We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

The personal is political By Ralph Nader

by JVE Thursday, Jun. 28, 2001 at 3:21 PM

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution spells out the right of citizens to be "secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches..." by their government.

The personal is political

Financial Modernization legislation allows corporations to distribute consumers' personal information to the highest bidder.

By Ralph Nader



The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution spells out the right of citizens to be "secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches..." by their government.

When that amendment was ratified in 1791, no one imagined that corporations, not governments, would be the ones exercising their vast power to invade the privacy of citizens and, in effect, carry out unreasonable searches of their most intimate personal data.

But, that is exactly what is happening, particularly among newly-formed giant financial conglomerates who have access to massive databases of information about millions of individuals, all of which has been provided by their far-flung insurance, bank, credit card, and securities affiliates. Today these giant corporations have the ability to assemble information that creates a head-to-toe profile of most citizens and their buying and personal habits, including what prescription and nonprescription health products they use, their investments, income, employment histories, and entertainment preferences.

For this consumers can thank the Clinton Administration and a bipartisan group of Senators and Congressmen who lacked the courage to really defend citizens' right to privacy when they passed the so-called Financial Modernization legislation in 1999. This law is the vehicle that allows banks, securities firms, and insurance companies to merge as parts of a financial conglomerate.

People like Democratic Representative Ed Markey of Massachusetts and Republican Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama fought hard to give citizens the right to control where and when their personal information was sold or used in any manner that was not authorized in writing by the consumer-owner of the information. In short, under the Markey-Shelby approach, consumers would be the only ones with the authority to "opt-in," in writing, the use of their personal information. Without this written permission from the consumer, the corporations would not be allowed to sell, share, or use the data for any purpose beyond that specifically agreed to by the consumer.

The industry, however, believed that few consumers would give permission to have their information shared with unknown persons and corporations and threatened to walk away from the legislation if the Shelby-Markey opt-in was adopted. They lobbied for an opt-out system that would require consumers to send in a form indicating that they were opposed to having their information shared.

The Clinton Administration and a bipartisan majority in the Congress surrendered to the threats and left privacy protections to the financial industry's demand for a weak ineffectual opt-out approach. This laid the burden on the consumer to "opt out," and if they failed to send in the form or could not understand the legal jargon, the corporations would be free to distribute the personal information to anyone they chose.

The industry has sent out more than a billion of these opt-out notices as required by law. Most of them have been stuffed in with the variety of miscellaneous promotional brochures that accompany monthly billing statements. Financial consultants who are following the issue estimate that only about five percent of the opt-out notices are being returned

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy