We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

The (Temporary) End of Globalization

by Fabian Fritzsche Monday, Jul. 09, 2018 at 10:03 AM
marc1seed@yahoo.com

Protectionist measures could lead to losses of prosperity and increase the pressure to introduce more measures. Before the 2008 crisis, world trade grew over 6% per year (now 2%). Why must US consumers pay more for imports from the EU? Why are European consumers punished?

THE (TEMPORARY) END OF GLOBALIZATION



By Fabian Fritzsche



[This article published on June 28, 2018 is translated from the German on the Internet, http://neuewirtschaftswunder.de.]



In Germany, a threatening trade war between the US and the European Union is often deplored. We are actually in the middle of that trade war.. To remain in the war rhetoric, this is a world trade war in which the US fights against the EU, China, Mexico, Canada, Russia and other states. However, these states are not forming a common front. The EU reproaches China protectionism and imposes sanctions against Russia – for political and not economic reasons – and Russia on its part imposes sanctions against the West. At the same time, China purchases technologically and/or economically important businesses worldwide on a large scale. This leads to ever louder demands for protectionist measures.

When this spiral will end can hardly be foreseen. The protectionist policy is applauded on both the left and right sides of the political spectrum. Since time immemorial, some have seen in globalization a threat to the social state and an essential reason for the miniscule wage increases and the exploding inequality between poor and rich. The other side also likes to argue with the well-being of local workers and sees national identity and security threatened.



Blaming Trump for escalating this trade war may not be completely wrong. Still, the Trump phenomenon can ultimately be explained with this anti-globalist attitude in wide parts of the population. Bernie Sanders, the democratic presidential candidate who lost in the primaries, is also not a globalization advocate. This is also true for the National front in France, the Five-Star movement in Italy, parts of Brexit-supporters and many other parties and organizations in Europe. Whoever thinks all this is only an apparition and will be over in two-and-a-half years when Trump is voted out of office will be mistaken. Another US president will probably appear less blustery and direct but can hardly be expected to cancel all Trump’s measures.



For everyone who opposes protectionist measures, the questions are raised in retrospect why do so many people reject globalization and looking to the future what would another world look like. The first question can presumably be easily answered. Many people feel the growth of the last decades was unjustly distributed. They may also feel they are foreign-controlled by multinational corporations and foreign governments and cannot make decisions themselves – even in their own country. The solution could seem obvious for whoever agrees with these points or at lest the first point and does not dismiss them as (wrong) feelings.

The problem would be solved by distributing the prosperity more evenly. However, it is not that simple. The protectionist mood will not simply shift or veer round from today to tomorrow only because income and wealth are distributed more evenly in one country. This is a process that will take many years. This should not be an excuse for not adopting a course and saying nothing will help in the short-term. Rather, protectionist measures could lead to losses of prosperity and increased pressure to introduce more measures. This danger exists. With all legitimate criticism of the effects of globalization – screening and tariffs will lower and not raise prosperity. No political economy is self-sufficient. Producing everything oneself cannot be a sensible goal.



Globalization-skeptics lack a clear strategy or alternative to past globalization, in view of the shifted mood in many countries. Advocates should urgently seek answers and a strategy. The first step could be acknowledging the wave of globalization that began in 1973 is now running out as a discontinued phase. With the end of Bretton Woods, world trade has only grown just over 2% per year since 2008/09. Before the crisis, world trade grew over 6% per year. Growth will decline again through the trade war.



The partly resolved and partly threatened countermeasures seem logical and understandable… What these retaliatory countermeasures will do is unclear. Others ask: why should European consumers be punished with higher prices for US imports? Why must US consumers pay more for imports from the EU? The US economy depends on imports from Europe. So consumers in Europe should not pay for the damage. In the short-term, the reaction will be simply accepting the US tariffs and negotiating tariff cuts with other countries as much as possible. This will cushion the effects of the US tariffs for businesses in Europe. There is no reason why European governments should imitate the US government in reducing the well-being of US citizens. In the medium-term, prosperity should be distributed more evenly to increase acceptance of globalization. The German economy must finally reduce its export dependence. These two points are not even discussed in the current trade war.

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy