We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Most of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Despite Two "Suicide Hijackers" Being Reported Alive And Well..

by Rick Giombetti Wednesday, Sep. 26, 2001 at 2:27 PM
rickjgio@speakeasy.org Seattle

...The Pioneer Press Publishes Names And Photos Of FBI "Suspects" Anyway

The lap dog role of the mass media is never more evident than when the government announces it's going to war. Although the recently christened crusade against terrorism doesn't count as a war in the traditional sense, the media has predictably been leading the drum beat for a military response to the September 11 terror attacks. There's nothing new about the current media lead cheerleading for war. From the U.S.S. Maine to the Gulf of Tonkin to the S11 terror attacks of this year, the mass media has always propagandized in favor of war in a time of crisis.

These days every pronouncement of a government official or a media appointed terrorism expert is being given headline status around the clock in the media. No matter how poorly sourced or how logically challenged the claim is, there isn't a newspaper, a radio station or a television station that isn't publicizing it virtually unchallenged by any criticism. A good example is the front page feature article appearing in the September 23, 2001 St. Paul Pioneer Press.

This edition of the Pioneer Press happened to catch the eye of the author while he was waiting for a Seattle bound Northwest Airlines flight at Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport. The feature story appearing on the front page contains the names and photos of the FBI's official list of the suspected S11 suicide highjackers. The list includes 19 men, all of them apparently Arab, including 16 black and white photographs, many of them low quality passport photos. The article in question is titled "Terrorists Left Behind A Twisted Trail," by Pioneer Press Washington Bureau reporters Tom Infield, Mark Fazlollah and Daniel Rubin. When I saw this I instantly thought to myself, "I'll bet there's some shoddy journalism to call the Pioneer Press on with this."

I was already aware of Robert Fiske's September 17 report in the Independent (www.independent.co.uk) on the recent whereabouts of one of the suspected "suicide highjackers," Abdulrahman al-Omari, who happens to be a Saudi Airlines pilot alive and well living in Jeddah, thank you very much(al-Omari, whose first name is misspelled on the front page of the Pioneer Press as "Abdulaziz" is one of the three suspects whose names appear without photos). I wasn't prepared for the actual text of the article to admit that it is a case study in bad journalism, but it does. The fourth paragraph of the article basically admits as much when it state that "the story of the suspects is a maddening maze of sketchy records, aliases and apparently phony documents. Even now, the FBI is uncertain about the identities of all the purported hijackers, leaving agents to work from the list they assembled from flight records." Then 39 paragraphs later it is admitted that one of the suspects named with a photo on the front page, Flight

175 "suspect" Waleed Alshehri, has been reported by the Associated Press alive and training with a Moroccan airline in Casablanca. Yet the editors at the Pioneer Press went ahead and published this story on the front page anyway.

I believe that there is only one source for this story, and that would be the FBI. The authors and editors do try to dress up the story with the appearance of journalistic integrity. The paragraph that mentions the AP report on the recent whereabouts of one of the suspected highjackers mentions the FBI declining comment on this revelation, as if this is what is required in a story dealing with 19 dead criminal suspects whose identities are in question. Earth to the editors of the Pioneer Press: WHAT ABOUT CONTACTING THE MAN IN MOROCCO NAMED WALEED ALSHEHRI, INSTEAD OF PUBLISHING HIS NAME WITH THE PHOTO OF A MAN WHO MIGHT HAVE BEEN USING HIS NAME AS AN ALIAS, YOU FUCKING IDIOTS!

Now this is what Robert Fiske did in his September 17 article in the Independent about the revelation that Abdulrahman al-Omari was alive and well in Saudi Arabia. Although Fiske didn't interview al-Olmari, the article states that the Saudi pilot is refusing to talk to reporters, leaving the impression that Fiske made an attempt to contact him (and given Fiske's reputation I don't doubt for a second that he did try to contact this man).

Fiske also wrote a September 16 article based on interview with the Lebanese family of Flight 93 suspect Ziad Jarrah(his name is misspelled as Jarrahi on the front page of the Pioneer Press). Jarrah's family vehemently denies that he could have had any role in the highjackings. Whether or not the denials of Jarrah's family turn out to be true, the Independent isn't risking defaming somebody by publishing Fiske's interview the suspect's family. This is also the ethical thing to do because what if it turns out that Jarrah had nothing to do with the hijacking of Flight 93. DUH!

Why would the Pioneer Press publish such a potentially defamatory article based on a list of suspects, produced by a law enforcement agency, whose identities are still in question? One possible explanation is that the Pioneer Press probably doesn't has have a reporter based in the Middle East. Yet how difficult is it to make the appropriate phone calls to overseas reporters and suspect family members to fact check the names the FBI is giving them? Could there be any doubt that a group of British or French citizens wouldn't be getting treated this way? I don't think they would. A group of European Americans certainly wouldn't be getting treated this way as well. There can be no doubt why the Pioneer Press published its September 23 front page story: Our society's racist attitudes towards Arab and/or Muslim peoples.

When Arabs and/or Muslims are accused of engaging in terrorism many non-Arab and non-Muslim Americans immediately condemn all of these peoples as terrorists. In fact, many Americans don't even have a rudimentary understand of the terms Arab and Muslim. A Sikh man in Mesa, Arizona is believed to have been murdered after the S11 attacks because the suspected killer thought he was Arab and/or Muslim even though he is neither. Many Sikh's happen to wear turban's, like many Arabs and/or Muslims are know to do.

What this tells is us that no standard of evidence is necessary when a group of Arabs and/or Muslims are accused of engaging in terrorism. Any photo a man with dark hair, brown skin and an Arab or an Arab-sounding name attached to it will do for a suspect. This is the low standard of evidence the Pioneer Press apparently needs to put publish 19 names with 16 photos on the front page of a Sunday edition of the paper with stories about the S11 hijackings. Why won't most of the U.S. media publish Fiske's sympathetic but yet hard hitting piece about highjacking suspect Jarrah's family (Fiske does not spare the suspect's family any tough questions in his interview)? Fiske's article on Jarrah's family portrays Arabs as human and understandably defensive about the role any family member may have played in such horrific crimes. This is the kind of reporting that doesn't seem to be allowed in the media once the FBI starts naming the names of suspects in a terrorist crime, and all of the names turn out to be Arabs.

On the editorial page of the same edition of the Pioneer Press appeared an op-ed by editor Walker Lundy titled, "Mr. Bush: Show us the 'hard evidence' against bin Laden." Lundy's column is a rare, reasoned piece of journalism in the war mongering media these days, with many pundits stating that they don't really care what country gets bombed or how many innocents get killed in retaliatory U.S. bombings for the S11 terror attacks. Lundy makes the reasonable observation that President Bush's statements about having evidence that Osama bin Laden was the mastermind behind the S11 terror attacks are long on bombast and short on any hard evidence. It's quite ironic then that the same edition of the Pioneer Press would contain a front page feature that reads like little more than a badly researched FBI most wanted bulletin, helping make asses out of Lundy and the rest of the editorial staff at the paper.

Report this post as:

LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 7 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
its pretty obvious jimdunne Wednesday, Sep. 26, 2001 at 2:55 PM
please stop anon Wednesday, Sep. 26, 2001 at 5:11 PM
Citation Democracy in the US Wednesday, Sep. 26, 2001 at 6:51 PM
I'm Rumor Mongering? Rick Wednesday, Sep. 26, 2001 at 6:53 PM
I'm Rumor Mongering? Rick Wednesday, Sep. 26, 2001 at 6:53 PM
I'm sure Jim Dunne's attitude would be... Rick Giombetti Wednesday, Sep. 26, 2001 at 7:08 PM
Hold the US Executive Branch responsibile or face concentration camps if the Disorder Thursday, Sep. 27, 2001 at 12:01 AM
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy