells the story. First of all, how did the cows even get that close to him? They were sidling up to him HOPING to get groped. Californians are not that naive, and the tired old "he's a pervert!" trick has gotten old, and it doesnt work anymore.

3.) Hispanics are the majority ethnic group in California. Unfortunately (for them), a vary large percentage of them are ILLEGAL ALIENS (fuck that "undocumented workers" crap). Hence, they CANNOT VOTE. The legal Hispanic citizens stand to lose if legislation is passed which allows the ILLEGAL invaders to more easily break the laws here.

4.) The tax base in California is skewed towards the poor and against the wealthy, therefore , causing a situation which might make them leave the state will ALWAYS be dropped. If you make less than $50K a year, you dont really get the picture. If you make $60K or more, you feel the pinch. If you make $100K or more, you REALLY feel it.. Those people making more than $200K a year are running businesses which employ lots of Californians. Screw them and you screw California.

BOTTOM LINE:

You left wing fuckwads dont know the first thing about responsibility. You have the Sherman Austins who irresponsibly create terrorist websites and end up in prison, and you have sign-carrying morons who could be burning that energy by working in a job, and you have a bunch of bull-dagger dyke bitches calling themselves "Code Pink" who dig up "groping" stories to win an election by low-blow politics. PATHETIC. Get a JOB, Get a LIFE or GET THE FUCK OUT.

Ahnold: the Second Embarassment for U.S. Democracy

by NASCAR Voters Suck Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 6:09 PM

Bush was the first.

Huge chunk of Democrats voted for Arnold

by Duane J. Roberts Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 6:11 PM
duaneroberts92804@yahoo.com

Earlier this year, the Gator Corporation, an online

marketing firm, conducted an extensive poll of internet users in California, asking them how they felt about the recall. At that time, the results strongly hinted that more than 1/3 of all Democrats would vote for Arnold Schwarzenegger in any future special election. Lt. Governor Cruz Bustamante's very weak performance in this special election indicates to me the poll they conducted was surprisingly accurate.

Sincerely,

Duane J. Roberts

duaneroberts92804@yahoo.com



http://www.gatorcorporation.com/companyinfo/press/pr030723.html

Schwarzenegger vs. any Democrat:

63% of all respondents stated they would vote for

Schwarzenegger

30% of Davis supporters stated they would vote for

Schwarzenegger

35% of Democrat respondents stated they would vote for

Schwarzenegger

When told of the results, George Gorton,

Schwarzenegger's political adviser said, "I am

delighted. This is the third poll we've seen where

Arnold beats Feinstein and the latest in an unbroken

string where he beats Davis. We are especially pleased

with The Gator Corporation's findings because Internet

users are more informed than the average voter, and

therefore their opinions should closely approximate

the opinions of the highly motivated voters who will

show up in this low turn out special election."

When Republicans Count the Votes, What Do You Expect?

by Lowbrow Nation Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 6:15 PM

[From an article by Lynn Landes]

ES&S - 7,305,680 registered voters

ES&S, the nation's largest voting company, is owned by the Omaha World Herald Company and has solid ties to the Republican Party. ES&S claims on their website that they tabulated "56% of the U.S. national vote for the past four presidential elections."

Sequoia - 3,682,051 voters

Sequoia is owned by De La Rue, a British-based company and the world's largest commercial security printer and papermaker. They also own a 20% stake in Camelot, the operator of the Great Britain's national lottery.

Diebold - 2,412,971 voters

Walden O'Dell, Diebold's chief executive, recently wrote a fund-raising letter for the re-election of President George Bush

When Republicans Count the Votes, What Do You Expect?

by 1 Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 6:17 PM

HAHAHA

The quacks are coming out.

And you people wonder why we stick around.

anti-arnold people did well

by Freckles Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 9:17 PM

Its all about the One World Order. The bankers run most of the politics, and they are a mean machine to fight. Whatever side you were on besides ARnold, you did good! You are to be commended.

" Whatever side you were on besides ARnold, you did good!"

by nonanarchist Thursday, Oct. 09, 2003 at 11:27 PM

Yeah! You lost!

Yay, team!

really?

by daveman Friday, Oct. 10, 2003 at 3:57 AM

who did you vote for nonanarchist?

Dont they have a south carolina indymedia website?

All praise to Ahhnold for his lack of political experience...god save us...

daveman

by nonanarchist Friday, Oct. 10, 2003 at 7:34 AM

I'm not a resident of CA. I couldn't vote.

But I would have voted for Arnie.

No, there's no SC imc. What's your point?

BTW: you do realize, don't you, that I was the original daveman? I don't mind you using the handle now, though.


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy