We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Martial law threat? Rep.Brad Sherman/DN! expose

by Lydia Howell Thursday, Oct. 09, 2008 at 12:14 PM

California Congressman Brad Sherman says threats were made to instigate martial law if the Wall Street bailout was not passed. Democarcy NOW! Army Col.Micheal Boatner & THE PROGRESSIVE's editor Mathew Rothschild re: deployment of US troops inside the U.S.

BREAKING NEWS! US Military Planning for Martial Law?
See transcript of DEMOCRACY NOW! interview below. TWO VIDEOs ADD SOME EVIDENCE before the Democarcy NOW interview.
Were the militarized police at the RNC a "dress rehearsal"?

Here's the video of Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) telling Congress the Paulson Mob threatened martial law if it didnt pass the Wall Street bailout

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaG9d_4zij8

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties
than standing armies.

Thomas Jefferson
And here's the talk author, Naomi Wolf gave on her book "The End of
America" nearly a
year ago



>> http://www.democracynow.org/2008/10/7/us_army_denies_unit_will_be

Friday, October 03, 2008

Democracy NOW! host AMY GOODMAN

Is Posse Comitatus Dead? US Troops on US Streets

In a barely noticed development, a US Army unit is now training for
domestic operations under the control of US Army North, the Army service
component of Northern Command. An initial news report in the Army Times
newspaper last month noted that in addition to emergency response the
force may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control.
The military has since claimed the force will not be used for civil
unrest, but questions remain. We speak to Army Col. Michael Boatner,
future operations division chief of USNORTHCOM, and Matthew Rothschild,
editor of The Progressive magazine. [includes rush transcript]


Col. Michael Boatner, Future Operations division chief of USNORTHCOM.

Matthew Rothschild, Editor of The Progressive magazine.

AMY GOODMAN: In a barely noticed development last week, the Army
stationed an active unit inside the United States. The Infantry
Divisions 1st Brigade Team is back from Iraq, now training for domestic
operations under the control of US Army North, the Army service
component of Northern Command. The unit will serve as an on-call federal
response for large-scale emergencies and disasters. Its being called
the Consequence Management Response Force, CCMRF, or sea-smurf for short.

Its the first time an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment
to USNORTHCOM, which was itself formed in October 2002 to provide
command and control of Department of Defense homeland defense efforts.

An initial news report in the Army Times newspaper last month noted, in
addition to emergency response, the force may be called upon to help
with civil unrest and crowd control. The Army Times has since appended
a clarification, and a September 30th press release from the Northern
Command states: This response force will not be called upon to help
with law enforcement, civil disturbance or crowd control."

When Democracy Now! spoke to Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Jamie
Goodpaster, a public affairs officer for NORTHCOM, she said the force
would have weapons stored in containers on site, as well as access to
tanks, but the decision to use weapons would be made at a far higher
level, perhaps by Secretary of Defense, SECDEF.

Well, Im joined now by two guests. Army Colonel Michael Boatner is
future operations division chief of USNORTHCOM. He joins me on the phone
from Colorado Springs. Were also joined from Madison, Wisconsin by
journalist and editor of The Progressive magazine, Matthew Rothschild.

We welcome you both to Democracy Now! Why dont we begin with Colonel
Michael Boatner? Can you explain the significance, the first time,
October 1st, deployment of the troops just back from Iraq?

COL. MICHAEL BOATNER: Yes, Amy. Id be happy to. And again, there has
been some concern and some misimpressions that I would like to correct.
The primary purpose of this force is to provide help to people in need
in the aftermath of a WMD-like event in the homeland. Its something
that figures very prominently in the national planning scenarios under
the National Response Framework, and thats how DoD provides support in
the homeland to civil authority. This capability is tailored technical
life-saving support and then further logistic support for that very
specific scenario. So, we designed it for that purpose.

And really, the new development is that its been assigned to NORTHCOM,
because theres an increasingly important requirement to ensure that
they have done that technical training, that they can work together as a
joint service team. These capabilities come from all of our services and
from a variety of installations, and thats not an ideal command and
control environment. So weve been given control of these forces so that
we can train them, ensure theyre responsive and direct them to
participate in our exercises, so that were they called to support civil
authority, those governors or local state jurisdictions that might need
our help, that they would be responsive and capable in the event and
also would be able to survive based on the skills that they have
learned, trained and focused on.

They ultimately have weapons, heavy weapons and combat vehicles and
another service capability at their home station at Fort Stewart,
Georgia, but they wouldnt bring that stuff with them. In fact, theyre
prohibited from bringing it. They would bring their individual weapons,
which is the standard policy for deployments in the homeland. Those
would be centralized and containerized, and they could only be issued to
the soldiers with the Secretary of Defense permission.

So I think, you know, that kind of wraps up our position on this. Were
proud to be able to provide this capability. Its all about saving
lives, relieving suffering, mitigating great property damage to
infrastructure and things like that, and frankly, restoring public
confidence in the aftermath of an event like this.

AMY GOODMAN: So the use of the weapons would only be decided by SECDEF,
the Secretary of Defense. But what about the governors? The SECDEF would
haveSecretary of Defense would havewould be able to preempt the
governors in a decision whether these soldiers would use their weapons
on US soil?

COL. MICHAEL BOATNER: No, this basically only boils down to
self-defense. Any military force has the inherent right to self-defense.
And if the situation was inherently dangerous, then potentially the
Secretary of Defense would allow them to carry their weapons, but it
would only be for self- and unit-defense. This force has got no role in
a civil disturbance or civil unrest, any of those kinds of things.

AMY GOODMAN: Matt Rothschild, youve been writing about this in The
Progressive magazine. What is your concern?

MATTHEW ROTHSCHILD: Well, Im very concerned on a number of fronts about
this, Amy. One, that NORTHCOM, the Northern Command, that came into
being in October of 2002, when that came in, people like me were
concerned that the Pentagon was going to use its forces here in the
United States, and now it looks like, in fact, it is, even though on its
website it says it doesnt have units of its own. Now its getting a
unit of its own.

And Colonel Boatner talked about this unit, what its trained for. Well,
lets look at what its trained for. This is the 3rd Infantry, 1st
Brigade Combat unit that has spent three of the last five years in Iraq
in counterinsurgency. Its a war-fighting unit, was one of the first
units to Baghdad. It was involved in the battle of Fallujah. And, you
know, thats what theyve been trained to do. And now theyre bringing
that training here?

On top of that, one of the commanders of this unit was boasting in the
Army Times about this new package of non-lethal weapons that has been
designed, and this unit itself is going be able to use, according to
that original article. And in fact, the commander was saying he had even
tasered himself and was boasting about tasering himself. So, why is a
Pentagon unit thats going to be possibly patrolling the streets of the
United States involved in using tasers?

AMY GOODMAN: Colonel Boatner?

COL. MICHAEL BOATNER: Well, Id like to address that. That involved a
service mission and a service set of equipment that was issued for
overseas deployment. Those soldiers do not have that on their equipment
list for deploying in the homeland. And again, they have been involved
in situations overseas. And having talked to commanders who have
returned, those situations are largely nonviolent, non-kinetic. And when
they do escalate, the soldiers have a lot of experience with seeing the
indicators and understanding it. So, I would say that our soldiers are
trustworthy. They can deploy in the homeland, and American citizens can
be confident that there will be no abuses.

AMY GOODMAN: Matt Rothschild?

MATTHEW ROTHSCHILD: Well, you know, that doesnt really satisfy me, and
I dont think it should satisfy your listeners and your audience, Amy,
because, you know, our people in the field in Iraq, some of them have
not behaved up to the highest standards, and a lot of police forces in
the United States who have been using these tasers have used them

The whole question here about what the Pentagon is doing patrolling in
the United States gets to the real heart of the matter, which is, do we
have a democracy here? I mean, there is a law on the books called the
Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act that says that the
president of the United States, as commander-in-chief, cannot put the
military on our streets. And this is a violation of that, it seems to me.

President Bush tried to get around this act a couple years ago in the
Defense Authorization Act that he signed that got rid of some of those
restrictions, and then last year, in the new Defense Authorization Act,
thanks to the work of Senator Patrick Leahy and Kit Bond of Missouri,
that was stripped away. And so, the President isnt supposed to be using
the military in this fashion, and though the President, true to form,
appended a signing statement to that saying hes not going to be
governed by that. So, here we have a situation where the President of
United States has been aggrandizing his power, and this gives him a
whole brigade unit to use against US citizens here at home.

AMY GOODMAN: Colonel Michael Boatner, what about the Posse Comitatus
Act, and where does that fit in when US troops are deployed on US soil?

COL. MICHAEL BOATNER: It absolutely governs in every instance. We are
not allowed to help enforce the law. We dont do that. Every time we get
a requestand again, this kind of a deployment is defense support to
civil authority under the National Response Framework and the Stafford
Act. And we do it all the time, in response to hurricanes, floods, fires
and things like that. But again, you know, if we review the requirement
that comes to us from civil authority and it has any complexion of law
enforcement whatsoever, it gets rejected and pushed back, because its
not lawful.

AMY GOODMAN: Matthew Rothschild, does this satisfy you, editor of The
Progressive magazine?

MATTHEW ROTHSCHILD: No, it doesnt. One of the reasons it doesnt is not
by what Boatner was saying right there, but what President Bush has been
doing. And if we looked at National Security Presidential Directive 51,
that he signed on May 9th of 2007, Amy, this gives the President
enormous powers to declare a catastrophic emergency and to bypass our
regular system of laws, essentially, to impose a form of martial law.

And if you look at that National Security Presidential Directive, what
it says, that in any incident where there is extraordinary disruption of
a whole range of things, including our economy, the President can
declare a catastrophic emergency. Well, were having these huge
disturbances in our economy. President Bush could today pick up that
National Security Directive 51 and say, Were in a catastrophic
emergency. Im going to declare martial law, and Im going to use this
combat brigade to enforce it.

AMY GOODMAN: Colonel Michael Boatner?

COL. MICHAEL BOATNER: The only exception that I know of is the
Insurrection Act. Its something that is very unlikely to be invoked. In
my thirty-year career, its only been used once, in the LA riots, and it
was a widespread situation of lawlessness and violence. And the governor
of the state requested that the President provide support. And thats a
completely different situation. The forces available to do that are in
every service in every part of the country, and its completely
unrelated to thethis consequence management force that were talking about.

AMY GOODMAN: You mentioned governors, and I was just looking at a piece
by Jeff Steinhe is the national security editor of Congressional
Quarterly talking about homeland security. And he said, Safely tucked
into the $526 billion defense bill, it easily crossed the goal line on
the last day of September.

The language doesnt just brush aside a liberal Democrat slated to take
over the Judiciary Committeethis was a piece written last yearit
runs over the backs of the governors, 22 of whom are Republicans.

The governors had waved red flags about the measure on Aug. 1, 2007,
sending letters of protest from their Washington office to the
Republican chairs and ranking Democrats on the House and Senate Armed
Services committees.

No response. So they petitioned the party heads on the Hill.

The letter, signed by every member of the National Governors
Association, said, This provision was drafted without consultation or
input from governors and represents an unprecedented shift in authority
from governorsto the federal government.

Colonel Michael Boatner?

COL. MICHAEL BOATNER: Thats in the political arena. That has nothing to
do with my responsibilities or what Imwas asked to talk about here
with regard to supporting civil authority in the homeland.

AMY GOODMAN: Matthew Rothschild?

MATTHEW ROTHSCHILD: Well, this gets to what Senator Patrick Leahy of
Vermont was so concerned about, that with NORTHCOM and with perhaps this
unitand I want to call Senator Leahys office today and ask him about
thisyou have the usurpation of the governors role, of the National
Guards role, and its given straight to the Pentagon in some of these
instances. And thats very alarming. And that was alarming to almost
every governor, if not every governor, in the country, when Bush tried
to do that and around about the Posse Comitatus Act. So, I think these
are real concerns.

AMY GOODMAN: Matt Rothschild, the Democratic and Republican conventions
were quite amazing displays of force at every level, from the local
police on to the state troopers to, well, in the Republican convention,
right onto troops just back from Iraq in their Army fatigues. Did this
surprise you?

MATTHEW ROTHSCHILD: It did. It surprised me also that NORTHCOM itself
was involved in intelligence sharing with local police officers in St.
Paul. I mean, what in the world is NORTHCOM doing looking at what some
of the protesters are involved in? And you had infiltration up there,
too. But what we have going on in this country is we have infiltration
and spying that goes on, not only at thewell, all the way from the
campus police, practically, Amy, up to the Pentagon and the National
Security Agency. Were becoming a police state here.

AMY GOODMAN: Colonel Michael Boatner, a tall order here, could you respond?

COL. MICHAEL BOATNER: Well, thats incorrect. We did not participate in
any intelligence collection. We were up there in support of the US
Secret Service. We provided some explosive ordnance disposal support of
the event. But Id like to go back and say that, again, in terms of

AMY GOODMAN: Could you explain what theirexplain again what was their
role there?

COL. MICHAEL BOATNER: They were just doing routine screens and scans of
the area in advance of this kind of a vulnerable event. Its pretty
standard support to a national special security event.

AMY GOODMAN: And are you saying there was absolutely no intelligence

COL. MICHAEL BOATNER: Thats correct. That is correct. [inaudible] were
very constrained

MATTHEW ROTHSCHILD: But even that, Amy, now the Pentagon is doing sweeps
of areas before, you know, a political convention? That used to be law
enforcements job. That used to be domestic civil law enforcement job.
Its now being taken over by the Pentagon. That should concern us.

AMY GOODMAN: Why is that, Colonel Michael Boatner? Why is the Pentagon
doing it, not local law enforcement?

COL. MICHAEL BOATNER: Thats because of the scale and the availability
of support. DoD is the only force that has the kind of capability. I
mean, were talking about dozens and dozens of dog detection teams. And
so, for anything on this large a scale, the Secret Service comes to DoD
with a standard Economy Act request for assistance.

AMY GOODMAN: Boatner, in the Republican Convention, these troops, just
back from Fallujahwhat about issues of, for example, PTSD,
post-traumatic stress disorder?

COL. MICHAEL BOATNER: Well, my sense is that thats something that the
services handled very well. Theres a long track record of great support
in the homeland. If those soldiers were National Guard soldiers, I have
no visibility of that. But for the active-duty forces, citizens can be
confident that if theyre employed in the homeland, that theyll be
reliable, accountable, and take care of their families and fellow
citizens in good form.

AMY GOODMAN: Last word, Matthew Rothschild? Ten seconds.

MATTHEW ROTHSCHILD: Well, this granting of the Pentagon a special unit
to be involved in US patrol is something that should alarm all of us.
And its very important to the Army. General Casey, Army chief of staff

AMY GOODMAN: Five seconds.

MATTHEW ROTHSCHILD: was a drill exercise for this group just last week,
or just three weeks ago. It was called

AMY GOODMAN: We leave it there. Weve got to leave it there. Thank you
to Matthew Rothschild and Colonel Michael Boatner.

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy