We had a server outage, and we're rebuilding the site. Some of the site features won't work. Thank you for your patience.
imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

white themeblack themered themetheme help
About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
latest news
best of news
syndication
commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
printable version - js reader version - view hidden posts - tags and related articles

What's wrong with civil disobedience? A CNN report

by Noah Dentity Monday, Aug. 07, 2000 at 9:06 PM
noahdentity@hotmail.com

What's wrong with civil disobedience? August 4, 2000 Web posted at: 6:40 p.m. EDT (2240 GMT) By Roger Cossack Law Center Contributing Editor

http://www.cnn.com/2000/LAW/08/columns/cossack.protest.08.04/

What's wrong with civil disobedience?

August 4, 2000

Web posted at: 6:40 p.m. EDT (2240 GMT)

By Roger Cossack

Law Center Contributing Editor

I am back from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where we aired "Burden of Proof" during the Republican National Convention. This was my first political convention and it was dynamic and exciting, to say the least.

I must say, however, that the protestors were, well, disappointing.

Please understand, I am in no way advocating civil violence. But civil disobedience is as old as this country. In fact, it was in Philadelphia that Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin and other American heroes combined to produce our most honored documents of civil disobedience, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.

The protests that occurred during the convention seemed to have no particular focus, but seemed to be aimed at various different enemies: big corporations, cruelty to animals, the legalization of marijuana.

My favorite was the one protestor who carried a sign that said, "Revolution is inevitable, why not now?" I think he was pro-revolution and anti-everything else.

The First Amendment to our Constitution guarantees that we not only have the right to protest by sign or voice, but that we also have the right to assemble. Of course, the tension that exists is always between these inalienable rights and how they are implemented.

Quietly protesting sounds like an oxymoron. Citizens who have points to make, wish to make them so that the greatest number of people will either hear them or see them. Sometimes the best way to guarantee that is to act in such a manner so as to guarantee that there will be as much press coverage as possible.

How do you do that? Well, by acting as outrageously as possible. Many protestors are willing--and even see it as their duty--to get arrested, even when the police really don't want to arrest them.

How do you get arrested? How about failing to disperse when ordered by the police, or lying down in the street and disrupting traffic? That seemed to be the plan of the Philadelphia protestors. Although it seemed to me that most of them left when the police told them to, a few refused and got picked up and put in jail.

Usually the charges against these folks are low-grade misdemeanors punishable by a fine or at the very worst a few days in jail. Most judges and police recognize that whatever else the protestors are, they are not criminals.

However, in Philadelphia, a few of the protestors are being held on huge bails. The protestors are charging that the police targeted certain well-known activists and arrested them before they engaged in any kind of protest. The protestors argue that they were arrested not for what they did, but what they might do.

If the police had reason to believe these leaders of the protests were organizing illegal demonstrations however, they were acting within their rights by arresting them.

Conspiracy is defined as agreeing to commit an illegal act. It does not matter whether the illegal act is prompted by a desire to have things change in a positive matter, or by greed.

That part of the equation is handled by the sentencing judge -- if it gets that far. But it seems to me that keeping these protest leaders in jail behind bails of million is somewhat heavy-handed.

After all, while some protestors may be charged with conspiracy, the crime they were conspiring to commit was, most of the time, a misdemeanor like failing to disperse or blocking traffic.

Yes, the Philadelphia police have a duty to keep the city safe, but the protestors have a right to demonstrate.

We're not talking about major disruptions here, merely some discomfort for the citizens who are trying to get home during rush hour.
Report this post as:

LATEST COMMENTS ABOUT THIS ARTICLE
Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 3 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
TITLE AUTHOR DATE
protesters more lacking in focus than Bush? Stefan
change joey
slaves, let us not curse life ch@nce
© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy