imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

The Social Security Distraction Game

by populist Monday, Mar. 14, 2005 at 4:42 PM

Left, Right, Center - not the real solution, just a distraction so they can continue pushing their real agenda - imperialism.

Populist Party of America
March 12, 2005
by Michael Boldin

So what's all this hoopla about Social Security?  Even the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has stated that "Social Security does not face an immediate crisis, but it does face a large and growing problem," and that private accounts will only "accelerate the date for when it will start spending more on pension benefits than it receives in annual revenue."  The GAO clearly stated that the problem lies primarily in where funding will come from to continue paying out to the disabled and retirees as promised.

To understand the problem, we first need a better understanding of the Social Security system itself.  The poorly named Social Security "trust fund" is not some huge vault with cash inside that the government writes checks against to pay recipients.  Social Security is not insurance, it's a tax.   When these taxes are collected, they are put in the general fund, and are used to pay for a majority of current benefit recipients, as well as other government programs, both constitutional and unconstitutional.  Currently, the government needs to "find" more than 0 million every year to pay for social security.  So the money each one of us puts into the Social Security "fund" is actually used to pay for current benefits and other programs.  At no time do our taxes, whether in the "fund" or in "private accounts" go anywhere that money can actually be accessed. 

Logically speaking then, any money put into a private account, such as under Bush's scheme, is actually a government loan.  If your account does really well, (>3%) when you retire, the government will deduct the amount it lent you, plus 3% interest, from your monthly benefits check, leaving you with almost the same amount as under the current system.  If your account does poorly, you're completely out of luck.  According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the expected average rate of return is 3.3%, so the net gain will be zero or slightly higher.  On the other hand, the net gain to the rich and powerful will be huge.  Wall Street expects to make about trillion on the investment of Social Security funds.  The result?  Greater risk to the People, and a huge guaranteed payout to the corporate rulers of America.

Hopefully, you're with me at this point in opposition to these so-called "private accounts."  If not, let's examine some case history of a very similar program, which Bush has cited as a model for his current plan - Chile's retirement program.  Nearly 25 years ago, Chile began an experiment in which millions of people began to pay 10% of their salaries to private investment accounts for retirement benefits.  Now that the first generation of workers in this system is beginning to retire, Chileans are learning that this program is delivering much less than what was "advertised" by American-backed dictator, Augusto Pinochet.  Many people who stayed in the old system are now earning nearly double what the new private account system is paying out, mainly due to high commission rates.

So, Bush has proposed a system that the GAO says won't fix problems and will accelerate the bankruptcy of the program, that the CBO says won't give a higher return, that Wall Street will get richer from, and that the only similar model (which was instituted by a murderous dictator), is failing.  If you still are in favor of these private accounts, you'd better stop reading, and go back to your network television.

Conversely, proponents (officials and their big-media propagandists) of this destructive private account plan have been demanding that opponents (mostly Democrats) come up with an alternative.  While most will not argue that the system is impervious to destruction, to force a debate on the solvency of a program that has, in many expert's minds, at least 50 more years of effectiveness, is nothing more than ambush politics and grandstanding.

The crux of the problem is that Social Security cannot last forever in its current state.  Obviously, private accounts will do more harm than good, but are opponents coming up with anything to save the system?  Of course not.  Rather than discussing real solutions to the problems we face, they only stand in opposition to Bush's proposal.  The solution is simple, and it's becoming clearer every day that neither side of the political spectrum has any interest in the solution.  They only want to continue this debate to keep us distracted from everything else that both Democrats and Republicans are supporting (endless billions of funding for the Iraq war, heightened war tensions with more countries, expansions of the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act, National ID cards, slowly eliminating free speech, a dying economy, and much more). 

Do you remember that 0 million that the government needs to "find" each year to pay for benefits?  Well, that's just about the same amount that the unconstitutional NAFTA has wiped out in excise taxes.  How about the nearly billion that both Democrats and Republicans support for additional Iraq war funding?  So, while corporations like Halliburton and Bechtel and the rest, get endless billions in war profits, and corporations like General Motors save millions by relocating to Mexico and not having to pay excise taxes, essential benefits for people are left behind.  Do we really need more evidence as to who the government is interested in?  Think of how many times you've heard either Republicans or Democrats talk about taking money that we already have, and using it to pay for Social Security benefits, rather than corporate benefits.  Not too often, I'm sure.

Here's a simple solution, taken right from the business world.  Prioritize.  Is it a radical solution to actually let American citizens create a priority "list" for federal funds?  Obviously the government has already done so, and we painfully know what it is.  We continually hear how it's important to "create a good business climate," or "defend freedom around the world," or "expand free trade," but with the wisdom of looking at history, who does that really benefit?  Corporations, and corporations only.  "Free trade" cuts corporate tax revenue, and puts a greater burden on the People.  A "good business climate" always favors none other than big business, and "defending freedom" has done nothing but help install pro-American puppet governments, and cause the deaths of countless people, from our country and elsewhere.

America is supposedly a Democracy, although this really is not true.  So how about this radical idea?  Maybe America should act more like a democracy and let the people, as a whole, decide how we'll spend our money, instead of these compromised rich politicians who run the country, telling us how they've decided to spend it.  Obviously, that current fascist system is proving to be a success for big business, and a failure for the people. 

Would it be so strange to come up with a budget?  Would it be so strange to look at how much money we have available, list what we need to spend money on in order of importance, and spend only the amount that we have available?  If that were the system, do you think many people would be interested in taking money from schools, healthcare, roads, infrastructure, and the like, and pour it into the military machine?  Do you think that people would be more interested in giving tax breaks to corporations than ensuring a safety net for their parents, their grandparents, and themselves?  The solution to the problem of Social Security is simple, and it's the same solution for all our financial problems.  A budget controlled by the people, rather than by corporate interests, is the solution.  Democrats and Republicans alike never talk about cutting military budgets, or corporate welfare, or anything like it, they only refer to cutting our benefits.  If we have the money to pay for all these other things, we obviously have the money to pay for Social Security.  The government's priorities are just screwed up.  Only when we start talking about using our wealth where it's needed can we have a solution.  Only when the military and the corporations start taking a few cuts, can we keep our promise help pay for the needs of the People in their waning years.

The economy is out of control, as we can barely pay for the interest on our outstanding debt.  The dollar is crashing, jobs are being lost, and America is turning into a nation that only services foreigners, and no longer produces its own goods - even though we have the capacity to do so.  Social Security isn't our only financial problem, although the politicians and pundits would like us to think so.  It's time we start running our own government, and start indicting those who have been pushing us on the path to financial ruin.

Has everyone forgotten that taxes are our money?  Don't forget, as strange as it sounds, the White House has absolutely no Constitutional authority to submit a budget.  Only the House of Representatives does.  "No taxation without Representation!"  Remember that phrase from your history books?  The government forces us to pay taxes, and they don't allow us to control how we, as a nation, spend it. 

Sounds like slavery to me.

Sounds like it's time for the People to start running America, and not the corporations.

Report this post as:

Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 3 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
reasons why the Bush Administration NEEDS to - Bruce Tuesday, Mar. 15, 2005 at 6:04 PM
OneEyedMan KPC Wednesday, Mar. 16, 2005 at 9:48 AM

Local News

Change Links 2018 July posted J09 1:27PM

More Pix: "Families Belong Together," Pasadena J02 12:16PM

"Families Belong Together" March, Pasadena J02 12:08PM

Short Report on the Families Belong Together Protest in Los Angeles J30 4:26PM

Summer 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert! J10 11:58PM

Watch the Debate: Excluded Candidates for Governor of California M30 10:20PM

Change Links June 2018 posted M28 12:41AM

The Montrose Peace Vigil at 12 Years M22 1:01PM

Unity Archive Project M21 2:42AM

Dianne Feinstein's Promotion of War, Secret Animal Abuse, Military Profiteering, Censorshi M17 3:22PM

CA Senate Bill 1303 would require an independent coroner rather than being part of police M10 2:08PM

Three years after OC snitch scandal, no charges filed against sheriffs deputies M10 1:57PM

California police agencies violate Brown Act (open meetings) M02 1:31PM

Insane Company Wants To Send Nuke Plant Waste To New Mexico A29 4:47PM

Change Links May 2018 A27 1:40AM

Worker-Owned Car Wash on Vermont Closed A26 10:37PM


lausd whistle blower A10 11:58PM

Website Upgrade A10 3:02AM

Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images A04 1:02PM

UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light A02 11:58AM

Change Links April 2018 A01 11:27AM

Nuclear Shutdown News March 2018 M31 6:57PM

Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018! M29 7:00PM

Spring 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert! M19 2:02PM

Anti-Eviction Mapping Project Shows Shocking Eviction Trends in L.A. M16 5:40PM

Steve Mnuchin video at UCLA released M15 12:34AM

Actress and Philanthropist Tanna Frederick Hosts Project Save Our Surf Beach Clean Ups M06 12:10PM

More Local News...

Other/Breaking News

Fbi fears this post J22 9:21PM

Disabled Folks among the extreme poorest in US counts J22 7:03PM

Banks Enriched By Trump Deficit Increase Of 4 to 5 Trillion $ J22 5:48PM

Illegal Russians Receiving Land and Homes in West Bank 2018 J22 11:24AM

Un monde de pauvreté J22 12:54AM

14 Disturbing Facts About Scott Gottlieb, Trump's FDA Head J20 10:47PM

Behind the scenes at fbi National Academy J20 2:47PM

Treasury Takes Aim at Shell Companies J20 11:18AM

Paraphysique de l'intelligence J20 9:08AM

Oklahoma GOP Senator Jim Inhofe's Bloody Record J20 4:01AM

Globalization: hope on the horizon despite Fake Liberals. J20 3:41AM

Sorry President Trump,Ted Cruz Texas Judicial System,is Worse Than Many Shithole Countries J19 4:49PM

The Shortwave Report 07/20/18 Listen Globally! J19 4:33PM

The System Question as a Survival Question J18 8:54PM

Nation's Largest Voting Machine Co., ESS, Admits Lying Re Having Installed Remote Control J18 11:55AM

Du pain et des jeux J18 9:53AM

Paraphysique de martyrologie J17 8:00AM

Children Incorporated Earns 4-Star Rating on Charity Navigator J16 11:24AM

Democratic Socialists of America J14 4:57PM

Leonard Peltier Non Violent Native American Political Prisoner since 1970's J14 4:18PM

Paraphysique miscellanées de l'aggiornamento J14 12:54AM

FBI Investigated LA County Sheriff Baca,Why Not Hank Skinner's Persecution? J13 3:52PM

Updated Partial List Of Famous Vegetarians, Vegans, & Fruitarians J13 2:59PM

The Shortwave Report 07136/18 Listen Globally! J12 4:36PM

Social Policy as Social Infrastructure J12 3:38AM

Vol I: 84 Varieties Of GOP Election Fraud J12 1:50AM

Texas Can Call it An Execution,But It is A State Sponsored Murder of Hank Skinner.. J11 6:48PM

June 2018 Honduras coup update J11 3:35PM

More Breaking News...
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy