We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Slow Death of America

by Sinking ship Friday, Mar. 22, 2002 at 7:55 PM

Are people getting the implications of this??????????????





Bill Gaining Momentum

By Jon Dougherty



The vast majority of states currently are considering a piece of model legislation that critics charge could turn out to be a major threat to civil liberties.

According to the

As reported

An initial version of the bill was drafted in October 2001, just a month after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, by The Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities, in collaboration with several other organizations, including the

But as word - and criticism - of the measure spread, its authors released a second draft Dec. 21, though ALEC says much of the original intent remained unchanged.

"While some of these changes reflect the concerns shared by groups interested in protecting and promoting civil liberties, other changes were merely cosmetic, inexplicable or altogether nonexistent," said a policy analysis paper issued by ALEC, which opposes the model bill.

"Moreover, the release of a revised draft does not mask the original intent of the authors, nor does it prevent states that have already introduced the original draft from considering the original provisions," the group said.

Jennifer King, the director of the Health and Human Services task force for ALEC, said that although "we're not breathing easy yet," most states so far have chosen to "water down" the model bill.

She told WorldNetDaily that South Dakota is the first and only state thus far to pass the measure, but it, too, "was a fairly watered-down version."

"It doesn't have all the offensive quarantine or ration language in it that the CDC model had," she said.

But Minnesota "is very close to passing the closest version of the bill that we have seen," she said, though "it's still been watered down considerably to require some studying of certain aspects." Other states have been "active" in holding hearings regarding the bill.

Mississippi, by contrast, "has killed the bill outright" the only state so far to do so, she said. And in other "positive trends," at least two other states, Georgia and Oklahoma, "added in some language saying that if the governor declares the public health emergency, then the legislature has to come into session within 48 hours and vote it up or down," said King.

"From our perspective, we found that to be quite positive," she said. "We should see a really hard push [in many states] in the next few weeks."

The model bill's preamble recalls the events of Sept. 11, focusing attention on a "need to protect the health and safety of citizens from epidemics and bioterrorism," according to one analysis. Since the terrorist attacks, federal officials have repeatedly warned that the threat of chemical, biological and even nuclear attack is "real."

The Homeland Security Agency, under its director, Tom Ridge, has even issued a new color-coded warning system, to gauge the level of threat against the nation at any given time.

But critics say the level of control that could be assumed by state authorities is unprecedented.

An analysis by ALEC says the bill "strips individuals and families of their rights and liberties at the expense of government," while representing "unnecessary and duplicative legislation given existing state natural-disaster statutes."

The bill, as written, "provides a number of potential legal loopholes for trial lawyers to extort," grants "overly sweeping rights to the government," and "fails to consider individual state needs," the group said.

Also, the measure "consolidates broad powers" to unelected public health officials while it "erects barriers to states' ability to respond, slowing down response times." It also utilizes "vague language" to "define key concepts, including when an emergency can be declared," the ALEC analysis concluded.

According to the measure, a "public health emergency" is defined as:

"an occurrence or imminent threat of an illness or health condition, caused by bioterrorism, epidemic or pandemic disease, or novel and highly fatal infectious agent or biological toxin, that poses a substantial risk of a significant number of human fatalities or incidents of permanent or long-term disability. Such illness or health condition includes, but is not limited to, an illness or health condition resulting from a national disaster."

The bill's authors have defended the measure, however, saying they believe it is a necessary tool to give state authorities the power they need to deal quickly with unconventional threats to the public safety.

Lawrence O. Gostin, director and principal investigator for the Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins, says there are no tools on the books for lawmakers and state chief executives to effectively deal with health emergencies such as bioterrorism.

"Current public health laws are too highly antiquated and inadequate to ensure a strong and effective response to bioterrorism," Gostin said. "Existing laws thwart public health officials in rapidly identifying and ameliorating health threats, thus jeopardizing the public's safety."

And last fall, when the model bill was unveiled, Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson hailed it as "an important tool for state and local officials to respond to bioterrorism and other public health emergencies."

However, some legal experts warn that even legislation that appears harmless or well-intended could be dangerous to civil liberties.

"We should think always that every new law may be enforced by our worst enemies," B. Utley, the Robert A. Taft fellow in constitutional and international studies at the Ludwig von Mises Institute, told WND last October, after President Bush signed the USA Patriot Act of 2001.

"As drafted, whether these threats are justified depends upon the opinion of only one person ñ the governor of a state," he said. Legislatures that may consider the bill at some point should "work to improve the model act to minimize the chance that a governor could make a mistake."

Others contend the entire bill is unnecessary because governors already retain the authority to declare emergencies should one arise. The model bill, however, would override some of the civil-liberties protections built into current state statutes.

About one-third of all state legislators are members of ALEC. It was founded in 1973 by a "small group of state legislators and conservative policy advocates Ö who share a common belief in limited government, free markets, federalism and individual liberty."


Email This Article



This Site Served by TheHostPros
Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy