imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Important Information on What *YOU* Can Do to Stop the War on Iraq!

by vic Friday, Jul. 26, 2002 at 2:43 AM

"As a guy who was part of the first Gulf War," said Ritter, who indeed served under Schwarzkopf in that conflict, "when you deploy that much military power forward - disrupting their training cycles, disrupting their operational cycles, disrupting everything, spending a lot of money - it is very difficult to pull them back without using them." "You got 20,000 Marines forward deployed in October," said Ritter, "you better expect war in October."

Hi All,

I recieved this in an email when I wrote to a columnist on - she says it’s urgent to make these phone calls. The info comes from First is the contact info, then the article. Please take action.

- Vic

The following article is about what Scott Ritter, former UN weapons inspector in Iraq, has to say on the (un)reality of the Iraq threat.  What he has to say is powerful and seems based on more direct knowledge, certainly, than anyone in Congress will personally have when and if they vote to declare war on Iraq. 

The purpose of circulating this transcript is to urge you, and everyone you can think of to send it to, to immediately contact the members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at the contact numbers shown at the bottom of the email and urge the Committee to allow Ritter to testify next Monday at the hearings on the Iraq situation.

The Senate Foreign Relations Committee will meet to hear evidence regarding the Iraqi threat to America on Monday, July 29th. The sitting members of this Committee are:

Joseph Biden - Chairman

(202) 224-5225

Fax: (202) 224-0139

Paul Sarbanes - Maryland

(202) 224-4524

Chris Dodd - Connecticut

(202) 224-2823

John Kerry - Massachusetts

(202) 224-2742

Fax: (202) 224-8525

Russell Feingold - Wisconsin

(202) 224-5323

Paul Wellstone - Minnesota

(202) 224-5641

Fax: (202) 224-8438

Barbara Boxer - California

(202) 224-3553

Robert Toricelli - New Jersey

(202) 224-3224

Bill Nelson - Florida

(202) 224-5274

Fax: (202) 228-2183

Jay Rockefeller - West Virginia

(202) 224-6472

Fax: (202) 224-7665

In order for Scott Ritter to have a chance to speak before the Committee,

these individuals must be convinced that the American people want him, and his information, to be part of the conversation. Phone calls and faxes are best - the mail is unreliable and slow after the anthrax attacks, and email is virtually ignored.

The speech given by Scott Ritter in Boston will be broadcast between 7:00

am and 9:00 am on WMFO radio this Thursday, July 25th. The radio station

has a webcast at A CD of a speech delivered by Ritter on July 2nd on this topic can be procured from the Traprock Peace Center,103A Keets Road, Deerfield MA 01342 | (413) 773-7427.

Time is short.

ALERT! Prevent Bush's "October Surprise"

July 24 2002


I saw former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter last night in Boston, and I

have been up all night transcribing the tape and writing the following report.

The situation is worse than dire, and we will have to beat long odds to

stop Bush from attacking Iraq. But it can be done, and the attempt must be

made by all of us. I pray, beg, plead that you will read what follows, and

use the information provided. Take some time today and do this. Tell

friends. Give this to non-political friends who have been brainwashed about Iraq.

The clock is ticking. All quotes below are direct from Ritter, transcribed

by hand from the tape I made tonight. I met him, interviewed him, shook his hand. He gave me the data, and I give it to you. The following will be a

working Truthout link by 1pm, so you can forward that. In the meantime, I

beg you to read and get down to business.

- - - - -

The Coming October War in Iraq, and How You Can Stop It

Room 295 of the Suffolk Law School building in downtown Boston was filled to capacity on July 23rd with peace activists, aging Cambridge hippies and assorted freaks. One of the organizers for the gathering, United For Justice With Peace Coalition, handed out green pieces of paper that read, "We will not support war, no matter what reason or rhetoric is offered by politicians or the media. War in our time and in this context is

indiscriminate, a war against innocents and against children." Judging from the crowd, and from the buzz in the room, that pretty much summed things up.

The contrast presented when Scott Ritter, former UN weapons inspector in

Iraq, entered the room, could not have been more disparate. There at the

lectern stood this tall lantern-jawed man, every inch the twelve-year

Marine Corps veteran he was, who looked and spoke just exactly like a

bulldogging high school football coach. A whistle on a string around his

neck would have perfected the image.

"I need to say right out front," he said minutes into his speech, "I'm a

card-carrying Republican in the conservative-moderate range who voted for George W. Bush for President. I'm not here with a political agenda. I'm not here to slam Republicans. I am one."

Yet this was a lie - Scott Ritter had come to Boston with a political

agenda, one that impacts every single American citizen. Ritter was in the

room that night to denounce, with roaring voice and burning eyes, the

coming American war in Iraq. According to Ritter, this coming war is about nothing more or less than domestic American politics, based upon

speculation and rhetoric entirely divorced from fact. According to Ritter,

that war is just over the horizon.

"The Third Marine Expeditionary Force in California is preparing to have

20,000 Marines deployed in the (Iraq) region for ground combat operations

by mid-October," he said. "The Air Force used the vast majority of its

precision-guided munitions blowing up caves in Afghanistan. Congress just passed emergency appropriations money and told Boeing company to accelerate their production of the GPS satellite kits, that go on bombs that allow them to hit targets while the planes fly away, by September 30, 2002. Why? Because the Air Force has been told to have three air expeditionary wings ready for combat operations in Iraq by mid-October."

"As a guy who was part of the first Gulf War," said Ritter, who indeed

served under Schwarzkopf in that conflict, "when you deploy that much

military power forward - disrupting their training cycles, disrupting their

operational cycles, disrupting everything, spending a lot of money - it is

very difficult to pull them back without using them."

"You got 20,000 Marines forward deployed in October," said Ritter, "you

better expect war in October."

His purpose for coming to that room was straightforward: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Democrat Joe Biden, plans to call a hearing beginning on Monday, July 29th. The Committee will call forth witnesses to describe the threat posed to America by Iraq. Ritter fears that much crucial information will not be discussed in that hearing, precipitating a war authorization by Congress based on political expediency and ignorance. Scott Ritter came to that Boston classroom to exhort all there to demand of the Senators on the Committee that he be allowed to stand as a witness.

Ritter began his comments by noting the interesting times we live in after

September 11th. There has been much talk of war, and much talk of war with Iraq. Ritter was careful to note that there are no good wars - as a

veteran, he described war as purely awful and something not to be

trivialized - but that there is such a thing as a just war. He described

America as a good place, filled with potential and worth fighting for. We

go to just war, he said, when our national existence has been threatened.

According to Ritter, there is no justification in fact, national security,

international law or basic morality to justify this coming war with Iraq.

In fact, when asked pointedly what the mid-October scheduling of this

conflict has to do with the midterm Congressional elections that will

follow a few weeks later, he replied, simply, "Everything."

"This is not about the security of the United States," said this

card-carrying Republican while pounding the lectern. "This is about

domestic American politics. The national security of the United States of

America has been hijacked by a handful of neo-conservatives who are using their position of authority to pursue their own ideologically-driven

political ambitions. The day we go to war for that reason is the day we

have failed collectively as a nation."

Ritter was sledding up a pretty steep slope with all this. After all,

Saddam Hussein has been demonized for twelve years by American politicians and the media. He gassed his own people, and America has already fought one war to keep him under control. Ritter's presence in Iraq was demanded in the first place by Hussein's pursuit of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction, along with the ballistic missile technology that could deliver these weapons to all points on the compass.

According to the Bush administration, Hussein has ties to the same Al Qaeda terrorists that brought down the World Trade Center. It is certain that Hussein will use these terrorist links to deliver a lethal blow to America, using any number of the aforementioned weapons. The argument, propounded by Bush administration officials on any number of Sunday news talk shows, is that a pre-emptive strike against Iraq, and the unseating of Saddam Hussein, is critical to American national security. Why wait for them to hit us first?

"If I were an American, uninformed on Iraq as we all are," said Ritter, "I

would be concerned." Furthermore, continued Ritter, if an unquestionable

case could be made that such weapons and terrorist connections existed, he would be all for a war in Iraq. It would be just, smart, and in the

interest of national defense.

Therein lies the rub: According to Scott Ritter, who spent seven years in

Iraq with the UNSCOM weapons inspection teams performing acidly detailed investigations into Iraq's weapons program, no such capability exists. Iraq simply does not have weapons of mass destruction, and does not have threatening ties to international terrorism. Therefore, no premise for a war in Iraq exists. Considering the American military lives and the Iraqi civilian lives that will be spent in such an endeavor, not to mention the deadly regional destabilization that will ensue, such a baseless war must be avoided at all costs.

"The Bush administration has provided the American public with little more than rhetorically laced speculation," said Ritter. "There has been nothing in the way of substantive fact presented that makes the case that Iraq possesses these weapons or has links to international terror, that Iraq poses a threat to the United States of America worthy of war."

Ritter regaled the crowd with stories of his time in Iraq with UNSCOM. The basis for the coming October war is the continued existence of a weapons program that threatens America. Ritter noted explicitly that Iraq, of course, had these weapons at one time - he spent seven years there tracking them down. At the outset, said Ritter, they lied about it. They failed to declare the existence of their biological and nuclear programs after the Gulf War, and declared less than 50 of their chemical and missile stockpiles. They hid everything they could, as cleverly as they could.

After the first lie, Ritter and his team refused to believe anything else

they said. For the next seven years, they meticulously tracked down every

bomb, every missile, every factory designed to produce chemical, biological and nuclear weaponry. They went to Europe and found the manufacturers who sold them the equipment. They got the invoices and shoved them into the faces of Iraqi officials. They tracked the shipping of these materials and cross-referenced this data against the invoices. They lifted the foundations of buildings destroyed in the Gulf War to find wrecked research and development labs, at great risk to their lives, and used the reams of paperwork there to cross-reference what they had already cross-referenced.

Everything they found was later destroyed in place.

After a while, the Iraqis knew Ritter and his people were robotically

thorough. Fearing military retaliation if they hid anything, the Iraqis

instituted a policy of full disclosure. Still, Ritter believed nothing they

said and tracked everything down. By the time he was finished, Ritter was

mortally sure that he and his UNSCOM investigators had stripped Iraq of 90-95% of all their weapons of mass destruction.

What of the missing 10%? Is this not still a threat? Ritter believes that

the ravages of the Gulf War accounted for a great deal of the missing

material, as did the governmental chaos caused by sanctions. The Iraqis'

policy of full disclosure, also, was of a curious nature that deserved all

of Ritter's mistrust. Fearing the aforementioned attacks, Iraq instituted a

policy of destroying whatever Ritter's people had not yet found, and then

pretending it never existed in the first place. Often, the dodge failed to

fool UNSCOM. That some of it did also accounts for a portion of that

missing 10%.

Ritter told a story about running down 98 missiles the Iraqis tried to

pretend never existed. UNSCOM got hold of the documentation describing

them, and demanded proof that they had, in fact, been destroyed. He was

brought to a field where, according to Iraqi officials, the missiles had

been blown up and then buried. At this point, Ritter and his team became

"forensic archaeologists," digging up every single missile component they

could find there.

After sifting through the bits and pieces to find parts bearing serial

numbers, they went to Russia, who sold Iraq the weapons in the first place. They cross-referenced the serial numbers with the manufacturer's records, and confirmed the data with the shipping invoices. When finished, they had accounted for 96 of the missiles. Left over was a pile of metal with no identifying marks, which the Iraqis claimed were the other two missiles. Ritter didn't believe them, but could go no further with the investigation.

This story was telling in many ways. Americans mesmerized with stories of lying Iraqis who never told the weapons inspectors the truth about anything should take note of the fact that Ritter was led to exactly the place where the Iraqis themselves had destroyed their weapons without being ordered to. The pile of metal left over from this investigation that could not be identified means Iraq, technically, could not receive a 100% confirmation that all its weapons were destroyed. Along with the other mitigating factors described above, it seems clear that 100 %compliance under the UNSCOM rules was impossible to achieve. 90-95%, however, is an impressive record.

The fact that chemical and biological weapons ever existed in the first

place demands action, according to the Bush administration. After all, they could have managed to hide vast amounts of the stuff from Ritter's

investigators. Iraq manufactured three kinds of these nerve agents: VX,

Sarin and Tabou. Some alarmists who want war with Iraq describe 20,000

munitions filled with Sarin and Tabou nerve agents that could be used

against Americans.

The facts, however, allay the fears. Sarin and Tabou have a shelf life of

five years. Even if Iraq had somehow managed to hide this vast number of

weapons from Ritter's people, what they are now storing is nothing more

than useless and completely harmless goo.

The VX gas was of a greater concern to Ritter. It is harder to manufacture

than the others, but once made stable, it can be kept for much longer.

Ritter's people found the VX manufacturing facility that the Iraqis claimed

never existed totally destroyed, hit by a Gulf War bomb on January 23, 1991. The field where the material they had manufactured was subsequently buried underwent more forensic archaeology to determine that whatever they had made had also been destroyed. All of this, again, was cross-referenced and meticulously researched.

"The research and development factory is destroyed," said Ritter. "The

product of that factory is destroyed. The weapons they loaded up have been

destroyed. More importantly, the equipment procured from Europe that was

going to be used for their large-scale VX nerve agent factory was

identified by the special commission - still packed in its crates in 1997 -

and destroyed. Is there a VX nerve agent factory in Iraq today? Not on your


This is, in and of itself, a bold statement. Ritter himself and no weapons

inspection team has set foot in Iraq since 1998. Ritter believed Iraq

technically capable of restarting its weapons manufacturing capabilities

within six months of his departure. That leaves some three and one half

years to manufacture and weaponize all the horrors that has purportedly

motivated the Bush administration to attack.

"Technically capable," however, is the important phrase here. If no one

were watching, Iraq could do this. But they would have to start completely

from scratch, having been deprived of all equipment, facilities and

research because of Ritter's work. They would have to procure the

complicated tools and technology required through front companies, which

would be detected. The manufacture of chemical and biological weapons emits vented gasses that would have been detected by now if they existed. The manufacture of nuclear weapons emits gamma rays that would have been detected by now if they existed. We have been watching, via satellite and other means, and we have seen none of this.

"If Iraq was producing weapons today, we would have definitive proof," said Ritter, "plain and simple."

And yet we march to war, and soon. A chorus of voices was raised in the

room asking why we are going. What motivates this, if not hard facts and

true threats? According to Ritter, it comes down to opportunistic politics

and a decade of hard anti-Hussein rhetoric that has boxed the Bush

administration into a rhetorical corner.

Back in 1991, the UN Security Council mandated the destruction of Iraq's

weapons of mass destruction. Sanctions were placed upon Iraq to pressure

them to comply. The first Bush administration signed on to this, but also

issued a covert finding that mandated the removal of Saddam Hussein. Even if all the weapons were destroyed, Bush Sr. would not lift the sanctions until Hussein was gone.

Bush Sr., and Clinton after him, came to realize that talking about

removing Hussein was far, far easier than achieving that goal. Hussein was, and remains, virtually coup-proof. No one could get close enough to put a bullet in him, and no viable intelligence existed to pinpoint his location from day to day. Rousing a complacent American populace to support the massive military engagement that would have been required to remove Hussein by force presented insurmountable political obstacles. The tough talk about confronting Hussein continued, but the Bush and Clinton administrations treaded water.

This lack of results became exponentially more complicated. Politicians

began making a living off of demonizing Hussein, and lambasting Clinton for

failing to have him removed. The roots of our current problem began to

deepen at this point, for it became acceptable to encapsulate a nation of

20 million citizens in the visage of one man who was hated and reviled in

bipartisan fashion. Before long, the American people knew the drill -

Saddam is an evil threat and must be met with military force, period.

In 1998, the Republican-controlled Congress passed the Iraqi Liberation

Act. The weight of public American law now demanded the removal of Saddam Hussein. The American government went on to use data gathered by UNSCOM, narrowly meant to pinpoint possible areas of investigation, to choose bombing targets in an operation called Desert Fox. Confrontation, rather than resolution, continued to be the rule. By 1999, however, Hussein was still in power.

"An open letter was written to Bill Clinton in the fall of 1999," said

Ritter, "condemning him for failing to fully implement the Iraqi Liberation

Act. It demanded that he use the American military to facilitate the Iraqi

opposition's operations inside Iraq, to put troops on the ground and move

on up to Baghdad to get rid of Saddam. Who signed this letter? Donald

Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, Robert Zoellick, Richard Perle, and on and on and on."

The removal of Saddam Hussein became a plank in the GOP's race for the

Presidency in 2000. After gaining office, George W. Bush was confronted

with the reality that he and many within his administration had spent a

great amount of political capital promising that removal. Once in power,

however, he came to realize what his father and Clinton already knew -

talking tough was easy, and instigating pinprick military confrontations

was easy, but removing Hussein from power was not easy at all. His own

rhetoric was all around him, however, pushing him into that corner which

had only one exit. Still, like the two Presidents before him, he treaded


Then came September 11th. Within days, Bush was on television claiming that the terrorists must have had state-sponsored help, and that state sponsor must be Iraq. When the anthrax attacks came, Bush blamed Iraq again. Both times, he had no basis whatsoever in fact for his claims. The habit of lambasting Iraq, and the opportunity to escape the rhetorical box twelve years of hard-talking American policy, were too juicy to ignore.

The dearth of definitive proof of an Iraqi threat against America began to

go international. Defense Secretary Rumsfeld appeared before NATO not long ago and demanded that they support America's looming Iraq war. Most of the NATO nations appeared ready to do so - they trusted that America's top defense official would not come before them and lie. But when they tried to ask questions of him about the basis for this war, Rumsfeld absolutely refused to answer any of them. Instead, he offered this regarding our utter lack of meaningful data to support a conflict: "The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence."

Scott Ritter appeared before NATO some days after this at their invitation

to offer answers to their questions. Much of what he told them was mirrored in his comments in that Boston classroom. After he was finished, 16 of the 19 NATO nations present wrote letters of complaint to the American government about Rumsfeld's comments, and about our basis for war. American UN representatives boycotted this hearing, and denounced all who gave ear to Ritter.

Some have claimed that the Bush administration may hold secret evidence

pointing to a threat within Iraq, one that cannot be exposed for fear of

compromising a source. Ritter dismissed this out of hand in Boston. "If the

administration had such secret evidence," he said, "we'd be at war in Iraq

right now. We wouldn't be talking about it. It would be a fait accompli."

Our immediate military action in Afghanistan, whose ties to Al Qaeda were manifest, lends great credence to this point.

Ritter dismissed oil as a motivating factor behind our coming war with

Iraq. He made a good defense of this claim. Yes, Iraq has the

second-largest oil reserves on earth, a juicy target for the

petroleum-loving Bush administration. But the U.S. already buys some 68

of all the oil produced in Iraq. "The Navy ships in the Gulf who work to

interdict the smuggling of Iraqi oil," said Ritter, "are fueled by Iraqi

oil." Iraq's Oil Minister has stated on camera that if the sanctions are

lifted, Iraq will do whatever it takes to see that America's oil needs are

fulfilled. "You can't get a better deal than that," claimed Ritter.

His thinking on this aspect of the coming war may be in error. That sort of

logic exists in an all-things-being-equal world of politics and influence,

a world that has ceased to exist. Oil is a coin in the bargaining, peddled

as influence to oil-state congressmen and American petroleum companies by the Iraqi National Congress to procure support for this baseless conflict. Invade, says the INC, put us in power, and you will have all you want. There are many ruling in America today, both in government and business, who would shed innocent blood for this opportunity.

Ritter made no bones about the fact that Saddam Hussein is an evil man.

Like most Americans, however, he detests being lied to. His work in Iraq,

and his detailed understanding of the incredible technological requirements for the production of weapons of mass destruction, leads him to believe beyond question that there is no basis in fact or in the needs of national security for a war in Iraq. This Marine, this Republican who seemed so essentially hawkish that no one in that Boston classroom would have been surprised to find wings under his natty blue sportcoat, called the man he cast a Presidential vote for a liar.

"The clock is ticking," he said, "and it's ticking towards war. And it's

going to be a real war. It's going to be a war that will result in the

deaths of hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans and tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians. It's a war that is going to devastate Iraq. It's a war

that's going to destroy the credibility of the United States of America. I

just came back from London, and I can tell you this - Tony Blair may talk a

good show about war, but the British people and the bulk of the British

government do not support this war. The Europeans do not support this war. NATO does not support this war. No one supports this war."

It is of a certainty that few in the Muslim world support another American

war with Iraq. Osama bin Laden used the civilian suffering in Iraq under

the sanctions to demonstrate to his followers the evils of America and the West. Another war would exacerbate those already-raw emotions. After 9/11, much of the Islamic world repudiated bin Laden and his actions. Another Iraq war would go a long way to proving, in the minds of many Muslims, that bin Laden was right all along. The fires of terrorism that would follow this are unimaginable.

Scott Ritter wants to be present as a witness on Monday when the Foreign

Relations Committee convenes its hearing, a hearing that will decide

whether or not America goes to war in Iraq. He wants to share the

information he delivered in that Boston classroom with Senators who have

spent too many years listening to, or propounding, rhetorical and

speculative fearmongering about an Iraqi threat to America that does not

exist. Instead, he wants the inspectors back in Iraq, doing their jobs. He

wants to try and keep American and Iraqi blood from being spilled in a

military exercise promulgated by right-wing ideologues that may serve no

purpose beyond affecting the outcome of the midterm Congressional elections in November 2002.

"This is not theory," said Ritter in Boston as he closed his comments.

"This is real. And the only way this war is going to be stopped is if

Congress stops this war."

Report this post as:

Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 1 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
HOLY SHIT Technopeasant Friday, Jul. 26, 2002 at 3:48 AM

Local News

Change Links September 2018 posted S02 10:22PM

More Scandals Rock Southern California Nuke Plant San Onofre A30 11:09PM

Site Outage Friday A30 3:49PM

Change Links August 2018 A14 1:56AM

Setback for Developer of SC Farm Land A12 11:09PM

More problems at Shutdown San Onofre Nuke J29 10:40PM

Change Links 2018 July posted J09 8:27PM

More Pix: "Families Belong Together," Pasadena J02 7:16PM

"Families Belong Together" March, Pasadena J02 7:08PM

Short Report on the Families Belong Together Protest in Los Angeles J30 11:26PM

Summer 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert! J11 6:58AM

Watch the Debate: Excluded Candidates for Governor of California M31 5:20AM

Change Links June 2018 posted M28 7:41AM

The Montrose Peace Vigil at 12 Years M22 8:01PM

Unity Archive Project M21 9:42AM

Dianne Feinstein's Promotion of War, Secret Animal Abuse, Military Profiteering, Censorshi M17 10:22PM

CA Senate Bill 1303 would require an independent coroner rather than being part of police M10 9:08PM

Three years after OC snitch scandal, no charges filed against sheriffs deputies M10 8:57PM

California police agencies violate Brown Act (open meetings) M02 8:31PM

Insane Company Wants To Send Nuke Plant Waste To New Mexico A29 11:47PM

Change Links May 2018 A27 8:40AM

Worker-Owned Car Wash on Vermont Closed A27 5:37AM


lausd whistle blower A11 6:58AM

Website Upgrade A10 10:02AM

Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images A04 8:02PM

UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light A02 6:58PM

Change Links April 2018 A01 6:27PM

More Local News...

Other/Breaking News

OUR HOUSE Grief Support Center Celebrates 25 Years with the House of Hope Gala S24 7:10PM

Against the Rent Madness and For a Nonprofit Orientation! S24 11:56AM

Cybermonde, cyberguerre, cyberespace, cyberterrorisme S24 6:35AM

Paraphysique de psychosomatique S22 6:58AM

Chuck Grassley: Women Abusing, Animal Murdering, Illegal War Supporting Criminal S22 2:58AM

Finance Capitalism and the Digital Economy S21 4:45PM

Muselières syndicales, muselières patronales S21 7:19AM

Jeff Bezos, Amazon, The Washington Post, Whole Foods, Etc S21 2:50AM

Why Choose Nut Milk Over Cows' Milk S21 1:01AM

Antrhopocène, le grand effondrement S19 9:53AM

Abolir l'économie S18 11:18AM

The Dictatorship of Corporations S17 5:26PM

18 Lethal Consequences Of Hunting S17 3:13PM

Paraphysique de l'outplacement déontologue S15 6:51AM

Shopping du bashing S14 8:42AM

After Lehman Brothers, Experts Say Global Financial Crisis Can Happen Again S13 8:28PM

“Animaniacs in Concert!” Starring Voice Legend Rob Paulsen S12 9:30PM

Probabilités de fin d'humanité S12 6:49AM

Florida Area of Migrant Farmworkers Denied Right to Construct Health Clinic near NaplesCIW S11 2:57AM

Steer clear of work morality! S09 12:10PM

The Shortwave Report 09/07/18 Listen Globally! S06 11:23PM

August 2018 Honduras Coup update S06 12:28PM

Brett Kavanaugh Filled The 5th Circuit With Execution Judges S06 6:14AM

Augusta Georgia Woman Gets 5 Year Prison Sentence for Writing About Russians Crime Acts S05 8:29AM

Paraphysique de contextualité S05 8:29AM

Crisis Regulation in Global Capitalism S03 3:39PM

Ex-voto de réification S03 10:24AM

Please Oppose Warmonger, Execution and Torture Supporting Bush Operative Brett Kavanaugh A31 10:45PM

More Breaking News...
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy