Today I read an enigmatic article of Caio Blinder (Brazilian journalist that lives in the USA and it is always irritated when I say that he receives cookies and milk of CIA).



http://ultimosegundo.ig.com.br/opiniao/caio_blinder/2009/09/10/os+perigos+da+democracia+de+partido+unico+nos+eua+8352029.html



Impossible to know on which country the author wrote. Does Blinder refer to the colossus of Northern Hemisphere that has more than 600 military bases around of the planet, thousands of nuclear bombs (for not mentioning the other bombs) and a disposition truly criminal and obstinate of doing the one what wants anywhere without consent of the international legislation under republicans or democratic? More probable than he has spoken about his ideal model of western democracy, that in practice it adopts foreign policies that if they were copied would take the world to the one savage planetary war.



What would be happened if Brazil supported systematically Colombia (of the cocaine producers) as the USA they support Afghanistan (of the opium producers)? What would of the world be if China decided to take care of the oil reserves of Kwait as the USA became proprietors, in the big hand, of the petroleum of Iraq? What future would have the human species if the Russians of Putin wanted to have so many military bases as the Americans of Obama?



Blinder treats China as a out law country by definition and it considers the USA the eternal and well held good exemplary young man. In the world of the facts, however, the things have been very different.



In the reality the only significant difference between China and the USA is this: Chinese don't have more than 600 military bases in the exterior and in the last decade they didn't begin any illegal war to control the petroleum of another people lying for the international community. As for the rest USA and China are siamese siblings. Both take care of their interests and they are governed by corrupted and corruptors politicians.



Taking into account just the facts, at the present time Chinese have more credibility than the Americans. China is peaceful and who commits the world stability with his/her criminal militancy are the USA. Actually we should lament a thing deeply. Jimmy Carter should have accepted the Small Steersman's offer in the occasion in that he found the Chinese leader.



In that opportunity Carter affirmed that was concerned with the right of to go and to come in China. Smiling little Deng Xiaoping asked the American friend how many Chinese he wanted China to send to the USA: 10 million, 20 million... If the President of the USA had accepted the generous offer of Peking today Chinese would already have turned majority in the USA and they would command that country. Under Chinese the USA would be more peaceful and the white and racist Anglo-American elite that it provoked this global financial series of misfortunes would have moved to Mexico and Canada (under protest of the Mexicans and Canadian).