IRS WANTS 20% OF EMBEZZLEMENT OF HANSENS ABVA TRUST 1982-2008.
FROM IMPOSTERS ANDERSON,ZEIGLER,DISHAROON,GALLAGHER& GRAY BOND STREET HOLDINGS LTD.
ROBERT D. SALISBURY IS SETTLEMENT ATTORNEY DELAWARE UCC 93146900 RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL CRIMES COMMITED AGAINST THE HANSEN STANGHELLINI FAMILIES AND IS DESIGNATED AS CHIEF AUDITOR.
ALL COURTS AND OTHER ATTORNEYS INVOLVED IN MALICOUS PROSECUTIONS AND DEFENSE OF MR HANSEN WHO WILL ASSIST MR SALISBURY ARE;
1. MELVIN E. SOLL ESQ, DELAWARE 1998-99
Who voided all forgeries in Delaware and was bribed and threatened to
conceal ANDERSON CALIFORNIA TRUST THEFT and abandon1999
2. BRADLEY GROVE, got false oregon indictment dismissed. 1994
3. JOE ORZANO took judgment in Nevada Case March 28, 1995
94-428 HDM
4. JOHN STORKLE Oregon got false indictment dismissed.
5. STEVEN T. WAX, Oregon Got false indictment dismissed 1994
(all attorneys in both Oregon and Nevada Cases and SF Sup Ct.
6. JERRY AND PENNY PAGE, January-August 1995 forged ABVA file in
Nevada UCC 94-07952
7. DAVE BARELA, 1997 S F Sup St case.
REALTORS;
1. GERARDA STOCKING Livermore 2001 Found was paid to conceal
Anderson ID theft helped kill Penni.
2. PACIFIC AUCTION EXCHANGE KEITH DANIELS 2005
Listed all properties abandoned under threat.
3. WILLIAM WORD, became CEO bought property opened accounts
abandoned under threat. July 2007
PRIVATE INVESTIGATORS
1. ACP ARTHUR PADILLA MEDFORD.
2. ATTORNEYS DIVERSIFIED SERVICE OAKLAND.
3. FLOYD A. SMITH P.I. 2005
4. DUSTY HARRISON P.I.
ALL ABANDONED UNDER THREAT
ATTEST;
Alvin Joseph Hansen
Victim UCC Judgment Lien Creditor
Vernon Hansen Co Trustee victim
William E Thomson SEO
Allen Matthews CEO 1996
IRS WANTS 20 % OF ANDERSON ZEIGLER DISHAROON $3.4 TRILLION VIOLENT MURDER ID THEFT TRUST FORGERY EMBEZZLEMENT
Scanning one's own Social Security card, credit cards, birth certificate and suchlike and then posting them on the freakin' Internet is like BEGGING to be the victim of identity theft. Most people would know better.
But then, most people are sane; the melange of documents in that pdf tell a very different story than you appear to think, and a very sad one too.
The tale that emerges is of someone who can't distinguish between a court docket entry and a judgment, who fills in Web forms with unintelligible rants, takes screenshots of them and deludes himself that they are official documents, who believes that scribbling rants on actual official documents alters or negates their meaning, and who, when a remarkably patient lawyer attempts to explain reality, ignores well-meant professional advice with a scribbled "LIAR".
The whole thing can be summed up in a quote from that lawyer's letter:
"Despite the fact that I have told you over and over that I need Judgments to enforce, I have not seen one money judgment awarded by any Court that has stood up on Appeal, and is ready for enforcement. Remember, you have been at this for 10 years on your own and have nothing to show for it. You need to listen to someone if you want to recover anything."
This is sad. Why the LA IMC seems to think that allowing someone obviously mentally ill to use the newswire to thus humiliate himself is very hard to understand or to justify.
Do you even know anything about this case? Have you read the files? Have you read the book? If the answer is no to any of these then I suggest you do that first and then comment. If you answered yes to any of the above and commented the way you did, it seems you have a vested interest to discredit the plaintiffs.
And you think 12+ years of litigation can be summed up by one lawyers letter???