Imperialist Hypocrisy and
the Taliban Oppression of Women
By Bob Avakian, Chairman of the RCP,USA
Revolutionary Worker #1124, October 28, 2001, posted at rwor.org
Has anyone noticed the glaring hypocrisy in the fact that many of the same
assholes--all the way up to the highest levels of government--who have tried to
prevent women from having the right to abortion and reproductive freedom in
general are all of a sudden pretending to be outraged by the oppression of women
under the Taliban?!
What is done by the Taliban, in the name of Islam, is in essence no different
from what would follow from the literal interpretation of the Bible that many
"Born Again Christians" like Falwell, Robertson, and a number of Bush's closest
advisers (not to say Bush himself) insist upon. If you don't believe it, read
the Bible!
Now the apologists for U.S. (and "Western") imperialism are opportunizing on
outrage about the egregious forms of the oppression of women carried out by the
Taliban (and more generally the overt forms of inequality and oppression that
women are subjected to in "the Muslim world") as part of the justification for
their "campaign" and even to generally assert (whether noisily and crudely or
more "softly" and subtly) the "superiority of Western civilization" over Islamic
civilization. Given all this, it is important not only in general but
specifically in relation to this whole crisis and war to continue to do
hard-hitting exposure of the oppression of women, in its many different forms,
in the U.S. and other "advanced" and "modern" imperialist countries.
In this connection, there is relevance and importance to the point in
Preaching from a Pulpit of Bones that there is a fundamental unity
between the "traditional" (and "fundamentalist") forms of the oppression of
women touted by the Bible-toting Christian Fascists, on the one hand, and on the
other hand, "end of the empire" forms of the oppression of women--the widespread
pornography and the widely promoted commodification of women's bodies and
sexuality, the enslavement of millions of women in the "sex trade" that
"services" men mainly in the imperialist countries, the fact that at least 1 out
of every 4 women in the U.S. will be subjected to some form of sexual assault,
and on and on.
These different forms and manifestations of degrading and subjugating women
are "mirror opposites" and are all part of the overall oppression of women in
the imperialist-dominated world today.
Preaching was speaking particularly about the imperialist countries
themselves, and more particularly the U.S.--and focusing on the Christian
Fascist program vis-a-vis that of more "laissez faire" bourgeois democracy and
decadence. But this basic point also applies to the relationship between the
"traditional" and "fundamentalist" forms of oppression of women in much of the
"Middle East" and other "Islamic countries" (and much of the Third World more
broadly--including countries in which Christianity is the dominant
religion--where the bourgeois-democratic transformation of society has not been
carried out, or carried out only partially and incompletely) vis-a-vis the
bourgeois-democratic imperialist countries themselves. In short, while it may
take some different forms, brutality against women, inequality and subordination
and degradation in every sphere of society is no less a fundamental and
indispensable feature of "modern" bourgeois-imperialist countries than it is in
"Islamic" and other societies where there are significant aspects of
pre-capitalist forms of oppression and exploitation.
*****
Now, we do have to take into account the argument that, after all, even if
there are many outrages in terms of the oppression of women in a country like
the U.S., it is still qualitatively better than what it is like under the
Taliban.
This is a difficult and "tricky" contradiction to deal with. On the one hand,
the fact is that the way women are shrouded and shackled under the Taliban--and
everything that this symbolizes and encapsulates about their oppression under
Taliban rule--does represent forms of oppression that are essentially (or
largely) eliminated with the bourgeois-democratic transformation of society.
And, of course, we support even bourgeois-democratic reforms in opposition to
feudal (and other pre-capitalist) relations of oppression.
In a way, this is analogous to the point that--if these are the terms we
accept--bourgeois democracy is "better" than fascism. But the more fundamental
truth--and point to be emphasized--is that these are not the terms in
which things should be understood and posed: the "choice" must not be limited to
bourgeois-democratic society--with its forms of exploitative, oppressive,
and repressive relations and rule--vs. feudal (or fascistic) forms of rule,
repression, and oppression. And we should also never forget that bourgeois
rule--that is, bourgeois dictatorship--in its "democratic" form, can be
transformed into open, unvarnished dictatorship--fascism--which is an especially
relevant and important point with regard to what is unfolding in U.S. society
today.
We must not allow things to be cast in--and confined to--the question of
which forms of oppression and exploitation, and reactionary dictatorship, are
"better."
More specifically, and more especially in present circumstances, we must not
allow things to be cast in such a way as to fall in line with the notion (or the
pretense) that the U.S. (and other) imperialists somehow represent "progress" or
"liberation," either in terms of the oppression of women or more generally, with
regard to Afghanistan or in the world as a whole.
To help illustrate this, it can be pointed out that the various governments
that were installed or at least backed by the Soviet Union in Afghanistan
actually attempted to carry out reforms--not only land reforms but also reforms
extending rights and opportunities for women, in education and many other
fields--that, taken in isolation, are much better than what is represented by
the Taliban, and by other mujahedeen forces who fought the Soviet- backed
regimes and the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, with massive U.S. backing. But
the attempt by what was then Soviet social-imperialism to impose such
reforms through its own brand of imperialist domination did not in fact
represent "liberation"--and led to anything but "liberation" for Afghan women or
the Afghan people as a whole. This liberation must be the result of their own
conscious revolutionary struggle and can never come through any imperialist
aggression, invasion, occupation, domination.
What we must emphasize is the fact that both bourgeois-democratic and
feudal (and other pre-capitalist) social relations embody horrendous oppression
of women, even if in somewhat different forms (along with many of the same
forms) and there is a need for a radical rupture with all of
this--with both pre-capitalist as well as bourgeois (including
bourgeois-democratic) forms of oppression and exploitation (and repression).
In the world today, this radical rupture is represented by and is being
actively struggled for by MLM and the MLM forces in countries all over the
globe, including in Afghanistan. We must support and forge unity with masses
rising up against all these various forms of oppression and exploitation,
worldwide, while the most fundamental support must go to the MLM forces who
represent the only road for the masses out of all this madness--the only path to
overthrowing, uprooting, and finally, completely abolishing all forms of the
oppression of women, and all exploitation and oppression of human beings,
everywhere in the world.
This article is posted in English and Spanish on Revolutionary Worker
Online
rwor.org
Write: Box 3486,
Merchandise Mart, Chicago, IL 60654
Phone: 773-227-4066 Fax:
773-227-4497
(The RW Online does not currently communicate via email.)