We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
latest news
best of news




A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List


IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

Critical Thinking And Constructive Criticism

by Ron Daniels Friday, Oct. 13, 2000 at 3:25 PM

"To be a critical thinker is to refuse to simply accept things as they appear on the surface, to question and analyze before acting." Ron Daniels, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, spells out exactly what this means for the liberation struggles of Africans in America--and, indeed, for all of us.

Critical Thinking And Constructive Criticism The Black World Today

October 9, 2000

Critical Thinking And Constructive Criticism:
Essential Elements Of The Liberation Process

By Ron Daniels

As Africans in America and the world continue the journey towards liberation from cultural aggression, racial oppression and economic exploitation into the 21st century, it is vitally important that we strive to develop educated, conscious and critical thinking citizens of the Pan-African world. The experiences of African people in the 20th century should have taught us that being biologically black in and of itself is not sufficient to guarantee liberation for the masses of our people. In the U.S. and throughout the African world our experiences with corrupt, self-serving, self-aggrandizing, dictatorially inclined "Black" leaders should have exposed the fallacy of skin politics -- a focus on and allegiance to skin color rather than substance.

It is my contention that as a people we have often been victimized by skin politics because we do not think critically, engage in critical discussions about the issues of the day or engage in constructive criticism of our leaders. To be a critical thinker is to refuse to simply accept things as they appear on the surface, to question and analyze before acting. To complete our journey towards liberation, we need informed, tough minded, critical thinking Africans who are unwilling to accept pronouncements from on high from Black leaders or anyone else without a serious and thoughtful examination of the questions and issues at hand.

Recent history offers some telling examples where Black political leadership has demanded of Black people that we accept their pronouncements uncritically. For example, William Jefferson Clinton, despite a decidedly mixed record on issues affecting Black people, has assumed almost hero status in the Black community merely because he is not as bad as Bush or Dole might have been and because he gets along well with Black people. Some comedians have gone so far as to dub him an honorary Black man. Similarly Clinton was recently received in Africa like he was a savior. He was paraded around in traditional African dress and given five African names, an honor that was not bestowed so abundantly on notable African leaders from the U.S. like Malcolm X or Martin Luther King.

Despite the passage of the Africa Trade Bill, which most progressives believe is a prescription for institutionalizing neo-colonialism, Africa is still not very high on the foreign policy agenda of the U.S. African leaders seem so starved for attention and economic trinkets from the U.S. that Clinton is welcomed and presented to the African masses as a savior for offering a more slightly polished set of shackles. It is not necessarily wrong to develop working political relations with Clinton or to even support him. However, the people should demand that the "leaders" tell the truth about why we might choose pragmatically to deal with Clinton instead of presenting him as the best thing to happen to Black people since sliced bread. There is nothing inherently wrong with supporting a political candidate or leader because his/her positives outweigh the negatives given our agenda and interests at a particular time. We used to call this "critical support."

This is how Black people should treat this Presidential election or any election for that matter. But during the Democratic primary, I was stunned to hear Cornel West, as a self-defined radical democrat, introduce Senator Bill Bradley to Black people like he was a "revolutionary" alternative to Al Gore. Amiri Baraka actually used the rhetoric of revolution to describe his embrace of Bradley! Cornel should have simply provided a reasoned explanation of why Bill Bradley's record was incrementally better than Gore's on certain issues. Now that Gore is the candidate, Black Democrats are presenting him to Black folks and praising him to high heavens as if the sky will fall if George Bush becomes President. And heaven forbid that a Black person should consider Ralph Nader, even though his politics are closer to that of Rev. Jesse L. Jackson, the insurgent candidate for President in 1984 and 1988, than either of the candidates of the establishment parties. There is a reasonable rationale for supporting Gore, but Black leaders should present him without the halo.

The campaign to mobilize Black voters to assist the Democrats to recapture the Congress, particularly the House of Representatives, is also devoid of discussion and debate. My recollection is that it was a Democratically controlled Congress that cowered before Reagan and later Bush in drastically reducing spending for social programs while beefing up the military budget and expenditures for police and prisons. The question is what do the Democrats propose to do differently this time. It is not enough simply to tantalize Black voters with the prospect that Charlie Rangel will be Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee and that a number of other members of the Congressional Black Caucus will Chair powerful committees and sub-committees. Charlie Rangel and other prospective Black chairs of committees should be campaigning across the country sharing their vision and platform for what they intend to do when the Democrats regain control of Congress. Instead the Black electorate is being asked to support the effort to reclaim Congress so that Black faces will replace White faces in powerful positions and places. Our experience in the 20th century strongly suggests that this does not necessarily lead to empowerment for the masses of Black people.

Black leaders need to speak to the people about their goals and objectives and not assume that pigmentation equals liberation. And, knowledgeable, conscious and critically thinking Black people should not let Black leaders get away with it. Critical thinking and constructive criticism are vital elements of the liberation process.

Copyright (c) 2000 The Black World Today. All Rights Reserved. Republished by permission of the author.

Report this post as:

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy