We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

THE HUNGER FOR WAR

by MUMIA ABU JAMAL Monday, Sep. 30, 2002 at 1:45 AM

MUMIA ABU JAMAL DISSECTS AMERICA'S HUNGER FOR WAR

THE HUNGER FOR WAR
____________________________________________________________________

By Mumia Abu-Jamal
[Col. Writ. 9/16/02]
Source: Afrikan Frontline Network, nattyreb@comcast.net
- Saturday, 21 September 2002 -

"There never was a good war, or a bad peace." -- Ben Franklin

One is always somewhat bemused when one hears the voices of those Americans
(and others) who call on TV call-in shows, spouting their opinions, on
issues large and small:

"Whacha need ta do, see, is go in 'ere, and just nuke the hell outta 'em
there!"

"That guy Saddam (pronounced 'SOD-om,' as in the Biblical city of sin) isa
same thing as Hitler, and we need to take him out for what he did for-- er,
with the Twin Towers, up in New York. What are we waitin' for?"

>From such uninformed opinions as these comes the rising swells of public
opinion polls, the false gusts lifting the hopes of politicians into the
winds of war.

But, in truth, there is really nothing new about this "New" War on
Terrorism that is claimed by the Bush Administration and the economic elite
behind it. For as Lebanese political scientist, As'ad Abu-Khalil notes, in
his recent book, Bin Laden, Islam and America's New "War on Terrorism"
(Seven Stories/Open Media, 2002):

>From a historical perspective, America's new war against terrorism is not
new at all. Didn't the U.S. bomb Libya in 1986 under the pretext of
fighting terrorism? Didn't the CIA plant a car bomb in the southern suburbs
of Beirut in 1985 to assassinate a Shi'ite religious leader? (They missed
their target -- Shaykh Muhammad Husayn Fadlallah -- but they hit 285 other
people, innocent civilians, 85 of whom died)... Didn't the Reagan
administration bomb Lebanon in the 1980s in its fight against terrorism?
Weren't Nicaraguan harbors mined in the 1980s because Nicaragua was engaged
in terrorism? Hasn't American support for Israel been in order to defend
that country from terrorism? And finally, weren't fundamentalist fanatics
in Pakistan and Afghanistan armed and financed by the CIA because their
common enemy was exporting terrorism? [p. 83]

What makes this 'new', however, is the scope that is sought by the American
presidency: 'regime change.'

One wonders, why there was never a call for 'regime change' when the brutes
of Afrikanerdom in apartheid South Africa were, quite literally, shooting
down unarmed Black children for demonstrating against the racist excesses
of the minority government?

When the Pinochet regime in Chile was executing thousands of people in
football stadiums, and sending its minions to execute people on the streets
of Washington, D.C., there was no call for 'regime change', was there?

In the new colonialism of today 'regime change' is news-speak for a coup;
removal of any leader the U.S. deems somehow "unworthy" of true sovereignty.

But who will dare call for 'regime change' in Washington, D.C.?

Given the underhanded and strongarm tactics of polling officials and state
troopers in the controversial 2000 U.S. presidential election, where the
Supreme Court interceded and imposed its will on the nation, it is indeed
probable, or at least arguable that Saddam Hussein's election may have been
demonstrably fairer than George Bush's. (I think we can safely say that no
candidate in Iraq scored over 500,000 more votes than Saddam did -- and
still lost!)

Yet, even in the face of the U.N.-directed arms inspections, the rumblings
and saber-rattling of war continues. We will see if these arms inspections
make any difference.

This writer thinks not.

For political ambition is at the root of this hunger for war. As Bush
adviser and Hawk, Richard Perle recently told the *New York Times*: "The
failure to take on Saddam after what the President said would produce such
a collapse of confidence in the President that it would set back the war on
terrorism." What he means, of course, is it will hurt his re-election
chances!

War for money is one thing, but ambition?

The hunger grows.

Copyright 2002 Mumia Abu-Jamal. All rights reserved.
Report this post as:
Share on: Twitter, Facebook, Google+

add your comments


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy