error The Ultimate Delusion: by Stephen Ames src="The Ultimate Delusion by Stephen Ames_files/index.html" frameBorder=0
width=468 scrolling=no height=60 BORDERCOLOR="#000000">
| href="http://www.topcities.com/cgi-bin/affiliates/clickcount.cgi?url=www.thefreesite.com" |
target=_top> src="The Ultimate Delusion by Stephen Ames_files/mb_thefreesite156x20.gif"
| href="http://www.topcities.com/cgi-bin/affiliates/clickcount.cgi?url=www.topcities.com/cgi-bin/home/signup" |
target=_top> src="The Ultimate Delusion by Stephen Ames_files/mb_topcities312x20.gif"
src="The Ultimate Delusion by Stephen Ames_files/archivel.gif" width=478
border=0> src="The Ultimate Delusion by Stephen Ames_files/madhack.gif" width=48
src="The Ultimate Delusion by Stephen Ames_files/greygrad.gif" width=585
By: Stephen Ames
Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S.
Social Security, as follows: S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security (United
States of America) Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st
See APFN Web Pages: href="http://www.apfn.org/apfn/knighthood.htm">http://www.apfn.org/apfn/knighthood.htm
At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of
July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and
(2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers
enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council,
to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:
"This Order may be cited as
the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into
force on 1st September 1997."
Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge
William Wayne Justice stating in court that he takes his orders from
This order goes on to redefine words in the Social
Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law. Remember, King George
was the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and
of the United States of America." See: Treaty of Peace (1783) 8 U.S. Statutes at
Large 80.. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the
What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers and
King George were working hand-in-hand to bring the people of America to their
knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that
could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a
corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See Republica v.
Sweers 1 Dallas 43. and 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)
The United States is not a land mass, it is a
Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the
King of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8
Statutes at Large 80.
On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract
for the repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating
from February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King
money which is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. King George
funded both sides of the Revolutionary War.
Now the Articles of Confederation which were
declared in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12:
"All bills of credit
emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of
Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the
present confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the
United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and
the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged."
The Articles of Confederation acknowledge the debt
owed to King George.
Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the
War was nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King,
the conquest was not yet complete. Now the loans were coming due and so a
meeting was convened in Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability
of the country under the Articles of Confederation. Only five States come to the
meeting, but there is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia
the following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of
Confederation On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take
place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of Confederation.
Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did the people know
that the so called founding fathers were going to reorganize the United States
because it was Bankrupt.
On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates
approve the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors. Constitutor:
In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the
payment of another's debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed.
The States were now
liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not because
they were not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a
See APFN web page href="http://www.apfn.org/apfn/money.htm">http://www.apfn.org/apfn/money.htm
On August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was
Titled.-An Act making provision for the payment of the Debt of the United
States. This can be found at 1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act
for all intents and purposes abolished the States and Created the Districts. If
you don't believe it look it up. The Act set up Federal Districts, here in
Pennsylvania we got two. In this Act each District was assigned a portion of the
debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments which
most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States needed to legally bind
the people to the debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to
the people for a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted
them to people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great
Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso
facto a citizen of the United States. A citizen is a member of a fictional
entity and it is synonymous with subject.
What you think is a state is in
reality a corporation, in other words, a Person.
Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272 "Word "person" does not include state. 12
Op Atty Gen 176.
There are no states, just corporations. Every body
politic on this planet is a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity,
a fiction at law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind,
that speak to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a
fiction. For an in-depth look into the nature
of these corporations and to see how you also have been declared a fictional
entity. See: AMERICAN LAW AND PROCEDURE. JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL INSTITUTIONS.
VOL.XIII By James De Witt Andrews LL.B. (Albany Law School), LL.D. (Ruskin
University) from La Salle University. This book explains in detail the nature
and purpose of these corporations, you will be stunned at what you
Now before we go any further let us examine a few
things in the Constitution.
Article six section one keeps the loans from the
King valid it states; "All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before
the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States
under this Constitution, as under the Confederation."
Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article
One Section Eight clause Two which states that Congress has the power to borrow
money on the credit of the United States. This was needed so the United States
(Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then
because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable
for it. The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank in
1791. This was a private Bank of which there were 25,000 shares issued of which
18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States money in
exchange for Securities of the United States. Now the creditors of the United
States which included the King wanted paid the Interest on the loans that were
given to the United States. So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of
taxing alcohol. The people resisted so George Washington sent out the militia to
collect the tax which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion.
It is the Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect
taxes off of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll
tell you how. The people are slaves! The United States belongs to the founding
fathers, their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a
Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen someone in court
attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. It is
because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!!!
If you don't believe read Padelford, Fay & Co.
vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which
states " But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in
court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is
true, is a compact but he is not a party to it."
Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One
Section Eight clause (15) which states that it is the militia's job to execute
the laws of the Union. Now read Clause (16) Which states that Congress has the
power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for
governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United
States.... the Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is their duty to
collect our substance. As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up
a Military Government to guard the King's commerce and make us slaves. If one
goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find "The Treaty of Amity,
Commerce and Navigation". This Treaty was signed on November 19th, 1794 which
was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King's
Troops were still occupying the United States. Being the nice King that he was,
he decided that the troops would return to England by June 1st, 1796. The troops
were still on American soil because, quite frankly the King wanted them
Many people tend to blame the Jews for our
problems, but they too are for the most part also slaves. Jewish Law does
however govern the entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY
PRESIDENT SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit: "Everything in the Babylonian Talmud
is binding on all Israel. Every town and country must follow all customs, give
effect to the decrees, and carry out the enactment's of the Talmudic sages,
because the entire Jewish people accepted everything contained in Talmud. The
sages who adopted the enactment's and decrees, instituted the practices,
rendered the decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the
Sages of Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of
the entire Torah in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher."
are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the subject Index,
Mammon is defined as ("Civil law and procedure").
Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English Law"
-- A Law of the Jews Becomes the Law of the Land, found in "The George Town Law
Journal, Vol 71: pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the Law Review that
the Jews are the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains
that the Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud
became the law of the land, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code
which is private international law. The written credit agreement -- the Jewish
shetar is a lien on all of the property in the world. The treatise also explains
that the Jews are owned by Great Britain and that the Jews are in charge of the
We are living under the Babylonian Talmud. It was
brought into England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, Kings and the
various religions ever since. It is total and relentless mind control, people
are taught to believe in things that do not exist. Private International Law,
which is commercial law, only deals with fictions, known as persons. A person is
a fictional entity at law, not a living being. See UCC 1-201.
Now before you
scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I'm sorry people, you are not a party to
any constitution. Read the case cite below.
"But, indeed, no private person has a right to
complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The
Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." Padelford,
Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520
You have to understand that Great Britain, (Article six Section one) the United
States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you. Let me try to
explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile has a warranty
and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell the man just forget
about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me and he says no. So you
take him to court for not holding up the contract. The court then says case
dismissed. Why? Because you are not a party to the contract. You cannot sue a
government official for not adhering to a contract (Constitution) that you are
not a party too. You better accept the fact that you are a Slave. When you try
to use the Constitution you are committing a CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS.
Why? Because you are attempting to infringe on a private contract that you are
not a party to. Then to make matters worse you are a debt slave who owns no
property or has any rights. You are a mere user of your Masters
Here are just a couple of examples:
control and custody of infants is with the government" Tillman V. Roberts. 108
"Marriage is a civil contract to which there are
three parties-the husband, the wife and the state." Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154
"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the
State: individual so-called 'ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e.
law amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and
subordinate to the necessities of the State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd
Congress 1st Session. (Brown v. Welch supra)
You own no Property because you are a slave. Really
you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor.
"The right of traffic or the transmission of
property, as an absolute inalienable right, is one which has never existed since
governments were instituted, and never can exist under government." Wynehamer v.
The People. 13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481
Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the
American people. The IRS is not an Agency of the United States
See APFN web page href="http://www.apfn.org/apfn/irstax.htm">http://www.apfn.org/apfn/irstax.htm
All taxpayers have an Individual Master File which
is in code. By using IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a
blocking series which shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid.
Most taxpayers fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is
reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399 which is the Business Master File in 6209
prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers are considered a
business and involved in commerce and are held liable for taxes via a treaty
between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K. The form that is supposed to
be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA-Foreign Investment Real Property Tax
Account. The 8288 form is in the Law Enforcement Manual of the IRS, chapter 3.
The OMB's-paper-Office of Management and Budget, in the Department of Treasury,
List of Active Information collections, Approved Under Paperwork Reduction Act
is where form 8288 is found under OMB number 1545-0902, which says U.S. with
holding tax return for dispositions by foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288,
These codes have since been changed to read as
follows: IMF 300-309, Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which
is the code for the 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF
390-399 reads U.S.-U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. Isn't it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form
is a payment of a tax to the U.K.? Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for
the law that makes one liable for the so called Income Tax but, it is not in
there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through a private contract
called the Constitution of the United States Article Six, Section One and
various agreements. Is a cow paying an income tax when the machine gets
connected to it's udders ? The answer is no. I have never known a cow that owns
property or has been compensated for its labor. You own nothing that your labor
has ever produced. You don't even own your labor or yourself. Your labor is
measured in current credit money, which is debt. You are allowed to retain a
small portion of your labor so that you can have food, clothing shelter and most
of all breed more slaves.
You see, we are cows, the IRS is company who milks
the cows and the United States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the
herd and Great Britain is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held
in allodium by the Pope. Now the picture will become much clearer after reading
the next few paragraphs. We will now show the Popes involvement in the scheme of
things. "Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to
keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes,
the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in
their respective states, those measures which the clergy may adopt with the aim
of ameliorating their interests, so intimately connected with the preservation
of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering
their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for them, and solicit his
constant cooperation in their views of submitting the nations." Article (3)
Treaty of Varona (1822)
If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless,
insist on his law being observed he must be obeyed. Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec,
lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws moreover become obligatory
without being accepted or confirmed by secular rulers. Syllabus, prop. 28, 29,
44. Hence the jus nationale, (Federal Law) or the exceptional ecclesiastical
laws prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the
Sovereign Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law. Vol. I 53-54. So could this
be shown that the Pope rules the world?
The Pope (Vicar of Christ) claims to be the
ultimate owner of everything in the World. See Treaty of 1213, Papal Bulls of
1455 and 1492.
Don't let this information alarm you because
without it you cannot be free, You have to understand that all slavery and
freedom originates in the mind. When your mind allows you to accept and
understand that the United States, Great Britain and the Vatican are
corporations which are nothing but fictional entities which have been placed
into your mind, you will understand that our slavery is because we believe in
src="The Ultimate Delusion by Stephen Ames_files/greygrad.gif" width=585