When access is permitted to the paper court files - no signed judicial records can be found in there; access to the electronic court files is entirely denied; false and contradictory dockets, journals, orders lists are published online, but no valid, signed orders or decisions; no signed judicial records are served with notices of the Court; letters of denial are issued unsigned, signed by unauthorized staff, or signed in a false manner.
The office of Clerk of the Court William Suter denies applicants and petitioners, as well as the public at large, the right to distinguish, which cases were duly reviewed by the Supreme Court of the United States, and which one were not.
The Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States undermines the Human, Constitutional, and Civil Rights of all in the United States.
____
Los Angeles, January 25 –Joseph Zernik, PhD, of Human Rights Alert (NGO) has filed a request with the US Congress Judiciary Committees and the House Rules Committee for impeachment of Clerk William Suter of the US Supreme Court for violations of his Oath of Office.

Third party declarations regarding repeated failed attempts to discover any valid judicial records in the paper court files, and entire denial of access to the electronic records of the Court, as well as records, which were served by the office of Clerk William Suter on petitioners and applicants, have been provided as the core evidence for the request.

The request alleges that the office of Clerk William Suter routinely violates the First Amendment right to inspect and to copy court records and the Due Process right for notice and service.

The request alleges that Clerk William Suter denies applicants and petitioners, as well as the public at large, the right to distinguish, which cases were duly reviewed by the Court, and which ones were not. Such conduct renders judicial proceedings of the highest court of the land vague and ambiguous.

The conduct of Clerk William Suter should be considered of the highest public policy significance, because of the nature of the cases that are listed in the request, petitions and applications for the protection of their rights against alleged abuse by government and by large corporations. Some of the cases, ranging from 2007 to 2011, also pertain to matters, which are noted in the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations as “corruption of the courts” [2] and denial of the right for Habeas Corpus in the United States. [3]

Notable among such cases were matters pertaining to alleged widespread corruption of the courts in Los Angeles County, California, and the habeas corpus petition of the former US prosecutor Richard Fine, who was held in solitary confinement for 18 months in Los Angeles County, California, with no valid papers for his arrest and booking.

The conduct of Clerk William Suter is alleged in the request as violation of his Oath of Office, and violation of his duties and obligations pursuant to the Judiciary Act of 1789, including, but not limited to: denial of Access to Justice, denial of Equal Protection, Deprivation of Rights under the Color of Law, and/or Misprision of Felonies; therefore - impeachable offences.

Additional measures are proposed in the request for restoring the integrity of the offices of the clerks of the US courts. The US Congress enacted laws, presidential directives were issued, regulations were promulgated, and systems were implemented for authentication and validation of e-government in the Executive Branch. In contrast, the US courts implemented electronic court systems and electronic court records with no legal foundation. Therefore, the request also urges the US Congress to enact federal rules of electronic courts.

Regardless, the request notes that no measure can substitute for vigilance of the public at large, and computing professionals in particular, in “keeping a watchful eye” on the courts.

Notice was given to the United Nations Human Rights Council, in view of the pending final vote on the 2010 UPR of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations.
____
LINKS:
[1] 11-01-25 Request for Impeachment of US Supreme Court Clerk WILLIAM SUTER
http://www.scribd.com/doc/47539382/
[2] 10-11-10 United Nations Human Rights Council, Human Rights Working Group: Outcome Document of the 2010 UPR of the United States: Wg.6 9 l.9 USA
http://www.scribd.com/doc/42157366/
[3] 10-04-19 Human Rights Alert (NG0) submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council for the 2010 Review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States as incorporated into the UPR staff report
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/
____
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Human Rights Alert focuses on the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of the integrity of the justice system in the United States.
____
http://twitter.com/inproperinla
http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://www.liveleak.com/user/jz12345
http://www.examiner.com/x-38742-LA-Business-Headlines-Examiner
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES?
* "On July 26, 2010, Laurence Tribe, Senior Counsel for the United States Department of Justice, Access to Justice Initiative, delivered an important speech to the Conference of Chief Justices, challenging them to halt the disintegration of our state justice systems before they become indistinguishable from courts of third world nations."
Prof Laurence Tribe, Harvard Law School (2010), per National Defender Leadership Institute
http://www.nlada.net/library/article/national_dojspeechto%20chiefjustice07-26-2010_gideonalert
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?
* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24902306/
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29043589/
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted."
Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/274339
_____________________________
WHAT DID THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL STAFF REPORT SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA?
* "...corruption of the courts and the legal profession and discrimination by law enforcement in California."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38566837/