Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Bernie Sanders Wins at the End

by Robert D. Meyer Monday, Jul. 18, 2016 at 4:19 AM
marc1seed@yahoo.com

Sanders has a quality that gives him an advantage in the US election campaign that is based largely on sympathies: authenticity...The logical consequence of "Not Me.Us" is that the individual fights for improvement of social conditions, not for himself and his personal success.

BERNIE SANDERS WINS AT THE END


Why the election campaign of the US socialist did not end with a defeat


By Robert D. Meyer


Bernie Sanders supports Hillary Clinton in the race for the White House. He should not be accused of treachery or betrayal.


[This article published on 7/14/2016 is translated from the German on the Internet, www.neues-deutschland.de.]


Maybe Bernie Sanders thought of Ralph Nader. Maybe the leftist senator from Vermont came to the point where he decided not to make the same politically disastrous decision as the civil rights lawyer made during the 2000 presidential election. Many democrats today are firmly convinced Nader was the reason why their candidate Al Gore lost to the republicans and the later two-term president George W. Bush (translator’s note: Gore even lost his home state Tennessee). This strategic reflection is not false. Nader tipped the scales in Florida known as a “swing state.” Polls predicted an extremely tight race between Gore and Bush. Therefore the democrats tried to persuade Nader of a deal, either not run in Florida or convince at least part of his supporters to vote for Gore. In a countermove, people could vote for Nader in smaller campaigns in states secure for democrats.


However the US left supported by the Green Party did not enter into that strategic barter. Gore lost Florida by 600 votes and as a result the race for the White House. The election outcome in 2000 was a heavy blow for the US left. It began a continuing debate to what extent strategic decisions should be more important than holding onto principles. So the leftist US filmmaker Michael Moore who supported Nader in the election campaign later asked retrospectively whether his decision was right in light of Bush’s eight-year era. From the beginning, it was clear Nader could win a respect or esteem victory. At the end he won three million votes nationwide. However the winner-takes-all principle counts in the American electoral system.


Sanders faced a similar situation. Different from Nader, the socialist took on a 15-month Democratic primary campaign and inspired 23 states and 13 million voters – including disproportionally many young- and floating voters – with his vision. From the beginning, the 74-year old emphasized issues were central, not his person. One of his campaign slogans “Not me. Us” embodied this attitude. Unlike other professional or career politicians who like to speak of a “we,” Sanders has one quality that gives him an advantage in the US election campaign that is largely based on sympathies: authenticity.


Although Sanders’ election campaign in the last 15 months experienced an increasing professionalization, many of his appearances at the start of his campaign showed his embodiment of the honest broker… If Sanders were a scholar at a US university, his lectures would often be overcrowded since he has so little in common with the entirely staged teleprompter election campaign of Hillary Clinton.


From this perspective, we could say his election program is more important to him than his own person or some mandate. Because he holds firmly to his candidacy, he could put significant political pressure on democrats and ultimately move them to the left. The demand to double the nationwide minimum wage to $15, further development of universal health care and free access to state universities are now on the election program of the party. These demands should be regarded as a victory for the US left in a country where republicans castigated Obama’s ultimately correct but timid health care reform as the way to authoritarian socialism according to the 20th century model.


The democrats’ relation to Sanders is marked by contradictions as was clear at the “Left Forum” in New York in May 2016. [1] Sanders is considered too adapted or conformist to the political mainstream for supporters of the most different small leftist parties like the Greens. However there are also many Sanders’ supporters who want a political alternative to the left of the Democratic Party. Sanders knows how to do the splits. Months ago he began passionately campaigning on one hand for reforming democrats from within and on the other hand motivating the grassroots movement arising around him to become active in the communities and states beyond the presidential election. Ultimately Sanders only took up an attitude deeply rooted in the US that success depends on individuals.


Instead of promoting the rat-race or dog-eat-dog mentality, the logical consequence from “Not Me. Us” is the exact opposite. The individual fights for improvement of social conditions, not for himself and his personal success. Sanders convinced 13 million voters of this change of awareness. That was a huge success for a candidate only known one-and-a-half years ago outside Vermont to persons intensely interested in politics.


That Sanders now supports Clinton should not be misinterpreted as betrayal of the idea. The attitude of the leftist senator was clear when he appeared with the former US Secretary of State at a joint election campaign event on Tuesday in New Hampshire. He began his speech with the symbolically important words that Clinton was the best female candidate in the race for the White House. But his following statements stressed the vision that he embodied in his election campaign… At the beginning, Clinton was declared the only possible and logical winner… In the case of the republicans, the whole media landscape was completely incoherent and Donald Trump had no chance at all. No hasty headlines should be written for the election in November.


It became quieter around Sanders in the following months… The political approaches of Sanders and Clinton are very different. Although he had the support of many followers and thus a base, Sanders excluded early on jumping in the presidential election campaign as an independent if his campaign with the democrats did not go off well.


Sanders is not a power-seeker. But he does not want to be a Nader who maneuvers his ideals in a cul-de-sac that at the end splits the candidacy of the left camp and thus brings a President Trump. Sanders’ project goes beyond the current election campaign. Therefore Sanders and his issues will win at the end.


RELATED LINKS


David Niose, “This is one weak nominee: Hillary Clinton’s problem isn’t Bernie Sanders. Its Hillary Clinton,” Salon.com, 5/14/2016
http://www.salon.com/2016/05/14/this_is_one_weak_nominee_hillary_clintons_problem_isnt_bernie_sanders_its_hillary_clinton/


Nathan Robinson, “The Democrats Are Making A Suicidal Mistake,” Current Affairs.org, 5/26/2016
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2016/05/the-democrats-are-making-a-suicidal-mistake


Nathan Robinson, “Unless The Democrats Run Sanders, a Trump Nomination Means a Trump Presidency,” Current Affairs, 2/23/2016
http://static.currentaffairs.org/2016/02/unless-the-democrats-nominate-sanders-a-trump-nomination-means-a-trump-presidency


Nathan Robinson, “Why Leftists Should Have No Problem Voting for Hillary Clinton,” Current Affairs.org, 7/12/2016
https://www.currentaffairs.org/2016/07/why-leftists-should-have-no-problem-voting-for-hillary-clinton


http://www.onthecommons.org

http://www.openculture.com
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy