Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
• latest news
• best of news
• syndication
• commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/ÃŽle-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

This war toy will only cost every man, woman, and child in the USA $700

by Ed Taylor Monday, Jul. 31, 2006 at 4:17 PM

Wow what a bargin!!! At $200 billion this anti-missile systems will only cost $700 for every man, woman, and child in the USA. What a bargin! Lets buy it now in case of the one in a million chance that North Korea starts shooting missiles at the good old United States of Amerika!

With North Korea launching a missile that apparently is capable of reaching the United States and with Hezbollah rockets raining down on northern Israel, interest is growing in America’s efforts to develop a defense system to block such attacks.


Two East Valley companies — Orbital Sciences and General Dynamics — are deeply involved in developing parts of the U.S. Defense Department’s Ballistic Missile Defense System. A high priority with the Bush administration, the hugely expensive network uses tracking radars and interceptor missiles to knock down nuclear or biological rockets launched at the U.S.

Critics say the undertaking, which may eventually cost $200 billion, is too expensive and the resulting technology might not work in a real crisis. But with militant foreign states continually upgrading their missile capabilities, the system has enjoyed steady support in the Republican-controlled Congress.

“The public is now educated on the reality of the threat,” said Riki Ellison, president of the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance, an organization that supports development and deployment of missile defense systems. “In the past the public didn’t perceive it as a real threat. That has changed dramatically with North Korea firing seven missiles on July 4.”

ORBITAL SCIENCES

The Orbital Sciences Launch Systems Group in Chandler has a contract that could reach $1 billion by the end of the decade to develop interceptor booster rockets for the Missile Defense Agency, which is overseeing the program for the Pentagon. The company, which is functioning as a subcontractor to Boeing, has about 1,000 Chandler employees working on the project, said Orbital spokesman Barry Beneski.

So far, 11 of the ground-based intercepter missiles have been deployed in silos at Ft. Greely, Alaska and Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., he said.

“We are building them at a rate of about one a month and are under contract to do that into 2009,” he said.

In Chandler the company is doing design, development and avionics work but the actual fabrication of the rockets takes place at Vandenberg, he said.

“Our role is to be the integrator of the rocket,” he said. “The motors we get from a supplier, the guidance system is from a supplier. We manage all of those suppliers and put it all together in California.”

The intercepters do not carry an explosive warhead but instead are designed to kill an incoming missile by colliding with it at high speed as it reaches the height of its trajectory in outer space. So far there have been nine tests of the system, and five have successfully intercepted target missiles, Ellison said.

Orbital also is working on a separate system called the kinetic energy intercepter, a mobile truck-launch missile designed to be deployed in distant lands near the adversary’s launch site. The highspeed intercepters would destroy the enemy missile shortly after launch while it is still in the boost phase of its flight. Orbital is working as a subcontractor to Raytheon and Northrop Grumman on that project.

That program is still in research and development with the first test flight scheduled in 2008.

Finally, Orbital also is producing target missiles that simulate enemy missiles in tests of the system.

GENERAL DYNAMICS

The intercepter missiles, while playing a crucial role, are actually only a small part of the overall Ballistic Missile Defense System. Just as important and even more complex are the radars and other tracking devices designed to identify, track and guide the intercepters to their targets.

That’s where General Dynamics in Gilbert is playing a role. GD has a $75 million contract with the Missile Defense Agency to build a infrared sensing satellite that would collection information on enemy missile launches and direct the interceptors.

The GD facility at Elliott and McQueen roads in Gilbert is producing the spacecraft and will integrate the instruments into the vehicle in preparation for a launch next spring, said Ted Kehl, director of missile defense programs for GD.

The purpose of the spacecraft is to conduct research, not be an actual functioning part of the missile defense system, he said.

Also the satellite will carry a German-built laser communications terminal that will test the feasibility of highspeed laser communications between satellites, he said. That technology could be used some time in the future in the missile defense system.

The satellite will be launched on a Minotaur rocket provided by Orbital from a government launch center in Virginia. A few months later two Orbital target rockets will be launched from Vandenberg to test the satellite’s sensors, he said.

Also GD has a $120 million contract to develop a very high performance satellite system that would track intercontinental ballistic missiles from outer space. That program is only in the preliminary phases, and the system could take four to six years to develop, Kehl said.

GD is acting as a subcontractor to Northrop Grumman for that program and will be responsible only for building the spacecraft, not any of the instruments that will go on board, he said.

GD has about 50 employees doing missile defense work in Gilbert.

What the critics are saying
Missile defense has generated political controversies for many years — ever since critics of the Reagan administration dubbed it the “Star Wars” program.

Much of the complaints surrounded the fact that the U.S. had to abrogate the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty of 1972, under which the U.S. and the Soviet Union agreed to limit missile defense installations as part of the process of nuclear disarmament.

To pursue missile defense only encouraged American adversaries to build up their offensive missile capabilities to overwhelm America’s defenses, they said.

Critics also have argued that adversaries could easily deploy decoys and other countermeasures that would render even the most expensive missile defense system ineffective. They add that as terrorism has come to the forefront, the greater threat to the U.S. comes not from ballistic missiles but from weapons of mass destruction hiding in boats, planes or trucks.

So far, however, the program has moved ahead in Congress with support from both political parties. The primary difference has been over the timing of deployment.

Republicans favor rapid deployment even before the components are fully tested to provide at least a rudimentary defense in case of an emergency.

Democrats prefer more thorough testing to make sure the technology works before committing large amounts of money on deployment.
— Ed Taylor

Contact Ed Taylor by email, or phone (480) 898-6537
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy