We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Most of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Cindy Sheehan Hammered Hard in UK Guardian Piece

by NOMOREWAR_FORISRAEL Friday, Jul. 20, 2007 at 9:06 AM

Cindy Sheehan Hammered Hard in UK Guardian

Cindy Sheehan/'Nightline' email situation mentioned in UK Guardian piece

A friend sent me a link from the Guardian newspaper in the UK which included the Christopher Hitchens' (www.slate.com) piece (by his researcher) about the 'Nightline' email situation with Cindy Sheehan..


Here is a tinyurl for the above one:


Additional at following URL as well:


Here is the tinyurl for the above one:


Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: For Karen Houppert/Cindy Sheehan

Dear Ms. Houppert,

Please consider doing a piece about how disingenuous Cindy Sheehan is being when Chris Matthews (of MSNBC's 'Hardball' broadcast) asked her what she thought the motivation was for the Iraq war and Cindy put forth the 'for profit' motive when she wrote that it was for a PNAC Neocon agenda to benefit Israel in that ABC 'Nightline' email that was sent on her behalf to the producers at 'Nightline' per her request to do so (simply do a yahoo.com, Google.com or similar search to see the Wikipedia write-up about Cindy which mentions my name there as well..) as I just saw your piece for 'The Nation' as well via the following URL:


There is war profiteering in most wars, but such wasn't the primary motivation for Iraq. Securing the realm for Israel in accordance with the 'A Clean Break' was (again, one can read about the 'A Clean Break' from Bamford's 'A Pretext for War' book via the following URL):


Here are two URLs (take a look at the 'Hardball' transcript below which includes the interview that Cindy did with Chris Matthews yesterday):



Here is a tiny URL for the above one:



Well, Cindy Sheehan is an anti-war activist, probably the most famous. Her son, Casey, was killed during his service in the Iraq war. She‘s currently on a 17-city, two-and-a-half-week tour called “Journey for Humanity,” protesting against President Bush and actually calling for his impeachment. Cindy Sheehan joins us now from Charlotte, North Carolina. Thank you very much for joining us, Cindy Sheehan.
MATTHEWS: Thank you. Well, let me ask you about impeachment. What are the grounds? I mean, imagine you‘re a member calling for impeachment on the floor of the Senate, or conviction. What would you say?
SHEEHAN: Well, I would say the lies and the deceptions that led to an illegal and immoral occupation of Iraq, that has led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, I would say breaking the FISA laws by spying on Americans without warrants that George Bush admitted to, I would say the inadequate and tragic response to Katrina. I would say for authorizing torture. I would say for authorizing consolidating executive power, all the power in one branch. And I think there are many grounds that impeachment could be started on.
MATTHEWS: Do you believe that we have waged an aggressive war in Iraq?
SHEEHAN: Well, I think that it was illegal and immoral. There were no weapons of mass destructions. There was no connection between Saddam and 9/11, and all evidence has shown, especially this week, that what we‘re doing is strengthening al Qaeda and strengthening hatred against us for occupying the country and destroying a country that was no threat to us.
MATTHEWS: Why do you think President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, the other hawks in this administration—why do you think they took us to war?
SHEEHAN: Well, I think it was a lot to do with oil. It was a lot to do with destabilizing that region, which they have done very thoroughly. The Iraqi refugee crisis has made the entire region compromised there. And I think it was for profit. I mean, it‘s for Halliburton. It‘s for Blackwater. It‘s for Standard Oil. It‘s for the war profiteers. And that‘s why war is usually waged.
MATTHEWS: You believe that this was—this war was fought because people in the White House decided to make some money for their pals in business? You really believe that?
SHEEHAN: I believe that that...
MATTHEWS: That they sent...
MATTHEWS: That they sent 3,600 Americans to their death and 20,000-some losing their arms and legs and killed another 100,000 Arabs so that they could get richer?
SHEEHAN: As Major General Smedley Butler said, War is a racket. It always has been, and it always will be. And I believe that that‘s one of the reasons. It‘s what Dwight Eisenhower warned us of when he left office, the military-industrial complex.
MATTHEWS: Yes, but he was warning us about people like Kennedy and Rockefeller, who wanted to spend more money on the budget on defense spending. But was he warning us about...
SHEEHAN: Well, if we don‘t...
MATTHEWS: ... war profiteering...
SHEEHAN: Well, if we don‘t...
MATTHEWS: Do you really believe that Cheney...
SHEEHAN: Absolutely. Absolutely.
SHEEHAN: Cheney, and he was the CEO of Halliburton that got the no-bid contracts.
SHEEHAN: And it is for strengthening the military-industrial complex, because they can‘t build more bombs and tanks and guns if we don‘t use them, if we don‘t deplete them. And that‘s one of the major reasons for it. And also, it‘s for controlling the natural resources. And if it‘s not for that, what was it for, Chris? It wasn‘t for...
MATTHEWS: That‘s what I‘m asking.
SHEEHAN: It wasn‘t for terrorism because it‘s just made terrorism worse. And al Qaeda wasn‘t in Iraq before we invade.
MATTHEWS: Do you think that Cheney and the president are guilty of war crimes?
SHEEHAN: Absolutely, for authorizing torture, which is against the
Geneva Conventions and against our own 8th Amendment, and for spying on
Americans without due process, and for detaining human beings without due
process, which is against
MATTHEWS: Why do you think the president commuted the sentence of his former assistant for national security, Scooter Libby?
SHEEHAN: Well, Scooter Libby, the—one of the founders and promoters of the Project for a New American Century—Scooter Libby—I think Scooter Libby knows where a lot of the skeletons are buried, that‘s for sure.
MATTHEWS: OK. Let me ask you about your plans because you‘ve became active again. You took kind of a breather, didn‘t you, for a while there in the anti-war effort?
SHEEHAN: I took a very short, five-week retirement, but I feel rested and ready to go, yes.
MATTHEWS: Now, you‘ve talked about running against Nancy Pelosi. I‘m out here in San Francisco right now. It‘s very much an anti-war city, as you know.
SHEEHAN: Yes. Yes.
MATTHEWS: Feverishly anti-war.
MATTHEWS: Do you think you can actually take a nick out of her support, Nancy Pelosi, if you ran against her for the House?
SHEEHAN: Well, I think that we could do very well there, and I‘ve already gotten just tremendous support from the city of San Francisco, and really from people all over the country that are disgusted with the two-party system, disgusted with the spinelessness of the Democrats, who are—they want to close up their businesses and quit their jobs and move to San Francisco to help me. And I think it‘s going to be a real people‘s movement. And I think that we will have a profound effect on the race there...
SHEEHAN: ... if not win it.
MATTHEWS: Let‘s imagine you‘re a member of Congress. How would you -
or you‘re speaker yourself. How would you actually end the war? What parliamentary, legal moves would you make? These people up on the Hill are putting their sleeping bags out. They got their cots out to, all the theatrics.
MATTHEWS: And tomorrow morning, we‘ll still have a war. Do you have an actual legislative plan to end the war, Cindy Sheehan?
SHEEHAN: They need to shut off George Bush‘s funds. They need to appropriate enough money to bring our troops home, as General Odom said, as quickly and safely as possible. And we need to appropriate money for the people of Iraq and for our soldiers and our veterans, to take care of them. But give him just enough money to bring the troops home. That‘s what they have, they have the power of the purse strings.
MATTHEWS: And what happens...
SHEEHAN: ... the power of the purse string.
MATTHEWS: Hey, Cindy, I sympathize with that point of view, but what happens on the other side if you do that? If you do that, then the other side, the president can say, can‘t he—the minute there‘s a casualty out there, the minute there‘s a soldier that doesn‘t get his weapons—his ammo when he needs it or his fire support or anything breaks down out there, he‘ll say it‘s because the Democrats and the anti-war people cut off the spending. That‘s why that soldier died. What do you do then?
SHEEHAN: We need to appropriate enough money to bring them home, and...
MATTHEWS: But he‘s not going to sign that bill.
SHEEHAN: They don‘t need...
MATTHEWS: You know he‘s not going to sign that bill!
SHEEHAN: Chris, it‘s not a bill, it‘s taking away his money.
Congress can do that. That‘s the only way that they can stop it.
MATTHEWS: Well, and then he can say...
SHEEHAN: It‘s not a bill.
MATTHEWS: Right. It‘s an appropriation. I know about how the Hill works, Cindy.
MATTHEWS: I know all about it. You‘re right. The people who oppose this war can write an appropriation bill. Nancy Pelosi‘s talked about that on this show. And it says you can only spend this money to bring the troops home. Then, the second step, the president vetoes that bill and says, Send me a clean bill to support the troops. If the Democrats don‘t do that, then he blames every calamity over there on the Democrats, and you, the anti-war people.
SHEEHAN: Well, the Democrats have—the Democrats have not done a good job of making this George Bush‘s war, George Bush‘s calamity. It has been from the beginning...
SHEEHAN: ... and every death, every innocent Iraqi, every American soldier is directly related to George Bush.
SHEEHAN: And when Congress gave him...
MATTHEWS: You know why?
SHEEHAN: When Congress gave...
MATTHEWS: You know why they failed?
SHEEHAN: ... him more money—when Congress gave him more money, they made it their calamity.
MATTHEWS: You know why they failed? Because Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, Joe Lieberman, a whole batch of them, voted to support and authorize this war...
SHEEHAN: I know.
MATTHEWS: ... on day one. They‘ve never come back strong enough against their positions.
SHEEHAN: I agree. I agree. And we need to support people who will be courageous in supporting our troops, really supporting our troops by bringing them home.
MATTHEWS: You know what? I like your passion. I‘m very careful about motive, though. Whenever you assign motives to the other side, you‘re in a dangerous area because you don‘t know why they‘re supporting this war. You just don‘t like the war, and that‘s fair enough with me. Thank you very much, Cindy Sheehan.
SHEEHAN: Well, I—read “War Is a Racket,” Chris.
MATTHEWS: You know, I read so much, but thank you for that recommendation.
SHEEHAN: Thank you.
MATTHEWS: I‘ll get to it. Thank you. I mean it.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments

Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 1 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
"it was for a PNAC Neocon agenda to benefit Israel" Bongo Friday, Jul. 20, 2007 at 2:23 PM

Local News

Woolsey Fire: Worst News of 2018? J01 12:18AM

Oppose Environmentally-Harmful Development D10 4:03AM

Oppose Environmentally-Harmful Development D10 3:58AM

OUR HOUSE Grief Support Center Presents Night for Hope O30 5:38PM

Marshall Tuck’s racist dog whistle O27 5:01AM

Marshall Tuck’s ethnocentrism contradicts Californian values O27 4:32AM

Contra Costa-Hawkins O25 3:48AM

Debunking Some Anti-Prop 10 Propaganda O12 6:56AM

Why Should California Choose De Leon Over Feinstein? O10 9:55PM

Change Links September 2018 posted S02 10:22PM

More Scandals Rock Southern California Nuke Plant San Onofre A30 11:09PM

Site Outage Friday A30 3:49PM

Change Links August 2018 A14 1:56AM

Setback for Developer of SC Farm Land A12 11:09PM

More problems at Shutdown San Onofre Nuke J29 10:40PM

Change Links 2018 July posted J09 8:27PM

More Pix: "Families Belong Together," Pasadena J02 7:16PM

"Families Belong Together" March, Pasadena J02 7:08PM

Short Report on the Families Belong Together Protest in Los Angeles J30 11:26PM

More Local News...

Other/Breaking News

The Attack of Corporations and the Rich on the Rest of Society J22 2:36PM

bataclown J22 12:32PM

bataclone J21 8:08PM


Mobile Royale Hack Online Generator - Get Unlimited Crystals J21 3:03PM

Unification, séparation et fragmentation J21 2:48PM

Testing Upload J21 7:10AM



Chemtrails and Prince J20 2:43PM

Wages For Housework J20 2:41PM

Tutelle comportementaliste J20 9:18AM

A Mistake: Jesse Jackson-Toyota deal-in Lexington -Ky is .8 billion over 10 years 2018 J20 1:17AM

If Trump Declares a AantionalEmergency, He'll Be Breaking the Law J20 12:47AM

Jesse Jackson's Sneak Attck on Toyota Lexington Ky and it's workers 2018 J19 9:12PM

Video: Chris Herdges in Eugene, 1 hr 24 min J19 5:37PM



Judge Delays Ruling on Puerto Rico Debt Deal White House Opposes Island's Food Assistance J18 6:04PM



Paraphysique de proxémie guerrière J18 7:59AM


FARCELONA 8.17.2017 J17 3:23PM



PR Debt Cancel, Judge Reviews Cofina Debt J16 9:04PM

Réseautage, fragmentation du capital J16 4:20PM

More Breaking News...
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy