imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

The Social Security Distraction Game

by populist Monday, Mar. 14, 2005 at 4:42 PM

Left, Right, Center - not the real solution, just a distraction so they can continue pushing their real agenda - imperialism.

Populist Party of America
March 12, 2005
by Michael Boldin

So what's all this hoopla about Social Security?  Even the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has stated that "Social Security does not face an immediate crisis, but it does face a large and growing problem," and that private accounts will only "accelerate the date for when it will start spending more on pension benefits than it receives in annual revenue."  The GAO clearly stated that the problem lies primarily in where funding will come from to continue paying out to the disabled and retirees as promised.

To understand the problem, we first need a better understanding of the Social Security system itself.  The poorly named Social Security "trust fund" is not some huge vault with cash inside that the government writes checks against to pay recipients.  Social Security is not insurance, it's a tax.   When these taxes are collected, they are put in the general fund, and are used to pay for a majority of current benefit recipients, as well as other government programs, both constitutional and unconstitutional.  Currently, the government needs to "find" more than 0 million every year to pay for social security.  So the money each one of us puts into the Social Security "fund" is actually used to pay for current benefits and other programs.  At no time do our taxes, whether in the "fund" or in "private accounts" go anywhere that money can actually be accessed. 

Logically speaking then, any money put into a private account, such as under Bush's scheme, is actually a government loan.  If your account does really well, (>3%) when you retire, the government will deduct the amount it lent you, plus 3% interest, from your monthly benefits check, leaving you with almost the same amount as under the current system.  If your account does poorly, you're completely out of luck.  According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the expected average rate of return is 3.3%, so the net gain will be zero or slightly higher.  On the other hand, the net gain to the rich and powerful will be huge.  Wall Street expects to make about trillion on the investment of Social Security funds.  The result?  Greater risk to the People, and a huge guaranteed payout to the corporate rulers of America.

Hopefully, you're with me at this point in opposition to these so-called "private accounts."  If not, let's examine some case history of a very similar program, which Bush has cited as a model for his current plan - Chile's retirement program.  Nearly 25 years ago, Chile began an experiment in which millions of people began to pay 10% of their salaries to private investment accounts for retirement benefits.  Now that the first generation of workers in this system is beginning to retire, Chileans are learning that this program is delivering much less than what was "advertised" by American-backed dictator, Augusto Pinochet.  Many people who stayed in the old system are now earning nearly double what the new private account system is paying out, mainly due to high commission rates.

So, Bush has proposed a system that the GAO says won't fix problems and will accelerate the bankruptcy of the program, that the CBO says won't give a higher return, that Wall Street will get richer from, and that the only similar model (which was instituted by a murderous dictator), is failing.  If you still are in favor of these private accounts, you'd better stop reading, and go back to your network television.

Conversely, proponents (officials and their big-media propagandists) of this destructive private account plan have been demanding that opponents (mostly Democrats) come up with an alternative.  While most will not argue that the system is impervious to destruction, to force a debate on the solvency of a program that has, in many expert's minds, at least 50 more years of effectiveness, is nothing more than ambush politics and grandstanding.

The crux of the problem is that Social Security cannot last forever in its current state.  Obviously, private accounts will do more harm than good, but are opponents coming up with anything to save the system?  Of course not.  Rather than discussing real solutions to the problems we face, they only stand in opposition to Bush's proposal.  The solution is simple, and it's becoming clearer every day that neither side of the political spectrum has any interest in the solution.  They only want to continue this debate to keep us distracted from everything else that both Democrats and Republicans are supporting (endless billions of funding for the Iraq war, heightened war tensions with more countries, expansions of the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act, National ID cards, slowly eliminating free speech, a dying economy, and much more). 

Do you remember that 0 million that the government needs to "find" each year to pay for benefits?  Well, that's just about the same amount that the unconstitutional NAFTA has wiped out in excise taxes.  How about the nearly billion that both Democrats and Republicans support for additional Iraq war funding?  So, while corporations like Halliburton and Bechtel and the rest, get endless billions in war profits, and corporations like General Motors save millions by relocating to Mexico and not having to pay excise taxes, essential benefits for people are left behind.  Do we really need more evidence as to who the government is interested in?  Think of how many times you've heard either Republicans or Democrats talk about taking money that we already have, and using it to pay for Social Security benefits, rather than corporate benefits.  Not too often, I'm sure.

Here's a simple solution, taken right from the business world.  Prioritize.  Is it a radical solution to actually let American citizens create a priority "list" for federal funds?  Obviously the government has already done so, and we painfully know what it is.  We continually hear how it's important to "create a good business climate," or "defend freedom around the world," or "expand free trade," but with the wisdom of looking at history, who does that really benefit?  Corporations, and corporations only.  "Free trade" cuts corporate tax revenue, and puts a greater burden on the People.  A "good business climate" always favors none other than big business, and "defending freedom" has done nothing but help install pro-American puppet governments, and cause the deaths of countless people, from our country and elsewhere.

America is supposedly a Democracy, although this really is not true.  So how about this radical idea?  Maybe America should act more like a democracy and let the people, as a whole, decide how we'll spend our money, instead of these compromised rich politicians who run the country, telling us how they've decided to spend it.  Obviously, that current fascist system is proving to be a success for big business, and a failure for the people. 

Would it be so strange to come up with a budget?  Would it be so strange to look at how much money we have available, list what we need to spend money on in order of importance, and spend only the amount that we have available?  If that were the system, do you think many people would be interested in taking money from schools, healthcare, roads, infrastructure, and the like, and pour it into the military machine?  Do you think that people would be more interested in giving tax breaks to corporations than ensuring a safety net for their parents, their grandparents, and themselves?  The solution to the problem of Social Security is simple, and it's the same solution for all our financial problems.  A budget controlled by the people, rather than by corporate interests, is the solution.  Democrats and Republicans alike never talk about cutting military budgets, or corporate welfare, or anything like it, they only refer to cutting our benefits.  If we have the money to pay for all these other things, we obviously have the money to pay for Social Security.  The government's priorities are just screwed up.  Only when we start talking about using our wealth where it's needed can we have a solution.  Only when the military and the corporations start taking a few cuts, can we keep our promise help pay for the needs of the People in their waning years.

The economy is out of control, as we can barely pay for the interest on our outstanding debt.  The dollar is crashing, jobs are being lost, and America is turning into a nation that only services foreigners, and no longer produces its own goods - even though we have the capacity to do so.  Social Security isn't our only financial problem, although the politicians and pundits would like us to think so.  It's time we start running our own government, and start indicting those who have been pushing us on the path to financial ruin.

Has everyone forgotten that taxes are our money?  Don't forget, as strange as it sounds, the White House has absolutely no Constitutional authority to submit a budget.  Only the House of Representatives does.  "No taxation without Representation!"  Remember that phrase from your history books?  The government forces us to pay taxes, and they don't allow us to control how we, as a nation, spend it. 

Sounds like slavery to me.

Sounds like it's time for the People to start running America, and not the corporations.

Report this post as:

Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 3 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
reasons why the Bush Administration NEEDS to - Bruce Tuesday, Mar. 15, 2005 at 6:04 PM
OneEyedMan KPC Wednesday, Mar. 16, 2005 at 9:48 AM

Local News


lausd whistle blower A10 11:58PM

Website Upgrade A10 3:02AM

Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images A04 1:02PM

UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light A02 11:58AM

Change Links April 2018 A01 11:27AM

Nuclear Shutdown News March 2018 M31 6:57PM

Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018! M29 7:00PM

Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018! M29 6:38PM

Spring 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert! M19 2:02PM

Anti-Eviction Mapping Project Shows Shocking Eviction Trends in L.A. M16 5:40PM

Steve Mnuchin video at UCLA released M15 12:34AM

Actress and Philanthropist Tanna Frederick Hosts Project Save Our Surf Beach Clean Ups M06 12:10PM

After Being Told He's 'Full of Sh*t' at School Event, Mnuchin Demands UCLA Suppress Video M02 11:44AM

Resolution of the Rent Strike in Boyle Heights M01 6:28PM

What Big Brother Knows About You and What You Can Do About It M01 3:30PM

Step Up As LAPD Chief Charlie Beck Steps Down F14 2:44PM

Our House Grief Support Center Hosts 9th Annual Run For Hope, April 29 F13 12:51PM

Don’t let this LA County Probation Department overhaul proposal sit on the shelf F13 11:04AM

Echo Park Residents Sue LA Over Controversial Development F12 8:51AM

Former Signal Hill police officer pleads guilty in road-rage incident in Irvine F09 10:25PM

Calif. Police Accused of 'Collusion' With Neo-Nazis After Release of Court Documents F09 7:14PM

Center for the Study of Political Graphics exhibit on Police Abuse posters F07 9:50AM

City Agrees to Settle Lawsuit Claiming Pasadena Police Officer Had His Sister Falsely Arre F04 3:17PM

Professor's Study Highlights Health Risks of Urban Oil Drilling F04 12:42PM

Claims paid involving Pasadena Police Department 2014 to present F04 10:52AM

Pasadenans - get your license plate reader records from police F03 11:11PM

LA Times Homicide Report F03 1:57PM

More Local News...

Other/Breaking News

What does the Quran Say About Islamic Dress?? A21 4:15PM

Biodiversité ou la nature privatisée A20 11:22AM

The Market is a Universal Totalitarian Religion A20 7:14AM

Book Available about Hispanics and US Civil War by National Park Service A19 5:52PM

The Shortwave Report 04/20/18 Listen Globally! A19 4:01PM

The Republican 'Prolife' Party Is the Party of War, Execution, and Bear Cub Murder A19 11:48AM

Neurogenèse involutive A18 9:21AM

Paraphysique de la dictature étatique A16 10:13AM

Book Review: "The New Bonapartists" A16 3:45AM

The West Must Take the First Steps to Russia A14 12:25PM

Théorie générale de la révolution ou hommage à feu Mikhaïl Bakounine A14 3:30AM

The Shortwave Report 04/13/18 Listen Globally! A12 3:50PM

“Lost in a Dream” Singing Competition Winner to Be Chosen on April 15 for ,000 Prize! A12 3:48PM

The World Dependent on Central Banks A12 4:43AM

Ohio Governor Race: Dennis Kucinich & Richard Cordray Run Against Mike DeWine A11 9:40PM

March 2018 Honduras Coup Again Update A10 10:52PM

Apologie du zadisme insurrectionnel A10 3:33PM

ICE contract with license plate reader company A10 1:14PM

Palimpseste sisyphéen A09 11:23PM

Black Portraiture(S) IV: The Color of Silence...Cuba No...Cambridge Yes A09 5:32AM

Prohibiting Micro-Second Betting on the Exchanges A09 4:18AM

Prosecutors treat Muslims harsher than non-Muslims for the same crimes A08 10:33PM

Amy Goodman interview on cell phone safety A08 10:29PM

Mesa, Arizona police officer kills unarmed white man A08 9:50PM

Israeli leaders should be prosecuted for war crimes A08 9:48PM

Paraphysique de l'autorité A08 12:11AM

Two Podcasts on fbi corruption A06 10:13PM

Fbi assassins assault & try to kill DAVID ATKINS A06 7:29PM

More Breaking News...
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy