imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

protests and demonstrations post S11 - NAOMI KLEIN

by NAOMI KLEIN Monday, Oct. 08, 2001 at 4:48 AM

NAOMI KLEIN writes in a recent issue of The Nation about how our approach to street activism may be different after S11. While we may still experience grief regarding the events, the material conditions that give rise to our dissent remain.

Signs of the Times

by NAOMI KLEIN

As shocking as this must be to New Yorkers, in Toronto, the city where I live, lampposts and

mailboxes are plastered with posters advertising a plan by antipoverty activists to "shut down" the

business district on October 16. Some of the posters (those put up before September 11) even have a

picture of skyscrapers outlined in red--the perimeters of the designated direct-action zone. Many have

argued that O16 should be canceled, as other protests and demonstrations have been, in deference to

the mood of mourning--and out of fear of stepped-up police violence.

But the shutdown is going ahead. In the end, the events of September 11 don't change the fact that the

nights are getting colder and the recession is looming. They don't change the fact that in a city that

used to be described as "safe" and, well, "maybe a little boring," many will die on the streets this winter,

as they did last winter, and the one before that, unless more beds are found immediately.

And yet there is no disputing that the event, its militant tone and its choice of target will provoke terrible

memories and associations. Many political campaigns face a similar, and sudden, shift. Post-September

11, tactics that rely on attacking--even peacefully--powerful symbols of capitalism find themselves in

an utterly transformed semiotic landscape. After all, the attacks were acts of very real and horrifying

terror, but they were also acts of symbolic warfare, and instantly understood as such. As Tom Brokaw

and so many others put it, the towers were not just any buildings, they were "symbols of American

capitalism."

As someone whose life is thoroughly entwined with what some people call "the antiglobalization

movement," others call "anticapitalism" (and I tend to just sloppily call "the movement"), I find it difficult

to avoid discussions about symbolism these days. About all the anticorporate signs and signifiers--the

culture-jammed logos, the guerrilla-warfare stylings, the choices of brand name and political

targets--that make up the movement's dominant metaphors.

Many political opponents of anticorporate activism are using the symbolism of the World Trade Center

and Pentagon attacks to argue that young activists, playing at guerrilla war, have now been caught out

by a real war. The obituaries are already appearing in newspapers around the world:

"Anti-Globalization Is So Yesterday," reads a typical headline. It is, according to the Boston Globe, "in

tatters." Is it true? Our activism has been declared dead before. Indeed, it is declared dead with

ritualistic regularity before and after every mass demonstration: our strategies apparently discredited,

our coalitions divided, our arguments misguided. And yet those demonstrations have kept growing

larger, from 50,000 in Seattle to 300,000, by some estimates, in Genoa.

At the same time, it would be foolish to pretend that nothing has changed since September 11. This

struck me recently, looking at a slide show I had been pulling together before the attacks. It is about

how anticorporate imagery is increasingly being absorbed by corporate marketing. One slide shows a

group of activists spray-painting the window of a Gap outlet during the anti-WTO protests in Seattle.

The next shows The Gap's recent window displays featuring its own prefab graffiti--words like

"Independence" sprayed in black. And the next is a frame from Sony PlayStation's "State of

Emergency" game featuring cool-haired anarchists throwing rocks at evil riot cops protecting the

fictitious American Trade Organization. When I first looked at these images beside each other, I was

amazed by the speed of corporate co-optation. Now all I can see is how these snapshots from the

corporate versus anticorporate image wars have been instantly overshadowed, blown away by

September 11 like so many toy cars and action figures on a disaster movie set.

Despite the altered landscape--or because of it--it bears remembering why this movement chose to

wage symbolic struggles in the first place. The Ontario Coalition Against Poverty's decision to "shut

down" the business district came from a set of very specific and still relevant circumstances. Like so

many others trying to get issues of economic inequality on the political agenda, the people the group

represents felt that they had been discarded, left outside the paradigm, disappeared and reconstituted

as a panhandling or squeegee problem requiring tough new legislation. They realized that what they had

to confront was just not a local political enemy or even a particular trade law but an economic

system--the broken promise of deregulated, trickle-down capitalism. Thus the modern activist

challenge: How do you organize against an ideology so vast, it has no edges; so everywhere, it seems

nowhere? Where is the site of resistance for those with no workplaces to shut down, whose

communities are constantly being uprooted? What do we hold on to when so much that is powerful is

virtual--currency trades, stock prices, intellectual property and arcane trade agreements?

The short answer, at least before September 11, was that you grab anything you can get your hands

on: the brand image of a famous multinational, a stock exchange, a meeting of world leaders, a single

trade agreement or, in the case of the Toronto group, the banks and corporate headquarters that are

the engines that power this agenda. Anything that, even fleetingly, makes the intangible actual, the

vastness somehow human-scale. In short, you find symbols and you hope they become metaphors for

change.

For instance, when the United States launched a trade war against France for daring to ban

hormone-laced beef, Jos Bové and the French Farmers' Confederation didn't get the world's attention

by screaming about import duties on Roquefort cheese. They did it by "strategically dismantling" a

McDonald's. Nike, ExxonMobil, Monsanto, Shell, Chevron, Pfizer, Sodexho Marriott, Kellogg's,

Starbucks, The Gap, Rio Tinto, British Petroleum, General Electric, Wal-Mart, Home Depot, Citigroup,

Taco Bell--all have found their gleaming brands used to shine light on everything from bovine growth

hormone in milk to human rights in the Niger Delta; from labor abuses of Mexican tomato farmworkers

in Florida to war-financing of oil pipelines in Chad and Cameroon; from global warming to sweatshops.

In the weeks since September 11, we have been reminded many times that Americans aren't

particularly informed about the world outside their borders. That may be true, but many activists have

learned over the past decade that this blind spot for international affairs can be overcome by linking

campaigns to famous brands--an effective, if often problematic, weapon against parochialism. These

corporate campaigns have, in turn, opened back doors into the arcane world of international trade and

finance, to the World Trade Organization, the World Bank and, for some, to a questioning of capitalism

itself.

But these tactics have also proven to be an easy target in turn. After September 11, politicians and

pundits around the world instantly began spinning the terrorist attacks as part of a continuum of

anti-American and anticorporate violence: first the Starbucks window, then, presumably, the WTC.

New Republic editor Peter Beinart seized on an obscure post to an anticorporate Internet chat room

that asked if the attacks were committed by "one of us." Beinart concluded that "the anti-globalization

movement...is, in part, a movement motivated by hatred of the United States"--immoral with the United

States under attack.

In a sane world, rather than fueling such a backlash the terrorist attacks would raise questions about

why US intelligence agencies were spending so much time spying on environmentalists and

Independent Media Centers instead of on the terrorist networks plotting mass murder. Unfortunately, it

seems clear that the crackdown on activism that predated September 11 will only intensify, with

heightened surveillance, infiltration and police violence. It's also likely that the anonymity that has been

a hallmark of anticapitalism--masks, bandannas and pseudonyms--will become more suspect in a

culture searching for clandestine operatives in its midst.

But the attacks will cost us more than our civil liberties. They could well, I fear, cost us our few

political victories. Funds committed to the AIDS crisis in Africa are disappearing, and commitments to

expand debt cancellation will likely follow. Defending the rights of immigrants and refugees was

becoming a major focus for the direct-action crowd in Australia, Europe and, slowly, the United States.

This too is threatened by the rising tide of racism and xenophobia.

And free trade, long facing a public relations crisis, is fast being rebranded, like shopping and baseball,

as a patriotic duty. According to US Trade Representative Robert Zoellick (who is frantically trying to

get fast-track negotiating power pushed through in this moment of jingoistic groupthink), trade

"promotes the values at the heart of this protracted struggle." Michael Lewis makes a similar conflation

between freedom fighting and free trading when he explains, in an essay in The New York Times

Magazine, that the traders who died were targeted as "not merely symbols but also practitioners of

liberty.... They work hard, if unintentionally, to free others from constraints. This makes them, almost

by default, the spiritual antithesis of the religious fundamentalist, whose business depends on a denial of

personal liberty in the name of some putatively higher power."

The battle lines leading up to next month's WTO negotiations in Qatar are: Tradeequals freedom,

antitrade equals fascism. Never mind that Osama bin Laden is a multimillionaire with a rather

impressive global export network stretching from cash-crop agriculture to oil pipelines. And never mind

that this fight will take place in Qatar, that bastion of liberty, which is refusing foreign visas for

demonstrators but where bin Laden practically has his own TV show on the state-subsidized network

Al-Jazeera.

Our civil liberties, our modest victories, our usual strategies--all are now in question. But this crisis also

opens up new possibilities. As many have pointed out, the challenge for social justice movements is to

connect economic inequality with the security concerns that now grip us all--insisting that justice and

equality are the most sustainable strategies against violence and fundamentalism.

But we cannot be naïve, as if the very real and ongoing threat of more slaughtering of innocents will

disappear through political reform alone. There needs to be social justice, but there also needs to be

justice for the victims of these attacks and immediate, practical prevention of future ones. Terrorism is

indeed an international threat, and it did not begin with the attacks in the United States. As Bush invites

the world to join America's war, sidelining the United Nations and the international courts, we need to

become passionate defenders of true multilateralism, rejecting once and for all the label

"antiglobalization." Bush's "coalition" does not represent a genuinely global response to terrorism but the

internationalization of one country's foreign policy objectives--the trademark of US international

relations, from the WTO negotiating table to Kyoto: You are free to play by our rules or get shut out

completely. We can make these connections not as "anti-Americans" but as true internationalists.

We can also refuse to engage in a calculus of suffering. Some on the left have implied that the

outpouring of compassion and grief post-September 11 is disproportionate, even vaguely racist,

compared with responses to greater atrocities. Surely the job of those who claim to abhor injustice and

suffering is not to stingily parcel out compassion as if it were a finite commodity. Surely the challenge

is to attempt to increase the global reserves of compassion, rather than parsimoniously police them.

Besides, is the outpouring of mutual aid and support that this tragedy has elicited so different from the

humanitarian goals to which this movement aspires? The street slogans--PEOPLE BEFORE PROFIT ,

THE WORLD IS NOT FOR SALE --have become self-evident and viscerally felt truths for many in the

wake of the attacks. There is outrage in the face of profiteering. There are questions being raised

about the wisdom of leaving crucial services like airport security to private companies, about why there

are bailouts for airlines but not for the workers losing their jobs. There is a groundswell of appreciation

for public-sector workers of all kinds. In short, "the commons"--the public sphere, the public good, the

noncorporate, what we have been defending, what is on the negotiating table in Qatar--is undergoing

something of a rediscovery in the United States.

Instead of assuming that Americans can care about each other only when they are getting ready to kill

a common enemy, those concerned with changing minds (and not simply winning arguments) should

seize this moment to connect these humane reactions to the many other arenas in which human needs

must take precedence over corporate profits, from AIDS treatment to homelessness. As Paul Loeb,

author of Soul of a Citizen, puts it, despite the warmongering and coexisting with the xenophobia,

"People seem careful, vulnerable, and extraordinarily kind to each other. These events just might be

able to break us away from our gated communities of the heart."

This would require a dramatic change in activist strategy, one based much more on substance than on

symbols. Then again, for more than a year, the largely symbolic activism outside summits and against

individual corporations has already been challenged within movement circles. There is much that is

unsatisfying about fighting a war of symbols: The glass shatters in the McDonald's window, the

meetings are driven to ever more remote locations--but so what? It's still only symbols, facades,

representations.

Before September 11, a new mood of impatience was already taking hold, an insistence on putting

forward social and economic alternatives that address the roots of injustice as well as its symptoms,

from land reform to slavery reparations. Now seems like a good time to challenge the forces of both

nihilism and nostalgia within our own ranks, while making more room for the voices--coming from

Chiapas, Pôrto Alegre, Kerala--showing that it is indeed possible to challenge imperialism while

embracing plurality, progress and deep democracy. Our task, never more pressing, is to point out that

there are more than two worlds available, to expose all the invisible worlds between the economic

fundamentalism of "McWorld" and the religious fundamentalism of "Jihad."

Maybe the image wars are coming to a close. A year ago, I visited the University of Oregon to do a

story on antisweatshop activism at the campus that is nicknamed Nike U. There I met student activist

Sarah Jacobson. Nike, she told me, was not the target of her activism, but a tool, a way to access a

vast and often amorphous economic system. "It's a gateway drug," she said cheerfully.

For years, we in this movement have fed off our opponents' symbols--their brands, their office towers,

their photo-opportunity summits. We have used them as rallying cries, as focal points, as popular

education tools. But these symbols were never the real targets; they were the levers, the handles. They

were what allowed us, as British writer Katharine Ainger recently put it, "to open a crack in history."

The symbols were only ever doorways. It's time to walk through them.

Report this post as:

Local News

Change Links September 2018 posted S02 10:22PM

More Scandals Rock Southern California Nuke Plant San Onofre A30 11:09PM

Site Outage Friday A30 3:49PM

Change Links August 2018 A14 1:56AM

Setback for Developer of SC Farm Land A12 11:09PM

More problems at Shutdown San Onofre Nuke J29 10:40PM

Change Links 2018 July posted J09 8:27PM

More Pix: "Families Belong Together," Pasadena J02 7:16PM

"Families Belong Together" March, Pasadena J02 7:08PM

Short Report on the Families Belong Together Protest in Los Angeles J30 11:26PM

Summer 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert! J11 6:58AM

Watch the Debate: Excluded Candidates for Governor of California M31 5:20AM

Change Links June 2018 posted M28 7:41AM

The Montrose Peace Vigil at 12 Years M22 8:01PM

Unity Archive Project M21 9:42AM

Dianne Feinstein's Promotion of War, Secret Animal Abuse, Military Profiteering, Censorshi M17 10:22PM

CA Senate Bill 1303 would require an independent coroner rather than being part of police M10 9:08PM

Three years after OC snitch scandal, no charges filed against sheriffs deputies M10 8:57PM

California police agencies violate Brown Act (open meetings) M02 8:31PM

Insane Company Wants To Send Nuke Plant Waste To New Mexico A29 11:47PM

Change Links May 2018 A27 8:40AM

Worker-Owned Car Wash on Vermont Closed A27 5:37AM

GUIDE TO REBEL CITY LOS ANGELES AVAILABLE A13 12:39AM

lausd whistle blower A11 6:58AM

Website Upgrade A10 10:02AM

Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images A04 8:02PM

UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light A02 6:58PM

Change Links April 2018 A01 6:27PM

More Local News...

Other/Breaking News

Finance Capitalism and the Digital Economy S21 4:45PM

Muselières syndicales, muselières patronales S21 7:19AM

Jeff Bezos, Amazon, The Washington Post, Whole Foods, Etc S21 2:50AM

Why Choose Nut Milk Over Cows' Milk S21 1:01AM

Antrhopocène, le grand effondrement S19 9:53AM

Creative Destruction Hack Diamonds Windows/iOS/Android - Creative Destruction Generator S19 12:51AM

Abolir l'économie S18 11:18AM

The Dictatorship of Corporations S17 5:26PM

18 Lethal Consequences Of Hunting S17 3:13PM

Paraphysique de l'outplacement déontologue S15 6:51AM

Creative Destruction Hack Mod Generator S15 3:49AM

Shopping du bashing S14 8:42AM

After Lehman Brothers, Experts Say Global Financial Crisis Can Happen Again S13 8:28PM

“Animaniacs in Concert!” Starring Voice Legend Rob Paulsen S12 9:30PM

Probabilités de fin d'humanité S12 6:49AM

Florida Area of Migrant Farmworkers Denied Right to Construct Health Clinic near NaplesCIW S11 2:57AM

Propagande de virus, virus de propagande S10 7:34AM

Steer clear of work morality! S09 12:10PM

Sweatshop Lodge Ceremony Continues in US Fed Prisons Led by Inmates S08 6:17PM

Paraphysique de l'origami S08 7:11AM

The Shortwave Report 09/07/18 Listen Globally! S06 11:23PM

August 2018 Honduras Coup update S06 12:28PM

Du réussissement putréfié S06 10:55AM

Brett Kavanaugh Filled The 5th Circuit With Execution Judges S06 6:14AM

Log S06 4:25AM

Augusta Georgia Woman Gets 5 Year Prison Sentence for Writing About Russians Crime Acts S05 8:29AM

Paraphysique de contextualité S05 8:29AM

Crisis Regulation in Global Capitalism S03 3:39PM

More Breaking News...
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy