We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Growth and Social Justice: Joseph Stiglitz

by Joseph Stiglitz Wednesday, Sep. 03, 2008 at 10:40 AM
mbatko@lycos.com

The trickle-down economy does not function. The left understands the market and rhe role the market can and should play in the economy. The right doesn't understand either. The Bush administration is nothing but the old corporatism in a new garment.

GROWTH AND SOCIAL JUSTICE

By Joseph Stiglitz

Under rightwing leadership, the economic situation of most Americans has worsened in the last seven years. Whoever seeks a sound strategy for more growth and social justice must elect democrats

[Joseph Stiglitz teaches at Columbia University in New York and is the winner of a Nobel Prize for economics. This commentary published in: The Financial Times of Germany, 8/27/2008 is translated from the German on the World Wide Web, http://www.ftd.de/meinung/kommentare/406175.html?mode=print.]




Both America’s left and right say they are for economic growth. How should the voters decide? Should they see this as only choosing between different management teams?

Oh, if only it were so simple! In the 1990s, the US economy profited from cheap energy and high-speed innovations. China increasingly supplied top-flight goods at ever-lower prices. All this led to low inflation and rapid growth in the US. Former democratic president Bill Clinton and Alan Greenspan, head of the Federal Reserve, really don’t deserve commendation. Bad policy has led to a mess. The problems we battle today – including high energy- and food prices and a weak financial system – can largely be referred back to a misguided policy.

Great differences exist between the growth strategies of the right and the left, which produce different results. The greatest difference is how growth is seen. Increased gross domestic product is not the only imperative. Growth must be sound and stable and not based on environmental destruction, debt-financed consumer intoxication or exploitation of scarce resources.

CORPORATISM IN A NEW GARMENT

Growth must be extensive and a majority of the citizens must profit from it. The trickle-down economy does not function because increased efficiency can worsen conditions for most citizens. America’s growth was neither economically sound nor extensive. Most Americans are worse off today than seven years ago.

Equality and growth do not exclude each other. Governments can promote growth by integrating more people. People are the most valuable resource of a country. Therefore guaranteeing everyone’s potential is vital. This requires education possibilities for everyone. However a modern economy also demands readiness for risks. People take risks when a good security net exists. If promoting the solidarity of society is lacking, additional costs can arise for protecting property and imprisoning criminals.

A second great distinction between the left and the right is the role of the state in economic development. In the left’s opinion, the government has a central role in providing infrastructure and education, developing technology and even acting as an entrepreneur. So the government created the foundations for the Internet and modern biotechnology.

The last distinction may seem strange. The left understands the market and the role the market can and should play in the economy. The right above all in the US doesn’t understand either. The new right embodied in the Bush administration is nothing but the old corporatism in a new garment. The Bush administration is not liberal. It believes in a strong state with stable executive authority. However this state is used to defend established interests without rightly respecting the principles of the market.

In contrast, the left tries to make the markets function. Markets left to themselves do not run well as the financial crises proves. Advocates of markets admit markets can fail, sometimes even catastrophically. But they insist markets correct themselves within an acceptable time frame. No government can sit idle when the country skids into a recession – even when this is triggered by the boundless greed of bankers. When the government assumes the hospital costs of the economy, it must also slow these costs.

THE POWER OF THE MARKET IS LIMITED

The right often counts Adam Smith as one of its intellectual fathers. While Smith knew the power of the market, he also knew the limits of this power. In his time it was clear to businesses that profits rose faster through price agreements than through more efficient production of innovative products. Therefore a new anti-trust law is necessary.

Giving a party is simple. For a certain time, everyone can have fun. Championing sound stable growth is hard. Unlike the right, the left has a positive agenda, an agenda offering social justice and not only more growth. The election in November should be easy for voters in the US.

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy