We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Arianna Huffington on Free Speech

by Arianna Huffington Wednesday, Sep. 26, 2001 at 8:19 AM

Since Sept. 11, we've been told again and again that our failure to act in a certain way would be the moral equivalent of allowing the terrorists to win.

HUFFINGTON: Land of the Free?

Arianna Huffington, OverthrowTheGov.com

September 24, 2001

Since Sept. 11, we've been told again and again that our failure to act in a

certain way would be the moral equivalent of allowing the terrorists to win.

As in: "If we don't get back to work, they win;" or "If we don't go ahead and

play football this weekend, they win;" or "If this changes the way we think

about Arab-Americans, they win."

And, in a way, it's true -- few us of are going to be fighting the battle on the

ground in Afghanistan, but there are ways in which we can all do our part.

Ways that include resolutely defending values that define our country. But just

as this new military battleground is going to be complicated and risky, so, too,

is the one at home. And in the last few days, there is one front where it

appears that our enemies might be winning: the First Amendment. To the

extent that we give up our fundamental freedoms of expression and dissent,

then, yes, "they" have clearly won.

One of those battles is going on right now. It involves Bill Maher, who has

been excoriated for what he said on "Politically Incorrect" last week. But

excoriation -- a valuable form of free speech -- is not a problem. Censorship

is.

Aren't "they" winning when three ABC affiliates, including the Washington,

D.C., station, cancel the show?

Aren't "they" winning when networks cave in to rabble-rousing, self-promoting

radio shock jocks like Dan Patrick from Houston who started this tempest in a

teapot, and who midweek called the show to suggest himself as a guest?

And aren't "they" winning when major sponsors like Federal Express and

Sears put a higher price on their corporate image than on the essential

democratic ingredient of free speech by pulling their ads? These companies

have no problems defending capitalism, but they shrink from defending the

values that make it possible.

When the country just learned with such penetrating anguish what real terror

is, how can the corporate logo polishers fear Bill Maher? Particularly when

the point he was making was such an important one.

So what, exactly, was his point?

In response to guest Dinesh D'Souza's assertion that people who are willing to

die in service to their cause, whatever else they may be, are not "cowards,"

Maher said: "We have been the cowards lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000

miles away. That's cowardly."

I was sitting next to Bill when he said this. And not only did I not object, I

wholeheartedly agreed. In fact, in the past, I've made much the same criticism

of a foreign policy that obliges our military to fight at great remove from the

theater of battle. It was a mistake when we bombed a pharmaceutical factory

in the Sudan, and it was a mistake when we killed the very Albanian refugees

we were trying to protect with our indiscriminate carpet-bombing of Kosovo.

President Bush, himself, has been making much the same point that Bill

Maher did: "It will not look like the air war above Kosovo two years ago,

where no ground troops were used and not a single American was lost in

combat."

Presumably, if Maher had made those same comments on Sept. 10, nobody

would have batted an eyelid. But by uttering the same opinion seven days

later, he put the very existence of his show at risk.

Have we all gone mad?

What becomes of a country when opinions considered perfectly legitimate --

and indeed uttered by hundreds of academics, journalists and members of

Congress -- suddenly become a crime worthy of the media death penalty?

If the attacks on innocent American lives end up making us more like our

attackers, don't they most spectacularly win? And don't the corporate

sponsors, the affiliates and ABC itself see the inconsistency in the fact that,

as a way of showing solidarity against the Taliban, they are using the Taliban's

trademark weapon -- the stifling of dissent?

Isn't freedom what we're fighting for? And isn't lack of freedom -- including

freedom of the press -- the hallmark of our enemies?

"Cowardly" was the injurious word uttered by Maher. Well, let me use it now

where it really belongs -- to describe ABC if it decides to cancel a show that

is, after all, called "Politically Incorrect."

The show in question was the first since the attack. At curtain time, the studio

was electric with anxiety. "Politically Incorrect," though it deals with serious

subjects, is, after all, a satirical program. So we all held our breath as Bill

stepped onto the tightrope.

Maher's tone-setting opening comments, which took the place of his usual

monologue, were nothing short of brilliant and -- in light of the media firestorm

that followed -- remarkably prescient.

"I do not relinquish," he said, "nor should any of you, the right to criticize, even

as we support, our government. This is still a democracy, and they're still

politicians ... Political correctness itself is something we can no longer afford.

Feelings are gonna get hurt so that actual people won't, and that will be a good

thing." At the end of the show, the audience rose in a standing ovation --

something I had never seen before.

As well as being the host of the show, Bill is my friend. And, as his friend, I

was really proud of him. Proud of how perfect a note he had struck between

rallying around the flag, showing grief and expressing dissent. How he had

shown that they are not mutually contradictory. And everything that has

happened since has only made me prouder of him -- and more disgusted at the

politically correct cowards who are trying to stifle him.

We cannot let them succeed, for, as Benjamin Franklin put it, "Whoever

would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness

of speech."

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy