We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Oil Bubbles

by Philip Faigle Friday, Jun. 20, 2008 at 2:35 AM

Falling real interests, a weak dollar and an increasing demand from China led to a bubble on the market. In the long term, this bubble will burst.


Raw material experts were way off the mark time and again with their predictions. Why is it so hard to forecast the price of oil?

By Philip Faigle

[This article published in: ZEIT online 5/23/2008 is translated from the German on the World Wide Web, http://www.zeit.de/online/2008/22/rohoel-prognosen.]

Why is the price of a barrel of crude oil setting new records, recently surpassing the mark of $135 per barrel? For many economists, explaining this is increasingly difficult. “This price can hardly be understood,” admitted raw material expert Michael Brauninger who has concentrated on economic trends with the Hamburg World Economy Institute.

The experts are nervous. All too often their past predictions proved wrong. When a barrel of European Brent oil cost $40 in September 2004, Citigroup argued a price of around $30 would be reasonable. The rally on the oil market would soon end. The big French bank Societe Generale made a similar forecast. At the end of 2007 when the price for a barrel of oil approached $100, many analysts including the Goldman Sachs investment bank calmed the public with the assertion the crude oil price would soon fall to $80 a barrel. How could they be so spectacularly off the mark?

Experts today offer several explanations. The great interest of speculators in betting on rising crude oil prices was underrated. “There is a tremendous exaggeration on the market,” Commerce bank analyst Eugen Weinberg says. Falling real interests in the US, a weak dollar and an increasing oil demand from China led to a bubble on the market. In the long term this bubble will burst, Weinberg warns. A massive shortage will suddenly break out and demand will grow so quickly that today’s price will seem justified.

Here is another explanation. Influential players on the petroleum market like the International Energy Agency (IEA) revised their forecast. Earlier the IEA saw how demand soared and drafted its prognoses accordingly,” said Brauninger from HWWI. “Now how the supply can grow in the future seems more important.”In its 2008 world energy outlook, the energy agency based in Paris announced the most important 350 gas- and oil-fields were under close scrutiny and lowered its prediction for the world petroleum supply. This prediction alone now drives the price, the experts say.

Therefore Weinberg from the Commerce bank calculates that the price rally will continue a while. He does not exclude a level of $170 a barrel. The “house of cards will collapse” – when America’s car drivers begin to react to the higher price of oil or there is a decline of the demand from China. “An exaggeration of such an extent won’t last in the long run,” Weinberg says. “In the long term I do not see a price of $30 or $200.” The experts who predicted a price level of $80 were wrong.

With one thesis, the experts were obviously incorrect. In 2004, the US economist Jeremy Rifkin predicted that a storm would break ou9t over America’s economy when the oil price rose over $40 a barrel. Rifkin was not alone with his opinion at that time.

Today Brauninger from the HWWI says: “The economy copes with an oil price of $136 better than expected.” Rifkin manifestly underrated several factors that make life without oil easier for western industrial states. For example, flexible labor markets enable businesses to balance higher energy costs with layoffs.

This insures that wages will not rise as strongly as in the 1970s. This restrains the inflation pressure starting from rising energy prices. Something similar is true for the policy of the central banks that is regarded as more credible today than in the times of the oil crisis. Businesses use oil more efficiently today. They know the supply of oil will end sometime or other.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy