We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

View article without comments

5 Reasohns for UN Agreements Regulating Corporations

by Austrian justice advocates Monday, Apr. 02, 2018 at 9:49 AM
marc1seed@yahoo.com

Countless cases of human rights violations by corporations show voluntary self-commitments of businesses cannot ensure social and ecological standards. UN agreements create rights for persons instead of companies.

5 REASONS FOR A BINDING UN AGREEMENT REGULATING CORPORATIONS



{This article published on 3/6/2018 is translated from the German on the Internet, www.anders.handels.at.}



Countless cases of human rights violations by corporations show that voluntary self-commitments of businesses cannot ensure social and ecological standards. As one example, the Lidl supermarket chain boasted about good labor standards in its subcontractors. However, catastrophic working conditions were uncovered in Lidl’s supposedly showcase factories in Bangladesh: excessive working hours, wage deductions as sanctions for alleged crimes, poor overtime remuneration, prevention of union work, humiliations and discrimination of women. All this violates employee rights defined in the ILO conventions. Transnational corporations are not bound to those (and also to the human rights)… Binding rules and instruments protect persons and nature. Here are the five most important reasons why a binding UN agreement on regulating corporations is needed.



1. Enforcing human rights



Corporate profits are amassed systematically from human rights violations and the exploitation of natural resources – whether in the mining-, oil- or agricultural sectors, the textile-, food or electronics industries. Besides working conditions violating human rights, companies hire private security forces to violently suppress protests, rob and pollute land and water and destroy the foundations of life of the local population. A UN agreement should obligate corporations to observe human rights in their international activities.



2. End impunity



In the past, the community of states could only agree on a non-binding catalogue of recommendations: the UN principles for the economy and human rights. The victims of offenses have practically no chance for compensation and repatriation. Businesses go unpunished. Agreements would close this gap, make possible trials of companies and ensure victims rights to compensation.



3. Stop competition of states



To mazimize their profits, companies locate their subsidiary- and supplier firms where labor-, social- and environmental standards are trifling. States are in competition. Instead of social achievements, neoliberal globalization brings a deregulation race downwards. Agreements would take away companies’ power to play off states against each other.



4. Regulations instead of privileges for companies



Companies create expedient legal frameworks through lobbying and rece4ive more and more privileges. So trade agreements like TTIP, CETA and Co. privatize the law through private tribunals. Multilateral trade tribunals for corporate lawsuits against states desired by the European Union also undermine democracy. UN agreements would create rights for persons instead of companies rather than one-way streets for enforcing corporate interests.



5. Let us use this historic chance!



Since the 1970s, there were many attempts at binding regulations for corporations that failed in the resistance of the economic lobbies. Many things are different this time. The civil society pressure over years – the so-called Treaty Alliance of around 1000 organizations, movements, and networks supported internationally – bears fruit. In 2014, the majority of the UN Human Rights Council supported the resolution for an agreement brought by Ecuador and South Africa. Thus, there is now a mandate for the first time to work out such an agreement that is binding in international law. Austria voted against the resolution at that time and since then has not worked constructively in the process. Let us together put pressure on the government to support the process since Austria is also obliged to protect human rights.

Report this post as:

Public Interest Environmental Law Conference, 32 pp

by pielc.org Monday, Apr. 02, 2018 at 11:25 AM
marc1seed@yahoo.com

to download 30 pages of panels and keynotes at the Public Interest Environmental Law Conference in Eugene, OR, March 1-5, 2018, click on

http://pielc.org/

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy