- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
by Khalid Adad
Friday, Jul. 22, 2005 at 9:36 PM
"Since a capitalist democracy is a democracy of capital, `the people' simply don't count.."
THE ULTIMATE OXYMORON
Presidential candidates should refocus strategy
By Khalid Adad
[This article was published in the Portland State University Vanguard, 720/2005. Contact Khalid Adad at firstname.lastname@example.org.]
As far as oxymorons go, “capitalist democracy” is one of the better ones. It is much better than the more famous “jumbo shrimp” and “military intelligence” (neither of which are actual oxymorons).
The president will help us recognize this. He seeks revolution when he says, “Power is in the hands of an unelected few,” because this “unelected few” decides who runs in an election and if someone slips by who they disapprove of it really doesn’t matter. The elected officials don’t have the real power anyway.
The president’s statement makes sense. Democracy is impossible if a small group of people manages the elections and run them in their own interest.
He said this about the islamic Republic of Iran, of course, but it should hold true everywhere else, particularly in the leading democracies. If we take the president at his speech-writer’s word and accept this reasoning, then the capitalist democracy of the United States is due for a revolution soon and for good reasons too.
In the U.S. we have two candidates from two parties. The major businesses, the “capitalists,” fund both parties, so both candidates, whoever they happen to be, serve the businesses’ interests.
Those businesses decidee who the candidates are by giving them access to the media over the publicly owned airwaves, whichthe biggest businesses control.
When a candidate who would work for flesh and blood human beings instead of legally created “persons” (corporations) has significant support, like Ralph Nader did in 2000, the major businesses simply refuse him access to the media.
Someone who would criticize the political system is a danger to that system and the people who run it can’t afford to have it criticized, so they restrict debate to very narrow bounds where only pre-approved ideas are spoken: certain things ought not to be said.
Rather than go on television, for free, and talk about issues that matter, they spend hundreds of millions of dollars on public relations campaigns to avoid meaningful talk about policy and instead direct attention to “regular Joe”, cowboy, or windsurfer imagery.
That candidate A can pull off a better “regular Joe” than candidate B can has no relevance to people’s lives, so that’s exactly what they present us with. They avoid issues and policies because both candidates’ policies are pretty much the same.
The president also says “people deserve a genuinely democratic system” in which “their leaders answer to them instead of the other way around.” And in a democracy the majority rules, of course.
In the US we go to opinion polls to find out what the majority thinks as the public officials avoid public debate of issues. A Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) poll released in March details how Americans would spend their tax money, if it were up to them. It says that Americans “Would Reduce Deficit, Cut Defense Sharply, and Increase Spending on Education, Job training, Renewable Energy, and Veterans,” and it’s very interesting.
Two-thirds would cut “defense” spending by an average of 31 percent, or 3.8 billion. The same number would cut Iraq and Afghanistan war spending by 35 percent, or .6 billion.
Americans would redirect money saved from war expenses and use it to meet human needs through social spending. For example, the poll shows increases of 263 percent, billion, for job training and employment; 39 percent, .8 billion, for education; 53 percent, .5 billion, for medical research, 1090 percent, billion, for conservation and developing renewable resources; and 40 percent, .5 billion, for veterans’ benefits.
Majorities of 57 to 70 percent of the population made each decision.
When election time comes around, however, no candidate mantions any of this as an option. If candidate A focused on issues that matter, like these, and made policies that reflected them, he would defeat candidate B in a clear (57 percent) to very large (70 percent) landslide.
Winning is undesirable if the parties have to abandon their principles, however, and the main principle is to serve the major businesses interests above all, even if it means sacrificing victory. Since a capitalist democracy is a democracy of capital, “the people” simply don’t count. The other way around indeed.
Life in an oxymoron can be confusing. The president’s statement makes life in America, the capitalist democracy of the United States, much less confusing. In Iran his statements mean revolution. We’ll see what the American people make of them.
Report this post as:
Change Links September 2018 posted
More Scandals Rock Southern California Nuke Plant San Onofre
Site Outage Friday
Change Links August 2018
Setback for Developer of SC Farm Land
More problems at Shutdown San Onofre Nuke
Change Links 2018 July posted
More Pix: "Families Belong Together," Pasadena
"Families Belong Together" March, Pasadena
Short Report on the Families Belong Together Protest in Los Angeles
Summer 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert!
Watch the Debate: Excluded Candidates for Governor of California
Change Links June 2018 posted
The Montrose Peace Vigil at 12 Years
Unity Archive Project
Dianne Feinstein's Promotion of War, Secret Animal Abuse, Military Profiteering, Censorshi
CA Senate Bill 1303 would require an independent coroner rather than being part of police
Three years after OC snitch scandal, no charges filed against sheriffs deputies
California police agencies violate Brown Act (open meetings)
Insane Company Wants To Send Nuke Plant Waste To New Mexico
Change Links May 2018
Worker-Owned Car Wash on Vermont Closed
GUIDE TO REBEL CITY LOS ANGELES AVAILABLE
lausd whistle blower
Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images
UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light
More Local News...
Irrémissible, l'inhumanité acquise en héritage
Addendum: Benjamin Tucker American Mutualist: Tucker Did Not Advocate Voting in Businesses
OUR HOUSE Grief Support Center Celebrates 25 Years with the House of Hope Gala
Against the Rent Madness and For a Nonprofit Orientation!
Cybermonde, cyberguerre, cyberespace, cyberterrorisme
Paraphysique de psychosomatique
Chuck Grassley: Women Abusing, Animal Murdering, Illegal War Supporting Criminal
Finance Capitalism and the Digital Economy
Muselières syndicales, muselières patronales
Jeff Bezos, Amazon, The Washington Post, Whole Foods, Etc
Why Choose Nut Milk Over Cows' Milk
Antrhopocène, le grand effondrement
The Dictatorship of Corporations
18 Lethal Consequences Of Hunting
Paraphysique de l'outplacement déontologue
Shopping du bashing
After Lehman Brothers, Experts Say Global Financial Crisis Can Happen Again
“Animaniacs in Concert!” Starring Voice Legend Rob Paulsen
Probabilités de fin d'humanité
Florida Area of Migrant Farmworkers Denied Right to Construct Health Clinic near NaplesCIW
Steer clear of work morality!
The Shortwave Report 09/07/18 Listen Globally!
August 2018 Honduras Coup update
Brett Kavanaugh Filled The 5th Circuit With Execution Judges
Augusta Georgia Woman Gets 5 Year Prison Sentence for Writing About Russians Crime Acts
Paraphysique de contextualité
Crisis Regulation in Global Capitalism
More Breaking News...