Working on this new server in php7...
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Samuel L. Jackson (by Latuff)

by Latuff Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 8:37 AM
latuff@uninet.com.br

Actor Samuel L. Jackson during the 2003 Rio Film Festival, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In 2000, Jackson starred a racist movie called "Rules of Engagement". Please, read below article for details.

Samuel L. Jackson (b...
samuelljackson.jpg, image/jpeg, 335x420

A COMMENT ON "RULES OF ENGAGEMENT"

By Joseph Tanniru
23 May 2000

I went to see Rules of Engagement with a certain degree of trepidation. The film, directed by William Friedkin ( The French Connection, The Exorcist, To Live and Die in L.A.), has been denounced by, among others, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC) for overt racism. Knowing the type of films Hollywood is capable of creating these days, I thought the charge quite plausible. The level to which this film plunges is, however, far below such chauvinist productions as True Lies or Rising Sun.

Artistically speaking, the film is worthless. (Its original story was dreamed up by James Webb, Secretary of the Navy under Reagan!) The plot is shallow and superficial, the characters without substance. Samuel Jackson plays Colonel Childers, a highly decorated Vietnam veteran who has just received command of a Marine division. He and "his men" are ordered to handle a protest at the American Embassy in Yemen, a Middle Eastern country bordering Saudi Arabia. After Childers arrives, the situation turns violent, and ends after Childers issues the command to fire on the Yemeni outside the embassy, including women and children.

The bulk of the film is occupied by Childers' court-martial, where he is defended by Hays Hodges, his fellow officer from Vietnam, played by Tommy Lee Jones. Hodges attempts to show that Childers was just a man doing his duty, and that his command was justified because the angry protestors were armed and were firing on Childers' troops. The US government attempts to place all blame on Childers, claiming that the only people firing were snipers. In the end, Childers is found innocent of all serious charges, and is revealed to be a "good guy" after all.

In the meantime, we are presented with a combination of American nationalism and Anti-Arab chauvinism. All the Yemeni are evil, it seems. During the development (if one can call it that) of the plot, it becomes clear that Childers was completely justified in his actions. The protestors were really a frenzied and violent mob. A security tape of the incident (which is later burned by the National Security Advisor to bolster the government case) shows clearly that every demonstrator outside the embassy was armed, including children. They were all firing out of some irrational hatred of Americans. Whence this hatred comes we have no idea, but since even the children are consumed by it, we suspect that it is somehow engrained in the psyche of the Arab.

As the ADC points out, the portrayal of the Arab is dominated by stereotypes. They are the incomprehensible "Other," shouting untranslated slogans (presumably something on the order of “Death to all Americans”) and employing automatic weapons. We briefly sympathize with the wounded and killed children, especially with a girl (10 years old?) who lost her leg during the incident. Later, however, this sympathy is "corrected." As Hodges, on his visit to Yemen, approaches her to ask her name, she shouts back with venomous spite, “Killer!” The last time we see her face is in a flashback to the shooting incident, where she is shown firing a handgun at the embassy with a mixture of hatred and bestiality.

It would be hard to list every way in which the Arab community of Yemen is vilified. Suffice it to point out the film corresponds perfectly (and in a pure form) to the stereotype dominant within the popular media: The Arab as Terrorist. In response, the ADC, a non-sectarian Arab-American organization, has organized numerous protests denouncing the film. “‘Rules of Engagement,'” they write, “can only be considered in the same light as other films whose raison d'être is to deliberately and systematically vilify an entire people, such as 'Birth of a Nation' and ‘the Eternal Jew.'”

No chauvinism would be complete with merely the denigration of another race. The "They" is always counterpoised to the "Us," which in this case is that ever present figment of the imagination—the American. Within a country so ethnically mixed as the United States, one would like to think that such exclusive national categories as American and non-American would lose their meaning. Yet, these divisions that place nation against nation in irreconcilable antinomy are necessary in modern society, as is amply demonstrated in Rules of Engagement.

The movie is filled with national symbolism. After rescuing the American ambassador from the raging Arab mob, and before ordering the ensuing massacre, Childers returns to rescue the American flag, that eternal symbol, the film would like us to believe, of freedom and justice. It is significant that the demonstrators, unable to contain their virulent anti-Amerincanism, fire at the flag as it is lowered. Indeed, as the film develops, we realize that it is not the violence of the crowd that is so terrible, but their Anti-American sentiment, which is, in the eyes of the ruling circles in the United State at least, the deadliest of deadly sins.

Of course, there is no attempt to analyze why the causes of these emotions, for there is no conceivable explanation for why such a benevolent and just institution as the United States government could be hated. (To be completely accurate, the US government actually plays something of a villain in the film, but only because it attacks Childers, who, as a member of the military, represents this same government in his own way. The critique of the government, insofar as it exists, is from the right.)

The nationalism expressed is much more subtle than mere flag idolatry, however, and is bound up with an ugly glorification of the lives and deeds of military officers. Little attention is given to the military rank and file, for they are merely "the men" of the officers. The latter, including Childers in the end, are valiant and courageous "warriors," bringing honor to the American nation. In the scenes depicting military action, the US troops are always attacked; they are never the aggressors. This includes the opening scene depicting Childers and Hodges fighting in the Vietnam War, one of the most clear-cut examples of US aggression in the twentieth century.

The film is wretched, but in its wretchedness says something about the outlook and ambitions of the US ruling elite. The connection between storywriter Webb, a marine commander in Vietnam who spent six years in the 1970s defending a marine accused of war crimes, and Hollywood is particularly sinister. Friedkin has done nothing but hack-work for decades. Samuel L. Jackson and Tommy Lee Jones should simply be ashamed of themselves.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 71 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
what? fresca Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 9:11 AM
The New X The New X Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 9:37 AM
review of review reader Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 9:39 AM
Non-sequitor fresca Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 9:47 AM
Double standard Rabbi Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 10:05 AM
the flick was shallow Sheepdog Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 10:09 AM
Short course on American cinema Steven Spilberg Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 10:11 AM
Welcome to USA Phu Bai Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 10:14 AM
Well fresca Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 10:28 AM
Global Muslim conspiracy? Rabbi Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 10:37 AM
Continents, dummy fresca Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 10:45 AM
Hey, New X nonanarchist Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 11:05 AM
nah honker Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 11:19 AM
Wait, wait Rabbi Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 11:27 AM
ROFL fresca Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 12:13 PM
honker nonanarchist Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 12:18 PM
M-F is correct honker Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 12:55 PM
goodness! I made a few errors honker Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 1:04 PM
honker has... nonanarchist Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 1:05 PM
The hits just keep coming fresca Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 1:05 PM
Which of the inmates... nonanarchist Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 1:08 PM
Easy come, easy go Rabbi Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 1:10 PM
Non anarchist fresca Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 1:18 PM
By the way fresca Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 1:24 PM
fresca fresca Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 1:30 PM
Gotcha! Rabbi Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 1:34 PM
Clarifying Rabbi Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 1:39 PM
lots of work there honker Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 2:21 PM
??? fresca Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 3:09 PM
BA fresca Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 3:32 PM
Try as I might, honker... nonanarchist Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 3:53 PM
Excellent! Rabbi Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 4:19 PM
Heil Bill Gates! Rabbi Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 4:24 PM
It's amazing Amazed Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 4:34 PM
Heil Bill Gates and George W. Flush Rabbi Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 5:06 PM
Overload YYYYYYY Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 5:56 PM
Benefits Rabbi Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 6:08 PM
Analysis Rabbi Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 6:36 PM
Ah.. fresca Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 9:49 PM
Huh? Rabbi Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 10:09 PM
The New X The New X Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 10:23 PM
uh... fresca Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 10:31 PM
dup monikers Indy media IP checker Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 10:39 PM
I have more info on him Hex anon w/ encryption Sunday, Oct. 05, 2003 at 11:43 PM
IMC IP Checker & Hex nonanarchist Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 3:12 AM
Identifying posters by IP IMC IP Validator Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 3:43 AM
The New X The New X Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 6:49 AM
The third option: nonanarchist Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 6:57 AM
The New X The New X Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 8:43 AM
Help Find The New X Post His Identity Address and Phone Number Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 10:24 AM
^ nonanarchist Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 10:33 AM
The New X The New X Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 2:37 PM
Somebody hit X... nonanarchist Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 2:45 PM
The New X The New X Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 3:02 PM
The New X The New X Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 3:39 PM
Right fresca Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 3:56 PM
The New X The New X Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 4:07 PM
Good point fresca Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 6:37 PM
The New X The New X Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 7:19 PM
Okay, fresca Monday, Oct. 06, 2003 at 7:22 PM
The New X The New X Tuesday, Oct. 07, 2003 at 9:55 AM
Fair enough fresca Tuesday, Oct. 07, 2003 at 7:19 PM
wait i know what Israel can do... zionist Wednesday, Oct. 08, 2003 at 2:04 AM
Your Remarks Khairi Monday, Apr. 19, 2004 at 4:32 AM
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy