The rights group invited people around the world to log on to www.eyesondarfur.org, which will be updated regularly with new photographs, and help it monitor 12 vulnerable villages and put Khartoum on notice that these areas are being watched closely for signs of any further violence.
It also includes archived images that include some from the village of Donkey Dereis, which is shown in 2004 with hundreds of huts, but two years later had 1,171 homes gone and the landscape overgrown with vegetation.
More than 200,000 people have died and 2 million been driven from home since the conflict in western Sudan between ethnic African rebels and the government, backed by the Arab Janjaweed militia, began in 2003. Khartoum says 9,000 have died and rejects accusations of genocide.
The U.N. Security Council last year adopted a resolution to deploy a 23,000-strong "hybrid" U.N.-African Union force. But Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir called that figure too high. He has agreed to the deployment of 3,000 U.N. police and military personnel to aid the A.U. force of about 7,000.
However, the final plan for the hybrid force has not yet reached Khartoum because of differences between the African Union and United Nations about control of the operation.
Amnesty said the satellite images could show objects as small as 2 feet across, which would allow the display of destroyed huts, massing soldiers or fleeing refugees.
"We expect the Sudanese government to protect these and all villages throughout Darfur," said Ariela Blatter, director of Amnesty USA's Crisis Prevention and Response Center, who led the development of the Eyes on Darfur project. "We expect these villages to be intact today, tomorrow and well, well into the future."
Save Darfur… from BuSh & Co.
Exposing the Darfur Deception
Who is behind the conflict in Darfur and elsewhere in Africa? That should be the central question for those truly concerned about human rights violations in the region. There has been much in the press of atrocities in the region, yet the details of the situation and the groups involved are not clearly explained.
Exactly what is going on is unclear for a number of reasons: first the region is dangerous so the number of independent journalists there is very small. There are no large news organizations with the kind of resources there to cover the story comprehensively.
Secondly, the corporate media outlets that are issuing news about Darfur are doing so not by reporting from the region but by broadcasting pre-prepared material provided to them from government agencies and special interest advocacy groups.
Without reliable sources of information the question of who is behind the conflict in Darfur can not be answered. In the absence of such information one is forced to try and read though the lines of the information being distributed via the corporate media and statements from the government. Not an easy task. However recent events and a statement by Bush may help to reveal something about the source of the conflict in Darfur.
A group of organizations have formed the Save Darfur Coalition. Most of these groups are religious organizations, many of which are recipients of Bush’s faith based initiative program of funding church groups with taxpayer dollars.
Notably absent from this group are those peace organizations that typically hold rallies against the horrors of war. One would think that the issue of atrocities in Darfur would be of concern to those against the war in Iraq for example. Yet these groups are not part of the Save Darfur Coalition.
But what is even more unusual is Bush’s endorsement of Save Darfur protests. Last year President Bush actually met with the groups planning these protests and made this statement: "There will be rallies all across the country," Bush said at the White House. "And for those of you who are going out to march for justice, you represent the best of our country. We believe every life is precious, every human being is important. And the signal you send to the world is a strong signal, and I welcome your participation."
This from a man who has been the subject of historic nationwide peace protests for the last four years. Peace protests that he has ignored and ridiculed. The statement is truly Orwellian.
Also telling is the current campaign of the Save Darfur Coalition, in this from their website: “…demand a stronger and more effective U.S. response to the violence and atrocities plaguing the region. The Save Darfur Coalition and its partners will collect one million signed postcards urging President Bush to take action.”
Q: What kind of action are they urging Bush take?
A: Military action.
True anti-war activists, and those faith based groups with a long standing history of working for peace and justice should be wary of groups operating with Bush’s support. People concerned about Darfur should consider the following:
1. Bush has ordered the unprovoked invasion and occupation of a number of countries since taking office, Afghanistan, Iraq, Liberia and Haiti. He now seems posed to start a war with a fifth country, Iran. Given this, how can he be of any help to the people of Darfur?
2. What is the neo-con agenda for Africa? And how would an excuse to send troops into Sudan further that agenda?
How has the crisis creation tactic been used in the past to advance their agenda?
3. Is the Save Darfur Coalition is a government agency front group?
Many of the groups in this coalition are funded in part by Bush’s faith based political action program. Bush has publicly endorsed save Darfur protests, which have been slated as a protest against him. (Bush endorses a peace rally against himself?!)
The reader should consider this: the media coverage of Darfur in the US could be another manufacturing consent campaign in the run up to war with Sudan. It’s different from the WMDs in Iraq war lie, in that instead of using people’s fears it exploits people’s sense of charity. This is not to assert that there are not atrocities occurring in the region. That has been documented. The issue of this article is how the news of those events in being used by Neo-Cons to co-opt support from unsuspecting peace and justice groups.
The peace movement should not fall for this. Those concerned about the situation in Darfur should not join any groups endorsed by Bush and instead form their own independent groups.
List of groups in the Bush backed Save Darfur Coalition
Source: http://www.millionvoicesfordarfur.org/?page=about
Alliance of Baptists
American Humanist Association
American Jewish Committee
American Jewish World Service
Amnesty International USA
Anti-Defamation League
Archdiocesan Office for Social Justice, Saint Paul and Minneapolis
Armenian National Committee of America
B’nai B’rith International
Buddhist Peace Fellowship
Central Conference of American Rabbis
Church Alliance for a New Sudan
Church World Service
Church World Service Minn-Kota
Dallas Peace Center
Damanga Coalition for Freedom and Democracy
Darfur Rehabilitation Project
Dear Sudan
Democrats for Life of New York
DevArts: Development and Art
Echo Foundation
Edah
The Episcopal Church, USA
Facing History and Ourselves
Friends Committee on National Legislation
Feminist Majority
Foundation for Ethnic Understanding
Genocide Intervention Network
Greater Washington Jewish Task Force on Darfur
Global Youth Partnership for Africa
Hadassah
Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society
Hillel
Help Darfur Now
Interfaith Conference of Metropolitan Washington
Interfaith Council
International Crises Group
Jewish Council for Public Affairs
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Dallas
Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Washington
Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas
Jewish Federation of the Berkshires
Jewish Federation of Central New Jersey
Jewish Federation of St. Joseph Valley
Jewish Labor Committee
Jewish World Watch
Jewish Reconstructionist Federation
Jubilee Campaign USA
Maryknoll office for Global Concern
MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger
Methodist Church General Board of Church and Society
mtvU
Metropolitan Community of Churches
Minnesota Council of Churches
My Sister's Keeper
National Association of Evangelicals
National Council of Churches of Christ in the USA and Faithful America
NetAid
Omidyar Foundation
Open Doors USA
Pax Christi USA
Physicians for Human Rights
Pittsburgh Darfur Emergency Coalition
Progressive Democrats of America
Red Carpet Media Partners
Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism
Riverdale Jewish Community Council
Union for Reform Judaism
Religions for Peace
Save Darfur, Silicon Valley
Save Darfur Coalition of South Palm Beach
Sisters of St. Joseph of Carondelet, Los Angeles
Sojourners
STAND (Students Taking Action Now: Darfur)
Stop Genocide Now
Students Against Silence
The ETHIC
Union of Reform Judaism
Unitarian Universalist Association and Unitarian Universalist Service Committee (UUSC)
The United Jewish Community of Broward County
United Methodist Church
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, Rabbinical Assembly and Cantors Assembly
Washington Office of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America
Women’s Commission on Refugee Women and Children and NetAid
Workmen’s Circle/Arbeter Ring
World Evangelical Alliance
Western Massachusetts Save Darfur Coalition
Youth Against Poverty
Text of the LA times article:
5 Lawmakers Arrested Protesting Darfur Violence
By Matthew O'Rourke, Times Staff Writer
April 29, 2006
WASHINGTON — Five members of Congress were among 11 people arrested during a protest Friday outside the Sudanese Embassy, staged at a critical moment to call attention to genocidal violence in the Darfur region.
Rep. Tom Lantos (D-Burlingame), a Holocaust survivor and human rights advocate, was one of the lawmakers who were willingly arrested. Lantos was taken into custody by the U.S. Secret Service along with Democratic Reps. Jim McGovern and John W. Olver of Massachusetts, James P. Moran of Virginia and Sheila Jackson-Lee of Texas. Also arrested were six members of religious and humanitarian aid organizations.
The 11 protesters, who face fines on charges of misdemeanor disorderly conduct and unlawful assembly, were trying to focus attention on the Sudanese government, which they said had not cooperated with international efforts to stop the killing, attacks and rapes in Darfur.
The protest came two days before a crucial deadline in negotiations to halt the violence, in which an estimated 180,000 have died and 2 million have been displaced in the conflict between rebels and government-backed militias.
"Two generations ago, the civilized world stood in silence and looked away," said Lantos, who was imprisoned with his family in Nazi camps during World War II. "Congress stands united in our determination to put an end to this."
Friday's protest foreshadowed rallies across the United States on Sunday that are to feature celebrities, politicians and performing artists in a call for action in Darfur. In advance of those rallies, President Bush met Friday with activists and urged greater involvement by international peacekeeping troops to stop the bloodshed.
"There will be rallies all across the country," Bush said at the White House. "And for those of you who are going out to march for justice, you represent the best of our country. We believe every life is precious, every human being is important. And the signal you send to the world is a strong signal, and I welcome your participation."
About 7,000 African Union peacekeepers have been unable to prevent continuing violence. United Nations officials want to send a force of 20,000 to augment the peacekeepers, but the Sudanese government has not agreed to allow them in. U.S. officials want NATO troops involved in the effort as well.
At Friday's protest at the Embassy, the lawmakers read a list of four demands of the Sudanese government: to issue a cease-fire, to allow United Nations peacekeeping forces to enter the country, to grant full access to humanitarian organizations and to continue peace talks.
The Sudanese government has not taken proper actions to stop the genocide, McGovern said, and nations around the world "must take immediate concrete steps" to prevent more violence.
"We are here today because words are no longer enough," he said. "The world has said, 'Never again.' It is time for action."
Other protesters clapped and shouted as the lawmakers were put in plastic handcuffs and loaded by Secret Service officers into the back of a white police van. Some demonstrators carried pictures portraying the conflict; others held a painted banner with an image of a crying woman and the words "Stop the killing now."
Among the protesters were refugees from Darfur. Samia Eshag, who had arrived from the region 24 hours before the protest, said it was important for her to give voice to the thousands of women who had been raped.
"The civilians in Darfur are suffering day by day, night by night from all of the attacks," she said.
The Save Darfur Coalition, a group of about 100 humanitarian organizations that seeks to raise public awareness of the genocide, organized the event and plans rallies nationally Sunday. The largest rally, to be held on the National Mall, is expected to draw thousands of protesters.