understand this text, you must remember there is only one month and a half between
Genes and the september 11 ! In the note 2, at the end, we will understand why
the Democrats have not said that the 911 was ordered by Bush and the CIA. And,
in the same time, we will understand why it is not so strange that Bill Clinton
tells americans to support Bush who makes war against all the world since the
The aim of american
imperialism, by ordering these terrorist attacks, is to obtain quickly the absolute
power on the whole planet ! (Not only for oil. Oil is only a little thing !
They want the absolute power on the whole world ! The GLOBALIZATION of american
imperialism, it is that. And that, it is great !)
At these links you
can see that Bill Clinton tells americans to Support Bush :
« The engine of history, it is the class struggle. »
FROM ISLAMIST TERRORISM ?
There's nothing such as the noise of guns
to cover the whispering of rebels.
thesis, on the recent and massive terrorism that has just hit the USA, is that
islamist kamikazes have diverted airlines in order to smash them against the
World Trade Center Twin Towers, causing the death of thousands of people, with
the aim of exerting pressure on the US State in order to, for example, make
it stop its support of Israel against the Palestinians.
To exert pressure
on the US State, this massive terrorism must harm it. Is it really the case ?
These crashes of airliners, transformed into suicide-planes, against the WTC
have harmed the population who lives in the USA, as it has killed thousands
of people. But who is still stupid enough to mistake the population of a country
with the state of this country ? In May 68, for example, the population
of the Country France rebelled against the French State ! in 1992, the
population of the pour districts of all big American cities rebelled against
the US State. The State is nothing but the the weapon of the capitalists against
the population. The State represents cops and army, the armed gangs of power,
who maintain the population under slavery. Of course officially the cops are
not meant to bludgeon strikers and demonstrators, kill the passing Arab or Black,
but to rescue the widow and the orphan. Of course officially the army is not
meant to crush a possible rebellion of the population, as in Los Angeles in
1992 but to protect the population against a military attack from another country.
Of course, the capitalists have to lie to us to keep us in slavery.
Indeed a great
renewal of social fight, leading from Seatle to Genova, using revolutionary
violence, was threatening to release a general movement of the world population
against the masters of the world. So that the capitalists had to fill the streets
with still more policemen, and even soldiers, to cope with all possibilities,
they had to watch closely all person liable to be dangerous to the power, that
is, finally, everybody. They had to clearly increase the police and army budget
and give them much more power ; they had to impose new hyper-repressive
national and international laws ; they had to incite general denunciation ;
in short, with the secret aim of fighting against the powerful rise of international
social fight, the capitalists wanted to impose to the entire world a fascist
regime of the latino-american type. Nevertheless to do this, without any apparently
acceptable official excuse for everybody, would have provoked serious reactions
among the population and would have quickened events. Exactly when the capitalists
needed such an excuse, islamists offered it by starting a surge of massive terrorim.
So, does this terrorism harm the US State, or the population not only of the
United States, on which this State imposes its repression ?
QUESTION : ARE THE WESTERN STATES IN GENERAL, AND THE US
STATE IN PARTICULAR, ENEMIES OF ISLAMISM ?
I first heard
about islamism in 1978. A great revolution was taking place in Iran, it had
already sacked the torturing dictator at the beck of the West, the Shah of Iran.
It threatened to extend to the whole world. The capitalists had to stop it.
To be victorious of a revolution in the West, the capitalism use the left wing
parties and especially the one called "communist", and Trade Unions, especially
in Europe, those which are linked to the "Communist" Party. This is put into
evidence by the excellent movie by Ken Loach : « Land of freedom ».
This is what we noticed in France in May 68 and in many further strikes ;
But among moslems this repressive technic doesn't work because no "communist"
hierarchy has ever settled. So what can be done ? I think France found
the solution : Khomeiny was then living in France. It sent him back to
Iran in order to to retrieve the Iranian revolution and divert it towards islamism.
This is how, thanks to France, with the complicity of the USA, unless it be
the opposite, islamism could govern Iran after having broken down a powerful
Then the entire
western world, and the USA in particular, thoroughly helped the islamists to
"expel Russians" from Afghanistan.
In Sudan, France
supports and finances an islamist power it helps against the armed rebellion
of the "christian and animist" fraction of the population. Besides Sudan didn't
hesitate in handing over to France this stupid fellow, Carlos (1).
When in 1988
riots started in the suburbs of Algiers, the army had to kill 500 people in
a fortnight to stifle this renewal of the revolution in Algeria. But it resulted
insufficient, the revolt was still roaring. This is why the technic used in
Iran had to be used again : divert the revolution towards islamism. The
G.I.A. is financed and controled by Sudan (that is by France) and the F.I.S.
by the USA. In fact the first soldiers of the F.I.S. were Algerians who had
volunteered to go and fight among the islamists in Afghanistan, and trained
by Americans. And when the Americans required that the F.I.S. stop all armed
fight, it obeyed without grumbling.
The Gulf War
can be understood as military help brought by the western states as a whole
to an islamic State, that of Koweit, to defend it from the non-religious (lay)
Saddam Hussein (who was no saint).
And who, approximately
six years ago, saved the "Bosniacs", that is the islamic power that reigns there ?
Chirac himself urging NATO, that is the United-States, to bomb the "Serbs" massively.
At the end
of June 2001, a few weeks ago, NATO, that is the USA, saved the encircled pro-Albanian
UCK (Kosovo Liberation Army : KLA) at Aracinovo in Madedonia. Thanks to
the intervention of the Americans, the UCK escaped with arms and ammunitions.
But, according to an article
called "Truth on the UCK" (If the link is break click
here fo the google cache. Read the first four lines of the presentation,
then the second half of the last paragraph, that speaks of Agim Gashi, dubbed
the "Rambo" of Kossovo, linked to the islamo-terrorists of Ousssama Ben Laden.)
written by the specialist in islamism Alexandre del Valle on the 26th
of December 1999, the UCK is closely linked to islamism, especially to Ben Laden !
(and you can read this : http://globalresearch.ca/articles/PAS111A.html)
ANSWER : No, the masters of the West and islamism are no
enemies : they are allies. And if islamism has recently used massive terrorism
in the USA, it cannot be to harm the US State, but on the opposite to help it
crush down the revolts of the population of America and of the World, which
is fighting more and more valiantly against the globalization of American imperialism.
The masters of the world have financed islamism for a long time, it was high
time islamism gave them a counterpart !
ANOTHER QUESTION : WE HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT, SINCE A FEW YEARS,
BEN LADEN HAS BETRAYED HIS AMERICAN ALLIES ! AND THEN, AREN'T THE AMERICANS
GOING TO WAGE WAR AGAINST THE ISLAMISTS ?
It is not against
the whole of islamism that the rulers of America have declared war, but only
against Ben Laden and those who would support him. There is already many islamist
countries whose States have taken sides, in spite of their populations, in favor
of the USA against Ben Laden.
I haven't said that Ben Laden was the one who sacrificed a few men to pay back
what islamism owed the US ; it could be any other islamic chief of whom
the media haven't even pronounced the name in connexion with recent terrorism.
are continuously being lied to ! May be Ben Laden and the US State have
only pretended having fallen out with one another(2). Furthermore,
on this subject, we must notice that we are often told that it was after the
Gulf War, nearly ten years ago, that Ben Laden, considering that the American
army rabble was lingering on the land of Saudi Arabia, became anti-american,
nevertheless it was barely a few weeks ago that the USA saved the UCK linked
to Ben Laden ! If this "war" between american imperialism and Ben Laden
is really taking place, at least in a first time, it will strengthen both camps
and especially it will strengthen Ben Laden's position among all arab and moslem
populations. The masters of the USA well know it.
AIMS AT THE PEOPLE, IT IS THUS ORDERED BY THE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE : THE
STATE, THE COLDEST OF THE COLD MONSTERS : IT
IS THE US STATE WHICH HAS ORDERED THE RECENT ISLAMIST TERRORISM IN THE USA !
NOTE : 1) Carlos, because he was a great supporter of the
Palestinian cause, felt secure in Sudan as it was an islamist country ;
but, whatever the regime of a country, it is in the service of the one which
finances it !
We have seen recently that American imperialism has again helped the UCK, linked
to Ben Laden. It should be enough to wonder if this lie which pretends that
Ben Laden and the USA are sworn enemies, is true. Nevertheless TV has often
mentioned the bombing perpetrated on the 7th of August 1998 against
the American embassies in Nairobi (Kenya) and Dar es-salaam (Tanzania). These
attacks resulted in 224 dead, including 12 Americans. And more than 4000 wounded,
among whom several moslems. These attacks are attributed to Ben Laden, and the
aim of the journalists who keep on reminding us, is to show that Ben laden has
perpetrated terrorism against America for quite a long time ; They also
recall frequently that the reprisals, on the following 20th of August
were American bombings on Afghanistan and Sudan. And among the journalists,
the most honest ones go even as far as informing us that in Sudan the Americans,
or better their heads, bombed an innocent medicine factory. I must add that
before being bombed this medicine factory, called « Al Shifa »,
was producing 50% of the medicine consumed in Sudan !
indeed what journalists have never remind us, we wonder why, that is the monicagate
scandal. Do remember, Monica Lewinsky, the girl who, after having made love
with Clinton, instead of taking her sperm soiled dress to the cleaner, put it
away carefully in the freezer to keep intact its lovely sperm stain, in case
it came in useful, one day. Well, this poor Clinton was in deep shit, with this
story, you remember now ? That scandal was compared to the Watergate, which
had induced Nixon to resign on the 9th of August 1974. It was important.
Nobody spoke of anything else ! The monicagate scandal reached such a climax
that it nearly brought Clinton to resign. And it was exactly at the height of
this scandal that the Nairobi and Dar es-Salaam terrorist attacks took place,
then the reprisals that followed. Here are some essential dates :
30th 1998 : Monica Lewinsky gives the blue dress supposed to
be soiled by the president's sperm. It will be sent to the FBI for analysis
that will later prove the sperm was Clinton's.
7th 1998 : terrorist attacks against the US embassies in Nairobi
and Dar es-Salaam.
17th 1998 : Clinton
for more than four hours bears witness from the White House. He also speaks
to the American nation to say he's sorry he has deceived the people and his
20th 1998 : American bombings in Afghanistan and Sudan as reprisals
to « punish islamist terrorism ».
needn't be very bright to notice, strange coincidence, that these essential
events took place at the same time. With a slight lag, the events linked to
the islamic terrorism coming just after those of the monigate, to make we forget
them in a way. And indeed it is by using these attacks against the US embassies
in Nairobi and Dar es-Salaam that Clinton, acting as the great man indispensable
in the fight against « international terrorism », managed,
somewhat, to make people forget about the monicagate scandal that was hitting
him full in the face. And if you try to remember that epic time, you will surely
remember that in France, the journalists of those days were not afraid of revealing
at the best hearing periods, with a wink, as if it were a secret you were not
supposed to tell anyone, that this was a queer coincidence, implicating that
the monicagate could well have been the cause of the « indispensable
reprisal against international terrorism », and that anyhow, these
events linked to terrorism and its « reprisals » came
in fortunately for Clinton's affair.
since the 11th of September 2001, the journalists have often recalled
the terrorist attacks in Nairobi and Dar es-Salaam, it aimed at showing clearly
that Ben Laden had for quite a long time used blind terrorism against the USA
; but they have queerly, utterly forgotten that those terrorist attacks attributed
to Ben Laden against American embassies had done a good turn to president Bill
Clinton, as it was thanks to them he had escaped from a pitiful resignation
that , from all points of view, we are allowed to wonder if, contrary to what
we are supposed to believe, the masters of America on one side, and Ben Laden
on the other, are not the best of friends !