We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

House GOP “Stimulus” Bill Offers Over 0 Million Each To 14 Corporations

by Citizens For Tax Justice Thursday, Oct. 25, 2001 at 9:12 PM

House GOP “Stimulus” Bill Offers 14 Large, Low-Tax Corporations More than 0 Million in Tax Rebates Each IBM alone is slated for a .4 billion rebate check. The “stimulus” tax-cut bill just approved by the House Ways and Means Committee calls for some billion in immediate tax rebates to large profitable corporations that paid the low-rate “alternative minimum tax” over the past decade and a half because loopholes cut their regular income tax bills to little or nothing.

Low-Tax Corporations and the House GOP Stimulus Bill: CTJ Analysis

Citizens for Tax Justice , 202-626-3780 October 16, 2001
House GOP “Stimulus” Bill Offers 14 Large, Low-Tax Corporations More than 0 Million in Tax Rebates Each
IBM alone is slated for a .4 billion rebate check

Click here to see this analysis in PDF format.


The “stimulus” tax-cut bill just approved by the House Ways and Means Committee calls for some billion in immediate tax rebates to large profitable corporations that paid the low-rate “alternative minimum tax” over the past decade and a half because loopholes cut their regular income tax bills to little or nothing.

Some .3 billion of these corporate rebate checks would be made out to just 14 tax-avoiding Fortune 500 companies—whose rebates would average 0 million each. (These companies reported more than billion in pretax U.S. profits in 2000.)

A Baker's Dozen Corporations with More than 0 Million in AMT Tax Credit Carryforwards at the End of 2000
Company AMT Rebates under the
House GOP Tax Bill,
$-millions
IBM $ 1,424
General Motors 833
General Electric 671
TXU (Texas Utilities Company) 608
DaimlerChrysler* 600
ChevronTexaco 572
UAL (United Airlines) 371
Enron 254
Phillips Petroleum 241
AMR (American Airlines) 184
IMC Global 155
Comdisco 144
CMS Energy 136
Westvaco 112
Total, these 14 Companies $ 6,305
Source: Corporate Annual Reports for 2000 (2001).
*As reported by DaimlerChrysler to Automotive News
Citizens for Tax Justice, Oct. 16, 2001
  • Topping the list is IBM, slated to get a .4 billion rebate check. General Motors is next at 3 million, followed by General Electric at 1 million, TXU (Texas Utilities) at 8 million, DaimlerChrysler at 0 million, and ChevronTexaco at 2 million.
  • Of these 14 low-tax companies that would get more than 0 million each under the GOP-backed bill, five are in the energy business. Two are in the airline industry, which is receiving billion in grants and loans under already passed legislation.
  • The bill’s proposed total of billion in instant rebates for profitable tax-avoiding corporations is almost twice as big as the .7 billion in added individual rebates that the tax committee decided to provide to 37 million, mostly low-income families and singles whose 2000 earnings were too low to qualify for the previous round of personal tax rebates.

Under the bill, the “AMT” would be repealed (to facilitate future tax sheltering) and corporations would be entitled to an immediate rebate of any alternative minimum tax they paid since the tax was established in 1986. In contrast, under current law, a company that pays the AMT can get a refund in a later year only if its regular income tax payments exceed the AMT that year. Many profitable companies have so many loopholes that they never pay enough in regular income taxes to use these “AMT credit carryforwards.”


Back To Reports
Report this post as:

LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 1 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
interesting, one question air Thursday, Oct. 25, 2001 at 11:01 PM
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy