Woodwalton is a tiny community a few miles from the beautiful Woodwalton Fen. However, Woodwalton village itself belies its lovely surroundings. Beneath the surface, Woodwalton has an ugy secret.
Some residents have an affinity with the politics of the extreme Right and have been quite willing to allow themselves to be co-opted into a programme of organised bullying, harassment and character assassination. The purpose of this is to prevent the exposure of a Government controlled group of Nazi agent provocateurs, often known as ‘Combat18’, 'The National Socialist Movement' [NSM] and previously, 'column88'.
The award winning investigative journalist, Nick Ryan has exposed the consequences of ‘Combat18’ /' National Socialist Movement's' immunity from prosecution and what it means to ordinary, innocent people.
“ Combat18 subjected an Asian family to several months of attacks and racial harassment. A boulder was thrown through the family’s front door, graffiti was sprayed on the outside of their house, wheel nuts were loosened, and a corrosive liquid was thrown into the wife’s face.”
In keeping with David Wulstan Myatt’s reputation for animal cruelty (Myatt is widely known as ‘The Cat Strangler’ and has been investigated twice by the RSPCA) the family dog was slaughtered and thrown through the front window of the family’s house. Significantly, the local police allowed these attacks to continue unhindered for months even though the the perpetrators were known to both the victims and neighbours. This same immunity from prosecution is confirmed by my experiences and that of other victims mentioned later in this article.
Cambridgeshire Police have demonstrated their involvement in protecting David Wulstan Myatt / ‘Combat18’ / 'National Socialist Movement' by allowing serious crimes committed against my wife to go unpunished. The proof that David Wulstan Myatt is behind the unacknowledged criminal activity in Woodwalton is dealt with later in this piece.
DAVID WULSTAN MYATT – A BOOT LICKING COWARD WHO MUST BE PROTECTED SO HE CAN KILL AGAIN.
A minority of people who know what agent provocateurs are set up to do, may claim this is an acceptable practice. Unfortunately there are several problems with these schemes. Not least that they often end in ‘collateral damage’, i.e. the deaths of innocent bystanders.
The 1999 London bombings are an example of this.
( http://www.declarepeace.org.uk/captain/murder_inc/site/nazi.html ).
A young nazi, David Copeland, was groomed by members of ‘Combat18’ / 'National Socialist Movement' to construct and plant nail bombs in Soho, Brick Lane and Brixton. Many people were maimed and killed. The scandal behind ‘Combat18’ / 'National Socialist Movement', is that only David Copeland was arrested. The agent provocateurs who were really responsible, are still free to murder with impunity.
The following quote is from David Myatt, the leader of ‘Combat18’ / 'National Socialist Movement', pushing the Government line on the use of agent provocateurs:
“The price of freedom is collateral damage. So what if a few people were collateral damage? For that is the price of keeping Britain safe; the price of freedom and democracy, of maintaining the British way of life.”
This is essentially the belief of many people who live in Woodwalton. This is the practice that they want protected. Their beliefs do not stand close scrutiny however. If the state murdered one of their loved ones in a botched ‘security operation’, any one of the Woodwalton vigilantes would be outraged. So in fact, what the ‘respectable’ residents of Woodwalton actually mean is, ‘do it to other people's kids and I don’t care : however, my kids must be protected at any cost.’ Some of the victims of the of the 1999 London bombings were children. The casualties included expectant mother Andrea Dykes and her unborn child. But of course according to supporters of agent provocateur operations, a mother and child are simply disposable rubbish.
Many people will claim that nobody would actively support such barbarism. That the people of Woodwalton have been tricked. However, rather inconveniently for the majority of Woodwalton residents, that bolt-hole was closed off several years ago. I personally delivered over a hundred leaflets to most of the properties in Woodwalton and Church End, listing the crimes carried out by ‘Combat18’ / 'National Socialist Movement' and explaining that they had a presence in our village. The aim was not to canvas support or sympathy. The leaflets were instead, a social experiment.
I have have long suspected that the position of whistleblowers in our society is largely untenable, because of early psychological conditioning which the public are subject to. Although most people cherish their self image of being rational, well informed and fair minded, the process by which they come to conclusions about the veracity or otherwise, of evidence presented to them, has little to do with the evidence itself. In truth, the deciding factor for most closet vigilantes, is their perception of the messenger. It is irrelevant to most passive observers if the whistleblower has reams of verifiable evidence to support his or her assertions. It is messenger’s status within the community or wider world that is the central issue, not the message itself.
This is very convenient for any self interested and morally bankrupt group who wishes to cover up their own crimes. Drug cartels, wealthy paedophiles, the police and the security services, for example. All that is necessary is to martial enough liars, repeating the same falsehoods and most people will come to the conclusion that 2+2 does indeed equal 5.
The case of Julian Assange provides ample proof that members of the public are regarded and treated as nothing more than mere farm animals by the powers that be. The majority of us may have already seen the 'Collateral Damage' video of U.S. soldiers using unarmed civilians for target practice and laughing as they did so. We have also seen that the U.S. Government was complicit in this horrendous act by concealing the video as a ‘Classified Document’. Yet it is the messenger, Julian Assange who ends up in jail, not the murderers. The mass hypnosis kicks in and people say ‘but Julian Assange is a bad person and therefore’….. Therefore what? Regardless of what Julian may or may not have done, the video of State sanctioned murder still exists. The proof is there for all to see, yet somehow we are unable to process the evidence of our own eyes. 2+2 ends up making 5 simply because Julian Assange has been smeared mercilessly and we cannot separate the impression created by that smearing, from actual provable facts.
Woodwalton is a microcosm of wider society. The leaflets I distributed included screenshots of Abdul Ibn Myatt (David Myatt) calling for more suicide bombings. This didn’t cause any concern amongst local people. Nor were the police the least bit interested. This is very different to the public face of anti-terror legislation where we are constantly asked to report the slightest sign that extremists are attempting to radicalise people on the internet. Perhaps this blindness was induced by the unceasing smear campaign orchestrated by members of ‘Combat18’ / 'National Socialist Movement', who are now living amongst a group of gullible people who believe everything they are told.
We must accept this fundamental human failing as part of life. Some people have a tendency to rotten teeth or a pungent body odour, as a characteristic of their being. Others always believe the mob. The mob is always more numerous than the victim and the mob always has the loudest voice. Therefore according to the gullible, they must speak the truth. This in essence, is how the corporate media manipulate stupid people. I will examine this type of person in more detail later in ‘PROFILE OF A VIGILANTE’.
There is nothing new in State sponsored vigilantism. In East Germany The Stassi employed hundreds of thousands of Government controlled spies and thugs. Woodwalton and its racist controllers, ‘Combat18’ / 'National Socialist Movement', are only a recent manifestations of very old systems of State control. That the security services - MI5 in particular - are involved in overt harassment is reflected in the experiences of businessman Philip Kerr,
https://philipkerrblog.wordpress.com/2015/01/11/how-it-works/
So much of what has happened to Mr. Kerr is identical to mine and my wife's experiences. Overt surveillance, stalking, smearing, and the corruption of the police.
I first encountered ‘Combat18’ / 'National Socialist Movement' on an internet message board called ‘Blink’ (now disbanded). Someone was organising attacks on a disabled woman. She made frequent postings saying that she was being harassed and smeared in her local community. ‘Combat18’ / 'National Socialist Movement' branded her as a prostitute and a danger to the ‘community’. While all this was going on she was undergoing treatment for cancer of the bones in her face. Myatt knew this, yet he still continued to attack the woman.
Another member of the forum with several fake accounts ridiculed her mercilessly. He also seemed to know about vandalism to her car and house. It also became clear that he was stalking this woman, both on the internet and at her home address. She reported that her computer had been hacked and it soon became clear that my computer had been compromised and my identity stolen as well. The unfortunate victim was eventually driven out of her home by a mob of vindictive neighbours and is now living in hiding.
When you discover the identity of the orchestrator of these cowardly crimes, it becomes clear why a disabled woman was the chosen target. The perpetrator is an elderly nazi who is obsessed with satanism. He has written many articles promulgating the benefits of human culling. His recommended targets for disposal are Jews, black people, Asians, disabled people, feminists, gays, et al – in fact anyone who isn’t him. I later discovered who this nazi is and the pseudonym he writes satanic texts under (the spelling mistakes in his nazi writings are exactly the same as the satanist versions).
The strongest evidence that David Wulstan Myatt was indeed the orchestrator of the persecution of this vulnerable woman and the instigator of violence against my wife is as follows.
When I first started to piece together the identity of the nazi who was attacking the disabled woman on the Blink forum, I wrote to the police and my M.P. with my concerns. They were the only two recipients I contacted about this matter. The replies to my letters were delayed by about six weeks and the envelopes arrived torn open. Presumably they had been read.
So at that time, only three parties knew that I had complained about Combat18’ / 'National Socialist Movement :
1) My M.P.
2) The police.
3) The person who had hacked my computer, stole my identity and tormented a cancer patient driving her from her home.
Shortly after the stolen letters arrived, something odd happened. David Wulstan Myatt turned up outside our house. He is a tiny wizened creature who could barely see over the dashboard of the sports-car he was being driven in (a dark green Triumph TR4 from a local dealer). Myatt was driven up and down several times outside our home and then got out and stared at me. Seeing me approach he scuttled back to the Triumph and they drove off.
Later I discovered more about David Myatt's misogynistic attitudes to women and the 'manuscript' he had written on how to harass and drive people from their homes. Cambridgeshire police's response to my reporting of this incident was at once strange, dismissive and rather insulting. They said 'perhaps he was visiting someone'. The police did not think it was in the least odd that an ex- jailbird who I’d recently reported for abusing a disabled woman, should turn up outside my house in a tiny village of about 200 residents. A 'coincidence' to a bent police officer. Proof of computer hacking, stalking and criminal intent to everyone else.
The fate of the unfortunate Asian family and the disabled woman, mirrors our own treatment in Woodwalton. Zero protection by the police from serious crime. An unrelenting smear campaign, augmented and given credence by dishonest local police officers. And most significantly, local residents who consider the perceived status of their victim as the most reliable guide to establishing guilt or innocence, as opposed to provable facts presented in open court.
We realised quite early on that ‘Combat18’ /' National Socialist Movement', were Government protected thugs. My wife and I visited our local G.P. to have it recorded by a health professional, that the recent miniature crime wave being directed at us was causing stress and might later cause more serious problems. It soon became clear that the police had got their first.
The atmosphere in the consulting room was weird from the start. The Doctor refused to meet our gaze, continually looking out of the window and at the floor as she spoke. She spoke in terms of ‘your psychosis’ in a casual manner, as if it was already an established fact. Her ‘diagnosis’ was that any vandalism we had experienced was a figment of my imagination. My wife said she had seen the same things and could show the doctor photographs and video of arson and road rage attacks. However, the doctor refused to reply, or even look at my wife.
We got the distinct impression that she was working from a pre-arranged script and inconvenient things like proof or a witness, were not going to deflect her from the main purpose of this doctor's appointment. The purpose of the 'consultation' being not to listen, respect and help her patient, but rather to promote a police agenda which she had agreed to do without our knowledge.
After that things got even more strange. The Doctor said it was essential for me to undergo mental health treatment now, so that I would later be able to prove my sanity in a court of law. This appeared to be very odd advice from a medical practitioner, especially as we had made no mention of a legal action.
The reasons behind our doctor’s strange behaviour were revealed some time later. The police had spoken to my doctor and told her that I was mad and not to believe anything I said. I did wonder why the police didn’t tell me they were going to speak to my doctor in the first place. I asked the doctor’s receptionist if it was normal for the police to go behind a patient’s back. She said it was ‘very very unusual’, none of the G.P.s at the practice had ever been approached by the police and certainly not without the patient’s knowledge. Police contact with G.P.s was only used in exceptional circumstances, where an individual was severely psychotic and threatening to harm themselves or someone else. I had done neither of these things.
As the crimes committed against my wife and I became more frequent and serious, Cambridgeshire Police's agenda became clearer. Every time I contacted the police to report a crime the police failed to investigate. No matter how blatant the crime or how solid our evidence was, nothing was done. However, in each case, a few days later, I would be contacted by a mental health professional. When I explained that I had just reported a serious crime to the police, these practitioners were as confused as I was, as to why the police had taken this line.
A couple of examples might help to reveal Cambridgeshire Police's view of violent crime, harassment and attempted murder. Returning home one day my wife was driving in a 60 MPH limit stuck behind a car doing 30 MPH (a frequent occurrence for us). When it was safe, my wife attempted to overtake. Just at the moment she became parallel, the other driver pulled sharply to the right and attempted to force he off the road. It was a serious assault in our view and possibly attempted murder.
I contacted Cambs' Police and the operator was initially very keen to point out that I couldn't prove any of this. Then I informed her that the whole incident, with satellite proof of speeds and the offending car's registration, had all been captured on our dash cam'. There was a pause and the operator said that was 'such a good idea'. She then informed me that the police would 'put out obs'. I didn't hear anything for a couple of months, so contacted the police again and was again informed of the 'obs'. Cambridgeshire Police never contacted us or asked to see the footage. However, the police again did find time to refer me to mental health services without my knowledge.
The second incident was less serious, but does confirm Cambs' Police's policy on serious harassment. A woman in the next bay in a car park made obscene gestures and swore profusely at my wife and I. No provocation or even a look from us. Just a very sudden and threatening incident. Despite having a witness and reg number, the police remained unmoved and yet again referred me to a mental health professional without informing me.
The cynical reader might say, 'so you're having a bit of trouble with the neighbours and a local loony. That's got nothing to do with MI5. Lawless Agent Provocateurs don't exist. And lets face it, the police let everyone down all the time. So what are you trying to say?'
That argument might have had some credence 20 years ago, but the world has changed. People are now less likely to take the word of wealthy powerful institutions on matters of importance.
It has been discovered that The Home Office houses a secret court which investigates complaints about British intelligence agencies - (The Investigatory Powers Tribunal).
https://www.guardian2zotagl6tmjucg3lrhxdk4dw3lhbqnkvvkywawy3oqfoprid.onion/politics/2014/mar/05/independence-ipt-court-mi5-mi6-home-office-secrecy-clegg-miliband
Since 2000 this tribunal has investigated 1,500 complaints (figures from 2014). It has upheld only 10 - 'and five of these concerned members of one family who had all lodged complaints about surveillance by their local council'.
This newspaper report is significant because it contains a quote which goes right to the heart of the problem with security services' image of itself.
'The president of the IPT, Sir Michael Burton, a high court judge, has said this low figure' [of upheld complaints] 'is explained in part by the large number of "frivolous, vexatious" complaints that it receives, and because some complainants are paranoid, saying in a speech last year that the tribunal attracted people who insisted that MI5 had planted listening devices in their teeth.'
The judges dismissive attitude to victims of crime is strangely reminiscent of Cambridgeshire Police's treatment of my wife and I. Fake, unsubstantiated, 'diagnoses' of mental illness in victims of crime, to discredit the complainant's testimony.
Step outside the cosy, complacent world of the IPT PR exercise and reality is rather different. Victims of abuse by the security services, cannot even trust the tribunal to oversee the process properly.
'Among the few victims of so-called rendition who have turned to the IPT are the former Libyan dissident Abdel Hakim Belhaj and his wife, Fatima Bouchar, who were abducted in Thailand in 2004 and flown to one of Muammar Gaddafi's jails. Documents discovered during the Libyan revolution show that MI6 and the CIA co-operated to secure the couple's abduction.
Although the couple is now suing MI6 and MI5 – and also Jack Straw, the former foreign secretary, and Sir Mark Allen, the former head of counter-terrorism at MI6 – they have also brought a complaint to the IPT. The couple allege that their privileged communications with their legal team in London must have been spied upon during the GCHQ bulk surveillance operations that were disclosed by Edward Snowden.
Two public hearings were held in that case, after the couple's lawyers threatened to seek a judicial review of the tribunal's actions on discovering that a hearing to consider the matter had been held without their knowledge. The case resulted in the agencies giving an undertaking that any intercepted communications would not be used in preparing a defence against the couple's damages claim.'
Another person who has fallen foul of the this tribunal's suspect practices is Shaker Aamer. The article explains:
'Shaker Aamer, the former British resident who has been held at Guantánamo for almost 12 years has also complained to the IPT. His lawyers say they do not know whether there have been any hearings about his case or not. In addition, almost a dozen civil rights groups have lodged a complaint with the IPT about the UK and US governments' bulk surveillance operations.'
These two cases (and many others) contradict the impression that the judge, Sir Michael Burton, promulgates. He suggests that MOST people who complain about the security services are quite simply insane. Further he makes no mention of the individuals who have received grotesquely unjust treatment at the hands of MI5, MI6, Special Branch and the CIA. Why is this?
The behaviour of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal and Cambridgeshire Police are remarkably similar in their dishonesty and callousness. Could it be that Britain and the U.S. are quietly lurching towards the very totalitarianism they claim to oppose?
A clue to the origins of these practices may be found in that other totalitarian regime, The Soviet Union. Jonathan Cook explores this possibility in his excellent article.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/liberals-adopting-soviet-tactic-painting-dissent-mentally-ill/280160/
Of particular relevance to the practices of The Investigatory Powers Tribunal and Cambridgeshire Police, is the following quote:
'The weaponization of mental illness by the Soviet Union against internal critics has been described as “punitive psychiatry.” '
And:
'The medicalization of dissent was not unique to the Soviet Union, of course. It is a feature of authoritarian and repressive states. An ideological consensus is cultivated in the population by portraying opponents as traitors whose behaviour is proof of a mental disturbance or insanity.
Publicizing dissent, and the reasons for it, through criminal trials risks dangerously challenging dominant social assumptions inculcated by propaganda. Instead, the dissenter can quietly be detained for his or her 'own good' without their political ideology getting an airing'.
These overt shifts to anti-democratic practices by the Government and its security services are problematic in themselves, but they are also symptomatic of structural problems in the way our police state is administered.
The Northern Ireland 'Troubles' provides decades of primary and secondary source material that reveals the fractured command structure between Downing Street and the murderers, liars and rapists who did their dirty work. In a report from Mrs O'Loan The Police Ombudsman, she says :
'There was no effective strategic management of these informants' and
'As a consequence of the practices of Special Branch, the position of the UVF, particularly in north Belfast and Newtownabbey was consolidated and strengthened over the years. How could this happen?’
‘The handling of informants was done on a day-to-day basis. There were very few rules. There was no management intervention to ensure informants were properly managed and supervised.'
http://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/Police-and-UVF-links-who.1987318.jp
It gets worse.
'The Ombudsman's damning report revealed how Special Branch officers allowed informants to murder with immunity.'
A transcript of a 'Panorama' report reveals further horrors. An innocent man executed in front of his wife and children because an agent provocateur gave his hit man the wrong address.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/audio_video/programmes/panorama/transcripts/transcript_19_06_02.txt
This transcript contains a quote from Sean Slane, aged 8 when his father was murdered:
“And [I] would lie down beside him, just crying, asking him to wake up. Daddy, wake up, wake up. But there was just no movement, he was just lying there still. Just lying, staring. What's going on?”
Contrast the suffering of an 8 year old boy on seeing his father slaughtered in cold blood by an incompetent State actor and David Myatt's callous statement from above:
“The price of freedom is collateral damage. So what if a few people were collateral damage? For that is the price of keeping Britain safe; the price of freedom and democracy, of maintaining the British way of life.”
I will just reiterate my earlier point, because it is important in emphasising the faulty assumptions on how our security services are run.
'Their beliefs do not stand close scrutiny however. If the state murdered one of their loved ones in a botched security operation, any one of the Woodwalton vigilantes would be outraged. So in fact, what the ‘respectable’ residents of Woodwalton actually mean is, ‘do it to other people's kids [and loved ones] and I don’t care : however, my kids must be protected at any cost.’
David Myatt is an establishment boot licker, as are the people he manipulates. Reading the details of the horror stories contained in the above two links, highlights the dishonesty and fatuousness of the Government's and the IPT's view of itself.
I have included the above two links because they expose the methods and mindset of all our major security organisations. The levels of sheer cruelty and lack of responsibility are absolutely shocking. With this in mind, the criminal behaviour of David Myatt and ‘Combat18’/'National Socialist Movement', doesn't appear to be an outrageous 'conspiracy theory'. In fact, the criminal behaviour of David Myatt and ‘Combat18’/'National Socialist Movement' seems to be the norm for any security service operation. Government sponsored murder, no command structure, operatives given carte blanche to attack and harm any person they choose on a whim, with no corrective measures in place.
PART II
Myatt has let it be known that he thinks I must be very sorry I ever 'crossed him'. I disagree. It is preferable to be bullied by the police, neo-nazis and some local vigilantes, than to live my life as a fool. Many people are still blissfully unaware of the evil carried out by Government in the name of 'freedom'. I may have to endure the privations of ignorant people but at least I am no longer completely unaware of the States horrifically perverted system of values.
To say the last decade or two, has been a watershed in my life, would be an understatement. All my early societal training has vanished. The police don't protect victims of crime, they protect State run terrorists and murderers. My M.P. does not stand for law and order and despite knowing exactly what David Myatt has done, he has never lifted a finger to help my wife and I. Perhaps most importantly, i have learnt that the ruthlessness and cruelty of certain State servants is not the result of a few 'rogue elements'. This monstrously distorted value system comes from the top. From our Government. From the very people who pontificate on TV about freedom, democracy and respect for the rule of law.
I am just a very ordinary member of the public and make no claim to be as influential as ex-ambassador and human rights activist, Craig Murray. Yet I am heartened by the similarities in his moment of epiphany and my own.
Murray explores this awakening from Government induced hypnosis in his book 'Murder in Samarkand'. The book explains the British Government's complicity in torture and murder. The torture victims were raped with broken bottles and forced to watch their children tortured in front of them. One documented case, was a man who had his finger nails pulled out with pliers. Later he was boiled alive and died in agony. This isn't Medieval Europe. It is Europe in the late 20th century.
Having learned of the British Government's approval of these barbaric practices, Craig Murray describes with a single sentence, the moment his life changed forever.
'I was absolutely stunned — it changed my whole world view in an instant — to be told that London knew [the intelligence] coming from torture, that it was not illegal because our legal advisers had decided that under the United Nations convention against torture, it is not illegal to obtain or use intelligence gained from torture as long as we didn’t do the torture ourselves'
https://infiniteunknown.net/2009/11/05/former-uk-ambassador-cia-sent-people-to-uzbekistan-for-extreme-torture-to-be-%E2%80%98raped-with-broken-bottles-boiled-alive-and-having-their-children-tortured-in-front-of-them/
'BUT WHERE'S YOUR PROOF?'
The more one discovers about this strange seedy world of State sponsored violence, the faster the mythologies of our authoritarian belief systems crumble into dust.
Some readers may say I have been too hard on the police in this article. That I have portrayed them as heartless and corrupt, when in fact they are powerless to protect me. The reason being that their 'hands are tied' by a tangle petty rules and regulations introduced by well meaning liberals. Rules which ultimately leave victims of crime completely unprotected. At least that is what 'The Daily Mail' would have us believe.
The Police place heavy emphasis on crime victims to provide incontrovertible proof of wrong doing - then and only then are they able to act. That is the establishment myth we are asked to swallow again and again. But my car-cam example above shows this to be false. Even video evidence is insufficient for the police to take action.
But there is an even more disgraceful aspect to this Government manufactured mythology - it can work in reverse. The Police can harass victims of crime, if senior officers consider them to be a 'nuisance' politically. When this happens all the nonsense about evidence and cold, clear, objective proof, vanishes into thin air and a new set of manufactured rules are thrust upon the victim.
YOUR WIFE IS MISSING!
On the morning of January 2nd 2009 two police officers turned up on our doorstep. They wanted to know where my wife was. I was confused by this very abrupt question as I’d seen my wife safely depart on the 7am train to London, from Huntingdon station, a couple of hours previously. I explained that as far as I knew she was at work and asked if something had happened to her. The police were stony faced and silent. They then said it was their intention to question my wife’s boss and demanded his phone number. Then the officers said something which made me suspect the real purpose of this visit: ‘We are going to speak to all your neighbours and make enquiries about you’. As I will explain later, this proved very effective as smear tactic amongst the less bright villagers.
I immediately rang my wife and thankfully she was safe and sound. Like me, she was utterly confused by the hostile and abrupt behaviour of Cambridgeshire Police and why they were so unwilling to explain why they were asking such odd questions.
We had to wait until the evening when my wife returned from work to ring the police call centre for an explanation. The ‘evidence’ which led to the police ‘enquiries’ was as follows:
The day before, at a New Years Eve party in Woodwalton, an off duty police officer had been approached in the early hours of New Years day, by an anonymous Woodwalton resident. The un-named villager said they ‘hadn’t seen my wife for a while’. That single remark was enough to set in motion ‘enquiries’ amongst our neighbours.
The reader can decide for themselves if this remark can be considered enough evidence to launch a missing persons enquiry. However something else strikes me as odd. Only one day had elapsed since the initial casual remark, yet two officers turned up early on January 2nd. Is this how quickly most ‘missing person’ cases are dealt with? In my personal experience with Cambridgeshire Police, other crimes like arson, attempted murder, road rage, and obscene intimidating behaviour are not dealt with at all. Not one day later, or one month later, or ever. Even with much stronger evidence than a casual, undocumented remark from an anonymous person.
As we spoke to the (civilian) operator at the police call centre, it became clear that he thought the entire enquiry was laughable. Very much a ‘what are they up to now?’ response. He informed us that one of the other things the mystery informant had told the off duty officer, was that they’d seen a pile of earth in our garden. This was actually a compost heap which was decades old. But the police did not think of checking this, they just waded in. The person at the call centre implied that you couldn’t make this up, it was so obviously absurd.
As the evening wore on things became ever more surreal. A different pair of police officers arrived to ‘make checks’. We were bemused, but still eager to learn about the polices’ special ‘customs’.
When we asked why the the police acted on such flimsy evidence and why it was so rushed, they said that they are legally obliged to act immediately on all missing persons cases. I’m not sure this is true and I really don’t think my wife could have been remotely described as ‘missing’ in any legal context.
However, as if to emphasise the farcical nature of this whole incident, the two officers plunged themselves deeper into the realms of absurdity. They claimed that they had visited us to ascertain my wife was safe and well. My wife, who is more quick witted than myself, was intrigued by this deference. She said ‘do you have my picture on the police data base then?’ The officer responded with some piety. ‘We would never do that because it would be in breach of the data protection act’. The policeman still didn’t see it coming. My wife then said ‘so you know me by sight?’ He admitted he did not. Which brought the response, ‘so you haven’t made any sort of provable identification. I could be anyone and the real wife might still be missing.’ This brought the rather limp response ‘well you live here don’t you?’. Which of course he could not prove.
This carefully constructed farrago of police harassment and smear tactics certainly had the desired effect on the local gossips. On returning from the railway station the next morning, I found a woman blocking our drive. She said, ‘the police are asking questions about you all over the village. What have you done?’ This is another facet of the vigilante’s closet belief system – victims are guilty by the law of smear, victims are guilty by mob prejudice and victims are guilty by default.
Later I wrote to Cambridgeshire police asking whether they thought all this was normal, especially in the context of their casual attitude to crime in general. They sent out an Inspector, no less and he spent over an hour explaining why the police were right and batting away all our protests concerning Cambs’ Polices’ inconsistent definitions of proof and evidence.
The pivotal moment in the discussion came when I asked this senior policeman about David Myatt. I asked him what he thought about Myatt publishing bomb making manuals and inciting terrorist acts on the internet. I showed him screenshots of Myatt as a Nazi and also in the guise of a Muslim, publishing the same illegal material repeatedly. The Inspector did not claim these tracts were not actionable or that his ‘hands were tied’. He simply did not reply. There was the same weird behaviour that we’d noticed from our doctor. An odd distant look in the eyes, as if the person had gone into stonewall mode. Welcome to spook controlled policing.
These experiences confirm my suspicions about the police. Despite what the they say, the victim’s provision of proof is largely irrelevant. The law doesn’t matter, evidence doesn’t matter, compassion for the victim doesn’t matter and the truth doesn’t matter. No, the central tenet of ‘modern’ POLITICAL policing is, what is the status of the victim? Are they wealthy and powerful enough to fight back? Or are they poor, disabled and helpless? Will they be believed, or dismissed as ‘mad’? But the most important requirement, is whether the police’s masters in Westminster and MI5 believe that a victim of crime DESERVES justice based on their particular definition of right and wrong?
I think we can summarise the personal morality of our rulers in the following rather stark paragraphs:
1) Soldiers who kill unarmed civilians and laugh as they do so (Collateral Damage Video), Agent Provocateurs who publish bomb making manuals and incite terrorist acts that kill pregnant mothers and babies and torturers who boil human beings alive = ALL GOOD and not punishable by court martial or the law.
2) People who are appalled by soldiers who kill unarmed civilians and disgusted when they laugh as they do so, and ordinary people who are concerned about Agent Provocateurs who publish bomb making manuals and incite terrorist acts that kill pregnant mothers and finally, whistleblowers who regard torturers who boil people alive, as immoral and barbaric = ALL BAD and punishable by incarceration, torture, smearing and bullying.
The powers that be say those in group 1) should be rewarded and those in group 2) should be punished.
PEEPING TOMS, PERVERTS, FOOLS AND LIARS.
To return to the apparently parochial world of Woodwalton, it becomes clear that the corrupt morals of our leaders, also demean and sully the lives of everyone they come into contact with.
PEEPING TOM.
For example, one middle aged man has been converted by ‘Combat18’/'National Socialist Movement' into a peeping tom. He likes to wait until my wife and I are in our bedroom, then stand against the boundary fence looking in our window.
PERVERTS.
A pair of women from the village accosted my wife on the train as she travelled to work. They were amused by the fact that a man had been seen exposing himself outside our house on several occasions. It was strongly suggested that that the man was concentrating on our property and my wife 'better be careful', because people in the village 'knew things about her'. This vitriol was all delivered with shrieks of laughter, as if the women thought sexual assault was hugely funny.
One might ask why they were so unsympathetic, but think back to my earlier entry concerning the lady with cancer. She was driven out of her home having been falsely branded as a prostitute. No chance to defend herself. And at every turn, ‘Combat18’/'National Socialist Movement' assisted in their disgusting misogyny by stupid gutless people who believe everything they are told.
A PERVERTS FATHER.
Then there was the lorry driver who drove his vehicle at speed, straight at my wife on a blind corner, causing her to swerve violently and almost hit a wall. This wasn't a one off, because he timed it perfectly to replicate the same 'accident' on several other mornings.
FOOLS AND LIARS.
At the top of this shabby heap of mediocrity, is a woman that ‘Combat18’/'National Socialist Movement' have groomed to further their racist agenda. She does the dirty work of smearing the victims, to then facilitate the recruitment of more racists, vandals, gossips and sex offenders. All the most unpleasant characteristics of the organised bully are present in her character. A closet racist, a shameless gossip, and an inveterate liar. Someone who cherishes her own self image as being essentially right about everything. Yet, underneath all the arrogance and bluster, lies the true pathos of her abject failure in life. She is most of all, hugely and irredeemably gullible.
As I intimated above, these rather unpleasant specimens of humanity have no real agency themselves. They are Security States constructs, cloned from their ‘betters’ in Westminster. So perhaps it would be interesting to define the Government’s ideal citizen. In support of this notion, I would ask the reader to examine the similarities between our rulers moral values and the vigilantes they have created in their own image.
PROFILE OF A VIGILANTE.
Years of harassment certainly gives one a clearer perspective of the type of person who takes part in organised bullying. The vigilante’s patterns of behaviour can be charted much more precisely when they take place over decades and when scores of virtually identical idiots take part. I have set out my observations below. Some of the more intelligent victims of racism, sexism, homophobia and prejudice against disability, may be familiar with this profile.
1) Vigilantes feel very strongly that nobody has the right to defend themselves against accusations made by individuals or groups of people.
2) When prospective vigilantes are approached by gossips, they don’t insist that the gossip identify themselves to the victim and make their allegations in public. This complete absence of common sense, or any concept of right and wrong, makes even a simple test of veracity, completely impossible for every newly recruited vigilante. Gullibility is the most important requirement of any vigilante.
3) When vigilantes are exposed to public scrutiny, they behave like their racist and sexist counterparts – they attack the victim. The victim is ‘paranoid’ or mad, or oversensitive, or sad, or completely imagining vandalism and physical attacks on their person. At the heart of these smears is a core belief of the confirmed bully, defined below in 4).
4) Vigilantes, racists, sexists, rapists, paedophiles and abusers of gay people, are at one, in a crucial part of their mindset. They all claim for themselves a certain inalienable right:
The abuser and the abuser alone, will decide how the victim is allowed to feel, when subjected to the abuser’s concept of ‘normal’. If you don’t like being subjected to ‘racial epithets’, someone else will decide you have a ‘chip on your shoulder’ about race. If you don’t like being harassed, an ignorant person without a medical degree will designate you as ‘mad’ and so on. The victim will not be consulted on this, because bigots of all types, see themselves as the final arbiters of the truth.
This unproven assertion of the vigilantes infallibility, highlights another one of their characteristics. All of these people fundamentally disagree with the basic structures of the British and U.S. court systems.
As outlined above, vigilantes want to do away public courts and the fundamental right of the accused to know what they are being accused of and to defend themselves in front of a jury of their peers.
Behind the vigilante’s facade of certainty and ‘public duty’ is an inherent dishonesty. What they really seek is power without responsibility. To destroy another person in plain sight with no prospect of punishment, goes to the very heart of what they are as individuals. Craven, dishonest, cruel, frustrated. But most of all, haunted by their own impotence.
None of these bullies would dare to attack a Government sponsored child murderer. Nor would they openly attack the Government over its facilitating of torture in other countries, as Craig Murray has done. The penalties are too great for the secret coward. No, it is preferable to bully a woman with cancer out of her home and pretend you are a defender of ‘community values’.
VIGILANTES WHO ARE CRIMINALS THEMSELVES.
As I have mentioned, a couple of decades of abuse encourages one to observe aggressors more analytically. Perhaps these brief details might tell us something more about the vigilantes distorted sense of self righteousness and arrogance.
A basic fact to start with about vigilantism in Woodwalton.
Two families who have taken the hardest line with us and committed the most blatant crimes have very important characteristics in common. They both have members involved in and who have been convicted of, child abuse. The miniscule size of Woodwalton, makes that statistic all the more remarkable.
The charming man mentioned above, who created a series of identical planned ‘accidents’, on a blind corner, is the first of these people. A member of this man’s feral family was convicted of procuring underage girls for sex and imprisoned.
The second was the head of a family who carried out some serious vandalism on our property (all caught on CCTV). He was most upset about me letting some hedge clippings fall onto the public roadway and instructed me loudly to ‘****** clear it up!’
This upright man, so proud of his ‘community values’ in public was rather different in private however. He was engaged in arranging dates with girls he knew to be underage, for the purposes underage sex. Again, a custodial sentence was his reward.
Both of these cases were reported in the ‘Hunts Post’ newspaper.
So, is vigilantism an expression of public spiritedness? Or is it an unregulated free-for-all that dishes out punishment on the whim of ignorant – and sometimes – overtly criminal degenerates?
THE FUTURE
Contrary to what some might think, I did not write this in the hope of solving our own problems. It has been prompted by events in the wider world.
The Assange case has forced the U.S. and U.K. Governments to finally admit that they approve of war crimes, torture, wrongful imprisonment, abduction and murder. The proof of all these crimes is clearly documented in resources such as Wikileaks, articles by Craig Murray, Johnathan Cooke, Caitlin Johnstone, Medialens and numerous others.
My feelings at the beginning were similar to Craig Murray’s unpleasant discovery of the U.K.’s involvement in boiling a man alive. That something had gone wrong with the system. That ‘Combat18’/'National Socialist Movement', or the hired torturers, must be ‘rogue elements’. It has taken me years to finally see that the Government, the security services and the police are themselves the rogue elements. It is now clear that people with a completely alien set of values, have their wages paid for by the tax payer
Once in possession of this knowledge things are at once, worse and better. Worse in that all your old certainties have to be jettisoned. But better because one finally has an explanation for police corruption, uncaring M.P.s and ‘Night of the Living Dead’ villagers.
A single scandal like Woodwalton wont change a thing. However, it is emerging that as the U.K. and U.S. Governments are becoming ever more panic stricken, as yet more of their bestial practices are being leaked. This causes them to become ever more brutal in their treatment of simple humanitarianism. It is quite simple. I don’t agree with slaughtering pregnant women and that is what ‘Combat18’/'National Socialist Movement' have done. The powers that be, fundamentally disagree with common human decency, which creates conflict between them and wider society.
Julian Assange is the beginning of this process, not the end. The security services think that if they can only keep the lid on a scandal here and an outrage there, that they will be safe forever. But the reason they are encountering more opposition, is because they are committing greater numbers of cruel, unethical and illegal acts with each passing year. Millions of people like me find these acts morally unacceptable, so resistance is growing. Most importantly, more and more people are discovering what their rulers truly believe in. It isn’t nice.
Governments should realise that you cannot wipe out whole populations belief systems, their morality, compassion and decent upbringing, with censorship and bullying. The only way out for Governments now is Fascism. It looks like we’re in the early stages.
