imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
• latest news
• best of news
• syndication
• commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv

Bush re-elected? NOT!

by systemfailure Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 1:25 AM

The president's approval ratings soared following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. In recent weeks, those numbers have dropped to the lowest levels of his presidency, with approval ratings of 49 percent in an NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll out Wednesday night and 50 percent in a CNN-USA Today-Gallup poll released Monday. HA HA HA!!!



WASHINGTON - President Bush's standing with the public has eroded as Americans have become increasingly concerned about postwar Iraq and the economy at home, polls suggest.

 Bush is at a crossroads about 13 months before voters decide whether to give him a second term, say pollsters and experts on public opinion.

Half of Americans, 49 percent, name the economy and jobs as the issues they most want to hear the presidential candidates talk about, according to a poll by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press.

That's higher than levels in the past two presidential campaigns and nearly as high as in October 1991, when 58 percent felt that way. Bush's father lost his re-election bid in 1992.

The increased focus on the economy comes at a time the current president is seeing some of the lowest approval ratings of his presidency.

"We are at a juncture where the Democrats look like they have much more of a chance in the next election than they did a couple of years ago," said Andrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center.

Other surveys released this week show the president's standing in the mid-50s — 55 percent in the Pew poll and 54 percent in a Battleground 2004 poll.

In September 1991, Bush's father was at 66 percent in the Gallup poll, but by the beginning of the next year his job approval had dipped below 50 percent and he lost his re-election bid.

Although the current President Bush's stewardship of the fight against terrorism has boosted his ratings, any perception that U.S. involvement in Iraq is undermining the effort to combat terrorism could undercut Bush's support.

"Without the issue of terrorism, the president would be in much worse shape," said Robert Shapiro, a political scientist at Columbia University who specializes in public opinion. "The objective measure people have is that there haven't been any terrorist events at home."

Almost two-thirds still say they support the decision to use military force in Iraq. But with U.S. casualties mounting and no end in sight to the U.S. occupation of Iraq, a majority of people question whether Bush has a plan for successfully resolving the situation.

"If people begin to see Iraq as not furthering the war on terrorism, but hurting the war on terrorism, the issue that has kept his ratings up could be severely weakened," said pollster Andrew Kohut.

A survey last spring found that most respondents said the war in Iraq had reduced the risk of terrorism in the United States. That is no longer the case. An ABC News poll earlier this month found that, by a 48 percent to 40 percent margin, more Americans say the Iraq war has increased the risk of terrorism in this country.

GOP pollster Ed Goeas noted the latest Battleground 2004 poll suggests that Bush is very popular and trusted in fighting the war on terror. But he noted that six in 10 in the Battleground poll said it would take a drop in unemployment to convince them the economy is improving.

"He's not making his father's mistakes," Democrat pollster Celinda Lake said, referring to Bush's constant talk about his economic plans. In 1991, many thought his father was out of touch with the nation's economic problems.

another fascist bites the dust

by sf Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 1:27 AM

Looks like Bush Jr is headed the same way as the dinosaur......

Looks like his whole administration was a sham, just like his fathers.

And the people arent buying it anymore

There's the "f" word again.

by nonanarchist Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 1:34 AM

Someday, one of you guys is going to say "fascist" and be correct in its usage, and I'll spit coffee on my monitor.

I don't think I need to keep paper towels handy, though.

Back to the poll:

Kinda early to be printing those "Dewey Defeats Truman" headlines, isn't it?

Definition of fascism

by Black Cat Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 1:42 AM

America under the evil idiot bush is certainly becoming a more fascist place, more police, more spies, more prisons, more govt. intrusions into public life, no accountability, more class division, larger armies undertaking agreesive destabilizing maneuveurs, more arms deal to openly fascist dictators, more 'enemies' taregeted without evidence, more race baiting, more monkey trials, more weapons and more surveliance on ordinary civilians.

But one idiot will always follow another idiot, look in the mirror fascist scum, and keep your eyes on your back because you will fall and you will fail.

Kitty, kitty.

by nonanarchist Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 1:53 AM

I suggest you get your information from places other than IMC.

If all I read were IndyMedia, my brain would be toasted, too.

Oh, look! Still no coffee on my monitor!

read your own posts dummy

by ROFL Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 2:06 AM

"More Idiocy From the Neo-Cocks, I Mean Cons"

by nonanarchist Saturday September 27, 2003 03:45 AM



Wow.

Could you be ANY more childish?

Are you still in junior high?

^

by nonanarchist Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 2:27 AM

Do you actually have a point, or do I need to smoke some weed like you?

type, type

by nonantichrist Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 2:30 AM

up late tonight eh, daveman?

Bush will retain presidency elected or not.

by OzzyTeppic Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 6:35 AM

To think a minor inconvenience such as an election defeat will prevent Bush's regime from retaining the presidency is naive at best given his actions in 2000 and all his subisquent actions.

No if things go against the Bush regime in 2004 they will undertake a putsch, probably using legal niceities at first, if these fail they will declare a "terrorist" red alert and tell the people that for there own good and to protect the homeland they will suspend elections and stay in power untill the "war on terror" is won (indefinately ).

Bush 2004

by voter Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 9:33 AM

Who's going to defeat Bush in 2004? Kerry? Clark? Leiberman? Dean? Gephardt? any of the other 5 dwarfs? Nader?

Not in this lifetime.

nonantichrist

by nonanarchist Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 10:56 AM

Not really. You?

Ozzy

by nonanarchist Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 11:00 AM

Whole lotta "ifs" and nothing to back it up.

Except wishful thinking.

You simply cannot conceive the American electorate not falling for your empty rhetoric, can you?

No, if Bush "wins", it'll be because he "stole" the election, and will then stage a "putsch", and declare himself King.

Sounds like you almost wish it would happen, for two reasons:

1. So you can say, "I TOLD you so!"

2. So you can continue to have a focus for your unreasoning hate.

"up late tonight eh, daveman?"

by Eric Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 1:07 PM

I can always recognize the tone of utterfailure's puerile rants.

Utterfailure doesn't have to stay up late. Late is early where he lives.

Hey Enrique, how are things in Alicante?

SEAL meat

by Eric you don't have a clue as usual Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 1:45 PM

that was me, try agin.

"that was me, try agin."

by Eric Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 2:08 PM

Well, me, you and Enrique need to get together and start a club. You can call it the "He-man Capitalist Haters Club of Spain".

wouldn't waste my time

by Poor boy Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 2:27 PM

Eric

you really need to get used to the idea that it's you that is on the hate America or the freedoms that you say you defend club.

But you have several co workers.

fresca, daveman, Bush Admirer and the rest of you are here full time

on this comment board. It must annoy you no end to not be able to

convince people like me.

That's because your posts are nothing but clean up for the mess left

you from the trail of blood and misery caused by a country hi-jacked by criminals.

Me? Hate America? Hate freedom? How so?

by Eric Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 2:46 PM

I've made great personal sacrifices for this county and for freedom. I've fought in combat for those ideals. What have you done?

"But you have several co workers.

fresca, daveman, Bush Admirer and the rest of you"

Those folks are great patriots. I'd fight and die alongside any of them any day of the week. But you, I'm not sure what you stand for. Communism? Socialism? Anarchism? Why don't you identify yourself and what you stand for, and maybe we can dialogue?

I can only assume that you hate freedom.

"It must annoy you no end to not be able to

convince people like me."

Actually, it amuses me to no end.

I'm not here to convince anyone. I'm here to chime in my two cents is all.

I prefer to engage the enemy head on, not to hide in the bushes and wage guerrilla war, like you and your ilk.

Honor. Courage. Commitment.

Things you terrorists know nothing about.

The New X

by The New X Monday, Sep. 29, 2003 at 7:24 PM

oh americans...

i love you simple folk...

entertain me with your stories of how your country has never ever done any wrong.

Stick the constitution up your SUVs tailpipe

by Beezlebub Tuesday, Sep. 30, 2003 at 10:09 AM
Beezlebub@cia.us.gov

We don't need no stinking First Amendment!

^

by Baal Tuesday, Sep. 30, 2003 at 10:14 AM

The above comment brought to you courtesy of the First Amendment.

© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy