We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Electronic Frontier Foundation Admonishes Renegade Pacifica Board's Suppression

by sam Wednesday, Mar. 07, 2001 at 4:01 PM

Source: EFF The below open letter to the Pacifica Foundation from the Electronic Frontier Foundation is in regard to Pacifica Management's threats against listener web sites that are critical of the Pacifica Board's actions in hijacking the Foundation from it's Mission.

Board of Directors Pacifica Foundation 2390 Champlain St. NW Washington, DC 20009

March 1, 2001

An open letter to the Board of Directors of the Pacifica Foundation from the Electronic Frontier Foundation:

It has come to the attention of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) that counsel for the Pacifica Foundation (Pacifica) has been systematically threatening websites that are critical of Pacifica or some of your member stations with domain name lawsuits. While EFF is not representing any of those sites being threatened at the present time, we have been a vocal opponent to such anti-speech tactics and are representing defendants in a similar lawsuit filed by the Ford Motor Company. (See http://www.eff.org/Legal/Cases/Ford_v_GreatDomains/.

We write to you today because it has also come to our attention that you are displaying EFF's blue ribbon on the homepage of your website, www.pacifica.org. We are proud of our Blue Ribbon Campaign, and we are happy to see that Pacifica, at least in theory, believes in the principles of free speech that our blue ribbon symbolizes.

EFF's blue ribbon is displayed on tens of thousands of websites throughout the Internet as a symbol of support for the essential human right of free speech, a fundamental building block of a free society. This right was affirmed by the U.S. Bill of Rights in 1791 and by the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights in 1948. The Blue Ribbon Campaign has been one of EFF's ways of raising awareness of online censorship and freedom issues, both locally and globally.

We at EFF feel that free speech is such an important part of our humanity that no one, no company and no government, should have the right to abridge it. We also think that free speech has responsibilities such as being truthful and non-oppressive. We don't always agree with the speech we protect. So long as the blue ribbon is used simply to support our campaign, we would not bar its use based on whether or not we agree with the opinions of the user. That would contradict what the symbol is about. We would be concerned if the ribbon were used to imply endorsement of parties or ideas we don't support.

EFF believes that Internet domain names impact greatly on this fundamental right to free speech. It is through Internet protocol addresses and domain names that individuals and organizations place their speech on the Internet and give titles to that speech, or to collections of that speech. And it is through these addresses that others locate that speech to read and use it. A domain name is in some ways like a book title. A company does not have the right to stop publication of a book with their name in the title which says something negative about them, so why they should they be able to stop an online publication with what amounts to the same kind of title.

When individuals or groups choose to use domain names that identify things of which they are critical, that is a protected free speech right. Courts have upheld this use of speech as protected time and time again, and courts have upheld utilizing domain names for this purpose. It is only when there is true confusion that courts have intervened and ruled that free speech does not rule the day. The question EFF poses is

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy