We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Antitrust Victory for Consumers -

by Axcess Business News Friday, Dec. 27, 2002 at 7:16 PM
editor@theaxcess.net

Consumers won a major antitrust victory on Monday when a federal judge ordered Microsoft to distribute Sun's Java programming language in its Windows operating system.


Eric Stevenson Editor Antitrust Victory for Consumers -
Microsoft Ordered to Carry Sun's Java

By Eric Stevenson - Axcess Business News

In the scheme of things, sometimes the little guy wins. In the case of Microsoft (NasdaqNM: MSFT), Sun Microsystems (NasdaqNM: SUNW) won a major antitrust victory on Monday when a federal judge ordered Microsoft to distribute Sun's Java programming language in its Windows operating system.

While some liken the antitrust victory to go to Sun, I believe the real winners were consumers. Its been no secret that Microsoft has faced federal scrutiny for monopolizing the market for its Windows operating system. Let's face facts, approximately 80% of the total market belongs to ol' Bill Gates and his comrades at Microsoft and he wasn't about to give market share easily.

This is not the first time Microsoft has had a show down in court. AOL's Netscape communications is also facing Microsoft in a similar antitrust suit, as are less known companies such as Be Inc and Burst.com. Netscape had charged that Microsoft deliberately made their software incompatible, which has yet to face any similar ruling as was handed down today by U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz.

Bill Gates looses antitrust law suitIn a forty-two page opinion Judge Motz said, "I find it as an absolute certainty, that unless a preliminary injunction is entered, Sun will have forever lost its right to compete, and the opportunity to prevail, in a market undistorted by its competitor's antitrust violations."

Of course Microsoft stated they would ask for an appeal to Judge Motz's ruling, according to Microsoft spokesman, Jim Dresler who said, "Clearly we're disappointed with today's ruling and still need to review the details of the court's decision."

While it stands as no surprise that Microsoft would even consider asking for an appeal, the case itself has greater baring on those cases yet to be tried. You may recall that the government had settled with Microsoft in their landmark antitrust suit after U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly endorsed it. Judge Kollar-Kotelly had rejected a Java "must-carry" proposal by nine state attorneys general, although Massachusetts and West Virginia are appealing that decision.

Mike Morris, Sun Vice President, said in a prepared statement that the ruling will benefit consumers and software developers. "This decision changes the dynamics of the distribution channel for the Java technology. That technology promises to open the markets now monopolized by Microsoft to the benefits of robust competition and unrestrained innovation."

Judge Motz accuses Microsoft of imperialist inclinationsJudge Motz took a good shot at two Microsoft officials who had testified during the trial, saying, "they share what some might characterize as their employer's imperialist inclinations."

In his ruling, Judge Motz considered what the future impact of Microsoft's prior actions would have on the market, unlike Judge Kollar-Kotelly. "Microsoft, Sun and the developer community are all looking toward the future, and in order to determine whether a must-carry injunction is necessary and appropriate, a court must do so as well," Motz said.

In my opinion Sun's Vice President was right, this is a victory for consumers. We use Windows operating systems and have felt helpless as millions of others have who faced the same dilemma all users of Microsoft software have; compatibility. Its seems lame to think that a company like Microsoft would be so shortsighted as to curtail its own customers from having value-added software compatible with their own. Life's hard enough and the vines of life that bind twixt our feet (careful, I'm getting poetic) make roads hard to traverse. What I mean is it's lame to be deliberately made to use a product merely out of fear that I might change entirely. Have you bought any operating software lately? The cost and the time it takes to learn how to use it prohibit many users from switching, let alone upgrading!

I can only pray that Judge Motz's ruling is not overturned. Consumers need a break, especially from our court system. People's faith in American government is waning all over the world, not just in the United States and we need to do all we can to support our government and they need to support us in return and show the world that democracy still works and sometimes, the little guy wins. That's democracy in action, isn't it?

Back to Top News Stories >>

Give us your feedback on this Story

Disclaimer
The views or opinions contained Inside Commentary are those of the editor and are not necessarily the views or opinions of Axcess Business News. Comments made are independent of this web site, its partners sites, or the staff, employees, directors, officers or agents of Axcess Business News. No comments, views or opinions are intended to support any political party, organization, association or group, directly or indirectly, in any manner. Inside Commentary is purely an editorial presentation of our editor on subjects of interest to our audience. If you have any comments or suggestions please direct them to editor@theaxcess.net.

Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 3 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
editor Eric Stevenson Saturday, Dec. 28, 2002 at 4:27 PM
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy