|
printable version
- js reader version
- view hidden posts
- tags and related articles
View article without comments
by Anjem Choudary
Wednesday, Jan. 07, 2015 at 8:04 PM
People know the consequences. Why did France allow the tabloid to provoke Muslims?
ontrary to popular misconception, Islam does not mean peace but rather means submission to the commands of Allah alone. Therefore, Muslims do not believe in the concept of freedom of expression, as their speech and actions are determined by divine revelation and not based on people's desires.
Although Muslims may not agree about the idea of freedom of expression, even non-Muslims who espouse it say it comes with responsibilities. In an increasingly unstable and insecure world, the potential consequences of insulting the Messenger Muhammad are known to Muslims and non-Muslims alike.
OUR VIEW: Slaughter of French satirists can't silence free expression
Muslims consider the honor of the Prophet Muhammad to be dearer to them than that of their parents or even themselves. To defend it is considered to be an obligation upon them. The strict punishment if found guilty of this crime under sharia (Islamic law) is capital punishment implementable by an Islamic State. This is because the Messenger Muhammad said, "Whoever insults a Prophet kill him."
However, because the honor of the Prophet is something which all Muslims want to defend, many will take the law into their own hands, as we often see.
Within liberal democracies, freedom of expression has curtailments, such as laws against incitement and hatred.
The truth is that Western governments are content to sacrifice liberties and freedoms when being complicit to torture and rendition — or when restricting the freedom of movement of Muslims, under the guise of protecting national security.
So why in this case did the French government allow the magazine Charlie Hebdo to continue to provoke Muslims, thereby placing the sanctity of its citizens at risk?
It is time that the sanctity of a Prophet revered by up to one-quarter of the world's population was protected.
www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/01/07/islam-allah-mus...
Report this post as:
by nobody
Monday, Jan. 12, 2015 at 8:23 AM
It's not the role of the government to regulate this particular type of speech. If there's anything to be criticized, it's the fact that France did regulate religious speech when it banned wearing of the headscarf.
The problem is the status of Islam within France. Muslims lack the power to respond effectively to incursions upon their rights. They are oppressed. They are unable to exert sufficient social influence to get whatever it is they need, and to feel a part of French society.
Charlie Hebdo already engages in self-censorship (as do all publications), but they are not considering the feelings of the Islamic people of France. Judging from the covers, the publication isn't just racist, but particularly racist against Muslim and Black people.
Watching from America, I see the current protests in support of Charlie Hebdo as a celebration of white supremacy and Christian supremacy within France. It's not about freedom of speech for everyone. It's about freedom of speech for white, Christian French persons.
Report this post as:
by Gayle
Monday, Jan. 12, 2015 at 9:51 PM
And murder is the most socially acceptable way they can deal with their "Oppression"? Ok, then.
Report this post as:
by Another False Flag
Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2015 at 4:15 AM
There sure is an unfortunate failure of World gullibility here. This false flag, like the 9-11 event, is falling apart rather quickly.
Report this post as:
by Ralph
Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2015 at 8:16 AM
Says the troll without one iota of evidence
Report this post as:
by 'troll' v. spook
Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2015 at 10:11 AM
ok then... where's the blood? you go 1st
Report this post as:
by Where's the blood?
Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2015 at 8:26 PM
 blood.jpg, image/jpeg, 992x744
Oh, you expect the French to parade their dead like trophies. No, only the Palestinians do that. Most other people are respectful to their departed
PHOTO: The bloodied floor and desks in the Charlie Hebdo newsroom after gunman entered the office, Jan. 7, 2015. Polaris
********** The bloody attack reportedly started on the ground floor, when they killed one of the two doorman in the building after asking where they could find the satirical newspaper's offices.
Inside, editors and contributors were gathered for an editorial meeting, and that is where the string of execution-style killings occurred, authorities said. The tenth fatality inside the conference room was that of the state-ordered bodyguard who was assigned to protect the publication's editor and chief cartoonist, Stephane "Charb" Charbonnier.
Many of the head editors and cartoonists for the newspaper are believed to be among the fatalities, but the full list has not yet been released publicly.
Paris Deputy Mayor Patrick Klugman told ABC News that one of the assailants shot the staffers, including some of the country's best-known political cartoonists.
Ten people -- nine of them staffers or contributors -- were killed inside the office, and two others outside, plus an additional 11 people injured, four of whom were critical in the hours following the attack.
The assailants, believed to be brothers Said and Cherif Kouachi, were only in the office for five minutes before fleeing the scene, authorities said.
abcnews.go.com/International/inside-charlie-hebdo-offices...
Report this post as:
by 'troll' v. spook
Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2015 at 8:52 PM
Not the interior carnage...
I mean the blood and brains of the conveniently filmed policeman. You know, the one that ALLEGEDLY got shot, on film, at point blank range with a rifle. Not the victims of this Mossad / CIA event. I meant the crisis actors around the coincidentally unguarded publication office.
Like I said, this whole operation is showing itself as a very clumsy, hasty false flag event to warn/punish France about their reluctance to continue sanctions on Russia and to 'persuade' France to veto the Palestinian attempt to gain some form of justice. It also serves to foment the old standby Islamophobia. The only ones to gain are the usual suspects, Israel and its bitch, America.
Report this post as:
by rick
Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2015 at 12:05 PM
Thats your "evidence"? That a surveillance camera a block away didn't have high resolution photographs?
Time to polish your tin foil hat, buddy.
Report this post as:
by 'troll' v. spook
Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2015 at 8:37 PM
PARIS SHOOTING HOAX -About 408,421 results (0.35 seconds) 'tinfoil hats' ha ha... This is getting good. The degenerate, inbred, overclass has been found with its Operation Gladio pants down around their ankles. You see, there's a problem. The “strategy of tension” that the NATO stay behind units of terrorism didn't quite work in Spain with the railway bombings because the blood didn't dupe the people. They voted pro labor in the following election. 'Leftist' if you please.
Report this post as:
by 'troll' v. spook
Thursday, Jan. 15, 2015 at 7:01 AM
PARIS “FALSE FLAG” About 526,854 results (0.31 seconds) Unraveling at this very moment. Yes, the overclass has finally stomped into their own proverbial bag of pig flop while the lies that holds it together, comes apart. And their minions are working so hard to sew it back together. Luck with that, ha ha ha. life is really good sometimes
Report this post as:
by thats your evidence?
Friday, Jan. 16, 2015 at 6:49 PM
 goat.jpg, image/jpeg, 471x699
Hits on Google? Still in Junior High, Isee.
Incidentally, there are over 19,000,000 hits for "Flat earth", so using your logic, it must be true.
Report this post as:
by 'troll' v. spook
Sunday, Jan. 18, 2015 at 2:44 AM
You know something? I love the wasted effort involved in trying to patch this false flag up. Concerned? I bet you are. For the casual reader, we can't be responsible for the Zionist 'tin foil hat" response brigade. The facts of this false flag event speak for themselves. look it up.
Report this post as:
|