OCTOBER 7: FAKE NEWS

By Aleth August 7, 2024, 2:03 pm

As usual, in the ridiculously fake video linked below, by the zionazi de propaganda fide , you don't see a single corpse, a single drop of blood, absolutely nothing that proves the alleged massacre of 1200 people plus X kidnappings. Swallowing such fake zionazi propaganda videos is absurd:

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/speciali/guerra-in-medio-oriente/2023/10/23/reportage-il-film-del-massacro-44-minuti-di-orrore_3fe249f9-49cf-4632-b187-7e02d52aecc4.html

Imagine if in 2024, in the era of smart phones and ubiquitous street cameras , there wouldn't be thousands of hours of footage and photos of corpses around the web.

OCTOBER 7: FAKE NEWS

Let's go for proof, to a zionazi fake video linked by judeozionazi parrots:

https://www.hamas-massacre.net/?fbclid=IwAR1Gris6-KJWf9iCS22ihx_CRrOfbyXCQ54RNSvCT07lrDT31L_QP_bgXVA

I shall analyze the first video of the series: first of all there is no original source telling us who (name and surname, affiliation etc., except a generic and unverifiable "IDF reservist") would have filmed and who would have posted this video and where - non-transparency from the start.

Second: the camera moves very quickly, framing the alleged corpses for fractions of a second each, so that it is not possible to ascertain whether they are human beings or mannequins or crisis actors playing dead.

Let's now go frame by frame of the first video :

the first presumed corpse does not have a single drop of blood on it; he is prone and his face cannot be seen;

ditto for second and third presumed corpses: no blood and prone;

the first presumed blood appears on the fourth and fifth presumed corpses that appear, also prone and invisible in the face : so how does our average zionazi spammer know with such certainty that they are real dead people and not crisis actors or dummies ?

Or about the date on which this fakery was filmed ?

And: this cameraman would be a "first responder", therefore he is supposed to have arrived immediately after or very shortly after the ambush: yet the apparent blood of those few humanoids who appear bloody no longer flows, it looks dry and coagulated: which is obviously impossible, in a real-world scenario.

Also note that apart from this alleged blood on only two corpses out of 5 shown first, no lesion, no hole, no wound can be seen on them. Yet, if they had really been massacred, presumably with machine guns, or bombs, etc., these 5 fake corpses would have to be eviscerated, opened up in several places on the body: none of this. Fake.

Procedamus with this zionazi delirium: corpses 6 and 7 (the first near the coke) are too far away to discern anything certain, and are out of focus: a kid with a smart phone would have done better, ridiculously bad quality for a professional first responder with hi-tech bodycam. It's that they want to mask the falsity of the fake deaths.

The fake dead man 7, still in the coke aisle, can only be seen from the waist down – and gain, not even a drop of blood or wounds on him, like on several others.

At 00'37'', it would finally appear that a corpse is framed in the foreground, complete with blood and black holes that appear to be wounds: it's a shame that the mannequin or crisis actor in question is completely blurred, everything out of focus, as if this bodycam were not Israeli hi-tech but from a Chinese flea market... Not only that: but, once again, the alleged blood is dry, it does not flow, yet in theory we are with the first responder who arrives immediately after the alleged events. And around the black holes on his chest that appear to be wound holes, you can't see any blood at all.

And: all around these few fake dead on which we see apparent blood, there should be a lake of blood on the ground, but nothing, only on the bodies: fake.

Again: from OO´37´´ onwards, in the background two more out-of-focus fake dead, little blood and no fresh blood nor blood on the ground, no wounds, no injuries: archfake.

Ditto for the alleged piled-up corpses that follow.

At 00'55``, it would finally seem like we´re seeing a corpse hit in the neck, with a lake of apparent blood around the head: but here too it is impossible to ascertain from the way too fast images, whether it is truly a dead one or fake, because the face is once more, absurdly out of focus: I repeat, with a smartphone anyone would have done better. Evidently, you don't want the faces of these terrible crisis actors or mannequins to be visible (I think actors rather, or perhaps a mix of the two).

Furthermore, both the streams of blood on the ground here, and the stains on the coke drawer, and the apparent blood on the neck, are as usual clotted, dry, which is absurd were this a real scene of people just killed by gunshots , from which fresh blood should still be flowing continuously. Furthermore, the trick used here is not only the blurring of faces etc., but if you look very carefully, you will clearly notice that the alleged blood on the alleged neck is an overlayered image - cheap photoshop.

Nothing new in the few seconds of video that remain.

If not to observe in conclusion, that these alleged hamas killers must have had an infallible aim better than Clint Eastwood´s : in fact throughout, I mean the entire fake video, there is no visible sign of a bullet or bomb hitting objects: everyting is messed up, but perfectly intact, coca cola drawers and all. No bullet holes, not even a chip in all the objects: u cannot get any faker than that.

To consider such a demented fake video as evidence of a massacre is to allow yourself to be lobotomized: the massacre of October 7, 2023 never happened, it is fake news.