- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
by Jeffrey N. Jones
Sunday, Sep. 24, 2000 at 7:51 AM
firstname.lastname@example.org 310-442-6481 So. Cal. Coordinator / No on Prop. 37 campaign
Information from the No on 37 Campaign about another example of corporate protectionism & environmental destruction. Prop. 37 (aka "the Polluter Protection Act") is designed to let industry off the hook for the cost borne by society of the pollution and sickness they cause.
Vote No On Prop. 37, The Polluter Protection Act
-- It Lets Industry Fleece the Public for Its Clean Up Costs
Don't be fooled by an obscure-looking initiative on the November ballot entitled "Fees.Vote Requirements. Taxes." Proposition 37 was placed on the ballot by big oil, tobacco and liquor companies. It is the biggest threat to the environment to appear on California's ballot in nearly a decade.
Prop. 37 has been labelled the Polluter Protection Act by environmental and public health organizations opposing it. It is designed to let industry off the hook for the cost borne by society of the pollution and sickness they cause. Organizations opposing Proposition 37 include the Sierra Club, Communities for a Better Environment, The League of Women Voters and the American Cancer Society. Proposition 37 is pushed by special interest industries, and it is major give-away to them. So if polluters don't pay, guess who will?
A quick look at the list of contributors to Prop. 37 demonstrates who would benefit from its passage: Chevron, R.J Reynolds, Coors, Arco, Phillip Morris, and others spent over a hundred million dollars to put the constitutional amendment on the ballot. You know the old saying, "If you can't trust the Oil, Tobacco, and Alcohol interests, who can you trust."
As a constitutional amendment, Prop. 37 would override a unanimous Supreme Court decision that held that pollution mitigation fees are constitutional. It would reclassify mitigation such fees as taxes, thereby subjecting them to a two-thirds vote requirement for passage in the Legislature or local communities.
Background: The Sinclair Paint Decision
To understand the impact Prop. 37 would have, let's take a quick look at the court decision that it seeks to overturn, the Sinclair case: In 1991, the California Legislature passed by majority vote the Childhood Lead Poisoning Act. The law assessed a fee on the manufacturers of paint and other lead products to pay to screen and treat children for lead poisoning.
One of the manufacturers, Sinclair Paint Co., challenged the law, claiming that the fee was really a tax and therefore in violation of the state constitutional requirement of a 2/3 vote for tax increases. Sinclair won in a lower court, impairing the state's lead poisoning program for years. But the state Supreme Court reversed, upholding the law unanimously in 1997.
Big corporate lobbies now seek to overturn the Sinclair decision by passing Prop. 37. The initiative states that if a fee is imposed on a taxpaying entity for regulatory purposes, but imposes no regulatory requirements on that taxpayer other than payment of the fee, then that fee is considered a tax, because its sole purpose is to raise revenue.
Effects: What Specific Impacts Would Proposition 37 Have?
What does this really mean? Under that definition, a variety of fees intended to make the responsible parties pay for cleaning up after themselves would be virtually unpassable. (Prop. 37 would not actually revoke the lead paint fee, because it would apply only to fees enacted after July 1, 1999.) Such potential environmental measures as increased fees for disposal of tires (in the wake of disastrous tire fires) or fees on oil refineries to pay for MTBE-contaminated groundwater cleanup would become 'taxes' subject to the 2/3 vote requirement. Passing tough environmental regulations and fees is difficult enough when only a simple majority is necessary; attaining the 2/3 super-majority would be almost impossible given the money and clout of the corporate polluter lobbies.
In its editorial against Proposition 37, The Sacramento Bee warned: "the initiative won't change the underlying economic reality, which is that someone has to pay the costs of mitigating pollution; if not the polluters, then the rest of us."
The campaign to defeat Prop. 37 should be the environmental and social justice battle of this election year. If we don't galvanize our efforts to stop this Big Oil, Tobacco and Liquor industry ploy, we could lose our ability to enforce a key principle of the environmental and social justice movements---the Polluter Pays.
Please Vote No on Proposition 37. It shifts the burden of clean up costs from polluter to taxpayers. It poses a major obstacle to environmental and public health protection.
Report this post as:
More problems at Shutdown San Onofre Nuke
Change Links 2018 July posted
More Pix: "Families Belong Together," Pasadena
"Families Belong Together" March, Pasadena
Short Report on the Families Belong Together Protest in Los Angeles
Summer 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert!
Watch the Debate: Excluded Candidates for Governor of California
Change Links June 2018 posted
The Montrose Peace Vigil at 12 Years
Unity Archive Project
Dianne Feinstein's Promotion of War, Secret Animal Abuse, Military Profiteering, Censorshi
CA Senate Bill 1303 would require an independent coroner rather than being part of police
Three years after OC snitch scandal, no charges filed against sheriffs deputies
California police agencies violate Brown Act (open meetings)
Insane Company Wants To Send Nuke Plant Waste To New Mexico
Change Links May 2018
Worker-Owned Car Wash on Vermont Closed
GUIDE TO REBEL CITY LOS ANGELES AVAILABLE
lausd whistle blower
Help KCET and UCLA identify 60s-70s Chicano images
UCLA Luskin: Casting Youth Justice in a Different Light
Change Links April 2018
Nuclear Shutdown News March 2018
Join The Protest Rally in Glendale on April 10, 2018!
Spring 2018 National Immigrant Solidarity Network News Alert!
Anti-Eviction Mapping Project Shows Shocking Eviction Trends in L.A.
Steve Mnuchin video at UCLA released
More Local News...
Big Brother chez vous, Big Brother partout
Change Links August 2018
Vietnam Labor Watch Tackles Outside and Inside Exploitation of Nation's workforce
What it means to be an artist
Setback for Developer of SC Farm Land
Video: Lawrence Tribe: To End a Presidency: The Power of Impeachment," 59 min
Génétique de l'environnement
Video: Thomas Frank: Rendezvous with Oblivion, 58 min
Philippines – Duterte 2 Years on: Destructive, Divisive, and Despotic
Anarchie et anarchisme
July 2018 Honduras Coup update
The iranian Backed Militia Hezbollah Bombs Communty Center in Argentina July 1995 85 Dead
The Shortwave Report 08/10/136/18 Listen Globally!
Paraphysique du taulard
Pantarchy: Voluntary State and a New Catholic Church: Stephen Pearl Andrews
Against Market Radicalism
Négoce du vol organisé
Paraphysique de la litote
Kudzu Root grows in many US states has anti alcoholism help
Syrian People Suffe after years of Russian Air Bombings and Attacks by the Syrian Army2018
Over 20 State Attorneys General Call for Shell Company Transparency
Paraphysique d'ostracisme, du ça va, d'aparté
The Shortwave Report 08/03/18 Listen Globally!
Capitalism and Worldwide Inequality
Paraphysique de la sauvagerie
Paraphysique de la résignation
Mexican-American History Can Be Unveiled in USA 2018
More Breaking News...