We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Fast Tracks backers use September 11

by John Nichols Monday, Oct. 08, 2001 at 5:39 AM

Trading on Terror: Fast Tracks backers use September 11 to renew free-trade push.

Moving to exploit a shifting political landscape in the

aftermath of the September 11 terrorist attacks on the World

Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush's

Congressional point man on free trade issues has announced

that he will attempt to ram a Fast Track bill through the Congress as

soon as next week.

Bush's demand that Congress grant him unrestricted "Fast Track"

authority to negotiate a sweeping Free Trade Area of the Americas

appeared to be in serious political trouble before September 11. But,

after several weeks of attempting to equate support for the trade

legislation as a test of patriotism, the Bush administration and its

Congressional allies are now moving to force a dramatic confrontation on

the issue.

House Ways and Means Committee chair Bill Thomas, R-Cal., unveiled

a "Trade Promotion Authority" bill Wednesday afternoon and declared

that he will push for a committee vote on the legislation Friday. Though

he has yet to receive a go-ahead from House Speaker Dennis Hastert,

R-Ill., Thomas says that if the Ways and Means Committee approves his

bill he wants to see a rapid vote by the full House. Bush aides and their

Congressional allies are betting that, if the Thomas measure is packaged

as a component of Bush's overall response to terrorist threats and

international instability, they will be able to brow beat even skeptical

Democrats into backing it.

But there are already signs that the Bush camp is going to have a serious

fight on its hands. The AFL-CIO and its members unions have geared up

a major push to block action on the bill. The labor federation restarting its

toll-free number for Fast Track foes to call Congress (1-800-393-1082),

the Sierra Club has issues a national action alert to its members, and key

Democratic players on trade issues are voicing loud objections to the

strategy of linking trade with the terrorism fight.

"Piggybacking Fast Track onto our nation's reawakened patriotic fervor,"

argued U.S. Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, should be called what it is:

"shabby political profiteering."

The fury in Kaptur's words illustrates why Thomas' move is a

high-stakes gamble.

Fast Track remains unpopular not just with most Democrats but with

many members of his own party. Opposed by labor, environmental and

human rights group because it would eliminate the ability of Congress to

amend or moderate anti-worker, environmentally risky and undemocratic

components of trade deals reached by the Bush administration, Fast

Track has long been the top legislative priority of multinational

corporations and their lobbying associations. With Fast Track authority,

Bush would be freed to negotiate a borderless business zone from South

America to Antarctica -- creating a circumstance Public Citizen Global

Trade Watch director Lori Wallach has described as "NAFTA on


No surprise, then, that the Business Roundtable was praising Thomas'

move as soon as it was announced. Seizing on the fact that a handful of

Democrats who have long backed the corporate free-trade agenda are

backing the Thomas bill, the Roundtable declared it a "fair and bipartisan


But key Democratic players on trade issues, including some who have

backed free-trade measures in the past, remain furious as U.S. Trade

Representative Bob Zoellick's public pronouncements suggesting that it

was a patriotic duty of House members to give up their ability to

influence trade negotiations.

The ranking Democrat on the Ways and Means Committee, New York's

Charles Rangel, last week dispatched a blistering letter in which he

dismissed Zoellick's "Countering Terrorism With Trade" rhetoric as

political posturing of the worst sort. "Mr. Zoellick clearly is using the

attack and its aftermath as leverage to pressure Democrats to support

giving the president Fast Track authority," argued Rangel. "But this war

is not about passing Fast Track trade authority." Teamsters union

President James Hoffa, who has worked with the administration on

several issues in recent months, now says he is "outraged that U.S.

Trade Representative Robert Zoellick and members of Congress are

planning to take advantage of the September 11 crisis to ram fast-track

trade legislation through the House..." And two Democrats with histories

of supporting free-trade measures, Michigan's Sander Levin and

California's Robert Matsui, joined Rangel last week in blasting Thomas'

labeling of his latest fast-track proposal as a "Bipartisan Compromise."

Arguing that Thomas' proposal was neither "bipartisan" nor a

"compromise," the trio bluntly declared that, "Bringing up a Fast Track

bill at this time would disrupt the current bipartisan approach to


Despite the force of that language, foes of Fast Track still worry that

Levin might cut a deal with Thomas -- as he did during the 2000 debate

on granting China permanent normal trade relations. But House Minority

Leader Richard Gephardt, D-Mo., and Senate Majority Leader Tom

Daschle, D-SD, have indicated that they oppose linking Fast Track to

economic stimulus legislation, and have warned that bringing up the

divisive issue could wreck the spirit of bipartisanship that has been seen

in Congress since September 11.

"Just because Americans believe in eradicating terrorism does not mean

they want to keep exporting good-paying jobs and undermining our

nation's manufacturing and agricultural sectors," argues Kaptur, who

says the administration's Fast Track agenda "is the way to a weaker

American economy and a growing divide between the world's rich and


Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy