imc indymedia

Los Angeles Indymedia : Activist News

About Us Contact Us Calendar Publish RSS
Features
• latest news
• best of news
• syndication
• commentary


KILLRADIO

VozMob

ABCF LA

A-Infos Radio

Indymedia On Air

Dope-X-Resistance-LA List

LAAMN List




IMC Network:

Original Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq kenya nigeria south africa canada: hamilton london, ontario maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg east asia: burma jakarta japan korea manila qc europe: abruzzo alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol brussels bulgaria calabria croatia cyprus emilia-romagna estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege liguria lille linksunten lombardia london madrid malta marseille nantes napoli netherlands nice northern england norway oost-vlaanderen paris/Île-de-france patras piemonte poland portugal roma romania russia saint-petersburg scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki torun toscana toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia latin america: argentina bolivia chiapas chile chile sur cmi brasil colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso venezuela venezuela oceania: adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne perth qc sydney south asia: india mumbai united states: arizona arkansas asheville atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado columbus dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca sarasota seattle tampa bay tennessee urbana-champaign vermont western mass worcester west asia: armenia beirut israel palestine process: fbi/legal updates mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer projects: print radio satellite tv video regions: oceania united states topics: biotech

Surviving Cities

www.indymedia.org africa: canada: quebec east asia: japan europe: athens barcelona belgium bristol brussels cyprus germany grenoble ireland istanbul lille linksunten nantes netherlands norway portugal united kingdom latin america: argentina cmi brasil rosario oceania: aotearoa united states: austin big muddy binghamton boston chicago columbus la michigan nyc portland rochester saint louis san diego san francisco bay area santa cruz, ca tennessee urbana-champaign worcester west asia: palestine process: fbi/legal updates process & imc docs projects: radio satellite tv
json version - view hidden posts

Jeremy Scahill: Blackwater's Brothers

by Jeremy Scahill Saturday, Nov. 17, 2007 at 4:36 AM

Every day, new revelations emerge in the mounting scandal rocking the Bush Administration and the mercenary company Blackwater Worldwide. Much of the attention focuses on the now infamous shooting spree in Baghdad's Nisour Square on September 16, in which seventeen Iraqi civilians were killed and twenty-four wounded. FBI investigators are now alleging that fourteen were victims of unjustified and unprovoked shooting--some were shot while they were fleeing. Investigators also say they found nothing to substantiate Blackwater's claims of being fired on by Iraqis. This comes a month after a US Army investigation determined there was "no enemy activity involved" and labeled the shootings a "criminal event." But while Blackwater gets hammered in the press, the behind-the-scenes actions of the company's paymaster, the State Department, grow more scandalous by the minute.

ttp://www.thenation.com/doc/20071203/scahill

The Nation

Blackwater's Brothers

by JEREMY SCAHILL

[posted online on November 15, 2007]

Every day, new revelations emerge in the mounting scandal rocking the Bush Administration and the mercenary company Blackwater Worldwide. Much of the attention focuses on the now infamous shooting spree in

Baghdad's Nisour Square on September 16, in which seventeen Iraqi

civilians were killed and twenty-four wounded. FBI investigators are

now alleging that fourteen were victims of unjustified and unprovoked

shooting--some were shot while they were fleeing. Investigators also

say they found nothing to substantiate Blackwater's claims of being

fired on by Iraqis. This comes a month after a US Army investigation

determined there was "no enemy activity involved" and labeled the

shootings a "criminal event." But while Blackwater gets hammered in the

press, the behind-the-scenes actions of the company's paymaster, the

State Department, grow more scandalous by the minute.

Almost from the moment the Nisour Square shootings happened, the State

Department has taken actions that give the impression of trying to

cover up the incident. The department's initial report on the shooting

was drafted by a Blackwater contractor on official US government

stationery. The FBI was not dispatched to investigate the case until

two weeks after the shootings, meaning that the initial investigation

was in the hands of a non-law enforcement agency, the State Department,

that just happens to be Blackwater's employer. In late October it

emerged that the department had actually granted some Blackwater

operatives "limited use immunity" in return for their statements on the

shooting. Some Blackwater agents have reportedly refused to answer FBI

questions, citing their State Department-granted "immunity." This means

that their statements, and information gleaned from them, cannot be

used to bring criminal charges against them. The State Department also

offered to facilitate the payment of what amounted to hush money to

victims of the shooting, which it has done on numerous occasions for

Blackwater and other companies when they kill Iraqis.

Now this story has taken yet another dramatic twist. On Wednesday the

State Department Inspector General, Howard "Cookie" Krongard, was in

the hot seat on Capitol Hill, where he found himself being grilled by

Representative Henry Waxman's Oversight and Government Affairs

Committee. Krongard is the top State Department official charged with

investigating allegations of waste, fraud and abuse. In addition to all

of the questionable actions by the State Department in the Blackwater

investigation, Krongard has faced charges that he impeded a Justice

Department investigation into Blackwater over allegations the company

was illegally smuggling weapons into Iraq. But the bombshell at the

hearing was the revelation that Krongard's brother, Alvin "Buzzy"

Krongard, recently accepted a position as a paid consultant for

Blackwater, where he serves on the company's advisory board. Until his

resignation in 2004, Buzzy was the number-three man at the Central

Intelligence Agency (more on that later). Waxman's committee broke the

news of Buzzy's Blackwater position as part of what can only be

described as a masterful ambush of the Inspector General.

When Waxman revealed the conflict of interest with the brothers

Krongard and Blackwater, alleging that Cookie Krongard had "concealed"

his brother's relationship with Blackwater, the Inspector General told

Waxman:

"I can tell you very frankly, I am not aware of any financial interest

or position [my brother] has with respect to Blackwater. It couldn't

possibly have affected anything I've done, because I don't believe it.

And when these ugly rumors started recently, I specifically asked him.

I do not believe it is true that he is a member of the advisory board,

as you stated, and that is something I think I need to say."

This statement would quickly thrust Cookie Krongard, who was testifying

under oath, in front of a firing line that would ultimately produce his

recusal from the Blackwater investigation. Moments after Cookie

Krongard denied that his brother had any involvement with Blackwater,

the committee produced a letter from Blackwater CEO Erik Prince to

Buzzy Krongard, dated July 26, inviting him to join the board and

offering him a $3,500 honorarium per meeting attended plus all expenses

paid. "Your experience and insight would be ideal to help our team

determine where we are and where we are going," Prince wrote.

Cookie Krongard said his brother "has been involved in a lot of

activities involving security. So it's no surprise that someone like

Erik Prince would invite him to continue to support 'security, peace,

and freedom.'" But Cookie Krongard insisted his brother had not

accepted the position, saying, "I dispute that." Representative Elijah

Cummings then produced a September 5 e-mail from Prince to Buzzy

saying, "Welcome and thank you for accepting the invitation to be a

member of the board." Cummings told Cookie, "Prince invited your

brother to be at a board meeting to discuss strategic planning. And

this meeting is taking place right now, in Williamsburg, Virginia, this

week as we speak. Staff contacted the hotel to speak to your brother

and the hotel confirmed that he was scheduled to be there."

Cookie replied that he was not aware of this, adding, "By the nature of

my brother's work, you should understand that we have never discussed

his work or my work, so I had no reason to even think that he had any

involvement with Blackwater. But when these things surfaced, I called

him and I asked him directly, he has told me he does not have any

involvement, he does not have any financial interest. If you're telling

me he does absolutely I would recuse myself" from the Blackwater

investigation.

During a recess of the hearing, Cookie later said, he called his

brother, who confirmed for him that he had indeed accepted a position

on the Blackwater advisory board. Cookie abruptly announced he was

recusing himself from all matters relating to Blackwater. But this is

unlikely to be the end of Cookie's problems stemming from this scandal.

He may actually have perjured himself. After the hearing, Buzzy

Krongard told reporter Spencer Ackerman of TPM Muckraker that he had

informed Cookie weeks ago of his position with Blackwater. "I had told

my brother I was going on the advisory board," Buzzy said. "My brother

says that is not the case. I stand by what I told my brother." When

Ackerman asked Buzzy if Blackwater knew who his brother was when Prince

offered him the advisory board position, Buzzy said, "You think I had

to tell them? That they didn't know?" He added, "If [Cookie's] got

integrity it's not gonna matter one way or other.... If he doesn't have

integrity it's not gonna matter."

While Buzzy's new position on Blackwater's advisory board is indeed a

salacious development, it is just the tip of the iceberg. In my book

Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army, I

explore in depth the relationship between Buzzy Krongard and Blackwater

founder Erik Prince. The two men go back at least to 2002, when Buzzy

helped jump-start Blackwater's ultra-profitable role as a provider of

soldiers-for-hire in the "war on terror."

Though Blackwater was founded in 1997, Blackwater Security

Consulting--its mercenary division--was incorporated in Delaware on

January 22, 2002. Within months, as the United States occupied

Afghanistan and began planning the Iraq invasion, Blackwater Security

was already turning a profit, pulling in hundreds of thousands a month

from a valuable CIA contract.

One of the players in forging that first Blackwater Security contract

was Buzzy Krongard, at the time executive director of the CIA, the

agency's number-three position. Krongard, who was named to that post in

March 2001, had an unusual background for a spook, having spent most of

his adult life as an investment banker. He had built up Alex.Brown, the

country's oldest investment banking firm, into one of the most

successful, and eventually sold it to Bankers Trust, from which he

resigned in 1998. There have been some insinuations that Krongard was

working undercover for the CIA years before he officially joined the

agency in 1998 as a special adviser to George Tenet. But he won't

reveal how he met the CIA director, except to say that it was through

"mutual friends." The Princeton alum, Hall of Fame lacrosse player and

former Marine boasts of having once punched a great white shark in the

jaw; and he keeps one of its teeth on a chain and pictures of the

animal in his office. Despite his bravado, some at the agency thought

of Krongard as a wanna-be, according to a 2001 Newsweek story published

shortly after his ascension to the number-three spot. "A wanna-be?

Maybe I am. Maybe I'm not. That's as much as you're going to get,"

Krongard responded.

While working under Tenet at the CIA, Krongard acted internally,

reorganizing divisions and pushing for projects like an intelligence

venture capital firm, but he did on occasion speak publicly. In October

2001, he declared, "The war will be won in large measure by forces you

do not know about, in actions you will not see and in ways you may not

want to know about, but we will prevail."

Some three years later, in January 2005, Krongard made news when he

became the most senior Administration figure to articulate the benefits

of having not killed or captured Osama bin Laden. "You can make the

argument that we're better off with him [at large]," he said. "Because

if something happens to bin Laden, you might find a lot of people vying

for his position and demonstrating how macho they are by unleashing a

stream of terror.... He's turning into more of a charismatic leader

than a terrorist mastermind." Krongard also characterized bin Laden

"not as a chief executive but more like a venture capitalist," saying,

"Let's say you and I want to blow up Trafalgar Square. So we go to bin

Laden. And he'll say, 'Well, here's some money and some passports and

if you need weapons, see this guy.'"

It's not clear exactly what the original connection was between Prince

and Krongard. Some have alleged that Krongard knew Prince's father. In

a brief telephone interview conducted for my book, Krongard would only

say he was "familiar" with Prince and Blackwater. A former Blackwater

executive, however, asserted, "I know that Erik and Krongard were good

buddies." Whatever Krongard's involvement, it was during his tenure at

the CIA that Blackwater landed its first security contract, in April

2002. Krongard visited Kabul and said he realized the agency's new

station there was sorely lacking security. Blackwater received a $5.4

million six-month no-bid contract to provide twenty security guards for

the Kabul CIA station. Krongard said it was Blackwater's offering and

not his connection to Prince that led to the company landing the

contract, and that he talked to Prince about the contract but wasn't

certain who called whom, that he was "not sure which came first, the

chicken or the egg." He said that someone else was responsible for

actually signing off on the CIA contract. "Blackwater got a contract

because they were the first people that could get people on the

ground," Krongard said in the interview. "We were under the gun, we did

whatever it took when I came back from Kabul.... The only concern we

had was getting the best security for our people. If we thought

Martians could provide it, I guess we would have gone after them."

The relationship between Krongard and Prince apparently got chummier

after the contract was signed. "Krongard came down and visited

Blackwater, and I had to take his kids around and let them shoot on the

firing range a number of times," said a former Blackwater executive in

an interview for my book. "That was after the contract was signed, and

he may have come down just to see the company that he had just hired."

Prince apparently became consumed with the prospect of being involved

with secretive operations in the "war on terror"--so much so that he

personally deployed on the front lines. Prince joined Jamie Smith, a

former CIA operative who originally headed up Blackwater Security

Consulting, as part of the original twenty-man contingent Blackwater

sent to fulfill its first CIA contract, which began in May 2002,

according to Robert Young Pelton's book Licensed to Kill.

Since CIA and other intelligence and security contracts are "black"

contracts, it's difficult to pin down exactly how much Blackwater began

pulling in after that first Afghanistan contract, but Smith described

it as a rapid period of growth for Blackwater. The company's work for

the CIA and the military and Prince's political and military

connections would provide Blackwater with important leverage in wooing

what would become its largest confirmed client, the US State

Department. "After that first contract went off, there was a lot of

romancing with the State Department where they were just up the road,

so we traveled up there a lot in Kabul and tried to sweet-talk them

into letting us on board with them," Smith said in an interview. "Once

the State Department came on and there was a contract there, that

opened up some different doors. Once you get your foot in the door with

a government outfit that has offices in countries all over the world,

it's like--and this is probably a horrible analogy--but it's something

maybe like the metastasis of a cancer. You know, once you get into the

bloodstream you're going to be all over the body in just a couple of

days, you know what I mean? So if you get in that pipeline, then

everywhere that they've got a problem and an office, there's an

opportunity."

A year later, Prince's mercenary operations would get the boost of a

lifetime when Blackwater was handed a $27 million no-bid contract to

serve as the elite bodyguards of the US occupation of Iraq. To date

that arrangement has brought Blackwater about $1 billion in federal

"security" contracts. Is it just a coincidence that one of the key

players in securing Blackwater's role as the leading mercenary company

of the Bush Administration has a brother whose job it was to oversee

Blackwater? Or that the Inspector General stands accused of failing to

do his duty and actually impeding federal investigations into the

company's potentially criminal activities? Is there a connection

between the Krongards and the State Department's systematic cover-up

campaign for Blackwater? Unsurprisingly, Blackwater's spokesperson,

Anne Tyrrell, said, "We do not see a conflict of interest." But these

aren't questions for the company's PR people. These are questions that

must be answered by the brothers Krongard under oath.

###


© 2000-2018 Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Los Angeles Independent Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy