imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Disinformation as a Strategy of Power

by Gisbert Otto Tuesday, Jul. 19, 2005 at 10:23 AM
mbatko@lycos.com

"What caused this development? How could an economic system be built where ever-larger parts of the population are excluded from sharing in growth? ..In neoliberalism, the person is not regarded as a person but downgraded to mere labor power.."

DISINFORMATION AS A STRATEGY OF POWER

Critical Analysis of the Economic System and Possible Alternatives (Part I)

By Gisbert Otto, Stuttgart

[This article published in: Zeit-Fragen Nr. 27, 7/4/2005 is translated from the German on the World Wide Web, http://www.zeit-fragen.ch/.]




The so-called capitalism criticism of the SPD chairperson Franz Muntefering cast waves and generated a debate. However the present economic system of neoliberalism was not questioned. Muntefering’s statements were counter-productive, it was said, since prosperity is only produced by countries that accept innovations whose culture supports entrepreneurship and whose public values surplus more than distribution.

In contrast, a few commentators pointed out the economy is already too dominant today and economic goals determine worldwide developments. National governments with the task of setting framing conditions for the economy are often powerless or even one-sidedly fulfill the demands of the economy instead of offering counter-measures. The most impressive example of this one-sidedness is the income development of the last 30 years in the EU (European Union). The profits of businesses have massively increased to the burden of wages and salaries. The gap between poor and rich has expanded in developing countries and also in industrial countries. For example, 7% of the population in Germany have a quarter of the net income (this is very different from the seventies). Unemployment has become a permanent problem with 20 million impacted in the EU. Day after day many employees are directly or indirectly confronted with unemployment. However serious solutions are not in sight.

Instead the so-called “free market” is transfigured. We must pass through this difficult period and the ingrained welfare state must be driven back, it is said. Adjusting to the changes is paramount, not whether one rejects or supports modernization. This argument that doesn’t even allow the question of alternatives to arise is a consequence of the TINA-syndrome (There Is No Alternative) introduced by Margaret Thatcher. With absolute certainty, we should be persuaded there is no alternative to neoliberalism.

What caused this development? How could an economic system be built where ever-larger parts of the population are excluded from sharing in growth? How was it possible that dismantling the social systems in Europe could be represented as a necessary and positive measure? How is it possible that most of us don’t regard the social situation as dramatic? What mechanisms are used to veil a “Fun-society” and conceal the uncertainty, powerlessness and fear felt by many people today? Why aren’t we able to clearly recognize that our nation-state democracies and our protection from absolute rule are endangered more and more?

This article attempts to answer these questions.


The French No to the EU constitution is very important. The European public understands that the French have had enough of an economic policy carried on the backs of employees with sinking purchasing power and increasing unemployment. Neoliberal economics is a main item of the EU constitution. This was and is too much not only for the French. The media in France turned against the totally one-sided constant promotion of the Yes (Oui) and demanded that the No (Non) be stressed in the reporting. Their motive was exemplary. They complained that otherwise the whole profession would be discredited.

POLITICAL REACTIONS TO THE COURAGEOUS NO OF THE FRENCH

The political elites reacted to the No to the EU constitution. Instead of accepting the democratic result, they tried to turn it around. They devised phrases, for example that the European unification process cannot be stopped. The voluntary cooperation of the nations was not central to them. The excitement around the French “No” clearly demonstrated this. Isn’t a vote where only one answer is expected a farce from the beginning? Instead of a democratic cooperation, the EU elite seeks to build a power machine in which the nations should only unconditionally obey its principles without participating. We can only be thankful for the French resistance.

Another Europe is conceivable and possible despite all TINA-pressure. Nothing but the absolute power claims of a worldwide elite is behind this TINA-paralysis. Mindful of the media pressure and the many domestic and foreign politicians massively engaged for acceptance of the EU constitution, France’s No is very life-giving and shows what was regarded as impossible is possible. The public discussion demonstrated that – outside France – many politicians and media representatives had not read essential parts of the EU constitution.

DEVELOPMENTS SHAPING OUR WORLD

In answering the question “How was it possible to build an economic system to the burden of the majority of all people?,” three developments mark our world:

1. With the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989, the Soviet counter-system collapsed. The planned economic system was integrated in the market economy; neoliberalism was introduced worldwide.

2. The enormous technical progress – particularly in communication technology and information technology – makes possible central control for big business and “global players” with production sites all over the world (all production sites are connected to central headquarters through electronic connections). At the same time the “global players” also have strategic power. When a state does not act as desired, production can be shifted to another country. This was and is also true for wages. The lowest wage is paid.

3. Human labor has become almost completely dispensable today for capital. This historically new development is a consequence of technical progress and the globalized market.

THE STRUGGLE FROM TOP TO BOTTOM REPLACES CLASS STRUGGLE

The so-called class struggle was based on the indispensability of labor on one side and capital on the other side. Both sides had power. This balance of power does not exist any more today. The struggle continues without disclosed rules since the true connections should remain veiled, especially through means of modern communication and language research. The majority of the people may not become aware of the one-sidedness of the battle waged today from top to bottom.

As a result of these developments, we have a world today in which the globalized economy has an absolute precedence. Absolute profit maximization is central, not creation of jobs. Investing in new production sites is not economically practical when private and public demand stagnate and the profitable sale of additional goods is not possible. The profits of businesses are invested in the financial sector instead of production.

LANGUAGE DETERMINES THINKING

The worldwide manipulation of the people by the media went along with the dominance of the “free market.” Pictures and language are used to achieve the desired goals. The discovery that our thinking does not determine language but conversely language determines thinking was also applied. New word creations were invented. One example of many is the use of the term “free market.” It is a fact that the market is not free. Rather the market is determined by the “global players” and the big financial actors. The powerful make use of these word creations today to hide or extend their power through disinformation. The “flexibility of the labor market” is another term filled with a positive content. The limitation or suspension of termination protection is actually meant.

MATERIALLY-SUPPORTED IDEAS HAVE CONSEQUENCES

The neoliberals who have definitional power today in the US have understood that language determines thinking and “ideas have consequences.” From the tiny nucleus at the University of Chicago, the economics philosopher Friedrich von Hayek with his student Milton Friedman and very powerful financial backers developed a huge international network with the goal of implementing the neoliberal agenda worldwide. Foundations, institutes, research centers, publications, scholars, authors and public relations writers were joined in this network to develop, package and relentlessly promote the neoliberal ideas. However ideas alone are not enough; their conversion in practice is necessary. Executers of the neoliberal ideas were Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan who as heads of governments introduced neoliberalism “from above.” Thus neoliberalism was a political program and did not prevail through the mechanisms of the “free market” as the neoliberal theory maintains.

THE UNSPOKEN FOUNDATION OF THE ECONOMIC SYSTEM

Darwin is often cited as justification for this kind of economy. Darwin’s central theory of the evolution of life through the “survival of the strongest” was transferred by the social Darwinists to the development of societies. This ideology is quoted today as a justification for the globalization process even though social Darwinism is discredited. In biology, the insight has gained acceptance that evolutionary processes are not accompanied by a higher development and that an objective division of life forms in higher and lower groups is impossible. Besides the term “survival of the fittest” is misleading since the propagation of descendants most capable of survival and reproduction is the basis of biological success, not survival in itself. Darwin insisted that the strength of a population lies in the strong supporting and not oppressing the weak. Darwin’s great scientific achievement is used today above all to attain goals of power politics. Alongside this distortion of Darwin’s theory and the creation of new words without reference to reality, the powerful exploit the human striving for existential security.

THE PRESSURE FOR EXISTENTIAL SECURITY AS A MEANS OF POWER

Anxiety over jobs – existential security – occupies the majority of people today. Although many no longer agree with existing conditions, they still participate because they want to keep their jobs and not be among the losers. In this way the present system is confirmed; the world of the privileged appears as the only true world. In this system, the upstarts and successful politicians do everything to ascend higher. At the least they want to maintain their positions. The critical remark of a bank manager – for example that 8 billion francs annual profit is excessive – would cost him his very well-paid job and he wouldn’t be given any comparable offer. Those “still working” do everything to retain their jobs. In addition, most people still regard unemployment as a personal problem. As already explained, unemployment today is above all a social problem in which the goals of power politics predominate. How these goals are reached – the main goal is still redistribution from bottom to the top – will be shown in the following section. The process is based on the good faith or credulity of people who are usually told that the problems are too complex for them to share in decisions and on their blind faith in authority that – as we know – operates so they join and more or less abandon their own thinking and sense of responsibility.

OPINION-MAKERS AND THE AUTHORITY PROBLEM

At the EU summit in Lisbon in March 2000, the heads of government of the EU declared that the EU would reach full employment by the year 2010 and the gross domestic product GDP (value of the goods and services produced in the country in a year) would grow 3% per year. The opposite has occurred. The number of unemployed has increased since 2001 (in 2000 there were 13.7 million). The gap between poor and rich has expanded. Economic growth decreased in the “EU of 15” year after year since 2001 and lies between 0.4% and 1.5% (compared to the predicted 3%). Shouldn’t this development be enough reason for the politically responsible to rethink their economic policy?

A basic examination is not carried out. Instead a reform deadlock is emphasized or the example of England – a country with good growth and low unemployment – is stressed. The course is right. Changes are not necessary, only a little patience. Therefore the present fears in the population are not taken seriously but brushed off as anxieties, for example the fears around job security, selling off the national economy, the competitive pressure of international corporations and social underbidding competition through an unregulated immigration in the national labor markets. Practical information and actions are vital. Reassurance with words alone – especially words with false content – is elitist and short-sighted since it aims at maintaining power, not at understanding.

IS ENGLAND A CLASSIC EXAMPLE OF NEOLIBERALISM?

When low economic growth and high unemployment are deplored in the EU – particularly in Germany – England is cited as a country with good growth and trifling unemployment. But who would want to live in England if the reasons for English growth were known? Some of the reason can be listed in comparison to Germany (source: Der Spiegel 17/2005):

- Corporate tax rate of 30% (GB) compared to 38.7% in Germany

- Wage costs in manufacturing industries at 18.7 Euros (GB) compared to 27.1 Euros in Germany.

Wage costs are a third lower and social conditions are at an all-time low. Everyone in Europe knows the problem of waiting lists in England for all necessary hospital admissions. Discussions in England about raising the pension age to 70 also go in the same direction.

The frequent reference in the media to England – as a country where neoliberalism functions – is regrettable and misleading since neoliberalism only functions for the upper class, not for the English people. The hidden commission of the media can be seen in this example: passing on the “opinion of the dominant” instead of “dominant opinions.”

Neoliberalism brings great disadvantages to developing countries and industrial countries. Again and again the positive effects from a holistic perspective are stressed. Europe’s eastern countries had great growth rates. But whose growth is it? Part II of this article will pursue these questions.

LOOKING BACK

On the basis of enormous technical progress, the idea of greatly reducing working hours was discussed 30 years ago.

The same living standard could be guaranteed with the increased productivity. The powerful decided differently.

DEMOCRACY ENDANGERED

These language distortions have grave effects on democracy. Citizens are falsely informed since the new word creations lack reference to reality. As a result, they lose their positive creative rights in democracy. They make decisions that they would never make – if they had sufficient factual information.

THE FALSE PROMISE

Professor John Gray, former chief theoretician of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and promoter of English neoliberalism, turns against these hoaxes or false reports.

In his book “The False Promise,” he points out that neoliberalism – like communism – is a utopia. The history of human communities is ignored. The person is not regarded as a person but downgraded to mere labor power.

Report this post as:

Local News

Change Links September 2018 posted S02 10:22PM

More Scandals Rock Southern California Nuke Plant San Onofre A30 11:09PM

Site Outage Friday A30 3:49PM

Change Links August 2018 A14 1:56AM

Setback for Developer of SC Farm Land A12 11:09PM

More problems at Shutdown San Onofre Nuke J29 10:40PM

Change Links 2018 July posted J09 8:27PM

More Pix: "Families Belong Together," Pasadena J02 7:16PM

"Families Belong Together" March, Pasadena J02 7:08PM

Short Report on the Families Belong Together Protest in Los Angeles J30 11:26PM

Summer 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert! J11 6:58AM

Watch the Debate: Excluded Candidates for Governor of California M31 5:20AM

Change Links June 2018 posted M28 7:41AM

The Montrose Peace Vigil at 12 Years M22 8:01PM

Unity Archive Project M21 9:42AM

Dianne Feinstein's Promotion of War, Secret Animal Abuse, Military Profiteering, Censorshi M17 10:22PM

CA Senate Bill 1303 would require an independent coroner rather than being part of police M10 9:08PM

Three years after OC snitch scandal, no charges filed against sheriffs deputies M10 8:57PM

California police agencies violate Brown Act (open meetings) M02 8:31PM

Insane Company Wants To Send Nuke Plant Waste To New Mexico A29 11:47PM

Change Links May 2018 A27 8:40AM

Worker-Owned Car Wash on Vermont Closed A27 5:37AM

GUIDE TO REBEL CITY LOS ANGELES AVAILABLE A13 12:39AM

lausd whistle blower A11 6:58AM

Website Upgrade A10 10:02AM

Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images A04 8:02PM

UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light A02 6:58PM

Change Links April 2018 A01 6:27PM

More Local News...

Other/Breaking News

OUR HOUSE Grief Support Center Celebrates 25 Years with the House of Hope Gala S24 7:10PM

Against the Rent Madness and For a Nonprofit Orientation! S24 11:56AM

Cybermonde, cyberguerre, cyberespace, cyberterrorisme S24 6:35AM

Paraphysique de psychosomatique S22 6:58AM

Chuck Grassley: Women Abusing, Animal Murdering, Illegal War Supporting Criminal S22 2:58AM

Finance Capitalism and the Digital Economy S21 4:45PM

Muselières syndicales, muselières patronales S21 7:19AM

Jeff Bezos, Amazon, The Washington Post, Whole Foods, Etc S21 2:50AM

Why Choose Nut Milk Over Cows' Milk S21 1:01AM

Antrhopocène, le grand effondrement S19 9:53AM

Abolir l'économie S18 11:18AM

The Dictatorship of Corporations S17 5:26PM

18 Lethal Consequences Of Hunting S17 3:13PM

Paraphysique de l'outplacement déontologue S15 6:51AM

Shopping du bashing S14 8:42AM

After Lehman Brothers, Experts Say Global Financial Crisis Can Happen Again S13 8:28PM

“Animaniacs in Concert!” Starring Voice Legend Rob Paulsen S12 9:30PM

Probabilités de fin d'humanité S12 6:49AM

Florida Area of Migrant Farmworkers Denied Right to Construct Health Clinic near NaplesCIW S11 2:57AM

Steer clear of work morality! S09 12:10PM

The Shortwave Report 09/07/18 Listen Globally! S06 11:23PM

August 2018 Honduras Coup update S06 12:28PM

Brett Kavanaugh Filled The 5th Circuit With Execution Judges S06 6:14AM

Augusta Georgia Woman Gets 5 Year Prison Sentence for Writing About Russians Crime Acts S05 8:29AM

Paraphysique de contextualité S05 8:29AM

Crisis Regulation in Global Capitalism S03 3:39PM

Ex-voto de réification S03 10:24AM

Please Oppose Warmonger, Execution and Torture Supporting Bush Operative Brett Kavanaugh A31 10:45PM

More Breaking News...
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy