We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Most of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Populist #32

by franklin Friday, Jul. 21, 2006 at 7:33 PM

Centralization and Popular Elections

Click Here to Read Previous Papers in this Series

All of us in free societies seem to know that if a king holds all power, particularly if this power is administered directly rather than through delegated governors in regional provinces, he can and often will be, completely tyrannical with full immunity.  What more of us need to acknowledge is that any form of government firmly centralized, can and will impose a violent despotism against both individuals and substantial portions of the population.  Such a system of governance, by its inherent nature, must make at the very least, tax slaves of all of us!

Many have argued that establishing a national popular voting system for choosing a president will ensure that each person's vote will have equal weight and effect.  While I cannot dispute this claim, I still vehemently oppose this concept because such a system is hostile to a federally structured government.  In previous papers, we have discussed both the necessity of a federal system to safeguard our liberty, as well as the inherent propensity of national popular elections to speed up the never ending process of increased centralization which we labor under today.  Although we have already given such topics extensive study, the nature and very essence of how our government is organized, centralized and distant versus decentralized and local, is of such great importance that further examination is clearly warranted.  

Let us be reminded that we were intended to be the United States of America, and not the United People of America.  Such a federal system was meant to be not merely the collective will of the People as a whole, but rather, a union of sovereign states.  In a properly decentralized system, States directly elect presidents, while individuals only do so indirectly.  This is done to protect the integrity of the States and foster the growth of localized government.  Doing so also encourages a cohesive union of all the States because it discourages presidential candidates from focusing on just a few highly concentrated urban areas.

Since its inception, one could reasonably argue that the ensuing history of these United States has been one of a struggle between those trying to establish a decentralized society and those pushing for greater and greater levels of power and centralization.  Centralists, as the word suggests, support increasing the power of a central government, while decentralists believe in localism, and tend to agree with Thomas Jefferson, when he said, "the government that governs best is that which governs least."   In other words, decentralists want a central government to be as small as will possibly be compatible with societal peace. 

The Declaration of Independence is an excellent example of decentralist thinking in that it clearly states that a community of people has the inherent right to rid itself of any government that has grown too strong and despotic.  The United States Constitution, as originally written, was more of a mixture between centralized and decentralized government, while the Bill of Rights was included to pull power away from Washington, D.C. and put it back in the hands of the States and the People.

Experience and the entire history of the human struggle for freedom strongly suggest that a decentralized government is that which is most compatible with long-term liberty.  This is why I implore you to find a deep attachment to the idea of federalism.  Under this system of government, if it were ever to flourish in our country, the individual States would be the primary level of governance, while the Bill of Rights would serve as a legal boundary to protect both individuals and the States from overreaching impositions by the central government, no matter what the politicians use as justification.

There are a number of reasons in opposition to centralization and in favor of decentralized government:

In the first place, a localized system of government forces each region or jurisdiction to actually compete with each other for residents, and thus, for increased capital.  Such a system naturally gives those governing a strong incentive to ensure a free society, or they will risk losing both residents and capital to an area with greater freedom.  If tyrants still find a way to rule their areas, many people will find a way to leave.  But, on the other hand, if that same tyrant was given the power to rule a broad area, or an entire nation, very few would be able to escape.

Going further with this, the second reason is that despotism on a local level reduces the resultant damages just as despotism on a wide scale amplifies them.  For example, if Stalin had ruled only Moscow, Napoleon only Paris, and Mao had only ruled Beijing, the effects of their devastating rule would have had a much greater chance of being contained.  This is a simple concept; that evil people find it much harder to violate the rights of people outside their sphere of jurisdiction.

Third, an increased number of governmental levels and jurisdictions help to prevent any one group from increasing its power.  Each governing body naturally tries to keep its own power level, and will resist any usurpation of power by a central authority.  This is what the founders were hoping for when they created the system with a "balance of powers."  Although they were not as successful in the long-term as we would have hoped, we can still learn from, and improve upon, their ideals in order to help ensure the liberty of every person in the years to come.  Our starting point must be a realization that no one body of governors can ever be trusted with complete control over our freedom.

Fourth, history has absolutely proven to us that government cannot be trusted.  Throughout the world, voluminous examples exist where governments have been given increased power to do good one day, only to turn around and use that same power tyrannically just a short time later.  Sometimes good people call for greater power in government to do good things, while others use seemingly honorable motives as an unmitigated cover-up for personal aggrandizement and increased power alone.  Therefore, what we must continually guard against is increased power in the central government.  Once that power is gained, it is used by despots to put a legal authorization on control to the detriment of us all!

The enemy of our freedom is not the person who is liberal or conservative.  Our enemy is not from any particular party, social stratus, or geographic location.  Our enemy is, and will always be, the statist, who is the proponent of force and concentrated power.  Centralized government is the oppressor, and we the People, are its slaves.

Our goal should be to adhere to rights which are universally accepted, but enforced on a local level only. These two canons quite often fight against one another.  But, if we relinquish either, we risk losing liberty completely, as both are equally important and must remain in a proper stasis.  A regional or local government that violates rights is evil, while a central government that uses rights to rule universally is just as evil.   

The endless process of centralization in America has become a seemingly invincible force that, if not stopped in the near future, will eventually turn our great country into an absolute tyranny.  Once central government starts growing, no matter what the reason may be, it will, just like all parasites, do anything possible to continue its growth.

We are at a dangerous point in our history.  We will either completely lose our liberty to the cravings of a few, or we will resist and turn the tide in favor of our own freedom.  Our best strategy is to be a constant reminder that one cannot be for liberty without also being intensely opposed to centralization.

"The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position."
- George Washington

In the spirit of liberty and prosperity,


This essay is the 32nd edition of the series, The Populist Papers. Written anonymously to promote discussion of the principles alone, these essays attempt to both explain the complexities of government, and determine the proper place of a federal government based on the inherent rights of all people. Feedback is welcome at: info@populistamerica.com

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments

Local News

Woolsey Fire: Worst News of 2018? J01 12:18AM

Oppose Environmentally-Harmful Development D10 4:03AM

Oppose Environmentally-Harmful Development D10 3:58AM

OUR HOUSE Grief Support Center Presents Night for Hope O30 5:38PM

Marshall Tuck’s racist dog whistle O27 5:01AM

Marshall Tuck’s ethnocentrism contradicts Californian values O27 4:32AM

Contra Costa-Hawkins O25 3:48AM

Debunking Some Anti-Prop 10 Propaganda O12 6:56AM

Why Should California Choose De Leon Over Feinstein? O10 9:55PM

Change Links September 2018 posted S02 10:22PM

More Scandals Rock Southern California Nuke Plant San Onofre A30 11:09PM

Site Outage Friday A30 3:49PM

Change Links August 2018 A14 1:56AM

Setback for Developer of SC Farm Land A12 11:09PM

More problems at Shutdown San Onofre Nuke J29 10:40PM

Change Links 2018 July posted J09 8:27PM

More Pix: "Families Belong Together," Pasadena J02 7:16PM

"Families Belong Together" March, Pasadena J02 7:08PM

Short Report on the Families Belong Together Protest in Los Angeles J30 11:26PM

Summer 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert! J11 6:58AM

More Local News...

Other/Breaking News



Chemtrails and Prince J20 2:43PM

Wages For Housework J20 2:41PM

Tutelle comportementaliste J20 9:18AM

A Mistake: Jesse Jackson-Toyota deal-in Lexington -Ky is .8 billion over 10 years 2018 J20 1:17AM

If Trump Declares a AantionalEmergency, He'll Be Breaking the Law J20 12:47AM

Jesse Jackson's Sneak Attck on Toyota Lexington Ky and it's workers 2018 J19 9:12PM

Video: Chris Herdges in Eugene, 1 hr 24 min J19 5:37PM



Judge Delays Ruling on Puerto Rico Debt Deal White House Opposes Island's Food Assistance J18 6:04PM



Paraphysique de proxémie guerrière J18 7:59AM


FARCELONA 8.17.2017 J17 3:23PM



PR Debt Cancel, Judge Reviews Cofina Debt J16 9:04PM

Réseautage, fragmentation du capital J16 4:20PM

Paraphysique de manipulation mentale et sociale J15 9:51AM

The Global Justice Project and Human Survival: We're Badly Off Track J15 5:08AM

The Global Justice Project and Human Survival: We're Badly Off Track J15 5:08AM

The Global Justice Project and Human Survival: We're Badly Off Track J15 5:08AM

Markets as a Fetish, Globalization, and Dissent Management J14 1:03PM

State Debts - The Primal German Fear J13 5:09PM

Sans liberté, sans égalité, sans fraternité J13 8:09AM

More Breaking News...
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy