The state must now cushion the economic impact.

A very deep slump is ahead

By Heiner Flassbeck:

[This article published on 3/23/2020 is translated from the German on the Internet, https://www.nachdenkseiten.de/?p=59510.]



In times when a virus dominates the daily news, many people are concerned about the economic situation in the country. They wonder whether their jobs and businesses will still exist after the 'corona crisis'. The moderator Milena Preradovic spoke on her channel Punkt.PRERADOVIC with Prof. Heiner Flassbeck about the current situation and his proposed solutions. Flassbeck expects a slump in the gross domestic product of 20 to 30 percent. He says this is a one-off shock that has nothing to do with a normal recession. The macro-economist is now calling for drastic, but above all unbureaucratic and quick, stabilizing measures, as well as an end to the debt brake, austerity policies and an abolition of the criteria of the Maastricht Treaty. Christian Goldbrunner has transcribed the interview.

Milena Preradovic: Heiner Flassbeck, ex-top economist at the UN and ex-secretary of state in the Federal Ministry of Finance. Bonjour to France. What does it mean when Volkswagen, Daimler, Audi, BMW close down in Germany?

Heiner Flassbeck: It really does mean a major crisis, we have never experienced that before. There has never been anything of this magnitude before that so many companies have to close. It's not only car manufacturers, but many others as well, either because they don't want to put their workforce at risk or because they no longer have any demand. Nobody is buying cars at this time. That is quite clear, and it will indeed be a very, very deep economic slump, and it is regrettable that Mrs Merkel did not speak about it clearly and plainly last night.

The economy does not seem to be such a big issue at the moment. Everything is focusing on the medical side, on the virus. Is there already a fear of this economic crisis behind it in your opinion?

Yes, there is certainly a subliminal fear, but it is not open, it has to be discussed openly. Mrs Merkel should have said: People, the economic situation is also getting really serious, we will experience a deep slump. So you can calculate different scenarios, but if the whole thing takes three or four months, we are talking about a slump in gross domestic product of 20 to 30 per cent. That has nothing whatsoever to do with a normal recession. You shouldn't talk about recession anymore, it has nothing to do with a normal shock. It is a very, very deep slump, which will hopefully be followed by a recovery afterwards, but first of all this slump is incredibly deep because many areas are simply standing still. You can't just shut down the economy and then hope that nothing happens. Yes, there is a very deep slump and the state must now cushion it. Some people have understood this, the European Central Bank (ECB) has now reacted, the dimension is good, 750 billion, but I believe that the states have not yet understood what is in store for them.

In France, Macron is talking about nationalizing companies that are under threat. Could you imagine the same thing for Germany?

Yes, that can happen at times, but first of all it's a question of keeping the companies alive. Nationalization can be part of that, but that is certainly not the general solution. I think the only general solution is - as Germany intends to do in principle - to grant loans through the banks, because that has to happen quickly. It has to happen in the next few days - you can't spend months checking whether the company is creditworthy or not - via the banks, which are guaranteed by the state or the Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau [KfW]. Every company should apply for two to three months for a loan that gives it some breathing space, so to speak. With the application it should go to the bank and say, well, I need xyz. That should be checked very quickly, and then the state should say, yes, I'm behind it, we'll make a guarantee so that the bank doesn't get stuck with it.

Companies must be supported, probably the banks must also be supported, but of course people must also be supported.

Right.

The government in Germany is still talking about the zero deficit it wants to keep. Is that so tenable?

That's absolute nonsense. The national debt will increase dramatically. If the gross domestic product collapses by 20 to 25 percent, the national debt will also increase in this order of magnitude, i.e. from now 60 percent of the gross domestic product to 90 or maybe 100 percent. But that doesn't matter at all, so of course the black zero is a thing of the past. It is now being said that we must make a special arrangement for the debt brake. That is absolutely ridiculous, it is a completely different dimension, a huge dimension. In Germany we are talking about 300 billion that the state has to spend on workers and companies. In Europe, as the ECB has said, it is a matter of 600 to 750 billion, which the ECB is printing money on, so to speak, to refinance the states. Let us not delude ourselves; it is nothing other than printing money. That is not possible directly because we in the EU have a strange constitution. We cannot do it directly. So the states get into debt on the market, but to prevent interest rates from rising, the ECB buys back the bonds so that interest rates stay low. That is nothing other than financing through the central bank, that is feasible. It is not a disaster, but it has to happen very quickly. I do not believe that short-time working is enough for the workers either. Short-time work, that is 60%, that is also very little. The state should now say that I am giving you 80% or even 100% so that we can get through this short phase with as little friction as possible and then grow again relatively quickly afterwards. Because that will only happen if these people do not go into the rest of the year with fear, so to speak.

It is also said that loans would be made easier for small entrepreneurs and the self-employed, but is that enough, because they have to pay it back somehow?

Yes, I think there are still grand illusions. Someone from the Reconstruction Loan Corporation said you can't blow money out like that. They're wrong. You have to blow it out. It must also go to the little ones, that is absolutely right, and the solo entrepreneurs. The people would have to produce a simple paper showing what they had earned last year, and then the bank would have to say, yes, and on that basis I am giving you this for three months now, so that you can survive. We will see in three months' time, but I will give you this for three months, and I will send it to the Credit Bureau for Reconstruction. They'll tell you that you'll have a guarantee for it without a big check. How are we going to check 5 million companies? That's ridiculous. Otherwise the bureaucrats will sit there and say, now we go through all the forms or what? It'll take five months and then it'll all be over. It has to happen in the next few days and incredibly quickly.

What about unemployment? Economics Minister Altmaier actually sat down and said that Corona will not cost Germany any jobs. I must say I found that absurd.

Yes, it is unbelievable. No, it will cost a lot of jobs. People are already unemployed. They may not be officially registered as unemployed now, but they are sitting at home and have nothing to do, production is up, that is unemployment. What else is unemployment? But you have to make sure that these people get their jobs back. They got into this situation through no fault of their own and therefore the state should compensate them. Like I said, debt limits and all that, that's all nonsense, you can forget it. In a year's time you will find that you have saved for 15 years for nothing, and the debt ratio will, as I said, be much, much higher than it was in Maastricht or anywhere else. That is all bullshit, you have to forget all that right now. If you do not do that, it will end badly. But I still hope that they will understand what it is all about.

What does that mean for the euro? All that printing and pumping money into it?

That is unproblematic, because where is the euro going to go? The other countries are doing the same thing, the USA is talking about 1000 billion being pumped into the economy, and helicopter money - which I think is completely wrong - is now being distributed. Why should people like me, pensioners or civil servants, why should they get money now, it makes absolutely no sense. No, the money must go to those who are now becoming unemployed or going into short-time work, they must get money. But not everyone, that's cheese. But the dimension for the USA is just as great as for Europe and where should the euro fall now? It is the same problem all over the world. Nothing will happen, so I have no reservations about that. What I have great concerns about is that the stock markets are going crazy every day, up and down. I would close them now, I would just close them for a month or two. Because the signals coming from there only create uncertainty among people and companies, among managers. Everywhere it creates insecurity for no reason. With every signal it goes up or down, there's no point, it's completely irrational.

Colleagues of yours from the more neo-liberal corner, they have been predicting such a crash for a long time. They say, as it were, that first comes deflation, then inflation, then the euro will be destroyed, what do you say to that?

That is all nonsense, these crash prophets, none of it has anything to do with this. We have an extraordinary situation here, a health situation that is affecting countries all over the world. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the crash that these people are all predicting, nor does it have anything to do with inflation. We have to get this over and done with dramatic emergency measures, that is quite right, but we also have to explain it to people. As I said, I completely missed that with Mrs Merkel yesterday. She said she wants to explain, she has to explain. She should now stand up and say how she intends to stabilize the economy, because that is clearly the next task, and she did not say a word about it.

There are 750 billion now, you say that's enough to keep Europe [EU] stable. The central banks don't have that much room for maneuver any more, they've already shot their bolt, haven't they?

No, they only have no more leeway when it comes to interest rate cuts, that's where the powder is shot, but of course they can refinance now - if the states go to the limit now, the central bank will have to - I explained that earlier. Well, the printing press is going to get started, let us not fool ourselves, and the central bank will have to refinance it. 750 billion is, as I said, a quite reasonable figure if the crisis lasts two to three months. If it lasts four or five months, it won't be enough, it will be more, that's undoubtedly the case with this dramatic decline in gross domestic product.

When we spoke two weeks ago, we were already talking about a European crisis and a crisis we are in. I have the impression that we are going from crisis to crisis, quite apart from Corona, perhaps we simply need a new system?

We do not necessarily need a new system; we need a little more understanding of the system in which we live. We simply know too little about it, and we have some really wrong hypotheses and theories. In fact, Germany was actually already in a recession. In 2019 there was already a recession, which was not officially measured in this way, but it was clearly one. Europe has been in a difficult situation for much longer. We had the euro crisis and Italy and France are in much worse shape than Germany, even at the beginning of this shock now. I honestly do not want to imagine what would happen in Italy if I were to make a calculation now; it would be terrible for Italy. And the big problem is that we are now getting an additional shock that is hitting all the countries at once, for which we do not have common resources. I also find it very regrettable - if I may say so at this point - that Germany has now introduced unilateral border controls with France. In my view, there is no reason for this, because France is in the same health situation as Germany. This has been a huge shock in France, both symbolically and in European terms, and this 'close the borders, do something' is not a solution to the problem. That is actionism, which in the end only confuses and irritates people. So, we must now fundamentally reflect on how we make economic policy in Europe. It will no longer work with the old rules. The Maastricht Treaty has to go, and the Stability and Growth Pact is obsolete too, and all that can be forgotten. If we get out of this crisis now and the mass of states in Europe have a debt level of 90 or 100 percent of gross domestic product, then that is the way it is. Then you cannot say that you have to save for 20 or 30 years to get back to 60%. That is completely crazy, so if you imagine that, you are destroying Europe one hundred percent. It has already done a tremendous amount of damage. As I said, I don't want to imagine Italy when it comes out of the crisis. Nor do I want to imagine what the mood in Italy will be like when they get out of this crisis and start talking openly about the Germans and about Europe again, which I think will be terrible.

Do we, for example, already have this discussion about what really needs to be changed after this crisis? Does that already exist or is everything at the moment [fixed] on medicine? No, there are no such things yet, only very tentative approaches from my economist colleagues to now admit that something tremendous has happened. Now the president of the Kiel Institute has said that this will be the 'mother of all recessions', but as I said, recession is not the right word for what we are about to experience. We are experiencing a unique shock, a shock greater than anything we have seen before, and we have to prepare ourselves for a new language. This has nothing to do with the economy either, because it is a one-off shock that has to be cushioned by the state, by the central banks, in the hope that it will be over in two or three months and that we will then be able to get life back to normal. It is possible, but we must throw all our old dogmas about debt and the debt brake overboard. Everything must be thrown overboard.

There are people all over the world, not only in Germany, not only in Europe, in America, there are people in Brazil who are afraid that they will not get out of this crisis economically, that they will lose their jobs, that is almost a global story. That's a powder keg, isn't it? So many people who may no longer have a job, who are afraid?

Of course, uncertainty is the worst thing there is. Take Brazil for example, it's been in a deep crisis for two or three years now. Mr Bolsonaro, we don't have to talk about that man, a lunatic in the presidency, he hasn't managed to get himself out of it. This is really explosives. If they fall deep into the ditch now and the state is not in a position to compensate even halfway, then civil wars, riots and I don't know what else could happen everywhere. So the potential danger of this crisis is enormous and it is therefore important that the states understand what their task is now. It is an enormous task that can be solved, but it must now be tackled incredibly quickly and, above all, all bureaucrats must be removed and people who can see clearly what is going on must go to the decisive places.

Do you have this optimism that this will actually happen?

I have a certain optimism that, in an emergency, some people will understand what is happening. I hope that we can perhaps observe this. When Mrs Merkel comes to the people next week and makes a speech on the economic situation and says something like what I have said, then there is hope. But if she puts a brake on debt and says 'we have to do a bit here and a bit there now' and 'lending to businesses takes a lot of time' and 'short-time working is also good' and so on - all such excuses will not get through. It has to be said, in the harshest and most brutal terms, that this crisis, this shock, calls for special measures such as we have never seen before, not only in the health sector, but also in the economic sector.

We are currently experiencing the phenomenon of toilet paper being sold out everywhere, and that is something to think about. Today it is the toilet paper, the day after tomorrow people might run to the bank and get their money out of sheer fear.

As I said, if you do not react reasonably and quickly, if you do not give people the security of knowing that they will keep their money streams, that they will not fall into a very deep hole, then that cannot be ruled out either. I do not want to paint this on the wall. But of course, hoarding toilet paper - that's crazy too. Thank God, it's not so bad in France, I was just in the supermarket, there's still everything there, paper and everything else. It is of course a sign that some people panic in any case and the sensible ones always fall down the back and the sensible ones panic at some point. So it is important to act, it is important that Mrs Merkel stood up in front of the people yesterday - I would have made a different speech - but so be it. She thanked the nurses, but she should have remembered ten years earlier that these people are paid a reasonable wage, that hospitals are sewn on edge and all these things. Funnily enough, she forgot all that, it was all under her reign - so let's forget that, not important now. What is important now is that we act vigorously and immediately.

Does Macron do that better than Merkel?

No, Macron - in France everything is a bit easier because it is centralized. So German federalism - one does a bit here and another a bit there, some will now impose a curfew, others not. That is also cheese, in my eyes. Macron talked about 'war', which I thought was totally exaggerated. That was also not appropriate and he caused hecticness and uncertainty for two or three days at least. But centralism is already helpful here, because it ensures that people act in a uniform manner throughout the country. When you now see how the prime ministers and the mayors and who knows who else are lashing out at each other in Germany. That is a bit alarming, so it is not ideal. If you have already decided to pursue such a strategy, which I think is the right one, because I cannot judge it, because I have no better explanation. You have to rely on the experts, the virologists, there is no way around it, and then you have to take the next step and say, well, now I am economically buffering what I have decided on health.

u are just a troll, diverting focus from the proven fact thet sars cov 2 does not exist just like the alleged disease covid :

FARCE-COV-2 :

THE CON-VID COUP

BY SKEP

March 7 - August 30, 2020

There is no "covid" and bill gates is its propheteer.



NO DEATH SPIKES IN ITALY !

MSM state that there have been death spikes in Italy. There have not. It´s a huge lie spread by the national statistics center, directed by a fascist idiot with no mathematical competence whatsoever.

https://www.corriere.it/cronache/20_maggio_04/rapporto-istat-8fd5bbb4-8e05-11ea-b08e-d2743999949b.shtml?refresh_ce-cp

https://www.epicentro.iss.it/coronavirus/pdf/Rapporto_Istat_ISS.pdf

Read please, the Nota metodologica towards the end :

1. normally it takes ISTAT 10 months after the end of any given year to come up with definive statistical death data : this year for the first time in history, they have been allowed to spread death data in near-real time - a physical and mathematical impossibility.

2. Allowing for this miracle for a moment, which makes no sense because local county offices are extremely slow here in reporting definitive data, as families take ages to communicate a death to them, and they themselves take ages to process the data and send it to Rome ; but anyway : out of 7904 counties in total in Italy, ISTAT has arbitrarily chosen only 6866 for their extrapolations, ELIMINATING FROM THE COUNT AS MANY AS 1038 COUNTIES WHERE THERE HAD BEEN A DECREMENT IN DEATHS !!! THAT is how they came up with the OVERALL spikes - by way of fraud !!! And also the local spikes at this point are extremely dubiously arrived at.

3. They state clearly that their provisory data HAS NO STATISTICAL VALUE WHATSOEVER, pending further future elaboration and checks !

So do not fall into the trap of believing in data accuracy when in fact those alleged spikes are the same type of lie as with PCR tests etc., that we shall demonstrate below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFwqArvB1IM



A CRIMINAL MASTERPLAN

http://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/recommendations.html

https://futurism.com/neoscope/recent-simulation-coronavirus-killed-65-million-people

NOVEMBER 2019 : GATES GIVES A GOOD INVESTMENT TIP TO HIS COHORT RAY DALIO OF BRIDGEWATER FUND, WHO PROCEEDS TO MAKE A HUGE SHORT-TERM SPECULATIVE INVESTMENT BASED ON PREDICTING A STOCK EXCHANGE CRASH FOR MARCH 2020 - JUST WHAT WOULD REALLY HAPPEN THEN DUE TO THE FAKE "COVID" PANDEMIA :

http://www.lavocedellevoci.it/2020/03/16/pandemia-a-novembre-la-scommessa-da-1-miliardo-di-dollari-del-fondo-bridgewater/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridgewater_Associates

Remember how larry silverstein bought an insurance with lloyds covering terrorist attacks on his twin towers just before 911 ? Insider info it would appear.

Capitalfascism can only function through the spreading of fear and terror : until roughly 2001, they massmurdered their own, like 911 or the Bologna station massacre in 1980 ; starting with the Sandy Hook school shooting hoax back in 2012, they changed of tack and have started using their total control of the massmedia, to make Humanity believe in false shooters, nonexistent islamist kamikazes, virtual neonazi attackers and the like - until now : the new fake enemy is a fake disease called "covid 19" (dress rehearsals for this new form of psyop had been sars end mers starting in 2003 - caused by viruses whose very existence is every bit as questionable as that of "sars-cov-2").



GLOBAL POLICE STATE

" Police and public health officials to have powers to detain people who may be infected

Kate Proctor

Police, public health and immigration officers will be able to detain people suspected of having coronavirus under new emergency powers rolled out by the government.

The new guidance would allow the officials to return people to where they have been asked to stay during the virus outbreak, believed to be in a bid to curb people leaving hospital early. They will also have the power to take people to screening and testing facilities.

The bill says: “These measures look to fill existing gaps in powers to ensure the screening and isolation of people who may be infected or contaminated with the virus and to ensure that constables can enforce health protection measures where necessary.”

The bill says: “These measures look to fill existing gaps in powers to ensure the screening and isolation of people who may be infected or contaminated with the virus and to ensure that constables can enforce health protection measures where necessary.” " :

THIS AMOUNTS TO FULL GESTAPOIZATION OF SOCIETY - NOT EVEN HITLER WENT THIS FAR WITH HIS OWN CITIZENS !!!!!!:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2020/mar/19/uk-coronavirus-live-boris-johnson-london-lockdown-williamson-refuses-to-rule-out-government-putting-london-in-lockdown-by-weekend?page=with:block-5e735fb18f088d757559658f#block-5e735fb18f088d757559658f



VAXIS OF EVIL

How could u.s. pharma gangsters announce as early as of March 2020, they already had both drug and vaccine against "covid 19" at the ready ? It normally takes years to develop new drugs and vaccines against a new disease - no guaranteed achievement to boot.

Therefore it is mathematically certain that these same firms who are now claiming to have made drug and vaccine in 2 months, are those responsible for masterminding the "covid" hoax in the first place. They are going to sell governments snake oil bound to rot in state warehouses just like billions of anti-flu vaccines before - or worse, mandatory vax for all humanity. Some fear that, under the pretext of "covid", they are going to push a mandatory bar-code tattoo for all humanity.

What are these firms so apparently able to develop drugs and vaccines at the speed of light ?

The first one is Moderna :

https://www.corriere.it/economia/finanza/20_febbraio_25/coronavirus-vaccino-arrivo-usa-pronti-test-sull-uomo-f76b58b8-579d-11ea-a2d7-f1bec9902bd3.shtml?refresh_ce-cp

Now who are the owners of Moderna ? The usual suspects - the financial usurers who control the world : first up is fund vanguard, founded by the late christonazi usurer john bogle, but these days controlled by judeonazis fink laurence and kapito robert of blackrock:

https://money.cnn.com/quote/shareholders/shareholders.html?symb=AVD&subView=institutional

Next up is fidelity management, owned by the christonazi puritan dynasty of the johnsons, currently represented by johnson abigail ; third in line is blackrock itself, of judeonazis fink & kapito :

need I continue ? These criminals are the real spreaders !!! Of an utter hoax, that is - more proof will follow shortly.

The second lightning-speed drug maker is Gilead Sciences :

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/10/hopes-rise-over-experimental-drugs-effectiveness-against-coronavirus

" Gilead stressed that it was boosting production [of anticovid drug remdesivir] “in anticipation of potential future needs” before knowing whether the trial would show the drug to be safe and effective at treating patients with the virus " :

NOW YOU TELL ME WHAT CAPITALIST CORPORATION WOULD BOOST PRODUCTION BEFORE RECEIVING SCIENTIFIC AND GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL - RISKING TO LOSE BILLIONS ! THE ANSWER IS, GILEAD KNEW IN ADVANCE THAT REMDESIVIR WOULD BE TRUMPETED AS A SOLUTION TO THE FAKE PANDEMIC (AND THE OWNERS OF GILEAD SCIENCES ARE THE EXACT SAME AS THOSE FOR MODERNA : FINK & KAPITO OF BLACKROCK, THE JOHN BOGLE HEIRS, CAPITAL RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT OF CAPITALFASCIST LOVELACE DYNASTY CURRENTLY HEADED BY ROB LOVELACE, ETC. - BILDERBERG GALORE); "COVID" DOESN´T EVEN EXIST, AND THESE NEW DRUGS AND VACCINES ARE SNAKE OIL TO BE SOLD TO VASSAL GOVERNMENTS FOR A PROFIT, ONLY TO BE LEFT TO ROT IN SOME HEALTH MINISTRY BASEMENT AS IT HAPPENED ALREADY IN THE PAST - OR WORSE, TO BE MADE MANDATORY AND INOCULATED INTO ALL HUMANS WITH DEVASTATING HEALTH AND IMMUNITY DAMAGE.

https://www.thewealthadvisor.com/article/19t-fund-giant-crazy-idea-about-investing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Bell_Lovelace

THESE DRUGS ARE EXTREMELY HEAVY IN SIDE EFFECTS, TO THE POINT OF LETHALITY FOR THE OLD WEAK AND IMMUNODEFICIENT : IT IS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY TO GIVE THEM TO PATIENTS IN THE NAME OF A FAKE VIRUS !!!!

As for Europe, the dominant vax player apperas to be astrazeneca, owned by the usual global fund usurers :

https://www.corriere.it/salute/malattie_infettive/cards/guerra-vaccini-chi-vincera/sfida-senza-precedenti_principale.shtml

https://money.cnn.com/quote/shareholders/shareholders.html?symb=AZN&subView=institutional

REFUSE VACCINATION AGAINST A NONEXISTENT DISEASE !!!



HUNTED DOWN SPIED ON TRANSHUMANIZED

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/17/israel-to-track-mobile-phones-of-suspected-coronavirus-cases

One of the real main purposes of this giant global hoax it is, to force us all to accept individual tracking via smartphone/apps of everybody´s every single movement and communication, under pretext of emergency legislation (unapproved by Parliaments that have been shut down)

to fight the non-existent pandemic. Plus mandatory facial recognition and sanitary treatments for all but those in power, and the rest of the orwellian panoplia - a capitalfascist´s wet dream of total control come true.



NO VIRUS NO DISEASE NO PANDEMIC



https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017

Here´s what biochemist David Rasnik has to say about the alleged "sars-cov-2" virus :

" The electron microscopy images of the new coronavirus I was talking about were published in the New England Journal of Medicine 2019 (attached). I accept that coronaviruses that cause the common cold exist. I am not convinced that a new coronavirus causing Covid-19 has been purified or even really exists. Given the importance of this you’d think the proof of existence would be easy to come by and be confirmed by independent labs around the world.

Zhu (2019) did TEM on cell culture supernatant (Fig. 3A), which looks very much like a coronavirus (see 100 nm reference bar, ideal for identification of the viral family, see attached file)

Fig. 3B shows particles inside a cell. This is the correct thing to do on primary lung tissue. (It’s not clear this was the case, however. See below.) They should have used the same magnification as in 3A in order to identify the particles as virus, in particular, coronavirus. Instead, they used 1µm (1000nm) reference bar.

There are some things not quite clear in the paper. After close re-reading, It looks like the TEM photos, especially Fig. 3B, may not be of primary lung tissue from a patient.

On page 4 the authors say, "Virus isolation from clinical specimens was performed with airway epithelial cells and Vero E6 and Huh-7 cell lines.” This raises the question of a possible artifact, along the lines of Robert Gallo´s viral isolation of HIV. They should have first done TEM directly on primary lung tissue to establish the presence of virus. Culturing virus is fine but its presence must be confirmed by TEM of primary lung tissue.

It is essential to take great pains to accurately identify and characterize any presumed infectious agent present in people with new symptoms. That's where TEM on primary tissue samples from the person with symptoms is essential. This can be followed by culturing the suspect agent in order to purify it and performing TEM again, this time on the cultured virus. As a control, you must also perform TEM on the cultured cells that you have not treated with the suspect virus to make sure a virus had not contaminated the cells. I do not trust experiments using cancer cell lines to culture

virus. Usually, animals that are susceptible are treated with the pure virus to study and confirm its pathology.

Once all the preliminary work is done, which could take up to a year or more, simpler detection methods can be employed so long has their accuracy has been confirmed using gold standards such as TEM.

Look up Koch’s postulates. "



The chinese stated in their report that they had isolated the new virus now called sars-cov-2, termed by them 2019-nCoV, by combining (how?) 2 sequencing methods called Illumina and Nanopore, both of which are highly biased and error-prone :

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illumina_dye_sequencing

" This piecemeal process allows scientists to see the complete sequence even though an unfragmented sequence was never run; however, because Illumina read lengths are not very long[11] (HiSeq sequencing can produce read lengths around 90 bp long[7]), it can be a struggle to resolve short tandem repeat areas.[7][10] Also, if the sequence is de novo and so a reference doesn't exist, repeated areas can cause a lot of difficulty in sequence assembly.[10] Additional difficulties include base substitutions (especially at the 3' end of reads[11]) by inaccurate polymerases, chimeric sequences, and PCR-bias, all of which can contribute to generating an incorrect sequence.[11] "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanopore_sequencing

" Notably, theorists have shown that sequencing via exonuclease enzymes as described here is not feasible.[14] This is mainly due to diffusion related effects imposing a limit on the capture probability of each nucleotide as it is cleaved. This results in a significant probability that a nucleotide is either not captured before it diffuses into the bulk or captured out of order, and therefore is not properly sequenced by the nanopore, leading to insertion and deletion errors. Therefore, major changes are needed to this method before it can be considered a viable strategy.

The use of proteins in biological nanopore sequencing systems, despite the various benefits, also brings with it some negative characteristics. The sensitivity of the proteins in these systems to local environmental stress has a large impact on the longevity of the units, overall. One example is that a motor protein may only unzip samples with sufficient speed at a certain pH range while not operating fast enough outside of the range- this constraint impacts the functionality of the whole sequencing unit. Another example is that a transmembrane porin may only operate reliably for a certain number of runs before it breaks down. Both of these examples would have to be controlled for in the design of any viable biological nanopore system- something that may be difficult to achieve while keeping the costs of such a technology as low and as competitive, to other systems, as possible.[9]

One challenge for the 'exonuclease approach',[32] where a processive enzyme feeds individual bases, in the correct order, into the nanopore, is to integrate the exonuclease and the nanopore detection systems. In particular,[33] the problem is that when an exonuclease hydrolyzes the phosphodiester bonds between nucleotides in DNA, the subsequently released nucleotide is not necessarily guaranteed to directly move into, say, a nearby alpha-hemolysin nanopore. One idea is to attach the exonuclease to the nanopore, perhaps through biotinylation to the beta barrel hemolysin.[33] The central pore of the protein may be lined with charged residues arranged so that the positive and negative charges appear on opposite sides of the pore. However, this mechanism is primarily discriminatory and does not constitute a mechanism to guide nucleotides down some particular path. "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_novo_sequence_assemblers

" Reads from second generation technologies (called short read technologies) like Illumina are typically short (with lengths of the order of 50-200 base pairs) and have error rates of around 0.5-2%, with the errors chiefly being substitution errors. However, reads from third generation technologies like PacBio and fourth generation technologies like Oxford Nanopore (called long read technologies) are longer with read lengths typically in the thousands or tens of thousands and have much higher error rates of around 10-20% with errors being chiefly insertions and deletions."

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2012-7

"The association between 2019-nCoV and the disease has not been verified by animal experiments to fulfil the Koch’s postulates to establish a causative relationship between a microorganism and a disease."

"No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. The experiments were not randomized and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment."

The german counterparts of these chinese swindlers are no less subservient to bill gates and big pharma, substituting swindle for real science :

https://www.corriere.it/esteri/20_giugno_01/coronavirus-germania-virologo-star-bufera-l-accusa-stampa-asservito-politica-5e3bb63a-a403-11ea-b19d-c124828d4b5b.shtml

https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/politik-inland/fragwuerdige-methoden-drosten-studie-ueber-ansteckende-kinder-grob-falsch-70862170.bild.html



THERE IS NO SARS-COV-2 VIRUS THERE IS NO COVID 19 DISEASE THERE IS NO EPIDEMIC THERE IS NO PANDEMIC IT´S ALL ONE PHARMANAZI HOAX FOR PROFIT MASTERMINDED BY CRIMINALS AGAINST HUMANITY BILL GATES LAURENCE FINK RAY DALIO AND THE REST OF THEM BILDERBERG THUGS DO NOT GET TESTED FOR COVID DO NOT WEAR MASKS DO NOT DOWNLOAD TRACING APPS SPREAD TRUE SCIENCE AND FIGHT BACK !!!!!!!!!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFwqArvB1IM

https://la.indymedia.org/news/2020/05/299352.php

http://theinfectiousmyth.com/coronavirus/AntibodyTestingForCOVID.pdf https://twitter.com/DavidRCrowe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYr2jJf-zZ0&t=187s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWBRNwoUqFY&t=8s https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/04/04/the-gold-standard-of-medical-tests-is-fake/

https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf

https://twitter.com/DavidRCrowe https://theinfectiousmyth.com/coronavirus/EvidenceExistenceCOVID19Corbett.pdf

https://theinfectiousmyth.com/coronavirus/RT-PCR_Test_Issues.php

https://lockdownsceptics.org/the-incredible-and-scary-truth-about-covid-19-tests-2/

https://twitter.com/InfectiousMyth/status/1250138967799779328

https://www.projectveritas.com/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7A_cMpKm6w&t=5s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaOvva72b7o

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFwqArvB1IM

https://www.corriere.it/esteri/20_giugno_01/coronavirus-germania-virologo-star-bufera-l-accusa-stampa-asservito-politica-5e3bb63a-a403-11ea-b19d-c124828d4b5b.shtml



TESTING THE TESTS



PCR TESTING IS NOT INTENDED FOR DIAGNOSTIC USE, AS BIG PHARMA ROCHE MANUFACTURER ITSELF STATES :

" The LightCycler® 480 Instrument is

not intended for use in diagnostic procedures. " :

http://icob.sinica.edu.tw/pubweb/bio-chem/Core%20Facilities/Data/R401-core/LightCycler480%20II_Manual_V1.5.pdf

p.11.

AND YET ON SUCH NONDIAGNOSING TESTING, THE WHOLE DIAGNOSIS CIRCUS AND INFECTED-COUNT IS BEING BASED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IT´S A TOTAL FRAUD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

See for instance this ludicrous pseudoscientific report claiming to have detected sars-cov-2 in tears, by using lightcycler 480 :

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jmv.25725

"ran the PCR reaction using the Roche LightCycler® 480 (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). After instantaneous centrifugation for 40 cycles, the PCR was completed in about 85 minutes; thereafter, we checked the amplification curves to judge whether the results were negative or positive." !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The pseudoscientists in this pseudostudy admitted to not having isolated the virus in tears, so WTF are they ranting about ??? :

" However, the virus was not successfully isolated and cultured in the conjunctival secretion of the patient." !!!!!!!!!!!!!

An italian team after this, claimed to have isolated the virus and cultured it, but without performing electron microscopy on it, so how did they know what TYPE of virus it was in those tears ?

https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-1176

Again they relied on PCR - unsuited for diagnostic purposes as roche manufacturer itself clearly states. Furthermore, the italians cultured the alleged virus using vero cells and not primary lung tissue from patien biopsy, so let us remind them what it is to do science in David Rasnick´s wording again :

"Virus isolation from clinical specimens was performed with airway epithelial cells and Vero E6 and Huh-7 cell lines.” This raises the question of a possible artifact, along the lines of Robert Gallo´s viral isolation of HIV. They should have first done TEM directly on primary lung tissue to establish the presence of virus. Culturing virus is fine but its presence must be confirmed by TEM of primary lung tissue.

It is essential to take great pains to accurately identify and characterize any presumed infectious agent present in people with new symptoms. That's where TEM on primary tissue samples from the person with symptoms is essential. This can be followed by culturing the suspect agent in order to purify it and performing TEM again, this time on the cultured virus. As a control, you must also perform TEM on the cultured cells that you have not treated with the suspect virus to make sure a virus had not contaminated the cells. I do not trust experiments using cancer cell lines to culture

virus. Usually, animals that are susceptible are treated with the pure virus to study and confirm its pathology.

Once all the preliminary work is done, which could take up to a year or more, simpler detection methods can be employed so long has their accuracy has been confirmed using gold standards such as TEM.

Look up Koch’s postulates. "

Next we examine a southkorean report claiming to have isolated sars cov 2 and performed TEM on cells inoculated with it :

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045880/

They show TEM pics purported to detect coronavirus-like morphology : but how do they know the pics are of this alleged new virus and not of another X corona ? How can we be sure what those black dots are ? And then again, the southkoreans based their diagnosis on PCR - a test unsuited for diagnostic purposes ! And they sequenced the alleged full genome of this alleged new coronavirus, by using the miseq illumina system which states in its package insert :

"Solo a uso di ricerca. Non usare in procedimenti diagnostici."

" For research purposes alone. Do not use in diagnostic procedures." !!!

https://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/datasheets/miseq-data-sheet-770-2011-001-translations/miseq-specification-sheet-770-2011-001-ita.pdf

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/

" Dr. Mullis wrote, on May 7, 2013:“PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment. “

No, there is no such thing as a special test for the alleged "covid 19". Covid 19 is the official name they gave this alleged disease. The name for the virus is sars-cov-2. Now, if a virus is inside your body, it does NOT necessarily imply that you are sick. Just that you are "positive" to that particular virus. So : you might be sars-cov-2- positive, but still not have the disease covid 19 : not be sick.

Ok ? This is a very important difference, never forget it . Now : nobody has given us any solid evidence that this alleged new type of coronavirus, sars-cov-2, really exists. And there is no evidence that, IF it exists, it is the cause of the alleged disease called covid 19. What you hear from the massmedia is only lies : in the world of true science, it takes over a year to confirm the existence of a new virus, and its pathogenicity, that is to say, the fact that it does cause a new disease. Now : there are 2 main types of tests that are believed (falsely) to detect a virus in your body : the first test is called RT-PCR, or just simply PCR ; the second test is called serological, as it analyzes the serum (a part of your blood) in search of antibodies revealing that you are being or have been exposed to a virus. Neither of these 2 tests is specific to any particular virus, though they might claim otherwise. Let me give you 2 examples from commercially available PCR tests being used these days , I shall quote from the labels, the company labels that come with these tests : - Abbott : "Positive results do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses...Due to the high sensitivity of the assays run on the instrument, contamination of the work area with previous positive samples may cause false positive results" ; - Accula : " Cross-reactivity with respiratory tract organisms other than those listed in the Analytical Specificity Study may lead to erroneous results…" : what they are saying is : we cannot guarantee through our test that you are positive to sars-cov-2 because our test may confuse sars-cov-2 with everything else, any other kind of RNA in your cells or other things !!! It´s a hoax, it´s a swindle, it is global pharma nazism to terrorize us all into buying their useless and harmful vaccines and drugs and face masks and disinfectants that will only cause one allergies and poisonings, and accept total control of our lives, contact tracing etc., under the false pretext of a pandemic that does NOT exist.

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/

" Dr. Mullis wrote, on May 7, 2013:“PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment. “

PCR testing for the alleged sars-cov-2 virus is fraudulent : here is evidence taken directly from genesig company´s RT-PCR package insert :

" Interpretation of results must account for the possibility of false negative and false positive results.

• False negative results may be caused by:

o Unsuitable collection, handling and/or storage of samples.

o Sample outside of viraemic phase.

o Failure to follow procedures in this handbook.

o Use of unauthorised extraction kit or PCR platform.

• False positive results may be caused by:

o Unsuitable handling of samples containing high concentration of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA or positive control template.

o Unsuitable handling of amplified product.

• All results should be interpreted by a health care professional in the context of patient medical history and clinical symptoms.

• This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other pathogens.

• A negative result for any PCR test does not conclusively rule out the possibility of infection. " :

https://www.genesig.com/assets/files/Path_COVID_19_CE_IVD_IFU_Issue_3.pdf?timestamp=1589212981

p.8

Kiss my ass ! DO NOT TAKE THIS TEST, PCR IS NOT A DIAGNOSTIC TOOL !!!



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybridization_probe

"Detection of sequences with moderate or high similarity depends on how stringent the hybridization conditions were applied—high stringency, such as high hybridization temperature and low salt in hybridization buffers, permits only hybridization between nucleic acid sequences that are highly similar, whereas low stringency, such as lower temperature and high salt, allows hybridization when the sequences are less similar."

https://www.future-science.com/doi/abs/10.2144/01315dd03

https://www.gene-quantification.de/SIAL-qPCR-Technical-Guide.pdf

Now highly similar is NOT identical : and since the genome of other known coronaviruses such as especially NL63 causing some 10% of the common cold is highly similar to the alleged, artificially made up genome of this purported "sars-cov-2", a PCR test at best risks branding you positive to covid when in fact all you have is a cold or some other respiratory infection caused by other known coronas. DO NOT SUBMIT TO COVID TESTING !!!!!!!!!!!

PCR is unreliable when it comes to covid testing : from the package inserts of some PCR test kits in use :

Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 : The impacts of vaccines, antiviral therapeutics, antibiotics, chemotherapeutic or immunosuppressant drugs [on the performance of this test] have not been evaluated… Due to the high sensitivity of the assays run on the instrument, contamination of the work area with previous positive samples may cause false positive results.

Accula Test for SARS-CoV-2 : Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA may be affected by sample collection methods, patient factors (e.g., presence of symptoms), and/or stage of infection… Cross-reactivity with respiratory tract organisms other than those listed in the Analytical Specificity Study may lead to erroneous results… Analyte targets (viral nucleic acid) may persist in vivo, independent of virus viability… contamination of the work area with previous samples may cause false positive results.

Forget about PCR for covid diagnostics : it is fraud.

Ask yourselves whether or not this alleged disease exists at all to begin with.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybridization_probe

https://www.future-science.com/doi/abs/10.2144/01315dd03

https://www.gene-quantification.de/SIAL-qPCR-Technical-Guide.pdf

Simply put : if they perform qPCR testing by the probe method, they can easily skew it to make you test positive to any corona other than the alleged sars-cov-2.

If they perform qPCR on you by the dye method - the most commonly used as it´s way cheaper - then they won´t be able to tell a virus from another or from any type of nonviral RNA, because dye-based qPCR is NONspecific. qPCR = quantitative PCR :

" Two common methods for the detection of PCR products in real-time PCR are (1) non-specific fluorescent dyes that intercalate with any double-stranded DNA and (2) sequence-specific DNA probes consisting of oligonucleotides that are labelled with a fluorescent reporter, which permits detection only after hybridization of the probe with its complementary sequence. " :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_polymerase_chain_reaction

Briefly : PCR testing for covid is a fraud - DO NOT DO IT !!!



ANTIBODY TESTING AND THERAPY

Antibody tests for the alleged virus sars-cov-2 and the relative alleged disease covid 19 are a fraud : what they do is, they produce a synthetic protein in their labs, called S protein because it is allegedly present in the spike of the sars-cov-2 coronavirus : this artificial protein is produced in the lab, according to formulas from genebanks which have never been independently and scientifically verified. So they then proceed to coat their test grid with this S protein, and expose it to serum or plasma : if there are antibodies, for whatever reason, in your serum or plasma, they will attack this S-protein, because the S-protein enters our cells by attaching itself to a substance called ACE2 receptor. So if we develop antibodies that attack these infected cells where the S protein has entered thru this door called ACE2, they´ll say that we are positive to covid 19 - to the alleged disease covid 19. Bu that´a a lie : because there are other types of known coronaviruses causing for instance some 15% or so of the common cold : and these common coronas, such as NL63, that have been around forever, also feature the S-protein in their spikes, and also use the ACE2 receptor in our cells to enter them.

Therefore if you turn out to be positive to these fraudulent tests, it does NOT imply that you have or have had the alleged disease called covid 19 : you might have responded with antibodies that targeted S-1 because when you have had a cold, that´s what you do. In other words : antibody testing is a fraud, it´s totally artificial, it´s meant to stigmatize as many humans as possible and force them into treatment that is more harmful than what they might really have - often, a common cold. DO NOT GO FOR THESE TESTS, REFUSE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THESE FRAUDULENT, CRIMINAL ANTIBODY TESTING FOR AN ALLEGED VIRUS/DISEASE THAT HAS NOT EVEN BEEN PROVEN TO EXIST IN THE FIRST PLACE.

Even big pharma fraudsters such as the hoffman-family´s roche company, warn us that their sars-cov-2-antibody test is totally unreliable :

" False positive results for the Elecsys Anti‑SARS‑CoV‑2 assay may occur

due to cross reactivity from pre-existing antibodies or other possible

causes " :

https://www.fda.gov/media/137605/download

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronavirus

http://theinfectiousmyth.com/coronavirus/AntibodyTestingForCOVID.pdf

https://www.corriere.it/salute/malattie_infettive/cards/guerra-vaccini-chi-vincera/sfida-senza-precedenti_principale.shtml?refresh_ce-cp

https://www.corriere.it/salute/20_maggio_06/plasma-curare-coronavirus-entusiasmi-polemiche-ma-non-abbiamo-ancora-evidenze-35c35864-8fdd-11ea-bb7f-d3d655d2211a.shtml



https://www.foxnews.com/science/covid-cure-california-biopharmaceutical-coronavirus-antibody-breakthrough

https://www.google.it/search?ei=lmjCXsXgFICj1fAPgoGBuAo&q=adverse+side+effects+of+antibody+therapy&oq=adverse+side+effects+of+antibody+therapy&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQAzoOCAAQ6gIQtAIQmgEQ5QI6BAgAEEM6BQgAEIMBOgIIADoECAAQCjoGCAAQFhAeOgQIABATOggIABAWEB4QEzoFCCEQoAE6BAghEBU6BwghEAoQoAE6CAghEBYQHRAeULLnAlilxwNgjdMDaAFwAHgAgAHCAYgB4B6SAQUyOS4xMZgBAKABAaoBB2d3cy13aXqwAQY&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwjFg4CDn73pAhWAURUIHYJAAKcQ4dUDCAs&uact=5#spf=1589799121932

"In general, the more common side effects caused by monoclonal antibody drugs include:

Allergic reactions, such as hives or itching.

Flu-like signs and symptoms, including chills, fatigue, fever, and muscle aches and pains.

Nausea, vomiting.

Diarrhea.

Skin rashes.

Low blood pressure."

Plus worse, potentially lethal ones such as anaphylactic shock :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoclonal_antibody_therapy

"However, the immune response to certain antigens may be inadequate, especially in the elderly. Additionally, adverse reactions from these antibodies may occur because of long-lasting response to antigens.[6] Passive monoclonal antibody therapy can ensure consistent antibody concentration, and can control for adverse reactions by stopping administration. However, the repeated administration and consequent higher cost for this therapy are major disadvantages.[6]"

" Major problems associated with murine antibodies included reduced stimulation of cytotoxicity and the formation complexes after repeated administration, which resulted in mild allergic reactions and sometimes anaphylactic shock.[12]

These antibodies suggested as therapy are not natural, they are synthesized in the lab, by mixing human, animal and synthetic sections ; and bear in mind that the spike protein of the new alleged coronavirus sars-cov-2 that these pharma usurers are experimenting with, is also lab-made and not extracted from infected samples ! Lab-made according to a formula registered by the chinese into genebank, a global genomic database, that nobody has verified conclusively so far in the real world.



ANTIBODY TESTING

Here´s what doctor David Rasnick said about these proliferating antiboy tests :

mainstream media are making a big deal about new tests targeting specific antibodies, that is sars-cov-2-antigen-specific antibodies : aside from the danger of cross-reactivity, generally speaking, is each antibody specific and unique for each antigen ? Does each virus type produce specific and unique antigens ?

" Each virus produces antigens common to the family of viruses, and antigens common to the strain of virus. Viruses (especially RNA viruses) produce different antigens every time they replicate.

Your body produces about one trillion B-cells producing a trillion different antibodies. The trillion different antibodies attach to a protein antigen (most antigens are proteins) strongly (highly specific), moderately or slightly (non-specifically), and the overwhelming majority not at all. The range of these antibodies are called polyclonal antibodies.

Truly specific antigen-antibody reactions exist only in the laboratory—the so-called mono-clonal antibodies. "

Is there a danger there, that these serological tests would detect antibodies to antigens from common coronaviruses, and this might be sold for sars-cov-2 positivity ?

"The antibody tests always show a range of binding between viral test antigens and a person’s polyclonal antibodies. As with the HIV antibody tests, there is an arbitrary cut-off point of antibody-antigen reaction intensity, above the point is positive and below is negative.

There are over 80 documented ways a person who has never been exposed to HIV can have a positive result on the HIV antibody tests. This is true for any virus."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoclonal_antibody

https://www.creative-diagnostics.com/news-sars-cov-2-antigens-and-antibodies-79.htm

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30788-1/fulltext

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.18.20038059v1.full.pdf

Antibody testing is fraud : from the package insert of one of these bogus test kits : https://www.assaygenie.com/covid-19-rapid-poc-test/ " Results from antibody testing should not be used as the sole basis to diagnose or exclude SARS-CoV-2 infection or to inform infection status. Positive results may be due to past or present infection with non-SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus strains, such as coronavirus HKU1, NL63, OC43, or 229E." : you´ll test positive even if you have a common cold ! and they will kill you with heavy treatment, quarantine etc.

DO NOT GO FOR IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Antibody testing is unreliable, total fraud - this according to the WHO itself :

" Antibody detection tests targeting COVID-19 may also cross-react with other pathogens, including other human coronaviruses.

Based on current data, WHO does not recommend the use of antibody-detecting rapid diagnostic tests for patient care " :

https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/advice-on-the-use-of-point-of-care-immunodiagnostic-tests-for-covid-19

Antibody tests for this alleged sars-cov-2 virus whose very existence and pathogenicity nobody has proven so far, are a fraud : the alleged spike protein that is supposed to detect antibody response

and thus confirm covid diagnoses is NOT a real protein extracted from live samples of patients : it is a synthetic lab product, made according to a genome formula that was completely made up arbitrarily. So assuming that antibody response to this synthetic lab spike protein, is elicited in the serum or plasma sample, it does NOT mean a patient was infected with any real virus at all - just that his finger prick or serum etc., reacted to an artificial protein thrown into the sample by the tester, not to an alleged virus that does NOT repeat NOT even provably exist :

" Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

We used a novel ELISA. Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 trimeric spike protein was constructed,

tagged and purified. Immunoplates coated with StrepMAB-Classic were used to capture

tagged soluble trimeric SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S protein and then incubated with test plasma.

Antibody binding to the S protein was detected with ALP-conjugated anti-human IgG or antihuman

IgM." :

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.15.20066407v1.full.pdf

notice how none of this crap has been peer-reviewed - and it never will, for it is absurd and a mockery of science.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075877

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7164637/

(artificial construction of S-protein from databank genome)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094943/

(fan wu march 2020)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947

(alleged genomic structure of sars-cov-2 on genebank)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_coronavirus_NL63

(NL63 uses S-protein and ACE2 receptor to enter cells. just like the sars cov corona and the alleged sars cov 2, and is associated with kawasaki as they are now saying of sars cov 2...)

http://www.iskrae.eu/soldi-interessi-militari-nato-test-sierologici-covid-19-italia/

THERE IS NO SARS-COV-2 virus no covid disease no pandemic it´s all a pharmanazi hoax for profit :

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFwqArvB1IM

https://la.indymedia.org/news/2020/05/299370.php

http://theinfectiousmyth.com/coronavirus/AntibodyTestingForCOVID.pdf https://twitter.com/DavidRCrowe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYr2jJf-zZ0&t=187s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWBRNwoUqFY&t=8s https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2018/04/04/the-gold-standard-of-medical-tests-is-fake/

https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf

https://theinfectiousmyth.com/coronavirus/EvidenceExistenceCOVID19Corbett.pdf

https://theinfectiousmyth.com/coronavirus/RT-PCR_Test_Issues.php

https://lockdownsceptics.org/the-incredible-and-scary-truth-about-covid-19-tests-2/

https://twitter.com/InfectiousMyth/status/1250138967799779328

https://www.projectveritas.com/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7A_cMpKm6w&t=5s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaOvva72b7o

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ygms5aBiQQ8

https://www.regenbogenkreis.de/blog/gesundheit-und-ernaehrung/coronavirus-inszenierte-panikmache

https://www.nogeoingegneria.com/uncategorized/tempo-di-coronavirus-essere-critici-e-permesso/

https://www.wodarg.com/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32133832/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92pPKqGnt8k

(google function on everybody´s smartphones : " notice of exposure to covid" : so if you don´t download their fucking tracing apps, they´ll trace you and control you and blackmail you anyway, under permanent threat of quarantine, isolation, lockdown, forced sanitary treatment, psychiatric ward if you resist etc. : THROW AWAY YOUR SMARTPHONE NOW !!! )

https://www.ospfe.it/area-comunicazione/news/dal-27-maggio-tampone-a-tutti-i-pazienti-in-attesa-di-ricovero

(compulsory "covid"-test swab for all patients awaiting surgery : forced sanitary treatment : auschwitz : all of which, over an alleged disease that DOES NOTEXIST !!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_v2XWuPY09M

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S7xW72ahs7Guqo7JzzPFuI0P6wjg_j5r/view

https://lockdownsceptics.org/testing-do-you-have-the-disease/#comment-402

https://truthiverse.com/2

https://fakeologist.com/

http://fakeologist.com/corona-main/corona-2/

http://fakeologist.com/blog/2020/08/06/looking-for-the-key-to-destroy-the-entire-coronavirushoax/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dKFI4DHzzQ

https://www.facebook.com/VirusManiaBook

Bill gates and his lackeys the world over are trying to use this false pretext to turn us all into their transhumanistic robotic slaves :

SAY NO TO THIS VAXIS OF EVIL !!!!

http://www.lavocedellevoci.it/2020/05/17/microchip-per-tutti-la-nuova-democrazia-di-bill-gates-c/

https://oresundstartups.com/biohax-international-teams-up-with-london-based-icon-capital-reverse/

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/nov/08/the-rise-of-microchipping-are-we-ready-for-technology-to-get-under-the-skin

http://www.iskrae.eu/piano-usa-controllo-militarizzato-della-popolazione/

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/American_Medical_Association

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_brotherhood05.htm

August 27, 2020

David Crowe, the foremost opinion leader in the fight against the con-vid hoax, has died of cancer reportedly, on July 12, 2020 :

https://mhfh.com/tribute/details/31155/David-CROWE/obituary.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTmsQ60X-Uw

I am struck and deeply affected by his sudden demise. It reminds me of the sudden cancer death of a valiant 911-hoax researcher, Gerald Holmgren back in 2010. He was only 50 or so. David was 63.

Another early death of a freedom fighter was that of Scott Loughrey, 911-hoax pioneer, some years back, also at 50 or so. I´ll just ask the Q : is regime terror causing cancer somehow, in these more visible freedom fighters ?

August 30, 2020

SKEP